Power to you, I guess. I will say that the first bit you posted about the big bad MSM is an interesting misuse of journalism. Only headlines provided, which are often not even written by the author of the article, so no context as to what either article truly said. Even then, your gotcha moment highlights the name of a writer without any reflection on the dates. One written in April, the other 3 months later. Is it possible that the virus, and hydro, came to be better understood based on the subsequent study? That the first article reflected known medical practice at that time, and the second article provided updated information to the reader based on the latest data? Science and brains, can we first go back to using those? Otherwise, it's just a bunch of noise.
Since you started off with such a disingenuous example, I won't bother discussing any of the rest which kinda defeats the whole point of the thread.
However, nothing of what I see above is about being a conservative person when it comes to our governance. I don't see anything that doesn't demand MORE government in personal lives. It's all about the issues that YOU deem important, demanding as much be done as the other side about YOUR personal issues. Ensuring the adherence to the Constitution is not an exclusively "conservative" trait. It's just not. That's another example of the co-opting of a word for your partisan glean. Frankly, it's absolutely antithetical to the Constitution. There isn't one way things must be done. Being on the losing end of an election, legislative vote, or court decision isn't an affront to the Constitution. It's how it works.
You haven't shown me anything that is seeking a conservative approach to governance under the supreme law of the land. The view presented in the OP doesn't have much to do with only having a federal government that provides an impenetrable national defense to our enemies, a solid and advanced infrastructure that reflects our union, and the protection of all people within the borders under the words of the document from which it all starts. On the other hand, what I see presented has a lot to do with demanding fealty to one collection of opinions. Again, not what this place is about.
I am a lost conservative. Out in the wilderness from when the word had real meaning. I have no label to take now because the debate has become enraptured to the cult of personality, intolerance and bad faith interaction. Some both sideisms, but lately not very proportional at all. I don't care about the tint of your melanin, I do care that the ignorant and backwards understandings about how this thing works that I see demonstrated in the OP have potentially foundered this nation, political labels be damned. That is what will drive my next time in the ballot box. A reckoning must come.