Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Surly Horns

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

  • Replies 809
  • Views 70.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

I'm torn here -- 

On one hand - FUCKING BRAVO SPACEX.  That was amazing.  A massive huge success getting the integrated vehicle off the pad, fully through stage one and powered staging, and sub-orbital flight.  Those plasma heating (compression, not "friction", you GenX SpaceX BratPack public affairs dipshits) video feed views were fantastic!

On the other hand - I'm getting very tired of the "oh well, we lost another Starship" casualness.  You are eventually going to run out of taxpayer money (funneled through Elon).

 

image.png.f1ee57215efedd6186b1f494f8eb5f03.png

15 minutes ago, RamjetFDO said:

On the other hand - I'm getting very tired of the "oh well, we lost another Starship" casualness.  You are eventually going to run out of taxpayer money (funneled through Elon).

 

I agree with your sentiment.  It's helpful to consider that other Aerospace Cos just lose that money without launching a thing. 

They just burn that money in the waterfall design process.  Starliner?  When will it fly in production?  

I think that Space X has shown that they can deliver, and perhaps more importantly can capture the public's attention and therefore government cash.   Maybe think of these flights as 75% development 25% marketing

Disclosure:  Fuck Space Elmo

Edited by locodos

1 hour ago, locodos said:

I agree with your sentiment.  It's helpful to consider that other Aerospace Cos just lose that money without launching a thing. 

They just burn that money in the waterfall design process.  Starliner?  When will it fly in production?  

This is actually a very accurate comparison and I agree with you.  Good points.

I'm just of the age and environment that if you launch something that done-did-blown-up, you didn't succeed... and you weren't celebrated for it.  NOW - having said that - yes, I get that I'm yelling at clouds here and "things are different old man".  SpaceX is doing fantastic things when they do actually succeed.  I just don't want them to fail when people are aboard because of the cavalier attitude they have now in these design/test flights.

Much like sports and military training ... "train like you fight means you fight like you train".  It's an operational mindset that was burned into me that I don't think commercial space (in general, but SpaceX specifically since they're the most visible right now) has with their operational teams.  

Isn't that their whole approach? To take risks in order to gather real-world data that in the end leads to faster development than if they just kept refining on the ground. It's a move fast and break things sort of mentality and seems to be the reason for their vast lead over all other commercial space.  Look at how they  learned to land the Falcon 9 boosters. I don't think it's a "cavalier attitude," it's calculated risks and when people on board blowing things up is okay.

20 hours ago, horncyclist said:

Isn't that their whole approach? 

100%.  And as I agreed with @locodos above, it's working for them on their commercial space unmanned product line.

 

Quote

I don't think it's a "cavalier attitude," it's calculated risks and when people on board blowing things up is okay.

Ah... here we go.  "Two things can be true at the same time".  

It's ABSOLUTELY a cavalier attitude that has permeated everything that SpaceX does.  I know guys who work there that I trust, and they're very worried.  They see the social-media-driven generation making decisions based on public and fanboi positive comments rather than taking just a little bit longer and doing things right.  Do you think the technical oversight of not launching IFT-1 with flame trench deflectors was because of anything other than GO-fever and not wanting to be embarrassed on Twitter/X?  A total sense of "we know what we're doing, to hell with those old guys" hubris?

Trust me on this one ... NASA's not immune either.  The Apollo guys didn't have this problem, because they were also pretty much the Mercury/Gemini guys.  On Shuttle, we had a transition where a lot of the Apollo guys were on the way out, but some were still there to try to pass along the culture and the mindset.  Challenger happened just as much because of the bad decisions, misdirected focus, and not applying basic cockpit resource management to the decision processes as due to the technical design flaw.  That was a slap in the face and we learned... until we didn't again with Columbia.  

If you think that this culture of backwards-cap-wearing on console, fanboi-screaming adoration, and casually claiming "success" when failure is the real outcome won't come to bite SpaceX in the ass one day... you're misreading history.  There's nothing wrong with staring out by saying "hey, we're disappointed at the failure of the Heavy booster not performing on flyback and we're puzzled and more than a bit worried about what happened with Starship" and then going on to say, but we'll learn from what did go right, fix what went wrong, and those things won't happen again... but that's not even close to the public presentation that they're putting out there.

The story, sadly, is unfolding in front of us unless something changes and soon.

Again - I WANT them to succeed... but I see what's happening based on history and experience.

Yep, the current crop of rocketeers in Boca Chica probably think the Navy’s Vanguard program was a success because the engine ignited at the end of the countdown in 1957 and eventually achieved orbit in 3 of 7 attempts.

 

 

E6BDBD29-2F1F-4A6E-965E-118A64D02EF5.webp

Edited by Armybrat

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

the launch in the fog was amazing.  then the booster hovered over the gulf which was incredible.  live plasma shots again holy shit.

How in the fuck did that ship still perform a landing burn? I mean, what a tough (not so little) ship. 

6 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

How in the fuck did that ship still perform a landing burn? I mean, what a tough (not so little) ship. 

That was a spare flap. Who needs it?

2 minutes ago, UnivTex34 said:

That was a spare flap. Who needs it?

That flap was still functioning! It deserves the medal of honor. 

Also, I want that camera. 

This was a FAR sight better all around for the vehicle performance.

The "realtime plasma cam" was absolutely spellbinding.  I loved every second of that... and yes, what a surprise... plasma "finds a way" through gaps (that pivot point for the forward flap was an obvious plasma pathway), but it was very impressive to see how well it withstood those incredible temps/pressures anyway.

Once again, though, I find my blood boiling at the absolute giggle fest of the SpaceX commentary team.  While that plasma burn-through on the flap was happening, my mind was thinking about Columbia, and this giggling buffoon was adding nothing at all to the feed.  They did a better job (at least at first) of turning *DOWN* the volume of the fanboi crowd screams, but seemed to ramp the volume up again at the end.

Overall?  Great job, SpaceX.  You're almost there.

Any updates on the “leaks” and if there will be a problem?

they intentionally left off some tiles right there to see what would happen.

3 minutes ago, elfenix said:

they intentionally left off some tiles right there to see what would happen.

That isn't where they left the tiles off. 

3 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

That isn't where they left the tiles off. 

maybe i got the wrong idea, swear everyday astronaut said they'd left tiles off at that location

9 minutes ago, elfenix said:

maybe i got the wrong idea, swear everyday astronaut said they'd left tiles off at that location

They had cameras at that location because they knew it would be a hot spot. They already changed the location of the flaps for that reason. They left tiles off in other, non critical areas. 

Watching those boosters fall back to Earth and land will never get old.

 

Still somehow more sci-fi to me than landing on the moon.

  • 2 weeks later...

An acquaintance who live in Las Vegas just posted these photos this morning…

Quote

Talk about a lucky moment…
Just as we were driving out of our neighborhood I spotted what looked like a rocket launching across the sky.
Stopped the car and captured these shots…it was a Space X launch from Vandenberg.

 

IMG_3356.jpeg

IMG_3357.jpeg

  • 3 months later...

 

Liftoff of Super Heavy Booster 12 and Starship 30 for Starship Flight 5 is expected for 7:25 a.m. CDT / 12:25 UTC (see countdown in the upper left corner).

 

Edited by RPM

If this works it will be something straight out of Thunderbirds.

Fuck yeah!

That was fucking incredible 

Starship landing attempt in about 5 minutes, fuckin excited to see if they can complete the perfect launch

Holy shit that was crazy. Fun to watch with the kids. It’s amazing to me that they seem to think this shit is routine even though I try to impress on them how exceptional it really is. 

One flap starting to burn through. 

Landed in the ocean then 

Training Day Boom GIFs | Tenor

Edited by RPM

22 hours ago, Telegraph_it said:

Wow so fortuitous to have a buoy so close to where starship landed! 

Almost like they were aiming for that spot or something!

i didn't read the rocket report last week so i had no idea the faa was considering the permit for sunday sunrise

really sad i missed this

kudos to abc news, they showed it again on monday as the last story at 5:58 to close the program

love or hate him, but musk has just rendered every other space program on the planet worthless for any purpose other than maintaining independent launch capability for national security payloads

sunday was the biggest revolution in rocketry since the successful launch of apollo 4 in november 1967

falcons 9 and heavy are spacex v1.0

i am unable to conjure the words that concisely describe reusing starship

fIJlJkEkIyBUSDqBlpX3inrBZJQsiM4oXDmv8Rb7XGg.thumb.webp.a6dd7e89010e717e095ac06eebe75601.webp

On 10/16/2024 at 9:32 PM, Hagbard Celine said:

Yep exactly. This video from Wendover 6 years ago also describes this economic revolution in the space flight industry by SpaceX very well. As Sam said, just imagine a new $2000 car, a new $100 laptop, or a new $70 iphone..... that is what SpaceX and Elon have been and are achieving with within the space industry.

 

  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.