August 31, 20205 yr So this Disney chick made an 'onlyfans' account promising nudes for $200 a pop. Why you would pay $200 for a pic that will be all over the internet in 24 hours of release is beyond me. So after raking in $2 mill from the Beta set, she released a Disney nude. AKA, a bikini pic. After so many Betas demanded their money back, OF changed the rules, which screwed over all the whoars who need to pay their bills. And now the whoars, ahem sex workers, have a harder time selling videos of them sucking their boyfriend's dick for money. Of course Bella says she was just trying to normalize the whoar industry so that they wouldn't feel shamed. I'm sure she will be donating the money she banked to help the whoars. "I wanted to bring attention to the site, the more people on the site the more likely of a chance to normalize the stigmas, And in trying to do this I hurt you," Thorne wrote. "I have risked my career a few times to remove the stigma behind sex work, porn, and the natural hatred people spew behind anything sex related." Thorne added: "I am a mainstream face and when you have a voice, a platform, you try to use ... in helping others and advocate for something bigger than yourself. Again in this process I hurt you and for that I’m truly sorry." .
August 31, 20205 yr Author 4 minutes ago, markstanco said: Cool. Any pics of her tits? No. That's the problem.
August 31, 20205 yr She's not even that hot. There are thousands of hotter women that you can see naked without paying a dime. I don't get it.
August 31, 20205 yr Popular Post 24 minutes ago, markstanco said: Cool. Any pics of her tits? Absolutely. Send me $200 and they're yours.
August 31, 20205 yr Seems like OF is just making the 'creators' (not quite cute enough for cam work) get what their shitty porn is worth.
August 31, 20205 yr Absolutely. Send me $200 and they're yours.$200? Ha, send me $199 and they're yours.
August 31, 20205 yr 23 minutes ago, Irwin F Fletcher said: 46 minutes ago, Braff Zacklin said: Absolutely. Send me $200 and they're yours. $200? Ha, send me $199 and they're yours.
August 31, 20205 yr 2 hours ago, Bullneck said: Cliff notes version? C lister teases selling nudes on onlyfans, charges a shit ton, makes a boatload of money, doesn't send nudes, onlyfans gets charged back a shit ton of money, onlyfans changes policy as a result which reduces how much camwhores can sell for and limits their access to their money, and brothahorn hates camwhores for some reason. Edited August 31, 20205 yr by elfenix
August 31, 20205 yr I think it’s a bourbon. If it was, it would be the cheapest and nastiest bourbon you could buy and you would always wake up afterwards with a hangover and the shits.
August 31, 20205 yr Oh- so the whores are up in arms because they have to pay taxes and need to factor that into their business model- as opposed to illegally profiting by not paying their taxes unlike how everyone else has to suck it up and give Uncle Sam his cut? the horror.
August 31, 20205 yr 9 minutes ago, Wulaw Horn said: Oh- so the whores are up in arms because they have to pay taxes and need to factor that into their business model- as opposed to illegally profiting by not paying their taxes unlike how everyone else has to suck it up and give Uncle Sam his cut? the horror. No. They are up in arms because they just got a pay cut thanks to Bella Thorne.
August 31, 20205 yr 2 hours ago, Hate said: If it was, it would be the cheapest and nastiest bourbon you could buy and you would always wake up afterwards with a hangover and the shits. It would be industrial alcohol with food dye sold at a premium price in a really nice looking bottle.
August 31, 20205 yr It would say 100 proof on the bottle, but it would really only be 20 proof Edited August 31, 20205 yr by NeverMarryAStripper
August 31, 20205 yr 2 hours ago, Hate said: If it was, it would be the cheapest and nastiest bourbon you could buy and you would always wake up afterwards with a hangover and the shits. Had to look her up. Kinda reminds me of what you’d wake up next to after drinking the cheapest and nastiest bourbon you could buy. Hard pass on this chick, tho she does look rude and has some hardware in there. Face...lacking
August 31, 20205 yr As a dad with preteen kids watching when she was on a TV show, I have to say that Zendaya turned out much hotter.
August 31, 20205 yr 2 hours ago, Wulaw Horn said: Oh- so the whores are up in arms because they have to pay taxes and need to factor that into their business model- as opposed to illegally profiting by not paying their taxes unlike how everyone else has to suck it up and give Uncle Sam his cut? the horror. That's not at all what they're upset about. I don't see anything about this changing the way they pay taxes. The $50/$100 cap, along with having to wait 30 days to receive their money is the issue. Seems extreme by OF. I can understand the 30-day "escrow" type deal if refunds are costing them a bunch of money, but physically capping the market value of the models' content is pretty absurd.
August 31, 20205 yr Its not like it's a difficult platform to emulate... especially with how much capital social media giants have access to (or even smaller startups and SV entrepreneurs). If they make changes that disfavor their creator base then those creators will go somewhere else that offers them a better margin and revenue potential. OF will then have to back down on these new policies to remain competitive. This happens all. The. Fucking. Time. It's capitalism 101. Uber and Lyft are probably the best current example.
August 31, 20205 yr If these creators have any kind of fan base, they should drop any third party and start their own site. They could even hire other girls and get them started, for additional content.
August 31, 20205 yr 14 hours ago, Brothahorn said: So this Disney chick made an 'onlyfans' account promising nudes for $200 a pop. Why you would pay $200 for a pic that will be all over the internet in 24 hours of release is beyond me. So after raking in $2 mill from the Beta set, she released a Disney nude. AKA, a bikini pic. After so many Betas demanded their money back, OF changed the rules, which screwed over all the whoars who need to pay their bills. And now the whoars, ahem sex workers, have a harder time selling videos of them sucking their boyfriend's dick for money. Of course Bella says she was just trying to normalize the whoar industry so that they wouldn't feel shamed. I'm sure she will be donating the money she banked to help the whoars. "I wanted to bring attention to the site, the more people on the site the more likely of a chance to normalize the stigmas, And in trying to do this I hurt you," Thorne wrote. "I have risked my career a few times to remove the stigma behind sex work, porn, and the natural hatred people spew behind anything sex related." Thorne added: "I am a mainstream face and when you have a voice, a platform, you try to use ... in helping others and advocate for something bigger than yourself. Again in this process I hurt you and for that I’m truly sorry." . so are you getting your $200 back or what?
August 31, 20205 yr 3 hours ago, Wulaw Horn said: Oh- so the whores are up in arms because they have to pay taxes and need to factor that into their business model- as opposed to illegally profiting by not paying their taxes unlike how everyone else has to suck it up and give Uncle Sam his cut? the horror. Whores paying their taxes being a hot button issue that sets you off is pretty much peak Wulaw Horn. FWIW, I agree with you - should be legal, should pay taxes. Edited August 31, 20205 yr by BradInATX
August 31, 20205 yr Author 11 hours ago, elfenix said: C lister teases selling nudes on onlyfans, charges a shit ton, makes a boatload of money, doesn't send nudes, onlyfans gets charged back a shit ton of money, onlyfans changes policy as a result which reduces how much camwhores can sell for and limits their access to their money, and brothahorn hates camwhores for some reason. Cam whoars are the aggies of the whoar kingdom. Living in a fantasy world and over charging for a shitty product that doesn't live up to the hype. 6 hours ago, texasjacket said: WTF? Where are all the pics? Time to hand out some bans Would you pay $200 for this?
August 31, 20205 yr 3 hours ago, TrashMaster G said: No. They are up in arms because they just got a pay cut thanks to Bella Thorne. And being on the radar and having to pay taxes. Read that last part. The tax cut is basically as big as the OF cut.
August 31, 20205 yr 1 hour ago, Pato del Muerto said: If these creators have any kind of fan base, they should drop any third party and start their own site. They could even hire other girls and get them started, for additional content. That’s what they do. This is one of many sites for most of them. It’s a way to try to snag more people for their own sites.
August 31, 20205 yr Its not like it's a difficult platform to emulate... especially with how much capital social media giants have access to (or even smaller startups and SV entrepreneurs). If they make changes that disfavor their creator base then those creators will go somewhere else that offers them a better margin and revenue potential. OF will then have to back down on these new policies to remain competitive. This happens all. The. Fucking. Time. It's capitalism 101. Uber and Lyft are probably the best current example. I know a few girls who cam/OF, the smart ones utilize both along with other social media platforms. While some you joke about them, one of the girls I know made 65k in July and will beat that for August. She showed me her control panel on OF and her payout was right there.The big thing with this bella is the payout cap, some of these girls sell videos for a few hundered bucks and now its limited. I was shocked to hear that OF takes 20% right off the top. I know they need to charge for offering the platform and bandwidth but that seems a bit high. The camsite chaturbate takes 50% insane.There is certainly a business opportunity there
August 31, 20205 yr 10 minutes ago, BradInATX said: Whores paying their taxes being a hot button issue that sets you off is pretty much peak Wulaw Horn. FWIW, I agree with you - should be legal, should pay taxes. I read that again- as I wasn’t upset at all so to say “set off” or “hot button” isn’t remotely close to how I felt- you are reading too much emotion into what I was saying- maybe I will use an emoji next time. Let’s just say as a small business owner for a ton of years that’s always paid 100% of my taxes I consistently get a chuckle out of people who dodge and weave around the facts of life and then whine and complain when they get smacked upside the head with the reality that non tax cheats have to deal with and plan for in their day to day. So, when I read a sentence that laments that the government takes $8.00 of the $40 she has left over that someone paid her to watch her suck her boyfriends dick on camera I find that incredibly amusing. Especially when that’s the cherry on top of whining about her vendors terms of service. My last job where I wasn’t self employed when I was president of a title company- 1/3 of my time was spent dealing with vendors seemingly. So, this is really funny to me to think about the poor sex worker bitching about all the normal business stuff in life. Vendors, accounts payable, the IRS. just a small town girl getting into porn for love of the game, trying so so hard to make a buck and has to deal with small business problems. Funny, right?
August 31, 20205 yr 5 hours ago, G650 said: Who TF is Bella Thorne Some bitch who a) won't show her tits for $200. or b) some famous bitch that random internet incels put on a pedestal and are willing to pay $200 to see her nekkid
August 31, 20205 yr 5 minutes ago, Smax said: I know a few girls who cam/OF, the smart ones utilize both along with other social media platforms. While some you joke about them, one of the girls I know made 65k in July and will beat that for August. She showed me her control panel on OF and her payout was right there. The big thing with this bella is the payout cap, some of these girls sell videos for a few hundered bucks and now its limited. I was shocked to hear that OF takes 20% right off the top. I know they need to charge for offering the platform and bandwidth but that seems a bit high. The camsite chaturbate takes 50% insane. There is certainly a business opportunity there Being the low cost provider is hard work. Building infrastructure is expensive in time and money, and these platforms strike me as a not for long type thing (people moving on to the next thing fairly quickly). I would think this is the kind of thing that if you wanted to become the low cost platform for performers you would have to get a lot of market share. I could be wrong, but my guess is that’s why you still have vendors able to jerk creators around in this context.
August 31, 20205 yr 31 minutes ago, Smax said: I was shocked to hear that OF takes 20% right off the top. I know they need to charge for offering the platform and bandwidth but that seems a bit high. The camsite chaturbate takes 50% insane. i wonder what onlyfans live's rake is? keeping a shit ton of live streams up seems a bit more complicated than hosting a glorified blog
August 31, 20205 yr 2 hours ago, ztejas said: Its not like it's a difficult platform to emulate... especially with how much capital social media giants have access to (or even smaller startups and SV entrepreneurs). If they make changes that disfavor their creator base then those creators will go somewhere else that offers them a better margin and revenue potential. OF will then have to back down on these new policies to remain competitive. This happens all. The. Fucking. Time. It's capitalism 101. Uber and Lyft are probably the best current example. This is my exact thought/response to the "controversy".
August 31, 20205 yr 1 hour ago, Wulaw Horn said: I read that again- as I wasn’t upset at all so to say “set off” or “hot button” isn’t remotely close to how I felt- you are reading too much emotion into what I was saying- maybe I will use an emoji next time. Let’s just say as a small business owner for a ton of years that’s always paid 100% of my taxes I consistently get a chuckle out of people who dodge and weave around the facts of life and then whine and complain when they get smacked upside the head with the reality that non tax cheats have to deal with and plan for in their day to day. So, when I read a sentence that laments that the government takes $8.00 of the $40 she has left over that someone paid her to watch her suck her boyfriends dick on camera I find that incredibly amusing. Especially when that’s the cherry on top of whining about her vendors terms of service. My last job where I wasn’t self employed when I was president of a title company- 1/3 of my time was spent dealing with vendors seemingly. So, this is really funny to me to think about the poor sex worker bitching about all the normal business stuff in life. Vendors, accounts payable, the IRS. just a small town girl getting into porn for love of the game, trying so so hard to make a buck and has to deal with small business problems. Funny, right? just keep going down this assumption rabbit hole you've created in your head
August 31, 20205 yr 1 minute ago, elfenix said: just keep going down this assumption rabbit hole you've created in your head I have no idea what it actually looks like for anyone or everyone involved. That’s just the picture I laugh about in my head and chuckle. Nothing more in depth than that.
August 31, 20205 yr Author 2 hours ago, Smax said: I know a few girls who cam/OF, the smart ones utilize both along with other social media platforms. While some you joke about them, one of the girls I know made 65k in July and will beat that for August. She showed me her control panel on OF and her payout was right there. The big thing with this bella is the payout cap, some of these girls sell videos for a few hundered bucks and now its limited. I was shocked to hear that OF takes 20% right off the top. I know they need to charge for offering the platform and bandwidth but that seems a bit high. The camsite chaturbate takes 50% insane. There is certainly a business opportunity there So what the career life for one of these cam-whoars? Asking for a friends daughter, who will soon be graduating college. Her dumb ass dad told her she needed a respectable career.
August 31, 20205 yr 2 hours ago, Brothahorn said: Cam whoars are the aggies of the whoar kingdom. Living in a fantasy world and over charging for a shitty product that doesn't live up to the hype. Would you pay $200 for this? What body part am I looking at here?
August 31, 20205 yr 13 minutes ago, High Plains Drifter said: What body part am I looking at here? The meth pocket
August 31, 20205 yr 4 hours ago, Wally Fairway said: Some bitch who a) won't show her tits for $200. or b) some famous bitch that random internet incels put on a pedestal and are willing to pay $200 to see her nekkid kim kardashian started with much lower creed.
August 31, 20205 yr The rambling chick isn’t wrong about the chargebacks; site is gonna pay $20 a pop on that when the transaction itself already cost them $7....
September 1, 20205 yr 7 hours ago, elfenix said: just keep going down this assumption rabbit hole you've created in your head Shhh it’s his chance to rail against taxes and shit he doesn’t like
September 1, 20205 yr Paying for a nude picture on the internet is like paying for a grain of sand while you're standing in the Sahara. No, no, I have to have *that* grain of sand. Morons.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.