Just a point of clarification, these cases seem particularly aimed at the algorithm and tools they provide adolescents, girls in particular, on Instagram (and TikTok and Snapchat, who have both settled). So not so much directed at misinformation or lies. Things that draw them in, hook them, and then damage their body images and related aspects of their psyche. So the proof pattern is basically this: your ultimate goal is to sign people up and keep them on and engaged; you knew that certain groups were vulnerable to pressures unique to your platform; you knowingly kept things (filters and whatnot) on the platform that catered to and preyed upon these vulnerabilities; and, you really don't give a shit as long as they keep signing up. They had a rather extensive colloquy about signing up kids under 13, which is illegal. Zuckerberg defended that on several grounds, like "they lied," but my sense is that Lanier suckered him into admitting that he knew there were very young people on Insta. Doesn't matter whether it was illegal or they did enough to stop it, they knew they had a shit ton of adolescents on the platform and that the platform had features that preyed on them.