Jesus, I thought ambulance chasers were better writers than this. Your creative capabilities apparently end with MS Paint, because this is a weak and banal attempt of a retort using the written word.
Look, I know you get upset when your bullshit is called into account, but you don't get to devolve into the well-worn BBS maneuvers of lying on a new thread and eschewing context to suit your narrative.
1) You have never not been a Chuckles apologist. You lost your shit at the hint of misalignment with the guy on Shaggy back in the day. Referencing hordes and toadies shouldn't seem like a strong concept to someone that has participated in them and with them on the boards for years when it suits their narrative. Defending this wonderful man of a coach was one of those scenarios.
2) Anyone with an IQ above 80 would clearly understand the 3 years of life reference being relevant only to cheering on Texas. I assume this kind of non sequitur semantics tangling works with some dipshit during a deposition, but you don't do well with it here. You knew what I was referencing, as well as the rest of the board. I went with facts and called you out for what you are, so I get it, you didn't have much to work with, so fucking forget reading comprehension, right? Right.
Beyond all of that, I'm not a bully. I know it feels like that to you because every time you attempt a take on football or recruiting that deviates from a dick drawing, I call out that weak, uninformed shit of a take you've posted. That's not bullying, that's just your pride, fucking with you. I get it, you didn't play, you don't do much when watching it but follow the ball, and you drive-by the recruiting board once a month, so really, it's not your fault. That said, don't take offense when it's thrown in your face as you feign knowledge beyond the novice.
The rest of your post is the same condescension I referenced, and the board gets it. You threw out lazy internet smack tropes - calling me a loser, stating that I live with my parents, presenting that I don't make money, stating that I'm unsuccessful, and offering that I need Internet friends to make myself feel good. Blah blah blah. You forgot to throw out the concept that I've never been laid. Meh.
You just basically said that the board waits for my take, and then they follow it. Um, no. I get mocked regularly by guys here with better smack than you. And I'm wrong a lot, so the mocking could just be easy. But you'd have to actually know football and/or recruiting to get it, so that's why the discussions within the packs here are odd to you when they're not just applauding your funny MS Paint stuff.
Recruiting involves evaluation, aquisition, and roster management. Roster management entails understanding attrition risk, position count, and player development. You assume a ranking sorts all of that neatly, and it doesn't. A ranking, of which Strong was just okay and counter to your original point, consists of the acquisition aspect and that's about it. Strong was a mediocre recruiter. He recruited at the one place with every single recruiting advantage in the country, and he was lackluster at it on the ratings side compared his predecessor and successor, and terrible at it on the other two fronts. There were plenty of us at the time concerned about elements of what we were seeing.
Discussing the recruiting topic beyond that with you isn't worth the time or the energy. You aren't worth the fucking bullet.