April 6, 20214 yr Defense is getting destroyed. Not that it wasn’t a difficult case but Jesus - paint this as a systemic issue on how cops are trained etc. Instead their guy is out on an island getting lit the fuck up. Yeah. It was a hard case to begin with, but having his captain, the police chief, and other cops all come out and say what he did was wrong... woo boy. The PD is throwing him to the wolves. If every case went like this, we’d see a lot more convictions, and we’d eventually start to see real change
April 6, 20214 yr 3 minutes ago, SquishMitten said: Yeah. It was a hard case to begin with, but having his captain, the police chief, and other cops all come out and say what he did was wrong... woo boy. The PD is throwing him to the wolves. If every case went like this, we’d see a lot more convictions, and we’d eventually start to see real change The sad thing is that the PD is probably not trying to do the right thing here, they're just trying to survive, which happens to coincide with the right thing. Baby steps, I guess.
April 6, 20214 yr 47 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said: The sad thing is that the PD is probably not trying to do the right thing here, they're just trying to survive, which happens to coincide with the right thing. Baby steps, I guess. Completely agree. The chief did seem pretty sincere, but we've seen plenty of higher-ups around the country say the right things. That doesn't mean they actually believe them or try to implement them. The Floyd case being the second high-profile event under his watch seems to suggest he isn't as sincere about them as he claimed in his testimony yesterday, but I don't know enough about he guy to disparage him directly. ETA: Even if they're doing it for the wrong reasons, if every other PD followed in this path change would inevitably follow. Once cops know their bosses will line up to throw them under the bus, they'll think a lot harder about their actions. Edited April 6, 20214 yr by SquishMitten
April 6, 20214 yr 10 minutes ago, SquishMitten said: ETA: Even if they're doing it for the wrong reasons, if every other PD followed in this path change would inevitably follow. Once cops know their bosses will line up to throw them under the bus, they'll think a lot harder about their actions. A lot of this. If "self-preservation" is the motive that will get PDs to straighten up and fly right (or at least improve materially in that respect), then I'll take it. But we need to consistently send that message -- hey cop, do something that will hurt the PD as a whole, the PD will cut you loose.
April 6, 20214 yr Author 13 minutes ago, SquishMitten said: Completely agree. The chief did seem pretty sincere, but we've seen plenty of higher-ups around the country say the right things. That doesn't mean they actually believe them or try to implement them. The Floyd case being the second high-profile event under his watch seems to suggest he isn't as sincere about them as he claimed in his testimony yesterday, but I don't know enough about he guy to disparage him directly. ETA: Even if they're doing it for the wrong reasons, if every other PD followed in this path change would inevitably follow. Once cops know their bosses will line up to throw them under the bus, they'll think a lot harder about their actions. I think he's sincere. And for what it's worth, the Noor case was not under his watch. The chief at the time was removed immediately following the murder of Justine Damond and Arradando was promoted. He dealt with the aftermath of it, but was not chief when it happened.
April 6, 20214 yr Any amount of force is reasonable so long as the officer deems it reasonable at the time. Therefore there is no limit to the use of force available to the officer.
April 6, 20214 yr Any amount of force is reasonable so long as the officer deems it reasonable at the time. Therefore there is no limit to the use of force available to the officer. In other words, whatever it takes.
April 6, 20214 yr 1 minute ago, Bevo Num1 said: 5 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said: Any amount of force is reasonable so long as the officer deems it reasonable at the time. Therefore there is no limit to the use of force available to the officer. In other words, whatever it takes. And then some. And you can go as far as you want, even committing what a reasonable person would consider to be murder, and it’s all okay.
April 6, 20214 yr Author 11 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said: And then some. And you can go as far as you want, even committing what a reasonable person would consider to be murder, and it’s all okay. I don't fault you one bit for the cynical interpretation. But just to be clear, that's not an accurate summation of Graham V. Conner decision. Quite the opposite, really. Edited April 6, 20214 yr by TexasHooch
April 6, 20214 yr 48 minutes ago, Bevo Num1 said: Lol that prosecutor's last question was a doozy. What was the question?
April 6, 20214 yr It was an interrogative statement used to test knowledge. But that's not important right now.
April 6, 20214 yr 10 minutes ago, Hanrahan said: I still think he walks. See Texags. It just takes one juror who thinks anything like that, and it's a mistrial.
April 6, 20214 yr 3 hours ago, SquishMitten said: Completely agree. The chief did seem pretty sincere, but we've seen plenty of higher-ups around the country say the right things. That doesn't mean they actually believe them or try to implement them. The Floyd case being the second high-profile event under his watch seems to suggest he isn't as sincere about them as he claimed in his testimony yesterday, but I don't know enough about he guy to disparage him directly. ETA: Even if they're doing it for the wrong reasons, if every other PD followed in this path change would inevitably follow. Once cops know their bosses will line up to throw them under the bus, they'll think a lot harder about their actions. Fire their bosses and accountability will change... The leaders need to be thinking the way you're describing too.
April 6, 20214 yr 16 minutes ago, Brisketexan said: See Texags. It just takes one juror who thinks anything like that, and it's a mistrial. But if that juror's name leaks out, and I bet it would, they are toast in the eyes of the public. You may get a juror who secretly backs the thin blue line no matter what, but are they willing to put the spotlight on themselves?
April 6, 20214 yr 30 minutes ago, Hanrahan said: I still think he walks. He will, and his life will be shorter than if he was convicted and sent to prison.
April 6, 20214 yr He will, and his life will be shorter than if he was convicted and sent to prison. I doubt it. He’s not gonna kill himself and he’s probably not gonna be banned from being a cop again if he walks.
April 6, 20214 yr 1 hour ago, conVINCEd said: He will, and his life will be shorter than if he was convicted and sent to prison. lol, george fucking zimmerman still hasn't been capped and you think this dude will face consequences if he's acquitted?
April 6, 20214 yr 7 minutes ago, El Tri said: lol, george fucking zimmerman still hasn't been capped and you think this dude will face consequences if he's acquitted? lmao Chauvin had a fucking armed phalanx of riot gear cops protecting his murdering ass while the city dragged its feet on charging him. https://www.instagram.com/p/CAu844rni4H/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link The police are a separate and unequal class of citizen in the USA. They are a gang wearing badges with the justice system on their side.
April 6, 20214 yr 18 minutes ago, El Tri said: lol, george fucking zimmerman still hasn't been capped and you think this dude will face consequences if he's acquitted? It became really obvious during the GZ trial that most of the media narrative was false. This case is going to continue to be shades of grey regardless of the outcome.
April 6, 20214 yr On 4/4/2021 at 5:13 AM, Captainant said: Take away, or significantly limit sovereign immunity for a start. The legal precedent for what a cop has to merely claim to be justified in ending a life is ridiculously generous. To the point where there's an entire cottage industry of "warrior cop" trainings on how to get away with it I mean I almost agree, except take I'd like sovereign immunity away.
April 6, 20214 yr 2 hours ago, atomheartbevo said: But if that juror's name leaks out, and I bet it would, they are toast in the eyes of the public. Whatever, they'd be the new hero on Fox News. SuperPatriot!
April 7, 20214 yr 5 hours ago, El Tri said: lol, george fucking zimmerman still hasn't been capped and you think this dude will face consequences if he's acquitted? I think we occupy a different world than when Zimmerman was acquitted.
April 7, 20214 yr I think we occupy a different world than when Zimmerman was acquitted.You’re right.But not for the reason you think.It’s worse.
April 7, 20214 yr 3 minutes ago, Brisketexan said: You’re right. But not for the reason you think. It’s worse. I think it’s pretty fucking bad. I stand by my original statement that somebody will take a crack at this guy if he walks, and I doubt he can afford the security needed to prevent it on anything more than a short term basis. If by worse you are talking about the fallout of that, I agree with you.
April 7, 20214 yr I view a conviction of manslaughter as walking in this case. He committed 1st degree murder on camera.
April 7, 20214 yr Watched some of the testimony yesterday. It was not a good day for the state. At all.
April 7, 20214 yr I haven't watched much of the trial but it seems like the defense is attempting to use the crowd's response as one reason why Chauvin had to put his knee on Floyd's neck. One, even in the abstract that doesn't make much sense to me: the crowd is unruly, so I need to restrain my arrestee even more? An unruly crowd should only give the police more incentive to get Floyd out of there sooner, not kneel on his neck for 10 minutes. Two, if the crowd was unruly (not even a given here), it's BECAUSE Chauvin had his knee on Floyd which looked to everyone that Chauvin was killing Floyd. If I was in that crowd, I hope I would have been yelling at the cops to save Floyd from death. Nonsensical argument from the defense.
April 7, 20214 yr 17 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said: I haven't watched much of the trial but it seems like the defense is attempting to use the crowd's response as one reason why Chauvin had to put his knee on Floyd's neck. One, even in the abstract that doesn't make much sense to me: the crowd is unruly, so I need to restrain my arrestee even more? An unruly crowd should only give the police more incentive to get Floyd out of there sooner, not kneel on his neck for 10 minutes. Two, if the crowd was unruly (not even a given here), it's BECAUSE Chauvin had his knee on Floyd which looked to everyone that Chauvin was killing Floyd. If I was in that crowd, I hope I would have been yelling at the cops to save Floyd from death. Nonsensical argument from the defense. Well, it may be nonsense. But yesterday, two of the state's witnesses each testified the crowd being unruly and threatening would be a reason to keep the knee on his neck. (Along with Floyd telling them he had Covid). They also showed pictures timestamped from vest cams minutes a part where the knee was not even on his neck, but on his shoulder blades. I am telling you, yesterday was not a good day for the prosecution.
April 7, 20214 yr 4 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said: Well, it may be nonsense. But yesterday, two of the state's witnesses each testified the crowd being unruly and threatening would be a reason to keep the knee on his neck. (Along with Floyd telling them he had Covid). They also showed pictures timestamped from vest cams minutes a part where the knee was not even on his neck, but on his shoulder blades. I am telling you, yesterday was not a good day for the prosecution. We get it, if you were a juror in this case you'd latch onto any possible reason to excuse the murder.
April 7, 20214 yr 2 minutes ago, Captainant said: We get it, if you were a juror in this case you'd latch onto any possible reason to excuse the murder. Fuck off, nerd.
April 7, 20214 yr So the defense's new posture is "Crowd became unsavory and loud because they are human beings?" Bold strategy, Cotton. A half dozen people got weirded out watching a 10-minute murder play out in real time. Humans are funny that way. I, for one, think they were remarkably restrained. There was only person who seemed to be operating outside of the normal bounds of the human condition. This may also be a good time to discuss how the neck and upper back is part of your respiratory system.
April 7, 20214 yr 2 minutes ago, Lobo said: So the defense's new posture is "Crowd became unsavory and loud because they are human beings?" Bold strategy, Cotton. A half dozen people got weirded out watching a 10-minute murder play out in real time. Humans are funny that way. I, for one, think they were remarkably restrained. There was only person who seemed to be operating outside of the normal bounds of the human condition. This may also be a good time to discuss how the neck and upper back is part of your respiratory system. The state’s witnesses were agreeing with that theory. One is going to be called back as a defense witness.
April 7, 20214 yr Ultimately this case comes down to whether he would have died but for the cop’s action, which will be decided by experts. That in of itself could create reasonable doubt. Medical examiner says homicide. The medical examiner also said there were zero signs of asphyxiation and that Floyd had a fatal level of fentanyl in his system, had methamphetamine in his system, had lungs that were 2-3x the normal weight, had a heart condition, and had COVID. The Medical Examiner also said that had he found the body as it was and did not have the outside knowledge of the police encounter, then he would have ruled it a fentanyl overdose.
April 7, 20214 yr 1 hour ago, Johnny Sack said: Ultimately this case comes down to whether he would have died but for the cop’s action, which will be decided by experts. That in of itself could create reasonable doubt. Medical examiner says homicide. The medical examiner also said there were zero signs of asphyxiation and that Floyd had a fatal level of fentanyl in his system, had methamphetamine in his system, had lungs that were 2-3x the normal weight, had a heart condition, and had COVID. The Medical Examiner also said that had he found the body as it was and did not have the outside knowledge of the police encounter, then he would have ruled it a fentanyl overdose. the defense is saying that Floyd was going to die at that same time or even before, if the cop didn't put a knee on his neck?
April 7, 20214 yr 9 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said: the defense is saying that Floyd was going to die at that same time or even before, if the cop didn't put a knee on his neck? They are trying to say there is reasonable doubt in causation. Defense's experts are going to say Chauvin did not cause his death based on the factors I stated in post 438. Then they will ask the ME if reasonable minds could differ on cause of death.
April 7, 20214 yr 2 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said: They are trying to say there is reasonable doubt in causation. Defense's experts are going to say Chauvin did not cause his death based on the factors I stated in post 438. Then they will ask the ME if reasonable minds could differ on cause of death. thats when he stands up and shouts "reasonable! reasonable! do you see anyone being reasonable up in this bitch!"
April 7, 20214 yr State Witness James Reyerson, Lead Investigator being questioned about video clip: "Did you hear that?" "Yes I did." "Did it appear that Mr. Floyd said 'I ate too many drugs?'" "Yes it did"
April 7, 20214 yr The guy who was dying of a fentaynl overdose needed to be choked in to a submission because of an unruly crowd? If only George Floyd had been wearing a short skirt. Then he would have been asking for it too. Edited April 7, 20214 yr by kevwun
April 7, 20214 yr 30 minutes ago, kevwun said: The guy who was dying of a fentaynl overdose needed to be choked in to a submission because of an unruly crowd? If only George Floyd had been wearing a short skirt. Then he would have been asking for it too. Was it known that he was dying from an overdose?
April 7, 20214 yr Ultimately this case comes down to whether he would have died but for the cop’s action, which will be decided by experts. That in of itself could create reasonable doubt. Medical examiner says homicide. The medical examiner also said there were zero signs of asphyxiation and that Floyd had a fatal level of fentanyl in his system, had methamphetamine in his system, had lungs that were 2-3x the normal weight, had a heart condition, and had COVID. The Medical Examiner also said that had he found the body as it was and did not have the outside knowledge of the police encounter, then he would have ruled it a fentanyl overdose.How many autopsies did they do? The original one said it was a heart attack.
April 7, 20214 yr 3 minutes ago, workswithseed said: Was it known that he was dying from an overdose? No, it's a desperate defense excuse, but it doesn't matter even if it were true. If Chauvin shortened Floyd's life by 1 minute, he's still guilty of murder.
April 7, 20214 yr 15 minutes ago, kevwun said: No, it's a desperate defense excuse, but it doesn't matter even if it were true. If Chauvin shortened Floyd's life by 1 minute, he's still guilty of murder. That makes sense. This is a representation of what happened. It could be that it wasn't the fentanyl at all, but we'll see more from the prosecution.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.