He's not wrong. Really, he's not wrong about any of it. Except...he doesn't get into the "how and why" these things came about. Here's the rest of the story:
Young white men had it easy in terms of higher education, social dynamics, male roles in society and work, romantic relationships, etc.....because for GENERATIONS (really, all of western history), the deck was stacked IN THEIR FAVOR in all of those respects.
It was easier for Willy Whiteguy to get into a decent university because.....no/few minorities, and no/few women were competing for admission slots.
It was easier to participate in social institutions because they were almost all built for and run/filled with almost exclusively....white men. The Elks Lodge, fraternities, the local church Board of Elders, all of it....99% white guys.
Nice cushy job in a downtown office, or at a good factory? Again....much easier to get because they were filled 99% by white guys, no real competition from minorities or women for those jobs.
Romantic relationships? When women didn't have any real prospects for a safe, stable, secure (including financial security) future without a man to provide for them, men held all the cards. And again, the highest-value cards (remember the good education and all those good jobs) were held by white guys. If Pretty Paula wanted a nice house and decent food and a good lifestyle, she needed to marry a Willy Whiteguy, or she was hosed. Today....Pretty Paula beat out Willy Whiteguy for the latest promotion. She has a nice townhome, eats well, and has a nice life....she doesn't need Willy Whiteguy for any of that. Sure, she still might like a sexually compatible companion whose company she finds pleasing, but Whining Willy Whiteguy isn't doing great in that respect -- he sits at home, plays video games, has little ambition, and bitches about the fact that women who look like supermodels (the only women he thinks have any value) won't fuck him, and it must be someone else's fault.
We've failed young men because we haven't pounded into their heads "society isn't just going to hand you this shit anymore, you have to go out there and earn it." And you're goddamned right I put a lot of that on the heads of loser young men who don't have the ambition or balls to get up out of the gaming chair and improve themselves. But I also put some of that on the rest of society, because we indeed have failed young men. When you take away an expected pathway (for all the right reasons -- none of this was to "punish" young white men, but simply to allow everyone else onto the field to compete as well) without offering a well-defined alternative pathway, people end up lost. Shut down the factory in town where everyone works, without providing an alternative, training for a different field, etc., the former factory workers are 1) fucked and 2) pissed. Metaphorically, we've done some of that, and we haven't figured out how to equip our young men for the new paradigm. We really need to do that.
On the bright side, for young men who DO have their shit together, they're in high cotton. My son has talked about it (and he's already seen guys descend into the Andrew Tate world, bitter and angry, with little educational/professional/romantic success). He says "look, I'm smart enough, ambitious with a good work ethic, I'm decent looking and know how to dress and not look like a bum, and I can engage with women as equals and not treat them like they should be my property....I'm doing great." And he is. I'm sure he'd have done well under the old paradigm as well, but employers still want to hire men. Women still want male romantic partners. They just want winners, not losers. And has his peers fall away and become embittered losers, he looks better and better.
But for all of our sake, that shouldn't be how things go. His loser peers need to catch up, because society being stuck with a huge clump of underperforming, angry and bitter young men isn't good for anyone.