October 9, 20241 yr As reported on a super-credible maga X account. https://www.politifact.com/article/2024/sep/20/Fact-checking-ABC-debate-whistleblower-affidavit/ An anonymous affidavit.
October 9, 20241 yr 8 minutes ago, babysdaddy said: I believe this qualifies as bias if 60 minutes actually did this. BIAS!
October 9, 20241 yr Popular Post People have to got to stop taking something from Twitter as gospel. You are being played by people and an algorithm with real bias. And you fall for it every time.
October 9, 20241 yr 25 minutes ago, babysdaddy said: I believe this qualifies as bias if 60 minutes actually did this. Jesus Christ. The amount of posters lining up to show their asses with their shittily sourced bullshit is fucking perfect for this thread.
October 9, 20241 yr 11 hours ago, elfenix said: no one could have predicted questions on *checks notes* the economy, immigration, prices, january 6, ukraine, israel, and abortion. "It's not fair she was prepared!" is such an unreal self own. 29 minutes ago, babysdaddy said: I believe this qualifies as bias if 60 minutes actually did this. I believe falling for this qualifies you as an idiot.
October 9, 20241 yr 30 minutes ago, babysdaddy said: I believe this qualifies as bias if 60 minutes actually did this. Negged for posting misinformation garbage from Twitter. Be better.
October 9, 20241 yr I think all of us are suseptible to misinformation but this is intentional at this point from baby right?
October 9, 20241 yr I see the just asking questions crowd slept in, but finally woke-up and had their first cup of coffee.
October 9, 20241 yr 20 minutes ago, kevwun said: Any omg gotcha moments posted on social media are 99.99% likely to be false. Those people are working on the scammers’ ratios. They don’t need a high % of people to fall for their shit, they make it up with volume.
October 9, 20241 yr 40 minutes ago, babysdaddy said: I believe this qualifies as bias if 60 minutes actually did this. You should start thinking before believing.
October 9, 20241 yr A friendly PSA for those who apparently struggle with this: It's possible to believe the media is biased WITHOUT immediately believing everything you see from alternative sources that fit your worldview.
October 9, 20241 yr Monetizing social media influencers seems to be almost as stupid, as the people who fall for their obvious bullshit.
October 9, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, fattyflattie said: Don’t know. There were reports a whistleblower came out with it - but - I don’t know if true or not. Haven’t paid much attention since it became very clear D’s going to drag their nuts on Trumps face this go around. So fatty just posts outright bullshit as fact now.
October 9, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, fattyflattie said: Don’t know. There were reports a whistleblower came out with it - but - I don’t know if true or not. Haven’t paid much attention since it became very clear D’s going to drag their nuts on Trumps face this go around. Doesn't seem like a stretch to me. Something similar was confirmed in the past. Brazile: Leaking town hall topics to Clinton campaign 'mistake I will forever regret' - POLITICO Head of DNC leaked to Hillary, the preferred candidate over the populist. Now, we're in the most important election ever to save our democracy. I'd say just about anything is on the table.
October 9, 20241 yr 11 minutes ago, Celery Man said: You should start thinking before believing. It's so frustrating. It takes literally two seconds of critical thought. "Why would 60 Minutes, one of the few news sources left with real credibility built on decades of trustworthy reporting, risk throwing that all away to splice some shit together for Kamala Harris, thereby lying to their audience?" something, something, deep state, I eat paste Edited October 9, 20241 yr by aggie08
October 9, 20241 yr 4 minutes ago, Conqueeftador said: Doesn't seem like a stretch to me. Something similar was confirmed in the past. Brazile: Leaking town hall topics to Clinton campaign 'mistake I will forever regret' - POLITICO Head of DNC leaked to Hillary, the preferred candidate over the populist. Now, we're in the most important election ever to save our democracy. I'd say just about anything is on the table. Your gotcha moment is from 2015. Enjoy your latest crowd sourcing, you fucking troll. Edited October 9, 20241 yr by kevwun
October 9, 20241 yr 11 minutes ago, Conqueeftador said: Now, we're in the most important election ever to save our democracy.
October 9, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, fattyflattie said: Don’t know. There were reports a whistleblower came out with it - but - I don’t know if true or not. Haven’t paid much attention since it became very clear D’s going to drag their nuts on Trumps face this go around. 37 minutes ago, babysdaddy said: I believe this qualifies as bias if 60 minutes actually did this.
October 9, 20241 yr 59 minutes ago, babysdaddy said: I believe this qualifies as bias if 60 minutes actually did this. I finally figured out my real problem with this stuff.....its just so insulting to people's intelligence. You really expect everyone to eat this shit up and when they push back and tell you that it's stupid you get all butthurt. As if we're the ones with a problem.
October 9, 20241 yr Popular Post This is tremendous. A thread ostensibly about media bias that hammers home some posters’ persistent, desperate bias to believe damn near anything aligning with their victimhood mindset. Just top notch.
October 9, 20241 yr 37 minutes ago, kevwun said: Your gotcha moment is from 2015. Enjoy your latest crowd sourcing, you fucking troll. Public knowledge isn't a gotcha. It’s relevant to the discussion.
October 9, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, aggie08 said: Jesus Christ. The amount of posters lining up to show their asses with their shittily sourced bullshit is fucking perfect for this thread. It’s not that they show their asses, it’s that then they do so while on their knees and elbows.
October 9, 20241 yr 13 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said: Meanwhile, what 60 Minutes did with Harris the other night was a campaign violation, apparently. Ohhhhhhh, okay. I understand where this is coming from now.
October 9, 20241 yr Look, I saw the initial clip and was not very impressed with her answer. Bill followed up with another question and she gave, in my opinion, better answer. 60 minutes edited out the first answer for a reason. Here is the edit in written form from a politico reporter
October 9, 20241 yr 44 minutes ago, Willfully Horn said: It’s not that they show their asses, it’s that then they do so while on their knees and elbows. The irony of this comment after the history of your new Gods climb up the ladder. Amazing.
October 9, 20241 yr 14 hours ago, Conqueeftador said: Sorry. Physician. Have served (no longer thank goodness) as Chief of my department at major metropolitan hospital. I could have guessed. Physicians are known in the VC community as gullible rubes. 1 hour ago, F250 said: Media bias exists. I have disinformation to prove it. This is such a genius post. The thing that amazes me about the latest rube incarnation Conqweef is that you would think after years of reading this site, which is full of a lot of pretty smart people, he would finally start to examine his own stupidity and realize that he’s been completely fooled by a bunch of propagandists with alternative agendas. But no, he just continues to never learn a damn thing. He’s as dumb today as he was the first day he joined this site so many years ago. It’s amazing someone can have that low of an IQ.
October 9, 20241 yr 6 minutes ago, fattyflattie said: The irony of this comment after the history of your new Gods climb up the ladder. Amazing. Can you translate this into a language that isn't braindead dipshit?
October 9, 20241 yr 4 minutes ago, aggie08 said: Can you translate this into a language that isn't braindead dipshit? I believe that's an allusion to his misogynistic belief that she slept her way into power.
October 9, 20241 yr 3 minutes ago, Dbeasy said: This is such a genius post. I have posted no disinformation here. Not sure what you're referencing. 4 minutes ago, Dbeasy said: The thing that amazes me about the latest rube incarnation Conqweef is that you would think after years of reading this site, which is full of a lot of pretty smart people, he would finally start to examine his own stupidity and realize that he’s been completely fooled by a bunch of propagandists with alternative agendas. Again let's look at probably the biggest propaganda campaign in our country the last year plus. Biden's mental health. Were you calling out that he was obviously mentally impaired? I don't think so. Only when it was impossible to hide and the media told you so did you realize, oh Biden might not be all there. 7 minutes ago, Dbeasy said: I could have guessed. Physicians are known in the VC community as gullible rubes. We're not dumb, just known for being bad with money specifically.
October 9, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, Conqueeftador said: Again let's look at probably the biggest propaganda campaign in our country the last year plus. Biden's mental health. Were you calling out that he was obviously mentally impaired? I don't think so. Only when it was impossible to hide and the media told you so did you realize, oh Biden might not be all there. You must be fucking incensed that the media is doing it all over again and not calling out Trump's incredibly obvious mental decline every time he opens his mouth.
October 9, 20241 yr 42 minutes ago, Conqueeftador said: Again let's look at probably the biggest propaganda campaign in our country the last year plus. Biden's mental health. Were you calling out that he was obviously mentally impaired? I don't think so. Only when it was impossible to hide and the media told you so did you realize, oh Biden might not be all there. 51 minutes ago, Dbeasy said: Please show your work. I can find no media sources factually reporting that Biden is "sharp as a tack." I can find lots of magat sources taking issue with that phrasing. I can also find media sources reporting various Biden insiders as saying he's "sharp" or "sharp as a tack." Such as Mayorkas. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/mayorkas-defends-biden-sharp-intensely-probing-detail-oriented-rcna138192 Also Michael Douglas. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/he-s-sharp-as-a-tack-actor-michael-douglas-defends-biden-s-mental-acuity-during-cnn-interview/ar-AA1np5QF And a Republican Senator in 2021. https://www.politico.com/news/2021/03/26/biden-health-republican-senators-477813 Of course, quite clearly implicit in that reportage is that Biden was not, in fact, sharp as a tack. https://www.ap.org/news-highlights/elections/2024/biden-at-81-often-sharp-and-focused-but-sometimes-confused-and-forgetful/ None of the media sources I can find aver or allege themselves that Biden is, in fact, sharp as a tack, only that others seem to think so. Also, let's compare reportage of Biden's medical condition with Trumps. Biden 2023 https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/16/politics/read-biden-physical-summary/index.html Biden 2024 https://www.npr.org/2024/02/28/1234438761/biden-physical-report including https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Health-Summary-2.28.pdf Trump. https://www.npr.org/2023/11/21/1214389287/trump-medical-report-weight including https://www.donaldjtrump.com/news/da9bdc90-9ab2-4da8-819b-6fda5240a337 Edited October 9, 20241 yr by TwiceHorn
October 9, 20241 yr Popular Post The SOTU was in January, and IIRC, the consensus among almost everyone was that Biden looked sharp and capable. Once he shit the bed at the debate, the media was 24/7 "Biden has lost it!" Contrast that, of course, with the media on the right who has not uttered a single peep about Trump's obvious cognitive decline. The fact that GRUHorn thinks its the gravest injustice and political coverup that Biden is in the WH, but still plans on voting for Trump, tells you everything you need to know about his "concern." Not that anyone needed a reminder of what a disingenuous piece of shit he is.
October 9, 20241 yr The cognitive dissonance required to pretend that the last four years hasn't been filled to the absolute brim with media stories questioning Biden's age and cognitive function is truly something else.
October 9, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, aggie08 said: The cognitive dissonance required to pretend that the last four years hasn't been filled to the absolute brim with media stories questioning Biden's age and cognitive function is truly something else. And only passing reference to the word salad bar that is Donald Trump.
October 9, 20241 yr 9 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said: Please show your work. I can find no media sources factually reporting that Biden is "sharp as a tack." I can find lots of magat sources taking issue with that phrasing. I can also find media sources reporting various Biden insiders as saying he's "sharp" or "sharp as a tack." Such as Mayorkas. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/mayorkas-defends-biden-sharp-intensely-probing-detail-oriented-rcna138192 Also Michael Douglas. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/he-s-sharp-as-a-tack-actor-michael-douglas-defends-biden-s-mental-acuity-during-cnn-interview/ar-AA1np5QF And a Republican Senator in 2021. https://www.politico.com/news/2021/03/26/biden-health-republican-senators-477813 Of course, quite clearly implicit in that reportage is that Biden was not, in fact, sharp as a tack. https://www.ap.org/news-highlights/elections/2024/biden-at-81-often-sharp-and-focused-but-sometimes-confused-and-forgetful/ None of the media sources I can find aver or allege themselves that Biden is, in fact, sharp as a tack, only that others seem to think so. Also, let's compare reportage of Biden's medical condition with Trumps. Biden 2023 https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/16/politics/read-biden-physical-summary/index.html Biden 2024 https://www.npr.org/2024/02/28/1234438761/biden-physical-report including https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Health-Summary-2.28.pdf Trump. https://www.npr.org/2023/11/21/1214389287/trump-medical-report-weight including https://www.donaldjtrump.com/news/da9bdc90-9ab2-4da8-819b-6fda5240a337 Ask and you shall receive. I hear plenty of TV hosts, politicians and pundits I recognize.
October 9, 20241 yr 6 minutes ago, Foosters said: Once he shit the bed at the debate, the media was 24/7 "Biden has lost it!" Yes. Once he shit down his leg in front of the world and it was immediately clear he was going to lose, the knives came out. Crazy how that works. 2 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said: And only passing reference to the word salad bar This is glass house territory. Well, on take one anyhow. She’s pretty articulate once they get it cleaned up.
October 9, 20241 yr 5 minutes ago, Conqueeftador said: Ask and you shall receive. I hear plenty of TV hosts, politicians and pundits I recognize. I have no idea who those people speaking are. Reporting people's opinions is not propaganda. Every single article I can find that reports someone saying he is sharp has raised the question of his mental acuity, leaving it to the reader to determine whether to believe the asserted source. Asserting that he is sharp as a tack is another matter entirely. I gave you real citations to media and you give me some magat bullshit. Because you are in thrall to maga bullshit. Edited October 9, 20241 yr by TwiceHorn
October 9, 20241 yr 47 minutes ago, Conqueeftador said: We're not dumb, just known for being bad with money specifically. Why do you think physicians are such an easy mark for PE? Docs have made a lot of bankers and PE funds very, very rich over the years. Bad with money? Yep. But also rubes that let investors convince them that they can solve all of their problems. See any parallels?
October 9, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, TwiceHorn said: I have no idea who those people speaking are. Reporting people's opinions is not propaganda. Asserting that he is sharp as a tack is another matter entirely. I gave you real citations to media and you give me some magat bullshit. Because you are in thrall to maga bullshit. You can play dumb, but there were obvious TV personalities/reporters all over that montage. It was an obviously false narrative, pushed by politicians, parroted by media, swallowed by the believers.
October 9, 20241 yr 22 minutes ago, Foosters said: The fact that GRUHorn thinks it’s the gravest injustice and political coverup that Biden is in the WH, but still plans on voting for Trump, tells you everything you need to know about his "concern." Also his own cognitive decline.
October 9, 20241 yr 15 minutes ago, Conqueeftador said: You can play dumb, but there were obvious TV personalities/reporters all over that montage. It was an obviously false narrative, pushed by politicians, parroted by media, swallowed by the believers. Projection. It's you who swallow anything parroted by media. Unless it's that librul media. Then it's propaganda. I and most of us here are capable of distinguishing opinion from fact and assessing the credibility of the opinion. And, there was very extensive discussion here, among the CR "cabal," of Biden's acuity and competence long before the disastrous debate. We all knew it was a potential problem. Now, you do Trump. Does anything about his mental acuity raise questions in your learned eyes? Edited October 9, 20241 yr by TwiceHorn
October 9, 20241 yr 5 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said: Projection. It's you who swallow anything parroted by media. The Russian State. Unless it's that librul media. Then it's propaganda. FIFY
October 9, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, Foosters said: FIFY Excellent point. If we're going to start labeling things as propaganda, might as well bring Tucker, Tenet and RT into the conversation.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.