Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Surly Horns

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

Why would city even pay a dime for Kane? They are in the hunt for a quad almost every year. And favored to get a triple this year

  • Replies 2.3k
  • Views 131.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

7 minutes ago, Firemans4Horn said:

Sterling for Kane swap? Who says no. 

Levy laughs and hangs up the phone.

4 minutes ago, Schulz2.0 said:

Levy laughs and hangs up the phone.

source.gif

17 minutes ago, Firemans4Horn said:

Sterling for Kane swap? Who says no. 

Only the team trading Sterling if they were smart. Sterling is younger (1.5 years) and doesn’t have the injury history of Kane. Spurs should do that move in a heart beat. 

49 minutes ago, Captain Ron said:

Only the team trading Sterling if they were smart. Sterling is younger (1.5 years) and doesn’t have the injury history of Kane. Spurs should do that move in a heart beat. 

Sterling is overrated.

Sterling looked pretty awesome even with Stuart Downing and Fabio Borini. He’s legit

Everyone looks awesome with De Bruyne.
Except for Mourinho.
39 minutes ago, hobbes2702 said:

Sterling looked pretty awesome even with Stuart Downing and Fabio Borini. He’s legit

He's a good player, but no where near as valuable as Kane.  He's also on higher wages (£300k vs £200k). 

14 hours ago, Firemans4Horn said:

Sterling for Kane swap? Who says no. 

Sterling

2 hours ago, Cheeseweasel said:

Kane has leverage. If a big time player wants to go and has a suitor willing to splash the cash, doesn't really matter how many years they have left on their contract.. they get their way.

ie: Coutinho, VVD

Edited by yoladu

16 minutes ago, Cheeseweasel said:

Southampton knows...

What big time player left Southampton?

3 minutes ago, MoJames said:

What big time player left Southampton?

Ricky Lambert

39 minutes ago, yoladu said:

Kane has leverage. If a big time player wants to go and has a suitor willing to splash the cash, doesn't really matter how many years they have left on their contract.. they get their way.

ie: Coutinho, VVD

Saying the suitors are willing to splash the cash is very debatable. Kane also seems to value how he's thought of by Tottenham fans as well.

15 minutes ago, MoJames said:

What big time player left Southampton?

They are only big AFTER they leave Southampton.

2 hours ago, yoladu said:

Kane has leverage. If a big time player wants to go and has a suitor willing to splash the cash, doesn't really matter how many years they have left on their contract.. they get their way.

ie: Coutinho, VVD

I’d question he has leverage. If he had it, he would have already turned in his transfer request.

That said, if anyone offers the money, Spurs need to take it. He’s about to hit his peak, if he hasn’t already (Strikers peak at 28*), and his value is now. They are going to need to replace him eventually, they might as well do it when they get the money to do so. 

* yes there are exceptions, but they are rare compared to the vast majority

8 minutes ago, Captain Ron said:

That said, if anyone offers the money, Spurs need to take it. He’s about to hit his peak, if he hasn’t already (Strikers peak at 28*), and his value is now. They are going to need to replace him eventually, they might as well do it when they get the money to do so. 

Este.  Take the cash.  A massive rebuild is needed. 

1 hour ago, Cheeseweasel said:

They are only big AFTER they leave Southampton.

oh indeed, no one self-mythologizes their own like a Liverpool supporter does.

15 minutes ago, Captain Ron said:

That said, if anyone offers the money, Spurs need to take it. He’s about to hit his peak, if he hasn’t already (Strikers peak at 28*), and his value is now. They are going to need to replace him eventually, they might as well do it when they get the money to do so. 

yep, Liverpool definitely made good use of their Coutinho money.

5 minutes ago, yoladu said:

oh indeed, no one self-mythologizes their own like a Liverpool supporter does.

Look, we gave you Danny Ings and Minamino to make things right. What more do you want?

4 minutes ago, mdmost said:

Look, we gave you Danny Ings and Minamino to make things right. What more do you want?

They want Ricky Lambert back.

2 hours ago, Captain Ron said:

I’d question he has leverage. If he had it, he would have already turned in his transfer request.

That said, if anyone offers the money, Spurs need to take it. He’s about to hit his peak, if he hasn’t already (Strikers peak at 28*), and his value is now. They are going to need to replace him eventually, they might as well do it when they get the money to do so. 

* yes there are exceptions, but they are rare compared to the vast majority

Might as well sell Son too.

4 hours ago, Cheeseweasel said:

To Liverpool please.

Bayern after they sell Coman.

Yup. Class manager who brought success to the club. Not sure who'll they will get who is better. And fuck them if they hire Big Sam.

If he becomes the Spurs boss, that would be a pretty nice hire for them. 

 

As a Spurs fan I would be in favor of this.   However already reading tweets that he is not a candidate for the spurs job.

Edited by midtown

4 hours ago, midtown said:

As a Spurs fan I would be in favor of this.   However already reading tweets that he is not a candidate for the spurs job.

Spurs fans hated Mourinho playing defense first and counter attacking. That's exactly what Espirito Santos runs.

Edited by Schulz2.0

Brentford just need to hold on for 4 minutes to get to Wembley for the EFL playoff final. Barnsley and Swansea play at 12:30 today to decide who gets to play Brentford. 

So I'm sure there's a reason they play all of these games at the same time but WHY DO THEY PLAY ALL OF THESE GAMES AT THE SAME TIME? 

Fucking Brits.

So you can't tank your match to f over your rival on the final matchday. 

Edited by mdmost

34 minutes ago, mdmost said:

So you can't tank your match to f over your rival on the final matchday. 

Yeah I get why it's a thing. It's just irritating when you want to watch multiple games.

6 minutes ago, Captain Ron said:

I guess really what I'm hearing is that I need more devices. 

Just flipped Leicester on. Spurs disappointing me within 2 minutes of watching.

Just looking at a scoreboard I see Chelsea-Villa is about 5’ behind everyone.  Did they kickoff late?

 

Nevermind. They are all within 2 or so minutes. The scoreboard was slow. 

Edited by Captain Ron

Just now, Captain Ron said:

Just looking at a scoreboard I see Chelsea-Villa is about 5’ behind everyone.  Did they kickoff late?

Idk. Spurs game is like a minute and a half ahead for me but these streams can be all over the place. 

ManU scores first today. City right behind them. 

Edited by Captain Ron

God this is heartattack central. I'm just assuming Pool is going to win so currently just have 2 games on. Might have to break out another device if things get dicey for Pool though. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.