Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Surly Horns

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

Right, HF long term holds would be 12 months. PE 3-5 years so def for them no big deal. And VC is longer than that.

Anyhow, she’s going to get whatever she wants (within reason) and vote yes

  • Replies 844
  • Views 68.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Kyrsten: I'm a lesbian. Everyone: Fine. That's fine.  Kyrsten: I'm not a lesbian anymore.  Everyone: Okay.  Kyrsten: I'm bi. Everyone: That's fine.  Kyrsten at someone el

  • Pato del Muerto
    Pato del Muerto

  • Oh please, I've seen what you straight men on Surly respond to with "would" - it is shameful.  You'd accept her blowjob without a second thought.  A 48 year old bisexual woman who keeps hers

Posted Images

I can't wait until she gets primaried (is that not a word?).  That's 2024 right?

We have a deal?!

 

GOP helped fast track a 43 year old Dem election lawyer/former Sinema staffer to a lifetime appointment on the 9th circuit to get her to scuttle the deal. 

Mitch got played again?

Just now, Biff Tannen said:

I will not believe anything until the votes are cast.

This. The ability for Medicare to negotiate drug prices is a game changer. They’ve been trying to do that for 60 years. Pharma must be shitting bricks. 

As long as the Parliamentarian doesn’t blow it up, the 2 headaches are on board 

Don’t like having to throw out the carried interest provision, but worth it to get the package through. Not spiking the football until it’s across the goal line

GOP helped fast track a 43 year old Dem election lawyer/former Sinema staffer to a lifetime appointment on the 9th circuit to get her to scuttle the deal. 
Mitch got played again?

Link? Sounds like a good story
6 minutes ago, gmr548 said:

Don’t line having to throw out the carried interest provision, but worth it to get the package through. Not spiking the football until it’s across the goal line


Link? Sounds like a good story

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2022/08/04/senate-confirms-arizona-lawyer-roopali-desai-appeals-court-judge/10236105002/

50 days to be confirmed, fastest since the 90s. The GOP didn’t play games with it because they thought they could get on Sinema’s good side if they fast tracked her former staffer and get her to kill reconciliation 

25 minutes ago, gmr548 said:

Don’t like having to throw out the carried interest provision, but worth it to get the package through. Not spiking the football until it’s across the goal line


Link? Sounds like a good story

Apparently the text has or will have a 1% tax on stock buybacks. Generates $59 billion more than the carried interest provision. The Politico article says the new text with Sinema’s changes may increase the overall savings per year 

2 minutes ago, Js1 said:

Apparently the text has or will have a 1% tax on stock buybacks. Generates $59 billion more than the carried interest provision. The Politico article says the new text with Sinema’s changes may increase the overall savings per year 

Oh shit, I'll take that deal all fucking day long. 

11 minutes ago, Js1 said:

Apparently the text has or will have a 1% tax on stock buybacks. Generates $59 billion more than the carried interest provision. The Politico article says the new text with Sinema’s changes may increase the overall savings per year 

I’m fucking shocked.  They actually ended up with something better after negotiating with this dingbat?

Just now, ChiTownDoc said:

I’m fucking shocked.  They actually ended up with something better after negotiating with this dingbat?

I agree that she's a dingbat, but something about her tells me that she's a wildcat in the sack.  

Peel off those goofy outfits she wears and she'll show you a good time. 

27 minutes ago, Js1 said:

Apparently the text has or will have a 1% tax on stock buybacks. Generates $59 billion more than the carried interest provision. The Politico article says the new text with Sinema’s changes may increase the overall savings per year 

Wow. Can't wait for this to fall apart at the 11th hour then, because we can't have nice things.

3 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

Good god, how brazen can they be?

Democrats should campaign on that shit. Big pharma is up there in terms of most universally loathed "big X" groups in this country. Pissing them off so much tells everyone you did something right.

Edited by gmr548

1 hour ago, gmr548 said:

Don’t like having to throw out the carried interest provision, but worth it to get the package through. Not spiking the football until it’s across the goal line

Provision? Funny, I always hear it referred to as the carried interest tax loophole. 

1 hour ago, Gil Bang said:

I agree that she's a dingbat, but something about her tells me that she's a wildcat in the sack.  

Peel off those goofy outfits she wears and she'll show you a good time. 

Deon Cole Look GIF by ABC Network

2 hours ago, gmr548 said:

Democrats should campaign on that shit. Big pharma is up there in terms of most universally loathed "big X" groups in this country. Pissing them off so much tells everyone you did something right.

Would also frazzle the brains of Q-tards and COVID-vaccine deniers at the same time

9 hours ago, gmr548 said:

Saying they won’t be able to develop drugs is fucking laughable. They don’t develop shit in the first place. Universities discover new shit and Big Pharma buys it. That article is one big hissy fit over finally not being able to fuck over the American People with absurdly high drug prices. 

Provision? Funny, I always hear it referred to as the carried interest tax loophole. 

Provision for narrowing (wasn’t going to be fully closed) the loophole, to be clear.
10 hours ago, Gil Bang said:

I agree that she's a dingbat, but something about her tells me that she's a wildcat in the sack.  

Peel off those goofy outfits she wears and she'll show you a good time. 

supergirl-shes-gay.gif

1 hour ago, Kyrie Eleison said:

supergirl-shes-gay.gif

Ahem, bi.  But it doesn't matter.  She's a shitty human.

14 hours ago, gmr548 said:

Democrats should campaign on that shit. Big pharma is up there in terms of most universally loathed "big X" groups in this country. Pissing them off so much tells everyone you did something right.

The right will now be pro-Pharma, like they're pro-Russia, and probably pro-China now since Pelosi pissed them off. They have no actual thoughts or convictions, just hate.

12 minutes ago, 'stache said:

The right will now be pro-Pharma, like they're pro-Russia, and probably pro-China now since Pelosi pissed them off. They have no actual thoughts or convictions, just hate.

that and "against anything democrats support." that's their entire platform

6 hours ago, Neonmoon said:

Saying they won’t be able to develop drugs is fucking laughable. They don’t develop shit in the first place. Universities discover new shit and Big Pharma buys it. That article is one big hissy fit over finally not being able to fuck over the American People with absurdly high drug prices. 

For the life of me, I don’t understand why we haven’t been up in arms about this. It’s ridiculous that our own government can’t advocate on behalf of its citizens.

6 hours ago, Kyrie Eleison said:

supergirl-shes-gay.gif


move had two ‘lesbian’ gf’s in my life, both were fresh off divorces fro their ex wives. Wild in the sack is an understatement 

7 hours ago, Neonmoon said:

Saying they won’t be able to develop drugs is fucking laughable. They don’t develop shit in the first place. Universities discover new shit and Big Pharma buys it. That article is one big hissy fit over finally not being able to fuck over the American People with absurdly high drug prices. 

Pharma companies have shifted their r&d spending to acquisitions because the hit rate on internal r&d was so low. 

Regardless, that guy sucks.  And I don't see too many cures for cancer or alzheimers.....only treatments.  As the man said, more money being made treating a disease than curing it

12 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:


move had two ‘lesbian’ gf’s in my life, both were fresh off divorces fro their ex wives. Wild in the sack is an understatement 

current gf and probable future wife was married to a woman for about 5 years. wild in the sack in definitely an understatement

5 hours ago, babysdaddy said:

Pharma companies have shifted their r&d spending to acquisitions because the hit rate on internal r&d was so low. 

Regardless, that guy sucks.  And I don't see too many cures for cancer or alzheimers.....only treatments.  As the man said, more money being made treating a disease than curing it

Well then they shouldn’t use R&D spending as reason to charge so much for the drugs that make it to market. 
 

it’s obviously way more cost efficient to buy IP that has already had some level of testing already done. 

6 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:


move had two ‘lesbian’ gf’s in my life, both were fresh off divorces fro their ex wives. Wild in the sack is an understatement 

dude....

5 hours ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

current gf and probable future wife was married to a woman for about 5 years. wild in the sack in definitely an understatement

dude...

1 hour ago, Hagbard Celine said:

dude....

dude...

RULES!?!?!

1 hour ago, Bama Chick said:

sigh

30d39a56cbfe46ce3a5097566f458b20.jpg

6 hours ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

current gf and probable future wife was married to a woman for about 5 years. wild in the sack in definitely an understatement

she switch teams completely, or she's a switch hitter? 

She's going to end up fucking it all up, isn't she? I'm guessing that was her plan all along. Bitch. 
Senate 'vote-a-rama' continues with potential new hiccup for Democrats on sweeping climate and health care bill
https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/07/politics/senate-democrats-climate-health-care-bill-vote/index.html

That does not appear to be the case: https://www.politico.com/news/2022/08/07/democrats-senate-reconciliation-votearama-00050222

But still, it’s so on brand for Democrats to try to thwart their own plan after holding the line on GOP efforts to dismantle it.
1 hour ago, Mo Horn said:

She's going to end up fucking it all up, isn't she? I'm guessing that was her plan all along. Bitch. 

Senate 'vote-a-rama' continues with potential new hiccup for Democrats on sweeping climate and health care bill

https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/07/politics/senate-democrats-climate-health-care-bill-vote/index.html

She voted for it and it passed the Senate. Now it’s on to the House. She can only fuck it up now if the House makes changes she doesn’t like and sends it back to the Senate. Nothing is certain until Joe signs it but for now the Manchin and Sinema hurdles have been cleared. 

3 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

She voted for it and it passed the Senate. Now it’s on to the House. She can only fuck it up now if the House makes changes she doesn’t like and sends it back to the Senate. Nothing is certain until Joe signs it but for now the Manchin and Sinema hurdles have been cleared. 

They’ll probably push for the HoR to pass it with no changes. Too important not to pass

10 minutes ago, Js1 said:

They’ll probably push for the HoR to pass it with no changes. Too important not to pass

Yeah, they damn well better. I trust Nancy to keep everyone in line. 

Could the Indiana Republican car crash come into play here?  1 less no vote.

2 minutes ago, Voldemort86 said:

Could the Indiana Republican car crash come into play here?  1 less no vote.

If Bernie AND Manchin voted for it, the Squad and the conservaDems in the House can 

17 hours ago, Voldemort86 said:

Could the Indiana Republican car crash come into play here?  1 less no vote.

Also the House is only at 430 right now so 216 needed to pass (simple majority). Dems have some wiggle if 4 members want to vote no, but the SALT caucus has said they are a yes and the Progressive caucus said they’ll pass it 

Edited by Js1
Coffee

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.