April 10, 20187 yr Why even have the silly rep feature if people can just make four or five anonymous socks and neg rep blast longtime contributors like Smokeybear1861 into oblivion without ever having to post? http://www.surlyhorns.com/board/index.php?/profile/1960-smokeybear1861/
April 10, 20187 yr Why even have the silly rep feature if fucking Stiglitz is on the Leaderboard? Goddamn traveshamockery. Edited April 11, 20187 yr by Guest
April 10, 20187 yr Author 1 minute ago, Rex Kramer said: Why even have the silly rep feature of fucking Stiglitz is on the Leaderboard? Goddamn traveshamockery. I agree. I’d be fine with my rep permanently set to zero.
April 10, 20187 yr 20 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said: I agree. I’d be fine with my rep permanently set to zero. Who the fuck do you think you are, Art Briles?
April 10, 20187 yr He's doing the same thing to me now on multiple accounts. He's definitely got a small penis.
April 10, 20187 yr Author Just now, mdmost said: Why give a shit about rep at all? Apparently a lot of people.
April 10, 20187 yr Again, why? You aren't crowd sourced here? It's basically nothing but a way for you Cloak Room turds to continue your pissing matches. You guys all had a clean start and here you are again, continuing the same stupid back and forth with rep that you had over on Shaggy. Only this time you can't leave cute messages to one another. Edited April 10, 20187 yr by mdmost
April 10, 20187 yr Author 3 minutes ago, mdmost said: Again, why? You aren't crowd sourced here? It's basically nothing but a way for you Cloak Room turds to continue your pissing matches. Like I said, I’d prefer rep didn’t exist because it’s petty and often a distraction but if you’re going to have the feature, at least make it equitable and prevent abuse. Otherwise, what purpose does it serve?
April 10, 20187 yr 1 hour ago, Hugo Stiglitz said: Why even have the silly rep feature if people can just make four or five anonymous socks and neg rep blast longtime contributors like Smokeybear1861 into oblivion without ever having to post? http://www.surlyhorns.com/board/index.php?/profile/1960-smokeybear1861/ Negged lmao
April 10, 20187 yr 4 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said: Like I said, I’d prefer rep didn’t exist because it’s petty and often a distraction but if you’re going to have the feature, at least make it equitable and prevent abuse. Otherwise, what purpose does it serve? I guess but it's just a part of the platform and whomever is running the place doesn't care enough to mess with it right now. I'd rather it be gone so we don't see threads like this or whining from any of you over it. You started a thread about something that has no actual risk at all to it, unlike Shaggy where enough rep could get you booted. Rep here is even more meaningless here than it was over there. So who gives a shit if someone is using multiple accounts to give someone else meaningless negative feedback that does nothing to you unless you just can't stand people negging you?
April 10, 20187 yr 20 minutes ago, mdmost said: Why give a shit about rep at all? You'd have to ask BYG Jacob
April 10, 20187 yr It is prettty weird if he took the time to make multiple accounts for rep purposes. I blame trump Edited April 10, 20187 yr by Sawbonz
April 10, 20187 yr Author 12 minutes ago, mdmost said: I guess but it's just a part of the platform and whomever is running the place doesn't care enough to mess with it right now. I'd rather it be gone so we don't see threads like this or whining from any of you over it. You started a thread about something that has no actual risk at all to it, unlike Shaggy where enough rep could get you booted. Rep here is even more meaningless here than it was over there. So who gives a shit if someone is using multiple accounts to give someone else meaningless negative feedback that does nothing to you unless you just can't stand people negging you? I’m trying to address a problem before it gets out of hand. If this goes unaddressed, rep will become more of a liability to the forum. My goal is to improve the product that is Surlyhorns. Smokey couldn’t start this thread because he’d come off as a whiny bitch. I on the other hand DGAF about my rep but I’d like to see the overall quality of the forum aspire to be better. Edited April 10, 20187 yr by Hugo Stiglitz
April 10, 20187 yr 9 minutes ago, mdmost said: I guess but it's just a part of the platform and whomever is running the place doesn't care enough to mess with it right now. I'd rather it be gone so we don't see threads like this or whining from any of you over it. You started a thread about something that has no actual risk at all to it, unlike Shaggy where enough rep could get you booted. Rep here is even more meaningless here than it was over there. So who gives a shit if someone is using multiple accounts to give someone else meaningless negative feedback that does nothing to you unless you just can't stand people negging you? It's always a competition. I wasn't in it to win it or anything but I pointed out when someone was manipulating so people who are could see its an easily rigged system. I disagree that rep is meaningless here compared to there, since its a number next to your name on every post, rather than a little green bar.
April 10, 20187 yr Well, we certainly wouldn't want something to become a liability to the forum. You could, oh I don't know, PM a moderator about this, such as maybe...blacklab?
April 10, 20187 yr 1 hour ago, Hugo Stiglitz said: Why even have the silly rep feature if people can just make four or five anonymous socks and neg rep blast longtime contributors like Smokeybear1861 into oblivion without ever having to post? http://www.surlyhorns.com/board/index.php?/profile/1960-smokeybear1861/ If I remember correctly, that bear has only been around since last June and really only started posting the past couple months. Not that how new you are matters, but he seems more like a sock account than anything. Edited April 10, 20187 yr by SmokeyTheBear
April 10, 20187 yr 10 minutes ago, mdmost said: Well, we certainly wouldn't want something to become a liability to the forum. You could, oh I don't know, PM a moderator about this, such as maybe...blacklab? I think you missed the point. Per the to do list stickied at the top of this forum. Quote This thread grew pretty big and became a mess. I tried to clean it up and accedently deleted it. If you have an idea start a new thread about it. As long as 5+ people post they want it I'll add it here. I'll try to get one thing done per day. Edited April 10, 20187 yr by SDG
April 10, 20187 yr 1 hour ago, mdmost said: Again, why? You aren't crowd sourced here? It's basically nothing but a way for you Cloak Room turds to continue your pissing matches. You guys all had a clean start and here you are again, continuing the same stupid back and forth with rep that you had over on Shaggy. Only this time you can't leave cute messages to one another. Some of the neg messages that folks posted where hilarious too. I do have to admit I miss that.
April 11, 20187 yr I don't care about this topic so I am posting here to let you know that. What you post about is trite which is why I've taken the time to give you a piece of my mind. Try meta discussions somewhere else, a forum like "Board Discussions" is totally inappropriate.
April 11, 20187 yr On 4/10/2018 at 5:42 PM, SHOOTER12 said: Some of the neg messages that folks posted where hilarious too. I do have to admit I miss that. Agree. That's a feature I would love to see again. Those comments taught me a lot about other posters...and myself.
April 11, 20187 yr Those of you with high rep, save some pussy for the rest of us ffs!Slaying pussy in the vette
April 12, 20187 yr I have a few stalkers. I assume they’re rocko but who knows. I do find it funny that it probably takes a few minutes to make multiple accounts, with multiple emails, and then to log into each one and proceed to neg... those are a few minutes he’ll never get back.
April 12, 20187 yr How the hell did some people get above a hundred positive rep already? I liked the comments part on rep also.
April 12, 20187 yr Comments were dope. Bring em back. Also how can we crowd source? That needs to be a thing here...
April 12, 20187 yr 7 hours ago, ChiTownDoc said: Comments were dope. Bring em back. Also how can we crowd source? That needs to be a thing here... Hm... "crowd" source + unlimited socks allowed what could go wrong?
April 12, 20187 yr 15 minutes ago, SmokeyBear1861 said: Hm... "crowd" source + unlimited socks allowed what could go wrong? If your bitch ass getting crowd sourced is wrong, I don't want to be right.
April 12, 20187 yr 3 hours ago, High Plains Drifter said: If your bitch ass getting crowd sourced is wrong, I don't want to be right. Typical. Leftist in favor of censoring opposing views, but when it gets flipped you will be crying.
April 12, 20187 yr it ain't really political around here when it comes to rep. yes, there will always be a limited number of morons who neg because they disagree with you. Bitchassedness has a far higher yield.
April 14, 20187 yr On 4/12/2018 at 8:39 AM, High Plains Drifter said: If your bitch ass getting crowd sourced is wrong, I don't want to be right. Crowdsourcing is fine. One psycho registering multiple socks to fuck with someone would in past years have been universally condemned and likely resulted in a fatwa regardless of what we thought about the victim (unless it was Grendel) thanks trump
April 14, 20187 yr On 4/10/2018 at 12:59 PM, Hugo Stiglitz said: Why even have the silly rep feature if people can just make four or five anonymous socks and neg rep blast longtime contributors like Smokeybear1861 into oblivion without ever having to post? http://www.surlyhorns.com/board/index.php?/profile/1960-smokeybear1861/ you have 1110 post already, get a life
April 14, 20187 yr What’s the cutoff for number of posts between when one has a life and when one needs to get a life?
April 14, 20187 yr 2 hours ago, Landomatic said: What’s the cutoff for number of posts between when one has a life and when one needs to get a life? I'm probably north of the line so somewhere slightly less than my post count...
April 17, 20187 yr On 4/13/2018 at 10:59 PM, Sawbonz said: Crowdsourcing is fine. One psycho registering multiple socks to fuck with someone would in past years have been universally condemned and likely resulted in a fatwa regardless of what we thought about the victim (unless it was Grendel) thanks trump Crowd sourcing brings the community together like when there was a Baylor fan witch hunt on shaggy. That was enjoyable.
April 19, 20187 yr Is the sock war still going? I haven't got 40 consecutive negs in the past couple of days, guess he gave up.
April 20, 20187 yr 13 hours ago, SmokeyBear1861 said: Is the sock war still going? I haven't got 40 consecutive negs in the past couple of days, guess he gave up. negged
April 20, 20187 yr On 4/17/2018 at 8:28 AM, Texas_Rocks said: Internet politics IS his life. Not a joke. If that under-medicated shitstain passes Thujone on the rep board (damn tally is kept right on the home page now to see when logging on), instead of just negging him when he escapes his CR asylum and spews his volcanic diarrhea on to other forums here, I will go in every day and neg him there too up to the limit. I just can't let that aggression stand unopposed like a Frenchman watching the Nazis march by the Arc de Triomphe . Dumbfuck even found a way to Hugo an NSAA thread. Cartoon dicks > Under-medicated dicks.
April 20, 20187 yr Just now, Hugo Stiglitz said: And I’m the one with problems. How many mg of Risperdal does your doc have you on right now?
April 20, 20187 yr Author I don’t even know what that is. Besides, doctors and other wizards are outlawed where I live.
May 20, 20187 yr On 4/10/2018 at 3:01 PM, Rex Kramer said: Why even have the silly rep feature if fucking Stiglitz is on the Leaderboard? Goddamn traveshamockery. No shit. Ironic thread is ironic
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.