Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Surly Horns

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Featured Replies

>there's a reason this thread is a disaster 

Im sure you’ll go back and correct all of the  “He shot three black men” and “crossed state lines with an illegal weapon” statements, right?

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Views 292.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • The “I used to vote Republican” line is the CR’s version of “I have a black friend.”   

  • hayden_horn
    hayden_horn

    so, yeah, this is the problem writ large. unarmed black dude, may be a threat, shot several times in the back. armed white dude, with an assault rifle present and visible, who just shot some people, w

  • Kenosha's very own Sweet Corn Fest, held every August Jerry Smith Produce and Pumpkin Farm (7150 18th St.), would like you to know that they are here to support you during this difficult time. Wh

Posted Images

1 minute ago, Incredulity said:

You didn't ask about both in the post I quoted.

 

I responded directly to a direct question and am somehow accused of Q'ing, disinformation.....

 

Fucking bullshit.

settle down and try not to take all this shit so personally. jesus, i have enough problems with my teenage sons. this is just a forum. act like a grown up.

Just now, Cheeseweasel said:

>there's a reason this thread is a disaster 

Im sure you’ll go back and correct all of the  “He shot three black men” and “crossed state lines with an illegal weapon” statements, right?

i'm sure i will.

i haven't really been paying attention to this thread, as i prefer to do news + opinion on cloak room. you want to point out other disinformation, i guess that's fine. i'll correct them if you link them, unless it was fog of war lack of information, which is distinct from disinformation.

4 minutes ago, hayden_horn said:

um, i asked about both.

i thought the motion to dismiss was old news that i read yesterday, and it was:

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-kyle-rittenhouse-defense-mistrial-prosecutorial-misconduct-20211116-awjig565ynf3xknzhavdxdh7tm-story.html

the kick man, you're getting your news from am radio.

what i dislike, especially on this thread, is people making news assertions without news links. @Johnny Sack what i thought you were doing is presenting new news that just happened without a link. this thread is a shitshow of people just saying fuckall without any kind of news backup. 

you want opinions? go to cloak room. you want news? post real news. there's a reason this thread is a disaster.

I did not see the MTD posted yesterday, so it was new to me.  Was it posted here? Before I mentioned it?

2 minutes ago, hayden_horn said:i'll correct them if you link them, unless it was fog of war lack of information, which is distinct from disinformation.

Wow. That’s some top tier level bullshit right there. 

2 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

I did not see the MTD posted yesterday, so it was new to me.  Was it posted here? Before I mentioned it?

i dunno. 

i just know you didn't link to any news information about it. that's what i was simply asking about. it sounded like a new development that had just been breaking news. 

2 minutes ago, Cheeseweasel said:

Wow. That’s some top tier level bullshit right there. 

feel free to use the report post button on the bullshit posts you encounter.

The last page has been Robert Duvall talk on the Rittenhouse thread in cr.

3 minutes ago, hayden_horn said:

feel free to use the report post button on the bullshit posts you encounter.

Meme Reaction GIF

1 hour ago, BabaYaga said:

What the actual fuck?

I heard the lawyers on that Rekieta youtube channel discussing it.  

 

https://www.wisconsinrightnow.com/2021/11/16/maurice-freeland-jump-kick-man/

 

WISN 1130 talk radio host Dan O’Donnell first broke the storythat prosecutors had identified Jump Kick Man, although he chose not to name him. Our source then provided his name and gave additional details, also confirming O’Donnell’s account that prosecutors told the defense team that Freeland allegedly wanted immunity for an ongoing criminal case, which prosecutor Thomas Binger didn’t grant.

What is the judge blathering on about? Get to the good stuff!

this judge is a disaster. own your courtroom, dude. watching defense and prosecution try to walk on eggshells around this guy's recalcitrance is painful 

The judge has a case of Incipient Verbal Diarrhea.

 

Is the video even admissable?  Seems this needs to be determined before bantering about how many times the jury can see it?  Such a cluster

4 minutes ago, washparkhorn said:

The judge has a case of I know there are cameras.

fify

How is it even appropriate  that the defense wasn't supplied with the higher resolution version the prosecution held back?

5 minutes ago, BabaYaga said:

Is the video even admissable?  Seems this needs to be determined before bantering about how many times the jury can see it?  Such a cluster

The videos are already in evidence. 

The Monday Defense motion to dismiss based on the failure to provide HD footage is under advisement. 

12 minutes ago, BabaYaga said:

How is it even appropriate  that the defense wasn't supplied with the higher resolution version the prosecution held back?

Potential Brady violation (deprivation of due process for the Defendant). https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule

https://www.yalelawjournal.org/pdf/260_waifagsn.pdf (Remedies for Brady violation)

Edited by washparkhorn

12 minutes ago, BabaYaga said:

How is it even appropriate  that the defense wasn't supplied with the higher resolution version the prosecution held back?

We’ll find out, but seems like a slam dunk on appeal. 

1 minute ago, Cheeseweasel said:

We’ll find out, but seems like a slam dunk on appeal. 

As long as we're not the ones languishing in jail; waiting on things to play out.  

For the real lawyers here ... not looking good for the defense, eh? The jury taking this long points to conviction on something?

1 minute ago, Cheeseweasel said:

We’ll find out, but seems like a slam dunk on appeal. 

The defendant can't appeal a not guilt verdict.

4 minutes ago, Harrison Bergeron said:

For the real lawyers here ... not looking good for the defense, eh? The jury taking this long points to conviction on something?

Not necessarily. It just means it’s not a slam dunk win for either side. 

21 minutes ago, BabaYaga said:

How is it even appropriate  that the defense wasn't supplied with the higher resolution version the prosecution held back?

It’s not appropriate if it happened. I’ve had defendants in civil cases pull this crap. It’s shady as fuck but likely wouldn’t be grounds for a mistrial in a civil case. Dunno about a criminal case though. 

7 minutes ago, BabaYaga said:

As long as we're not the ones languishing in jail; waiting on things to play out.  

Ahem ...

 

5 minutes ago, Harrison Bergeron said:

For the real lawyers here ... not looking good for the defense, eh? The jury taking this long points to conviction on something?

Traditionally, quick verdicts were seen as signs of guilty and longer verdicts favored the defense. I am not sure those metrics are proven true by research. Some juries take their responsibilities seriously and take longer.

One of the jurors is probably busy making a youtube video in his truck. 

2 minutes ago, washparkhorn said:

Traditionally, quick verdicts were seen as signs of guilty and longer verdicts favored the defense. I am not sure those metrics are proven true by research. Some juries take their responsibilities seriously and take longer.

It's like people have never even seen Twelve Angry Men...

3 minutes ago, washparkhorn said:

Traditionally, quick verdicts were seen as signs of guilty and longer verdicts favored the defense. I am not sure those metrics are proven true by research. Some juries take their responsibilities seriously and take longer.

WzI9.gif

Just now, NotActuallyALonghorn said:

It's like people have never even seen Twelve Angry Men...

AHHHH, beat me to it...summbeech

12 Angry Men is a fantastic movie.

As for the lawyering and judging, Col. Potter is similar to the Rittenhouse judge. 

 

The jury is likely weighing two things:

1. Do they want to see their town burn again even if they acquit an innocent kid

2. How safe do they feel after there have already been threats of them being recorded? Do they need to sacrifice KR for their own safety

Edit: fixed a spelling issue

 

1 hour ago, hayden_horn said:

um, i asked about both.

i thought the motion to dismiss was old news that i read yesterday, and it was:

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-kyle-rittenhouse-defense-mistrial-prosecutorial-misconduct-20211116-awjig565ynf3xknzhavdxdh7tm-story.html

the kick man, you're getting your news from am radio.

what i dislike, especially on this thread, is people making news assertions without news links. @Johnny Sack what i thought you were doing is presenting new news that just happened without a link. this thread is a shitshow of people just saying fuckall without any kind of news backup. 

you want opinions? go to cloak room. you want news? post real news. there's a reason this thread is a disaster.

There are two motions.  This one is tied to the prosecutor trying to introduce previously excluded evidence and trying to make an issue of out the defendant's pre-trial silence.

There's a new one this morning because the state showed the jury during closing arguments enhanced drone footage that was not included in evidence.

The Jumpkick Man is a developing story.  We seem to know that he approached prosecutors to testify for immunity, and that the prosecutors disclosed this to the defense last Thursday.  We don't know when the prosecution was aware he was Jumpkick Man.  He was convicted of a misdemeanor battery in October and was arrested again yesterday if this guy is indeed Jumpkick Man.

Edited by JBJ

2 minutes ago, Hate said:

The jury is likely weighing two things:

1. Do they want to see their town burn again as an if they acquit an innocent kid

2. How safe do they feel after there have already been threats of them being recorded? Do they need to sacrifice KR for their own safety

This is utterly terrifying and should send shivers to everyone, regardless of which side of the isle that you sit on.  

4 minutes ago, Hate said:

The jury is likely weighing two things:

1. Do they want to see their town burn again as an if they acquit an innocent kid

2. How safe do they feel after there have already been threats of them being recorded? Do they need to sacrifice KR for their own safety

They shouldn't be doing that, but it is what it is - and they probably will speculate on the impact of their decision.

Not guilty or guilty, it is best that they go through the evidence in painstaking detail.

Pretty significant difference in quality of drone footage withheld by state and provided by state

 

42 minutes ago, NorthLoop said:

One of the jurors is probably busy making a youtube video in his truck. 

Tik Toc. 

24 minutes ago, washparkhorn said:

They shouldn't be doing that, but it is what it is - and they probably will speculate on the impact of their decision.

Not guilty or guilty, it is best that they go through the evidence in painstaking detail.

They shouldn't be, but look at the CR thread on this topic and it becomes clear why the have to.  There are posters actually hoping this kid gets murdered on his way out of the court house while others would settle for 3 weeks afterwards. 

5 minutes ago, Hate said:

They shouldn't be, but look at the CR thread on this topic and it becomes clear why the have to.  There are posters actually hoping this kid gets murdered on his way out of the court house while others would settle for 3 weeks afterwards. 

They've probably already started a bail fund for the killer. I continue to be fascinated by what triggers the crazies.

Edited by Harrison Bergeron

7 minutes ago, Hate said:

They shouldn't be, but look at the CR thread on this topic and it becomes clear why the have to.  There are posters actually hoping this kid gets murdered on his way out of the court house while others would settle for 3 weeks afterwards. 

Surly mods be like

Hillary Clinton Idk GIF

7 minutes ago, Incredulity said:

There are posters actually hoping this kid gets murdered

spacer.png

Edited by washparkhorn

  • Popular Post

Jury needs to hurry up so I can get a 4 day weekend.



I thought Black Friday wasn’t until the following week?  Either way, y’all take it easy.  I’ll cover yo shift.  

2 hours ago, hayden_horn said:

um, i asked about both.

i thought the motion to dismiss was old news that i read yesterday, and it was:

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-kyle-rittenhouse-defense-mistrial-prosecutorial-misconduct-20211116-awjig565ynf3xknzhavdxdh7tm-story.html

the kick man, you're getting your news from am radio.

what i dislike, especially on this thread, is people making news assertions without news links. @Johnny Sack what i thought you were doing is presenting new news that just happened without a link. this thread is a shitshow of people just saying fuckall without any kind of news backup. 

you want opinions? go to cloak room. you want news? post real news. there's a reason this thread is a disaster.

So you can't post opinions in DT now? Where is that fucking rule?

1 minute ago, washparkhorn said:

Cite? 

Quote the right person, numbnuts.

13 minutes ago, Harrison Bergeron said:

They've probably already started a bail fund for the killer. I continue to be fascinated by what triggers the crazies.

ironic alanis morissette GIF

Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.