I'm often amazed that you not only went to school to learn to, but also presumably made a living by formulating cohesive arguments. Then you come on here and diarrhea all down your legs. Hyperbole is obviously your go to, but is a bad look here. I'm not an attorney but does lumping groups the size of half the country and tying them in with the fringes work in court? Have you had success with that, off the message boards?
I'd like to give it a try.
When we have one party that reacts to gun violence with "don't do anything, not a single thing with respect to gun control -- but actually wait, let's arm EVERYONE, including teachers!" "I'm not looking to take anyone's guns - Beto O'Rourke polling 4%. "Hell yes I'm going to take your AR15 - Beto O'Rourke polling 1%", and they react to illegal immigration with "deport everyone! build a wall! close the border!" "We should decriminalize border crossings and give free health care to immigrants, I have a plan for that", it's pretty clear we're not going to have a rational, good-faith discussion about anything.
I tried to come up with hyperbolic bullshit but found it easier to take actual words from a recent Democratic flunkee and the Democratic front runner for the primary.
Maybe you can help me with the hyperbole? Maybe something like this... Half the country enjoys aborting fetus' up until birth, and removing God from anything and everything. Oh yeah, they also want to forcibly take your guns, and tax you at 80%. It's pretty clear when half the country is like that, we aren't going to have a rational, good-faith discussion about anything.
Keep laying blame on one side, it will surely fix the issue.
You are a caricature.
And I realized after quoting you and typing this out that you CR'd the wrong thread. So fuck me, apologies to the board.