Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Surly Horns

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Featured Replies

#91451
39 minutes ago, Sir Ulrich said:

In speaking with friends the last couple of weeks they all share this sentiment. They truly believe that Miami winning a championship makes them relevant and keeps them in the spotlight.

Congrats on being a speed bump, I guess

  • Replies 91.5k
  • Views 9.7m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

#91452
16 minutes ago, Ghost of NMAS said:

They also scored the fewest points against Miami of any team all season.

And Miami missed three field goals. Add the trophy case to the Hall of Champions.

Screenshot 2026-01-11 at 7.49.09 PM.png

#91453
12 minutes ago, TexArcher said:

Aggy finally made the playoff, scored exactly one field goal, and finished the season 4 wins shy of a championship.

This is like a kid at his first middle school dance getting a girl to slow dance with him for half a song and telling everyone he's on the cusp of getting laid.

I was getting there!

Son, you wouldn’t know what to do with it if you HAD gotten there, so don’t worry about it.

#91455
51 minutes ago, Sir Ulrich said:

In speaking with friends the last couple of weeks they all share this sentiment. They truly believe that Miami winning a championship makes them relevant and keeps them in the spotlight.

Oh neat, so Texas is the 2024-25 CFP runner up, because we lost to Ohio State in the semifinals, who went on to win it all?

#91456
On 1/11/2026 at 9:03 AM, Kdub said:

Who knew Plato was woke?

Bet he didn't even go to Athens University...just another T-Shirt philosopher

23 hours ago, TexasGolf said:

HES READY TO LEAVE HIS MARK ON A BUFFET 😂🤣😂


Every successful college football program follows a similar arc. There is a building period where progress is not always linear, but when the right coach and staff are in place, each season quietly moves the program closer to its ceiling. The outside world often judges teams by final outcomes alone, but those inside the process know that growth shows up first in competitiveness, consistency, and how close you are to elite teams on the field.

Take Indiana Hoosiers football as an example. For decades, Indiana was not associated with winning football. Then came incremental progress. Last season, they took a noticeable step forward but ultimately fell short of their biggest goals. This year, they made another leap. Whether or not they win a national title is still unknown, but what matters is that they are now operating in a space that once felt unreachable. Their climb did not happen overnight. It happened because each season built on the last.

That same lens changes how Texas A&M’s loss to Miami should be viewed.

Seeing Miami Hurricanes football reach the national championship reframes that game entirely. At the time, the loss felt like confirmation that A&M was still a step behind the elite. But in hindsight, Miami’s success suggests something different. Texas A&M did not lose to a fringe team. They lost to a program that was closer to its breakthrough moment than most people realized.

More importantly, Texas A&M has played Miami tougher than the other two teams that were widely labeled as “elite” during this run. That matters. Competitive margins against championship-level teams are often the clearest indicator of where a program truly stands, even more than wins and losses.

This is why Miami’s success actually brings clarity rather than frustration. It shows that Texas A&M Aggies football may already be closer to the next step than many assumed in the immediate aftermath of that loss. The gap between “good” and “contender” is often smaller than it appears, and it is usually bridged by continuity, development, and experience rather than dramatic overhauls.

If the current trajectory holds, next season presents an opportunity for Texas A&M similar to the one Indiana finds itself in now: competing at a high level with legitimate national championship implications. Not because expectations demand it, but because the progression supports it.

Sometimes the clearest proof of how close you are does not come from your own wins. It comes from watching the team that beat you show the rest of the country exactly who they are. — essay potna

IMG_0427.jpeg

"We lost better than you did!"

I mean...they do have a unique advantage and experience in losing so...

#91457
2 hours ago, Js1 said:

Oh neat, so Texas is the 2024-25 CFP runner up, because we lost to Ohio State in the semifinals, who went on to win it all?

You didn't know? We put the banner up in May, walked the players out and everything.

#91458
On 1/8/2026 at 7:45 PM, Vic Mackey said:

More from Essay Patna:

"The Truth about 78-37-5

When college football debates its greatest rivalries, the conversation usually begins and ends with all-time records. For Texas A&M fans, seeing the headline number against the University of Texas can feel frustrating without context.

But to understand the Texas A&M–Texas rivalry honestly, you have to acknowledge one critical truth:

This rivalry did not start on a level playing field.

The Myth of the “Equal Start”

Many of college football’s most famous rivalries began between institutions that were fundamentally alike.

Take Michigan and Ohio State. Their rivalry began in 1897. From the very beginning, both were large, co-educational, civilian state universities. They recruited from similar populations, offered similar campus life, and built their programs using nearly identical institutional models.

They started the race at the same starting line.

Texas A&M and Texas did not.

Two Very Different Institutions

For roughly the first 80 years of this rivalry, Texas A&M was not a typical college campus. It was a small, all-male military institution where membership in the Corps of Cadets was mandatory. Every student lived under military discipline, with daily formations, strict conduct codes, and limited personal freedom.

Texas, meanwhile, operated as a large, co-educational civilian university in a growing metropolitan area, offering a traditional college experience and drawing from a far broader recruiting base.

Imagine trying to build a modern football powerhouse today where every player is required to live in barracks, wake up before dawn for drill, and follow a strict military code, while your rival across the state offers a conventional “big city” college environment with a student body several times larger.

That was Texas A&M’s reality until the mid-1960s.

When “Going to War” Was Literal

World War II magnified this imbalance to its extreme.

Because Texas A&M was a mandatory military school, its campus served as a direct pipeline for officer training and active duty. When the nation called, Aggie upperclassmen didn’t simply leave for the draft. They were expected to serve.

By 1943, the Aggie football roster had been so depleted that the team consisted largely of 17-year-olds, earning the nickname the “Kiddie Corps.”

Civilian universities like Texas were impacted by the war as well, but in a fundamentally different way. Programs such as the Navy V-12 allowed elite athletes to remain on campus while receiving military training. In the 1943 Texas–A&M game, Texas fielded several players who had actually played for A&M the year before but were reassigned by the military.

That era alone accounts for a significant portion of the lopsided all-time record.

Same rivalry. Same war. Very different conditions.

The Most Skewed Stretch

From 1940 to 1983, Texas posted a dominant 36-7-1 record against A&M.

This period is often cited as proof of superiority, but it reflects more than coaching decisions or talent cycles. It reflects two programs operating under completely different institutional constraints.

Texas was expanding resources, recruiting reach, and national stature. A&M was still balancing athletics with a unique military mission that restricted roster depth, recruiting flexibility, and continuity.

When the Playing Field Finally Leveled

The rivalry did not truly normalize until Texas A&M fundamentally changed.

Women were admitted in 1963. In 1965, membership in the Corps of Cadets became voluntary. Over time, A&M evolved into a large, co-educational university capable of competing for talent under the same basic conditions as Texas.

Once that transformation took hold, the results changed.

From 1975 until the series paused in 2011, the rivalry stood at 19-19.

No dominance. No imbalance. Just two comparable programs trading wins.

Context Over Comparison

The all-time record between Texas and Texas A&M is real, but it is not self-explanatory. It is a historical artifact shaped by decades when one institution accepted constraints that no modern football program would willingly take on.

For Aggies, those early losses are not a source of embarrassment. They are evidence of an institutional mission rooted in service and sacrifice. While other rivalries grew up as equals, this one was forged between two entirely different worlds.

Understanding that context doesn’t erase the record.

It explains it."

00.jpg

Point of order, the V-12 program didn't allow time for athletics or hardly anything else. It was something like 6-8 hours of class per day, including Saturdays. Not including study time, which was a necessity, ie they all played school.

Edited by TwiceHorn

#91459
3 hours ago, TreatyOak said:

Screenshot 2026-01-11 at 7.49.09 PM.png

I've seen that ad before but when I went to 12thmanshop.com there were no Elko Era shirts. I am disappoint. That would go nice with my Don't Care, Got Jimbo cap.

#91460
7 minutes ago, WBT said:

I've seen that ad before but when I went to 12thmanshop.com there were no Elko Era shirts. I am disappoint. That would go nice with my Don't Care, Got Jimbo cap.

Any Elko era muumuus?

#91463
4 hours ago, TexArcher said:

Aggy finally made the playoff, scored exactly one field goal, and finished the season 4 wins shy of a championship.

This is like a kid at his first middle school dance getting a girl to slow dance with him for half a song and telling everyone he's on the cusp of getting laid.

You got to get to three quarter point for that. Yea, I was kind of stud during the sock hops at Eisenhower Jr. High.

  • Popular Post
#91468
3 hours ago, WBT said:

That would go nice with my Don't Care, Got Jimbo cap.

I have the "In Jimbo We Trust" t-shirt that I put on the skeleton at Halloween just to piss off a neighbor.

#91470
4 hours ago, WBT said:

I've seen that ad before but when I went to 12thmanshop.com there were no Elko Era shirts. I am disappoint. That would go nice with my Don't Care, Got Jimbo cap.

You could wear that with your #WRTS shirt

#91472
5 hours ago, WBT said:

I've seen that ad before but when I went to 12thmanshop.com there were no Elko Era shirts. I am disappoint. That would go nice with my Don't Care, Got Jimbo cap.

I have a "Trust in Jimbo" shirt.

#91473
7 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Point of order, the V-12 program didn't allow time for athletics or hardly anything else. It was something like 6-8 hours of class per day, including Saturdays. Not including study time, which was a necessity, ie they all played school.

Arbeit macht frei! 👍

Edited by Longhornstampede

#91476
20 hours ago, Sir Ulrich said:

In speaking with friends the last couple of weeks they all share this sentiment. They truly believe that Miami winning a championship makes them relevant and keeps them in the spotlight.

Using that line of thinking, Miami is champion in animal fucking.

#91477

We've won 3 in a row over you, aggy. 2 of them in your house. There was a period of great cowardice on your part between the 1st and 2nd one.

#91479
18 hours ago, Drew said:

Bet he didn't even go to Athens University...just another T-Shirt philosopher

"We lost better than you did!"

I mean...they do have a unique advantage and experience in losing so...

Elko Buffet.jpg

#91480
1 hour ago, Scholz said:

We've won 3 in a row over you, aggy. 2 of them in your house. There was a period of great cowardice on your part between the 1st and 2nd one.

Cowardice defines aggy.

#91481

Speaking of delusion, lying, and cowardice...

Someone mentioned aggy's bowl game envy in the recruiting thread, which got me looking up their bowl wins/losses (spoiler: they're under .500) and ultimately at the aggy football Wikipedia page.

Those with Wiki access may consider editing the "Rivalries" section, or add a factual accuracy disclaimer to the top. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_A%26M_Aggies_football#Rivalries

The Texas-Texas A&M rivalry dates back to 1894. It is the longest-running rivalry for both teams. It ranks as the third most-played rivalry in Division I-A college football, and the most-played intrastate rivalry. Most of the series' lopsided victories occurred prior to A&M's transition from an all-male and all-white military school, and the rivalry has been fairly even since.

"Fairly even" is 29-20 Texas (including the mid to late 80s program where, somehow, some way ... aggy quickly "got good" before regressing to the mean).

Just a brief sample of the margin of victory post "military school."

49-12
52-14
38-3
42-13
32-3
57-28
53-16
45-13
51-15
50-20

#91485
7 hours ago, gofuckyourself said:

Speaking of delusion, lying, and cowardice...

Someone mentioned aggy's bowl game envy in the recruiting thread, which got me looking up their bowl wins/losses (spoiler: they're under .500) and ultimately at the aggy football Wikipedia page.

Those with Wiki access may consider editing the "Rivalries" section, or add a factual accuracy disclaimer to the top. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_A%26M_Aggies_football#Rivalries

"Fairly even" is 29-20 Texas (including the mid to late 80s program where, somehow, some way ... aggy quickly "got good" before regressing to the mean).

Just a brief sample of the margin of victory post "military school."

49-12
52-14
38-3
42-13
32-3
57-28
53-16
45-13
51-15
50-20

Good god. That shit has Little Brother energy all over it.

#91486

Essay Patna is back!!

615299902_25994843080152994_9180321608145023855_n.jpg

"The Official Record: Texas A&M’s 3 National Championships
Understand that this isnt a debate. This is not an opinion. These titles are documented in the NCAA Record Books. Your best argument of why they’re fake isnt going to take them out of existence or the records.
For those who have no intention of reading this entire deep dive and simply want to verify the facts for themselves, here is how you access the official data. This is not a matter of opinion, a "claim," or a debate; it is a matter of documented history by the governing body of the sport.

How to verify the NCAA Record:
1. Go to NCAA.org and search for the "NCAA Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) Records" book (the official annual PDF).
2. Navigate to the section titled "National Champion Major Selectors."
3. You will find Texas A&M officially recorded as a National Champion in 1919 and 1939 in the primary selector tables.
4. Continue to the next section (typically the next page) to find the 1927 title awarded by the Sagarin Ratings.
If you disagree with these titles, your argument is not with Texas A&M; it is with the official historical record-keeping of the NCAA.
Understanding the Historical Fact of Texas A&M’s National Championships
In the world of college football, the title of "National Champion" is often debated as if it were a matter of opinion. However, there is a definitive source of truth for the sport: the NCAA FBS Records Book. This official governing document does not "crown" a single winner, but it does certify Major Selectors—the mathematical, research, and polling systems deemed legitimate for recording the history of the game.
According to the official NCAA record, Texas A&M is a three-time National Champion. To understand these titles is to understand the evolution of the sport itself.
The "AP Poll" Myth
A common misconception is that a championship only "counts" if it was awarded by the Associated Press. This logic is historically flawed. The AP Poll did not exist until 1936. If one were to disregard titles prior to the AP era, they would effectively be deleting the first 67 years of college football history—including the foundational championships of almost every major "blue-blood" program in America.
The NCAA addresses this by recognizing "Major Selectors" for the pre-poll and split-poll eras. Texas A&M’s titles are not "claims"; they are entries in the official record book based on these certified selectors.

1. 1919: The "Invincible" Season
* Record: 10–0–0
* Defense: 0 Points Allowed (Outscored opponents 275–0)
* NCAA Major Selectors: Billingsley Report, National Championship Foundation
The 1919 Aggies produced what is arguably the most dominant defensive season in history, finishing the entire year without allowing a single point. The NCAA recognizes the Billingsley Report and the National Championship Foundation as the official selectors for this year.

2. 1927: The Scientific Standard
* Record: 8–0–1
* NCAA Major Selector: Sagarin Ratings
The 1927 title is documented in the Mathematical/Computer Selectors section of the NCAA record book. This recognition comes from Jeff Sagarin—a name modern fans know from his decades of work with the BCS and major sports networks. When the 1927 season is analyzed through these certified scientific models, Texas A&M is the team that comes out on top.

3. 1939: The Consensus #1
* Record: 11–0–0
* Post-Season: Sugar Bowl Champions
* NCAA Major Selector: The Associated Press (AP Poll)
The 1939 championship is undisputed. In the fourth year of the AP Poll’s existence, the Aggies finished the season as the consensus #1 team in the country. This was a "Poll Era" title earned on the field and verified by the writers' ballots, capped off by a victory over #5 Tulane in the Sugar Bowl.
Fact vs. Folklore
Much has been made of the fact that Texas A&M updated its stadium branding in 2012 to display these championships. Critics often mistake this "branding update" for a "creation of history."
The truth is found on page 112 (and throughout the National Champions section) of the official NCAA FBS Records Book. The university did not invent these titles in 2012; they simply chose to formally recognize the history that the NCAA had already archived for nearly a century.
The Final Word
Texas A&M’s three stars represent three distinct moments where the program reached the pinnacle of college football. Whether measured by the "Zero-Point Defense" of 1919, the mathematical models of 1927, or the consensus AP Poll of 1939, the record remains the same.
* A National Championship is not a claim; it is a recorded fact. And the record is clear: Texas A&M is a three-time National Champion.
Now Watch how fast this goes from “they’re fake” to “look how old they are”. 😏

And the top comments of that post:

01.PNG

#91487
12 minutes ago, Vic Mackey said:

Essay Patna is back!!

615299902_25994843080152994_9180321608145023855_n.jpg

"The Official Record: Texas A&M’s 3 National Championships
Understand that this isnt a debate. This is not an opinion. These titles are documented in the NCAA Record Books. Your best argument of why they’re fake isnt going to take them out of existence or the records.
For those who have no intention of reading this entire deep dive and simply want to verify the facts for themselves, here is how you access the official data. This is not a matter of opinion, a "claim," or a debate; it is a matter of documented history by the governing body of the sport.

How to verify the NCAA Record:
1. Go to NCAA.org and search for the "NCAA Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) Records" book (the official annual PDF).
2. Navigate to the section titled "National Champion Major Selectors."
3. You will find Texas A&M officially recorded as a National Champion in 1919 and 1939 in the primary selector tables.
4. Continue to the next section (typically the next page) to find the 1927 title awarded by the Sagarin Ratings.
If you disagree with these titles, your argument is not with Texas A&M; it is with the official historical record-keeping of the NCAA.
Understanding the Historical Fact of Texas A&M’s National Championships
In the world of college football, the title of "National Champion" is often debated as if it were a matter of opinion. However, there is a definitive source of truth for the sport: the NCAA FBS Records Book. This official governing document does not "crown" a single winner, but it does certify Major Selectors—the mathematical, research, and polling systems deemed legitimate for recording the history of the game.
According to the official NCAA record, Texas A&M is a three-time National Champion. To understand these titles is to understand the evolution of the sport itself.
The "AP Poll" Myth
A common misconception is that a championship only "counts" if it was awarded by the Associated Press. This logic is historically flawed. The AP Poll did not exist until 1936. If one were to disregard titles prior to the AP era, they would effectively be deleting the first 67 years of college football history—including the foundational championships of almost every major "blue-blood" program in America.
The NCAA addresses this by recognizing "Major Selectors" for the pre-poll and split-poll eras. Texas A&M’s titles are not "claims"; they are entries in the official record book based on these certified selectors.

1. 1919: The "Invincible" Season
* Record: 10–0–0
* Defense: 0 Points Allowed (Outscored opponents 275–0)
* NCAA Major Selectors: Billingsley Report, National Championship Foundation
The 1919 Aggies produced what is arguably the most dominant defensive season in history, finishing the entire year without allowing a single point. The NCAA recognizes the Billingsley Report and the National Championship Foundation as the official selectors for this year.

2. 1927: The Scientific Standard
* Record: 8–0–1
* NCAA Major Selector: Sagarin Ratings
The 1927 title is documented in the Mathematical/Computer Selectors section of the NCAA record book. This recognition comes from Jeff Sagarin—a name modern fans know from his decades of work with the BCS and major sports networks. When the 1927 season is analyzed through these certified scientific models, Texas A&M is the team that comes out on top.

3. 1939: The Consensus #1
* Record: 11–0–0
* Post-Season: Sugar Bowl Champions
* NCAA Major Selector: The Associated Press (AP Poll)
The 1939 championship is undisputed. In the fourth year of the AP Poll’s existence, the Aggies finished the season as the consensus #1 team in the country. This was a "Poll Era" title earned on the field and verified by the writers' ballots, capped off by a victory over #5 Tulane in the Sugar Bowl.
Fact vs. Folklore
Much has been made of the fact that Texas A&M updated its stadium branding in 2012 to display these championships. Critics often mistake this "branding update" for a "creation of history."
The truth is found on page 112 (and throughout the National Champions section) of the official NCAA FBS Records Book. The university did not invent these titles in 2012; they simply chose to formally recognize the history that the NCAA had already archived for nearly a century.
The Final Word
Texas A&M’s three stars represent three distinct moments where the program reached the pinnacle of college football. Whether measured by the "Zero-Point Defense" of 1919, the mathematical models of 1927, or the consensus AP Poll of 1939, the record remains the same.
* A National Championship is not a claim; it is a recorded fact. And the record is clear: Texas A&M is a three-time National Champion.
Now Watch how fast this goes from “they’re fake” to “look how old they are”. 😏

And the top comments of that post:

01.PNG

If we claimed everyone listed here we could claim 9 championships. Texas could claim titles from 1914, 1941, 1968, 1977, and 1981. 


On3
No image preview

Bad Take Tuesday: Texas should claim five additional nati...

Texas claims four national championships in football: 1963, 1969, 1970, and 2005. If the Longhorns really cared, they would claim nine titles.
#91488

Essay Patna needs to correct his own picture, because in both 1919 and 1927 players could fold their helmets (leather skull caps w/ no face mask) and put them in their bag to go to class.

Hook’em!!!

#91489
10 hours ago, Vic Mackey said:

Essay Patna is back!!

615299902_25994843080152994_9180321608145023855_n.jpg

"The Official Record: Texas A&M’s 3 National Championships
Understand that this isnt a debate. This is not an opinion. These titles are documented in the NCAA Record Books. Your best argument of why they’re fake isnt going to take them out of existence or the records.
For those who have no intention of reading this entire deep dive and simply want to verify the facts for themselves, here is how you access the official data. This is not a matter of opinion, a "claim," or a debate; it is a matter of documented history by the governing body of the sport.

How to verify the NCAA Record:
1. Go to NCAA.org and search for the "NCAA Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) Records" book (the official annual PDF).
2. Navigate to the section titled "National Champion Major Selectors."
3. You will find Texas A&M officially recorded as a National Champion in 1919 and 1939 in the primary selector tables.
4. Continue to the next section (typically the next page) to find the 1927 title awarded by the Sagarin Ratings.
If you disagree with these titles, your argument is not with Texas A&M; it is with the official historical record-keeping of the NCAA.
Understanding the Historical Fact of Texas A&M’s National Championships
In the world of college football, the title of "National Champion" is often debated as if it were a matter of opinion. However, there is a definitive source of truth for the sport: the NCAA FBS Records Book. This official governing document does not "crown" a single winner, but it does certify Major Selectors—the mathematical, research, and polling systems deemed legitimate for recording the history of the game.
According to the official NCAA record, Texas A&M is a three-time National Champion. To understand these titles is to understand the evolution of the sport itself.
The "AP Poll" Myth
A common misconception is that a championship only "counts" if it was awarded by the Associated Press. This logic is historically flawed. The AP Poll did not exist until 1936. If one were to disregard titles prior to the AP era, they would effectively be deleting the first 67 years of college football history—including the foundational championships of almost every major "blue-blood" program in America.
The NCAA addresses this by recognizing "Major Selectors" for the pre-poll and split-poll eras. Texas A&M’s titles are not "claims"; they are entries in the official record book based on these certified selectors.

1. 1919: The "Invincible" Season
* Record: 10–0–0
* Defense: 0 Points Allowed (Outscored opponents 275–0)
* NCAA Major Selectors: Billingsley Report, National Championship Foundation
The 1919 Aggies produced what is arguably the most dominant defensive season in history, finishing the entire year without allowing a single point. The NCAA recognizes the Billingsley Report and the National Championship Foundation as the official selectors for this year.

2. 1927: The Scientific Standard
* Record: 8–0–1
* NCAA Major Selector: Sagarin Ratings
The 1927 title is documented in the Mathematical/Computer Selectors section of the NCAA record book. This recognition comes from Jeff Sagarin—a name modern fans know from his decades of work with the BCS and major sports networks. When the 1927 season is analyzed through these certified scientific models, Texas A&M is the team that comes out on top.

3. 1939: The Consensus #1
* Record: 11–0–0
* Post-Season: Sugar Bowl Champions
* NCAA Major Selector: The Associated Press (AP Poll)
The 1939 championship is undisputed. In the fourth year of the AP Poll’s existence, the Aggies finished the season as the consensus #1 team in the country. This was a "Poll Era" title earned on the field and verified by the writers' ballots, capped off by a victory over #5 Tulane in the Sugar Bowl.
Fact vs. Folklore
Much has been made of the fact that Texas A&M updated its stadium branding in 2012 to display these championships. Critics often mistake this "branding update" for a "creation of history."
The truth is found on page 112 (and throughout the National Champions section) of the official NCAA FBS Records Book. The university did not invent these titles in 2012; they simply chose to formally recognize the history that the NCAA had already archived for nearly a century.
The Final Word
Texas A&M’s three stars represent three distinct moments where the program reached the pinnacle of college football. Whether measured by the "Zero-Point Defense" of 1919, the mathematical models of 1927, or the consensus AP Poll of 1939, the record remains the same.
* A National Championship is not a claim; it is a recorded fact. And the record is clear: Texas A&M is a three-time National Champion.
Now Watch how fast this goes from “they’re fake” to “look how old they are”. 😏

And the top comments of that post:

01.PNG

no one:

aggy: head to head with Texas is irrelevant prior to a date in the 90s we select to define the "modern era" of football, as those historical records aren't relevant today

no one:

aggy: don't try to argue against these very important and relevant 100+ year old national championships we decided to award ourselves a few years ago

#91490
1 hour ago, Bill Lumbergh said:

no one:

aggy: head to head with Texas is irrelevant prior to a date in the 90s we select to define the "modern era" of football, as those historical records aren't relevant today

no one:

aggy: don't try to argue against these very important and relevant 100+ year old national championships we decided to award ourselves a few years ago in the feeble attempt to impress our new SEC grinder mates after we ran away from Big Brother tu with Reveille’s tail tucked between our red ass cheeks.

#91493

Whenever teams say "you lost to Florida!," my usual response back is:

You lost to the team that lost to Florida. What does that say about you?

#91494
14 minutes ago, Js1 said:

Whenever teams say "you lost to Florida!," my usual response back is:

You lost to the team that lost to Florida. What does that say about you?

I’d rather say something like “you’re right. A&M is so good- say, how come you didn’t play in the SEC championship game the last two years? What happened?” But I don’t live in Texas, so I don’t run into any aggy fans

#91496
3 minutes ago, Pig Bellmont said:

I’d rather say something like “you’re right. A&M is so good- say, how come you didn’t play in the SEC championship game the last two years? What happened?” But I don’t live in Texas, so I don’t run into any aggy fans

You can also say it to Vanderbilt fans who ran their mouths

#91497
1 hour ago, Vic Mackey said:

Whooop!!!!

Screenshot_2026-01-14-08-40-17-36_a23b203fd3aafc6dcb84e438dda678b6.jpg

Bet Texas scores more than 3 points, AT HOME, against Miami though...

And yes Miami has been amazing, but that first game they weren't good either. Were lucky to win. I could see Texas beating them. We'd get mud holed by Indiana probably, but Oh Well.

#91498

We'd beat Miami at home. I'd like our chances against anybody except Indiana at home.

On the road, well, it seemed like a different team.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.