I confess that I am utterly unsurprised by the response of OP -- it was exactly as big a pile of garbage as I thought it would be.
The damned shame of it is, there actually COULD be some really interesting conversations about CRT, about what it means, about where the proper boundaries and balance lie, etc. But we'll never, ever, ever have any of them, because it's been reduced to a collection of lazy buzzwords by its critics, and there it shall stay.
I mean, I think it's pretty obvious to acknowledge that systemic issues are a FACTOR in current racial socioeconomic status in the US. Not to the exclusion of individual action and responsibility, but certainly as a factor alongside individual action.
How many of our cities are laid out (and divided, and thus zoned) is largely a function of race-based decisions and actions. Austin included. Here's a good piece that summarizes some of the bigger factors: https://projects.statesman.com/news/economic-mobility/
Would any honest conversation about those factors acknowledge that 1) as time has gone by, particularly post-civil rights movement and post Austin's economic boom, the effects of those factors become more muted, but also 2) that they are not entirely erased? That's what an honest conversation would do. But we won't have one of those. Instead, we'll have further buzzword-laden mental masturbation by people like the OP, regurgitating shit from Fox and Prager U.