February 6Feb 6 26 minutes ago, closetohumping said: There's a very popular video of a man punching a kangaroo. Kangaroo didn't do shit This one? It had his dog! The punch was absolutely justified. Kangaroos appear to be assholes. Edited February 6Feb 6 by nnm
February 6Feb 6 One of my favorite golf pods, Chasing Scratch, has a question. If you put a great white shark and a polar bear in an olympic size swimming pool, who get's out alive. Some qualifications include the bear can't get out of the pool and jump on the shark and an argument over how deep the pool is.. I saw the pool is 9 meters deep. I'm team shark...
February 6Feb 6 12 minutes ago, nnm said: This one? It had his dog! The punch was absolutely justified. Kangaroos appear to be assholes. Other kangaroos seeing the video: "I'd like to see him try that shit with me."
February 6Feb 6 38 minutes ago, Litig8r said: One of my favorite golf pods, Chasing Scratch, has a question. If you put a great white shark and a polar bear in an olympic size swimming pool, who get's out alive. Some qualifications include the bear can't get out of the pool and jump on the shark and an argument over how deep the pool is.. I saw the pool is 9 meters deep. I'm team shark... Chat GPT says no contest. The shark has a massive advantage: Spoiler In an Olympic-size swimming pool (50 meters long, 25 meters wide, and 9 meters deep), the great white shark has a massive advantage over the polar bear, leading to an almost certain victory for the shark. Analysis of the Situation Mobility & Environment The great white shark (Carcharodon carcharias) is a purely aquatic predator, built for fast and powerful swimming. In a deep pool, it can maneuver easily and strike at will. The polar bear (Ursus maritimus) is an excellent swimmer, but it is not adapted for long-term survival in deep water with no land. Without a resting platform, exhaustion will set in. Attack Capabilities The great white shark can launch high-speed ambush attacks from below, delivering devastating bites with serrated teeth designed to rip through flesh and bone. The polar bear has powerful forelimbs and claws, but in deep water, it lacks a solid footing to deliver effective blows. Stamina & Survival The shark can swim indefinitely in the pool. The polar bear, despite its excellent swimming ability, would become exhausted over time. It normally swims between ice floes and needs to rest periodically. Outcome The shark will dominate the encounter. It can circle the bear, wait for exhaustion, and then attack from below. One or two well-placed bites could cause fatal injuries. The bear has no way to escape and will eventually drown or succumb to attacks. Final Verdict: The great white shark gets out alive. The polar bear does not. In contrast, Grok concludes that in this highly hypothetical and unnatural confrontation, the polar bear might have a slight edge due to its resilience and ability to withstand initial damage, but both animals could end up severely compromised or dead: Spoiler If you put a great white shark and a polar bear in an olympic size swimming pool, who gets out alive? Some qualifications include the bear can't get out of the pool and jump on the shark and the pool is 9 meters deep. In a scenario where a great white shark and a polar bear are confined to an Olympic-sized swimming pool with a depth of 9 meters and the bear cannot escape the pool: Great White Shark: Known for its speed, agility, and powerful bite, the shark has a significant advantage in water. Its primary hunting method involves rapid, surprise attacks from below, using its speed to close the distance quickly. However, its maneuverability might be somewhat limited in a confined space like a pool, especially with a large object like a polar bear. Polar Bear: Polar bears are excellent swimmers, capable of swimming vast distances in the Arctic waters. They are also adept hunters with strong, sharp claws and powerful jaws. In deep water, however, the bear might not be as agile as on land or ice, but it could use its paws to fend off or even grab the shark if it gets close enough. The bear's disadvantage is its inability to escape to land or ice where it would have a clear upper hand. Given these dynamics: Initial Advantage: The shark would likely have an initial advantage with its speed and surprise attack capability in the water. However, if the bear manages to grab or injure the shark, the scenario could shift. Endurance and Stamina: Polar bears have significant endurance, but in a prolonged struggle in water, both animals would tire. The shark might tire more quickly outside its natural environment of open water, where it can keep moving to breathe. Outcome: If we consider the scenario where both animals engage in combat: The shark could land several bites, potentially lethal ones if they hit vital areas like the bear's underbelly or limbs. However, the bear's thick fur, blubber, and tough skin might protect it from immediately fatal injuries. The bear, if it manages to get a hold of the shark, could potentially use its strength to crush or severely injure the shark, perhaps even biting through to vital organs if it gets a good grip. If neither can escape or kill the other quickly, the encounter might end with both animals severely injured or exhausted. Who Gets Out Alive? Given these considerations: Most Likely Scenario: If one must survive, it's more probable that the polar bear would come out alive due to its resilience, especially if it can withstand initial attacks long enough to counterattack effectively. However, this is highly speculative, as both animals could potentially kill each other in such an unnatural setting. Least Likely Scenario: If the shark manages to inflict critical damage early on, it might survive, but this would depend heavily on the bear not managing to retaliate effectively. In summary, in this highly hypothetical and unnatural confrontation, the polar bear might have a slight edge due to its resilience and ability to withstand initial damage, but both animals could end up severely compromised or dead.
February 7Feb 7 17 hours ago, Litig8r said: One of my favorite golf pods, Chasing Scratch, has a question. If you put a great white shark and a polar bear in an olympic size swimming pool, who get's out alive. Some qualifications include the bear can't get out of the pool and jump on the shark and an argument over how deep the pool is.. I saw the pool is 9 meters deep. I'm team shark... 17 hours ago, nnm said: Chat GPT says no contest. The shark has a massive advantage: Reveal hidden contents In an Olympic-size swimming pool (50 meters long, 25 meters wide, and 9 meters deep), the great white shark has a massive advantage over the polar bear, leading to an almost certain victory for the shark. Analysis of the Situation Mobility & Environment The great white shark (Carcharodon carcharias) is a purely aquatic predator, built for fast and powerful swimming. In a deep pool, it can maneuver easily and strike at will. The polar bear (Ursus maritimus) is an excellent swimmer, but it is not adapted for long-term survival in deep water with no land. Without a resting platform, exhaustion will set in. Attack Capabilities The great white shark can launch high-speed ambush attacks from below, delivering devastating bites with serrated teeth designed to rip through flesh and bone. The polar bear has powerful forelimbs and claws, but in deep water, it lacks a solid footing to deliver effective blows. Stamina & Survival The shark can swim indefinitely in the pool. The polar bear, despite its excellent swimming ability, would become exhausted over time. It normally swims between ice floes and needs to rest periodically. Outcome The shark will dominate the encounter. It can circle the bear, wait for exhaustion, and then attack from below. One or two well-placed bites could cause fatal injuries. The bear has no way to escape and will eventually drown or succumb to attacks. Final Verdict: The great white shark gets out alive. The polar bear does not. In contrast, Grok concludes that in this highly hypothetical and unnatural confrontation, the polar bear might have a slight edge due to its resilience and ability to withstand initial damage, but both animals could end up severely compromised or dead: Reveal hidden contents If you put a great white shark and a polar bear in an olympic size swimming pool, who gets out alive? Some qualifications include the bear can't get out of the pool and jump on the shark and the pool is 9 meters deep. In a scenario where a great white shark and a polar bear are confined to an Olympic-sized swimming pool with a depth of 9 meters and the bear cannot escape the pool: Great White Shark: Known for its speed, agility, and powerful bite, the shark has a significant advantage in water. Its primary hunting method involves rapid, surprise attacks from below, using its speed to close the distance quickly. However, its maneuverability might be somewhat limited in a confined space like a pool, especially with a large object like a polar bear. Polar Bear: Polar bears are excellent swimmers, capable of swimming vast distances in the Arctic waters. They are also adept hunters with strong, sharp claws and powerful jaws. In deep water, however, the bear might not be as agile as on land or ice, but it could use its paws to fend off or even grab the shark if it gets close enough. The bear's disadvantage is its inability to escape to land or ice where it would have a clear upper hand. Given these dynamics: Initial Advantage: The shark would likely have an initial advantage with its speed and surprise attack capability in the water. However, if the bear manages to grab or injure the shark, the scenario could shift. Endurance and Stamina: Polar bears have significant endurance, but in a prolonged struggle in water, both animals would tire. The shark might tire more quickly outside its natural environment of open water, where it can keep moving to breathe. Outcome: If we consider the scenario where both animals engage in combat: The shark could land several bites, potentially lethal ones if they hit vital areas like the bear's underbelly or limbs. However, the bear's thick fur, blubber, and tough skin might protect it from immediately fatal injuries. The bear, if it manages to get a hold of the shark, could potentially use its strength to crush or severely injure the shark, perhaps even biting through to vital organs if it gets a good grip. If neither can escape or kill the other quickly, the encounter might end with both animals severely injured or exhausted. Who Gets Out Alive? Given these considerations: Most Likely Scenario: If one must survive, it's more probable that the polar bear would come out alive due to its resilience, especially if it can withstand initial attacks long enough to counterattack effectively. However, this is highly speculative, as both animals could potentially kill each other in such an unnatural setting. Least Likely Scenario: If the shark manages to inflict critical damage early on, it might survive, but this would depend heavily on the bear not managing to retaliate effectively. In summary, in this highly hypothetical and unnatural confrontation, the polar bear might have a slight edge due to its resilience and ability to withstand initial damage, but both animals could end up severely compromised or dead. The great white hands down. Not only is it substantially larger than the bear, it's fighting on home turf. No contest.
February 7Feb 7 I suspect the bear swims around and the shark swims around and nothing happens. Eventually the bear will drown because he's unable to get out of the pool. At some point the shark will eat the rotting bear because there are no other food sources in the swimming pool, then slowing die of starvation.
February 7Feb 7 IIRC, no GWS has survived captivity so a “pool” setting could fuck up its bearings. If bear has no escape path(land), it’ll eventually tire and become prey as mentioned above.
February 7Feb 7 Walruses have been reported to have killed polar bears. If those fat sacks of shit with ivory face swords can take em out, all my money goes on the great white.
February 7Feb 7 Popular Post 18 hours ago, Litig8r said: One of my favorite golf pods, Chasing Scratch, has a question. If you put a great white shark and a polar bear in an olympic size swimming pool, who get's out alive. Some qualifications include the bear can't get out of the pool and jump on the shark and an argument over how deep the pool is.. I saw the pool is 9 meters deep. I'm team shark... Question. Is there water in the pool. If no, I'm team bear.
February 7Feb 7 18 hours ago, nnm said: Chat GPT says no contest. The shark has a massive advantage: Reveal hidden contents In an Olympic-size swimming pool (50 meters long, 25 meters wide, and 9 meters deep), the great white shark has a massive advantage over the polar bear, leading to an almost certain victory for the shark. Analysis of the Situation Mobility & Environment The great white shark (Carcharodon carcharias) is a purely aquatic predator, built for fast and powerful swimming. In a deep pool, it can maneuver easily and strike at will. The polar bear (Ursus maritimus) is an excellent swimmer, but it is not adapted for long-term survival in deep water with no land. Without a resting platform, exhaustion will set in. Attack Capabilities The great white shark can launch high-speed ambush attacks from below, delivering devastating bites with serrated teeth designed to rip through flesh and bone. The polar bear has powerful forelimbs and claws, but in deep water, it lacks a solid footing to deliver effective blows. Stamina & Survival The shark can swim indefinitely in the pool. The polar bear, despite its excellent swimming ability, would become exhausted over time. It normally swims between ice floes and needs to rest periodically. Outcome The shark will dominate the encounter. It can circle the bear, wait for exhaustion, and then attack from below. One or two well-placed bites could cause fatal injuries. The bear has no way to escape and will eventually drown or succumb to attacks. Final Verdict: The great white shark gets out alive. The polar bear does not. In contrast, Grok concludes that in this highly hypothetical and unnatural confrontation, the polar bear might have a slight edge due to its resilience and ability to withstand initial damage, but both animals could end up severely compromised or dead: Reveal hidden contents If you put a great white shark and a polar bear in an olympic size swimming pool, who gets out alive? Some qualifications include the bear can't get out of the pool and jump on the shark and the pool is 9 meters deep. In a scenario where a great white shark and a polar bear are confined to an Olympic-sized swimming pool with a depth of 9 meters and the bear cannot escape the pool: Great White Shark: Known for its speed, agility, and powerful bite, the shark has a significant advantage in water. Its primary hunting method involves rapid, surprise attacks from below, using its speed to close the distance quickly. However, its maneuverability might be somewhat limited in a confined space like a pool, especially with a large object like a polar bear. Polar Bear: Polar bears are excellent swimmers, capable of swimming vast distances in the Arctic waters. They are also adept hunters with strong, sharp claws and powerful jaws. In deep water, however, the bear might not be as agile as on land or ice, but it could use its paws to fend off or even grab the shark if it gets close enough. The bear's disadvantage is its inability to escape to land or ice where it would have a clear upper hand. Given these dynamics: Initial Advantage: The shark would likely have an initial advantage with its speed and surprise attack capability in the water. However, if the bear manages to grab or injure the shark, the scenario could shift. Endurance and Stamina: Polar bears have significant endurance, but in a prolonged struggle in water, both animals would tire. The shark might tire more quickly outside its natural environment of open water, where it can keep moving to breathe. Outcome: If we consider the scenario where both animals engage in combat: The shark could land several bites, potentially lethal ones if they hit vital areas like the bear's underbelly or limbs. However, the bear's thick fur, blubber, and tough skin might protect it from immediately fatal injuries. The bear, if it manages to get a hold of the shark, could potentially use its strength to crush or severely injure the shark, perhaps even biting through to vital organs if it gets a good grip. If neither can escape or kill the other quickly, the encounter might end with both animals severely injured or exhausted. Who Gets Out Alive? Given these considerations: Most Likely Scenario: If one must survive, it's more probable that the polar bear would come out alive due to its resilience, especially if it can withstand initial attacks long enough to counterattack effectively. However, this is highly speculative, as both animals could potentially kill each other in such an unnatural setting. Least Likely Scenario: If the shark manages to inflict critical damage early on, it might survive, but this would depend heavily on the bear not managing to retaliate effectively. In summary, in this highly hypothetical and unnatural confrontation, the polar bear might have a slight edge due to its resilience and ability to withstand initial damage, but both animals could end up severely compromised or dead. this is what AI is really for
February 7Feb 7 2 hours ago, SquishMitten said: Walruses have been reported to have killed polar bears. If those fat sacks of shit with ivory face swords can take em out, all my money goes on the great white.
February 7Feb 7 The bear puts the shark in tonic immobility using its great bear paws. Easy dub for the bear.
February 7Feb 7 On 2/6/2025 at 4:22 PM, Litig8r said: One of my favorite golf pods, Chasing Scratch, has a question. If you put a great white shark and a polar bear in an olympic size swimming pool, who get's out alive. Some qualifications include the bear can't get out of the pool and jump on the shark and an argument over how deep the pool is.. I saw the pool is 9 meters deep. I'm team shark... Golf pod? Did they mean Greg Norman v. Jack Nicklaus? Edited February 7Feb 7 by Bookman
February 8Feb 8 If Pipit couldn’t survive a GWS attack then no doubt a PB couldn’t as well… Edited February 8Feb 8 by Underdog
February 8Feb 8 8 hours ago, Jerry Callo said: I suspect the bear swims around and the shark swims around and nothing happens. Eventually the bear will drown because he's unable to get out of the pool. At some point the shark will eat the rotting bear because there are no other food sources in the swimming pool, then slowing die of starvation. Sounds like marriage to me.
February 8Feb 8 9 hours ago, High Plains Drifter said: What if its one of those super smart sharks from Deep Blue Sea? Then Samuel L Jackson is fucked.
February 10Feb 10 On 2/7/2025 at 4:08 PM, Im_smarter_then_you said: Shark would kill a polar bear. Stop Not sure if username checks out. Will need a pool, shark and polar bear to determine.
February 14Feb 14 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14398219/tourist-hands-bitten-shark-Caribbean-beach-predator.html I don't know the answer to the shark bear question, but apparently the shark wins against a dumb Canadian woman https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14391885/woman-killed-hippo-african-safari-husband-sues-negligence.html and the above couple are clearly not 1310 The Ticket P1s From Day 1 otherwise they would have been privy to the "hippos will kick your ass" discussions (really they will more like stomp your ass, but same outcome....they will also fling shit at you with their tail)
February 15Feb 15 Damn, that shark woman really fucking found out. Quote The 55-year-old had been wading in the shallows as she 'attempted to engage' with the animal and take a picture of it, local authorities said. —— The shark was estimated to be around 6ft in length, the local government said, adding that the species is not yet known. Unconfirmed reports online have suggested it was a bull shark. —— The woman reportedly had one of her hands amputated at the wrist and the other mid-way down her forearm, and is now said to be receiving medical care back in Canada.
February 15Feb 15 Another asshole kangaroo. video in link. https://x.com/amazlngnature/status/1890600852504641606?s=61&t=y24cLAxRGy73J6BPsctsHQ
February 15Feb 15 Do not fuck around with animals. Ever. I’n typing this loaded with psin killers following two hospitalizations and ghree surgeries on my infected right wrist resulting from a bite by a perfectly docile house cat I tried to put flea meds on. Little fucker went Tasmanian Devil on me. Docs say the bacteria in his saliva are badass infectors of sofg human tissue. One of the main ligaments to my thumb was ruptured by the infection, I’ll be infused with antibiotics through a picc line in my arm that hors into my fucking heart. Animals can fuck you up and wreck your life plans. Yes, I realize I was a dumbass. Now I have to do everything left handed. PS/ in the GWS/Polar Bear hypothetical I didn’t see the relative sizes of the participants. Could make a huge difference.
February 16Feb 16 On 2/15/2025 at 9:10 AM, shadow_operative2.0 said: Damn, that shark woman really fucking found out. Now imagine if it was a bear shark
February 16Feb 16 On 2/15/2025 at 1:46 PM, Bama Llama said: Do not fuck around with animals. Ever. I’n typing this loaded with psin killers following two hospitalizations and ghree surgeries on my infected right wrist resulting from a bite by a perfectly docile I was really hoping the next word was Llama…. But for real get well soon.
February 17Feb 17 On 2/15/2025 at 8:46 PM, Bama Llama said: Do not fuck around with animals. Ever. I’n typing this loaded with psin killers following two hospitalizations and ghree surgeries on my infected right wrist resulting from a bite by a perfectly docile house cat I tried to put flea meds on. Little fucker went Tasmanian Devil on me. Docs say the bacteria in his saliva are badass infectors of sofg human tissue. One of the main ligaments to my thumb was ruptured by the infection, I’ll be infused with antibiotics through a picc line in my arm that hors into my fucking heart. Animals can fuck you up and wreck your life plans. If it had killed you, the gravestone would read "here lies [xxx]. he died of embarassment"
February 21Feb 21 On 2/6/2025 at 4:03 PM, nnm said: Chat GPT says no contest. The shark has a massive advantage: Reveal hidden contents In an Olympic-size swimming pool (50 meters long, 25 meters wide, and 9 meters deep), the great white shark has a massive advantage over the polar bear, leading to an almost certain victory for the shark. Analysis of the Situation Mobility & Environment The great white shark (Carcharodon carcharias) is a purely aquatic predator, built for fast and powerful swimming. In a deep pool, it can maneuver easily and strike at will. The polar bear (Ursus maritimus) is an excellent swimmer, but it is not adapted for long-term survival in deep water with no land. Without a resting platform, exhaustion will set in. Attack Capabilities The great white shark can launch high-speed ambush attacks from below, delivering devastating bites with serrated teeth designed to rip through flesh and bone. The polar bear has powerful forelimbs and claws, but in deep water, it lacks a solid footing to deliver effective blows. Stamina & Survival The shark can swim indefinitely in the pool. The polar bear, despite its excellent swimming ability, would become exhausted over time. It normally swims between ice floes and needs to rest periodically. Outcome The shark will dominate the encounter. It can circle the bear, wait for exhaustion, and then attack from below. One or two well-placed bites could cause fatal injuries. The bear has no way to escape and will eventually drown or succumb to attacks. Final Verdict: The great white shark gets out alive. The polar bear does not. In contrast, Grok concludes that in this highly hypothetical and unnatural confrontation, the polar bear might have a slight edge due to its resilience and ability to withstand initial damage, but both animals could end up severely compromised or dead: Reveal hidden contents If you put a great white shark and a polar bear in an olympic size swimming pool, who gets out alive? Some qualifications include the bear can't get out of the pool and jump on the shark and the pool is 9 meters deep. In a scenario where a great white shark and a polar bear are confined to an Olympic-sized swimming pool with a depth of 9 meters and the bear cannot escape the pool: Great White Shark: Known for its speed, agility, and powerful bite, the shark has a significant advantage in water. Its primary hunting method involves rapid, surprise attacks from below, using its speed to close the distance quickly. However, its maneuverability might be somewhat limited in a confined space like a pool, especially with a large object like a polar bear. Polar Bear: Polar bears are excellent swimmers, capable of swimming vast distances in the Arctic waters. They are also adept hunters with strong, sharp claws and powerful jaws. In deep water, however, the bear might not be as agile as on land or ice, but it could use its paws to fend off or even grab the shark if it gets close enough. The bear's disadvantage is its inability to escape to land or ice where it would have a clear upper hand. Given these dynamics: Initial Advantage: The shark would likely have an initial advantage with its speed and surprise attack capability in the water. However, if the bear manages to grab or injure the shark, the scenario could shift. Endurance and Stamina: Polar bears have significant endurance, but in a prolonged struggle in water, both animals would tire. The shark might tire more quickly outside its natural environment of open water, where it can keep moving to breathe. Outcome: If we consider the scenario where both animals engage in combat: The shark could land several bites, potentially lethal ones if they hit vital areas like the bear's underbelly or limbs. However, the bear's thick fur, blubber, and tough skin might protect it from immediately fatal injuries. The bear, if it manages to get a hold of the shark, could potentially use its strength to crush or severely injure the shark, perhaps even biting through to vital organs if it gets a good grip. If neither can escape or kill the other quickly, the encounter might end with both animals severely injured or exhausted. Who Gets Out Alive? Given these considerations: Most Likely Scenario: If one must survive, it's more probable that the polar bear would come out alive due to its resilience, especially if it can withstand initial attacks long enough to counterattack effectively. However, this is highly speculative, as both animals could potentially kill each other in such an unnatural setting. Least Likely Scenario: If the shark manages to inflict critical damage early on, it might survive, but this would depend heavily on the bear not managing to retaliate effectively. In summary, in this highly hypothetical and unnatural confrontation, the polar bear might have a slight edge due to its resilience and ability to withstand initial damage, but both animals could end up severely compromised or dead. the shark would die quickly due to the chlorinated fresh water in the pool. extremely dumb scenario. bear wins 100x/100. next question.
March 25Mar 25 On 1/24/2025 at 9:01 AM, nnm said: See, the problem is that you’re assuming a cage with bars. That doesn’t work, because the snake will just slither away and live to fight another day. The other critters will also stick various limbs in and out of the slats. It’s gotta be a solid glass cage. In that case, the mini-cage, as illustrated above, works perfectly for the snek. He only has to keep hisself out of the other critters’ mouths and strangle each of them one by one. You have aggravated my claustrophobia. Don’t watch a new movie called Locked. Your claustrophobia will go into hyperdrive watching it.
March 25Mar 25 On 1/23/2025 at 12:44 PM, 956 Worldwide said: gorillas are not trained martial artists
April 29Apr 29 https://x.com/sergio_de_ennin/status/1917115551593468039?s=61&t=y24cLAxRGy73J6BPsctsHQ Some pretty good AI sims in there.
April 30Apr 30 Assuming there is no surprise, truly no weapons (can't pick up rocks, etc), I'm going with the gorilla. But in the "real" world, the gorilla would retreat faced with those numbers and humans would claim victory. If its some sort of make believe fight to the death, then gorilla.
April 30Apr 30 #teamgorilla. Well, I’m team man, but I think gorilla wins in a cage match. It doesn’t matter how many guys wrap themselves around his legs, arms, and neck, he can fling them off like mosquitos and break all of their necks, skulls, arms, legs, and whatever hell else he wants to.
April 30Apr 30 Author I think the only way the men win is if they are committed to taking one for the team and literally all pile on top of the gorilla to smother it to death.
April 30Apr 30 53 minutes ago, Prepuce of Doom said: I think the only way the men win is if they are committed to taking one for the team and literally all pile on top of the gorilla to smother it to death. Yeah the key here is how many of those guys can be actually fighting the gorilla at once. If they all dogpile, sure, but the guys at the bottom are dying too.
April 30Apr 30 Like 100 all at once? Or 1 v 1 in succession. Either way I’m prolly going humans. 100 is a lot
April 30Apr 30 20 minutes ago, Texasborn91 said: Like 100 all at once? Or 1 v 1 in succession. Either way I’m prolly going humans. 100 is a lot 100 men at 170 pounds average outweigh even a huge gorilla by like 35 times over. But the terms here are important. If they all have a bushido code mentality then the bum rush and smother technique works. Otherwise you’re drawing straws for who goes after him to hold him down and those people are getting fucked up and I’m not sure enough can physically get hands on him to hold him down.
April 30Apr 30 Who would win between Tyson at his peak or 100 unarmed 12 year olds? The answer to me seems obvious, and I think the gorilla has a bigger advantage than that.
April 30Apr 30 Author 10 minutes ago, SquishMitten said: Who would win between Tyson at his peak or 100 unarmed 12 year olds? The answer to me seems obvious, and I think the gorilla has a bigger advantage than that. Well, like the gorilla, Tyson also knows how to use his teeth... Edited April 30Apr 30 by Prepuce of Doom
April 30Apr 30 29 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said: 100 men at 170 pounds average outweigh even a huge gorilla by like 35 times over. But the terms here are important. If they all have a bushido code mentality then the bum rush and smother technique works. Otherwise you’re drawing straws for who goes after him to hold him down and those people are getting fucked up and I’m not sure enough can physically get hands on him to hold him down. Just like the Tyson scenario… it’s a numbers/cardio game. There are some big ass 12 year olds out there. If Shaq and the mountain from GOT are 2 of the 100 then maybe things get interesting.
April 30Apr 30 31 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said: 100 men at 170 pounds average outweigh even a huge gorilla by like 35 times over. But the terms here are important. If they all have a bushido code mentality then the bum rush and smother technique works. Otherwise you’re drawing straws for who goes after him to hold him down and those people are getting fucked up and I’m not sure enough can physically get hands on him to hold him down. What if 5 men are given a katana? 5 avg dudes with no training vs a big ass gorilla
April 30Apr 30 Unless the gorilla has been trained how to defend against a sword, I don’t need any training to know how to gut him with it. I wouldn’t even need the other 4 dudes
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.