I scrolled up and checked. You’re the only person that keeps bringing up the Clinton’s. Stop.
Are you an attorney? I’m surprised that creditors names would commonly be redacted in these filings. Why is that common?
I understand the reticence around Zerohedge posts. I don’t share any of their longer form commentary. These are bankruptcy filings. No editorializing needed.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/11/20/ftx-crypto-bankruptcy-creditors/
From WaPo if it makes you feel better.
“Its top 50 creditors are owed a total of $3.1 billion, the filing showed, with the largest due $226 million.
The names of the creditors were redacted.”
So what the ZH post said.
We have a shit ton of lawyers here. Any involved with bankruptcy/restructuring? How common is it to redact the names of creditors?
It’s a strange vibe there. “Like living in a cemetery”.
Also a sad irony is there’s a couple empty cop cars left out in front of the school to deter people with morbid curiosity from hanging around.
Well ackshually they did review it but thought it was fine. Then the cops had to make it them take it down. It’s not the own you think it is.
Thanks for the “context”.
Im going to go out on a limb and say cleaning up the hashtags is good thing.
Interesting that Twitter did a review of complaints related to child exploitation and tightly adhered to ToS until law enforcement had to intervene. But “deadnaming” people got you the axe immediately. Priorities were totally jacked.