So your position is that the intent of the texags posters, and similar folks who post the same shit on FB and all the other social media sites, are stringently fighting for the scientific integrity of numbers, the importance of data recording and future analysis, and general integrity of the science in general. You think that's the aim of these comments, coming from a group of people who are generally dismissive and disdainful of science? Well, ok, I suppose that's one interpretation that is entirely constructed in your mind. But lets be fucking clear: Because that distinction is important to you, does not make it important to everyone, and specifically doesn't make it important or the intent of the people in question during this conversation. Attempting to conflate it otherwise is...wait for it...gaslighting. Shockingly something you've been accused of many times here before. Huh. Go figure. I'd make some comment about patterns of behavior, but clearly that means nothing to you without a principal diagnosis from a trained physician.
Speaking of a principle diagnosis, way to tacitly imply that I'm unstable. Now whether you mean mentally, or emotionally isn't really clear, and obviously for your intent here it doesn't matter. Aren't Ad Hominem attacks diametrically opposed to the kind of frank, scientific addressing of a topic that you claim to champion? But instead you attempted to poison the well. Again, get that fucking shit out of here.