Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Surly Horns

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Quinn "La Joya" Ewers - The Man The Myth The Mullet, Now Starting for the Miami Dolphins

Featured Replies

#18751
4 minutes ago, utexas8 said:

Just double checking but there’s no way he comes back to Texas right? He did walk on senior day so I’m hoping he sticks with that. No way Sark screws us over and keeps Quinn while manning transfers? Has on3 said this is Quinn’s last year at Texas regardless of what happens?

they honored him on Senior Day. He gone.

  • Replies 28.5k
  • Views 2.3m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

#18752
11 minutes ago, utexas8 said:

Just double checking but there’s no way he comes back to Texas right? He did walk on senior day so I’m hoping he sticks with that. No way Sark screws us over and keeps Quinn while manning transfers? Has on3 said this is Quinn’s last year at Texas regardless of what happens?

Nm

Edited by closetohumping

#18754
Sark just said on the selection show he probably should have used Arch for his running threat earlier in the game.  Hopefully we see A Lot more of Arch in the playoffs.  Just give him a couple series at least, we have seen what he can do on the fly when things break down. 

Why in the fucking hell did it take his dumb ass this long to figure that out?
#18755
15 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

i’ve already predicted it ….

UT / Ewers wins the title. Ewers announces he’s coming back in the post game interview 

Some people in this thread would be miserable if that happened. 

#18757
3 minutes ago, Jkwellborn said:


Why in the fucking hell did it take his dumb ass this long to figure that out?

running the football is an inconvenience for Sark.

#18758
20 minutes ago, utexas8 said:

Just double checking but there’s no way he comes back to Texas right? He did walk on senior day so I’m hoping he sticks with that. No way Sark screws us over and keeps Quinn while manning transfers? Has on3 said this is Quinn’s last year at Texas regardless of what happens?

My completely non-insider belief is that Ewers would be told, essentially, "We all agreed on the plan. Thanks, but no thanks."

I will say though, Ewers played a better game than he's getting credit for yesterday. Pretty good argument that he's the reason Texas moved the ball so well. A few of those mistakes were just kicks in the nuts though. The duality of Quinn Ewers.

 

#18759
1 hour ago, Pimphand said:

Sark fucking sucked yesterday. Screen passes NEVER work against a team with Georgia's defensive speed and yet we ran several. Also for play action to work you need to be somewhat successful running the ball if not you are just setting the QB up to be sacked.

Unfortunately our offensive savant can't get out of his own way and has to continue to call plays GA feasts on.

The good news is Clemson & ASU don't have the requisite speed to fuck us. In fact only Ohio State, Oregon, & Georgia likely are the only teams that do.

 

The play action worked because of how aggressive Georgia was defending the run game. Unfortunately, it also backfired when we could not make or hold our blocks due to the run action (and all the pulling). Some of our best stuff was long passes in either max protect or out of play action. The game plan wasn't entirely crazy. But I think Sark sometimes goes too heavy on the eye candy in those play fakes. I think we would be better served with a lot more quickly developing play fakes rather than the long drawn out ones. You need both, but we were overly reliant on the latter. 

Edited by Dahobbs

#18760
4 minutes ago, gmr548 said:

My completely non-insider belief is that Ewers would be told, essentially, "We all agreed on the plan. Thanks, but no thanks."

I will say though, Ewers played a better game than he's getting credit for yesterday. Pretty good argument that he's the reason Texas moved the ball so well. A few of those mistakes were just kicks in the nuts though. The duality of Quinn Ewers.

 

Between the red zone, sure. In the red zone he fucking sucked. 

#18761
4 minutes ago, ATLLonghorn said:

running the football is an inconvenience for Sark.

Not true. We just don’t have the horses to run the ball against UGA. We usually just get what the play is blocked for. Uga was keen to stopping the outside zone and let Quinn beat you. Quinn did not beat them 

#18762
5 minutes ago, Texasborn91 said:

Not true. We just don’t have the horses to run the ball against UGA. We usually just get what the play is blocked for. Uga was keen to stopping the outside zone and let Quinn beat you. Quinn did not beat them 

really not sure what game some of you watched. 

#18763

I think Quinn is a good QB and I think he really did enough to win the game yesterday. He had two picks, but he also accounted for the second most passing yards allowed by the Georgia defense all season. And if we don’t have a false start on a field goal, there’s a chance the game never goes to overtime and we walk out with a win.

However, I think the biggest knock against Quinn is that in his 3 years here I think you can only count maybe 1 game where he made the throw that won you the game. And that was against a pretty mid TCU team last year. The other chances he’s had to engineer a legacy defining drive, he’s come up short.

I think there is a realistic chance that Texas wins a championship this year, but only if Quinn doesn’t have to go on a game winning drive to do so. Otherwise, I fear we’re out of luck. I want to give him grace and I want him to prove me wrong because I want every Longhorn to succeed at the highest level. But right now the gameplan has to be build a lead and then hold on for dear life in the second half.

Edited by Aslan24

#18764

ewers carried this team on his back !!!!!

Quinn Ewers was responsible for 92% of the yards gained by the Texas offense, but apparently he's the problem and I don't know ball... https://t.co/LsWKP6PnIH

 

#18765
39 minutes ago, ATLLonghorn said:

they honored him on Senior Day. He gone.

This.  Arch will be our QB next year.  Quinn will make his own decision about his next stop but it won't be TExas.

#18766
4 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

ewers carried this team on his back !!!!!

Quinn Ewers was responsible for 92% of the yards gained by the Texas offense, but apparently he's the problem and I don't know ball... https://t.co/LsWKP6PnIH

 

This stuff is so funny. 

BTW, thank God for Ewers that our defense stopped A&M at the 1 yard line last week. If they score to make it 17-14, even if we win there would have been a ton more heat on Quinn heading into this week. 

Ignore the bad shit in wins, focus on the good shit in losses...the life of a Longhorn sunshine pumper. 

 

#18767
15 minutes ago, ATLLonghorn said:

really not sure what game some of you watched. 

If you thought the problem was us not calling more run plays for a loss, you are mistaken. Maybe different run calls would work (we had some success out of the pistol in the first half). But Georgia shut down our bread and butter outside zone and the few times we tried something different in the second half didn't work well either. We simply don't deal well with Georgia's speed freaks. Playing Arch probably would have unlocked more of the run game. I think he would have been better option in the redzone for that reason. 

#18768
1 hour ago, Laxtonto said:
Texas football coach Steve Sarkisian said Quinn Ewers had the team's best game on offense vs. Georgia. Sarkisian said they had a season-high amount of drops in Saturday's game. Said Ewers had a gutsy performance, not many clean pockets, and delivered balls into tight windows.

 

I too, delivered "balls into tight windows" back in my day.

#18769
5 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

If you thought the problem was us not calling more run plays for a loss, you are mistaken. Maybe different run calls would work (we had some success out of the pistol in the first half). But Georgia shut down our bread and butter outside zone and the few times we tried something different in the second half didn't work well either. We simply don't deal well with Georgia's speed freaks. Playing Arch probably would have unlocked more of the run game. I think he would have been better option in the redzone for that reason. 

Sark just loves to come out passing no matter what. 

First drive - 

- Pass 

- Pass 

- Pass 

- Pass 

- Sack 

- Run (on 2nd and 11) 

- INT 

 

 

#18770
12 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

If you thought the problem was us not calling more run plays for a loss, you are mistaken. Maybe different run calls would work (we had some success out of the pistol in the first half). But Georgia shut down our bread and butter outside zone and the few times we tried something different in the second half didn't work well either. We simply don't deal well with Georgia's speed freaks. Playing Arch probably would have unlocked more of the run game. I think he would have been better option in the redzone for that reason. 

To be honest, I would have liked Sark to dust off the 1987 playbook and run a trap or 2. The guards were getting destroyed in the run game. Ear-holing a DT on trap or Wham block might have slowed them down. Might have been a disaster also, but I would like to see more quick hitting plays vs Georgia. They are just so fast sideline to sideline. 

#18771
9 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

Sark just loves to come out passing no matter what. 

First drive - 

- Pass 

- Pass 

- Pass 

- Pass 

- Sack 

- Run (on 2nd and 11) 

- INT 

 

 

Did you prefer the below? The run game simply wasn't working. Georgia was playing it aggressively. We made them pay between the 20s in the first half, but couldn't execute in the redzone. 

1st & 10 at TEX 25

(10:08 - 3rd) Quinn Ewers pass complete to Matthew Golden for 13 yds to the TEX 38 for a 1ST down

1st & 10 at TEX 38

(9:53 - 3rd) Quintrevion Wisner run for a loss of 3 yards to the TEX 35

2nd & 13 at TEX 35

(9:28 - 3rd) Quintrevion Wisner run for a loss of 2 yards to the TEX 33

3rd & 15 at TEX 33

(9:01 - 3rd) Quinn Ewers pass incomplete to Matthew Golden

--------

1st & 10 at TEX 13

(9:20 - 1st) Quintrevion Wisner run for a loss of 3 yards to the TEX 10

2nd & 13 at TEX 10

(8:48 - 1st) Jaydon Blue run for a loss of 1 yard to the TEX 9

3rd & 14 at TEX 9

(8:04 - 1st) Quinn Ewers pass complete to Matthew Golden for 50 yds to the UGA 41 for a 1ST down

1st & 10 at UGA 41

(7:41 - 1st) Quintrevion Wisner run for a loss of 2 yards to the UGA 43

2nd & 12 at UGA 43

(7:03 - 1st) Quinn Ewers pass complete to Isaiah Bond for 22 yds to the UGA 21 for a 1ST down

---------

1st & 10 at TEX 32

(1:46 - 2nd) Quinn Ewers pass complete to Gunnar Helm for 11 yds to the TEX 43 for a 1ST down

1st & 10 at TEX 43

(1:12 - 2nd) Quintrevion Wisner run for a loss of 2 yards to the TEX 41

2nd & 12 at TEX 41

(0:58 - 2nd) Ewers, Quinn rush for 5 yards to the TEX46, PENALTY TEX holding (Williams, Cameron) 10 yards to the TEX31, NO PLAY.

2nd & 22 at TEX 31

(0:51 - 2nd) Quinn Ewers pass incomplete to Gunnar Helm

3rd & 22 at TEX 31

(0:45 - 2nd) Quintrevion Wisner run for 4 yds to the TEX 35

#18772
Just now, Dahobbs said:

Did you prefer the below? The run game simply wasn't working. Georgia was playing it aggressively. We made them pay between the 20s in the first half, but couldn't execute in the redzone. 

1st & 10 at TEX 25

(10:08 - 3rd) Quinn Ewers pass complete to Matthew Golden for 13 yds to the TEX 38 for a 1ST down

1st & 10 at TEX 38

(9:53 - 3rd) Quintrevion Wisner run for a loss of 3 yards to the TEX 35

2nd & 13 at TEX 35

(9:28 - 3rd) Quintrevion Wisner run for a loss of 2 yards to the TEX 33

3rd & 15 at TEX 33

(9:01 - 3rd) Quinn Ewers pass incomplete to Matthew Golden

--------

1st & 10 at TEX 13

(9:20 - 1st) Quintrevion Wisner run for a loss of 3 yards to the TEX 10

2nd & 13 at TEX 10

(8:48 - 1st) Jaydon Blue run for a loss of 1 yard to the TEX 9

3rd & 14 at TEX 9

(8:04 - 1st) Quinn Ewers pass complete to Matthew Golden for 50 yds to the UGA 41 for a 1ST down

1st & 10 at UGA 41

(7:41 - 1st) Quintrevion Wisner run for a loss of 2 yards to the UGA 43

2nd & 12 at UGA 43

(7:03 - 1st) Quinn Ewers pass complete to Isaiah Bond for 22 yds to the UGA 21 for a 1ST down

---------

1st & 10 at TEX 32

(1:46 - 2nd) Quinn Ewers pass complete to Gunnar Helm for 11 yds to the TEX 43 for a 1ST down

1st & 10 at TEX 43

(1:12 - 2nd) Quintrevion Wisner run for a loss of 2 yards to the TEX 41

2nd & 12 at TEX 41

(0:58 - 2nd) Ewers, Quinn rush for 5 yards to the TEX46, PENALTY TEX holding (Williams, Cameron) 10 yards to the TEX31, NO PLAY.

2nd & 22 at TEX 31

(0:51 - 2nd) Quinn Ewers pass incomplete to Gunnar Helm

3rd & 22 at TEX 31

(0:45 - 2nd) Quintrevion Wisner run for 4 yds to the TEX 35

You're cherry picking drives. Our 3rd drive of the game started with a 5 yard run and then a 10 yard run with Wisner. I brought up the first drive for a reason, as it is scripted. 

I'm not saying we should have pounded the ball. It was TOUGH sledding out there. But when you say we've found an identity in the run game, then come out throwing on 6 of the first 7 plays (like we seemingly do a lot), you're not trying to establish a run game at the outset.

#18773
8 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

You're cherry picking drives. Our 3rd drive of the game started with a 5 yard run and then a 10 yard run with Wisner. I brought up the first drive for a reason, as it is scripted. 

I'm not saying we should have pounded the ball. It was TOUGH sledding out there. But when you say we've found an identity in the run game, then come out throwing on 6 of the first 7 plays (like we seemingly do a lot), you're not trying to establish a run game at the outset.

We averaged 1.1 yards per rush on 28 carries. Our backs averaged 2.7 and 1.0 yards per carry. How am I cherry picking? I know you want the story to be that we should have just tried running more. It would have been foolish to try that with how Georgia was playing us. 

#18774
1 minute ago, Dahobbs said:

We averaged 1.1 yards per rush on 28 carries. Our backs averaged 2.7 and 1.0 yards per carry. How am I cherry picking? I know you want the story to be that we should have just tried running more. It would have been foolish to try that with how Georgia was playing us. 

I'm specifically talking to start the game. I wasn't begging for running calls in the 2nd half. We needed to throw to move the ball. 

 

#18775
1 minute ago, Hank Kingsley said:

I'm specifically talking to start the game. I wasn't begging for running calls in the 2nd half. We needed to throw to move the ball. 

 

Do you think coming out running to start the game would have worked any differently? If not, why are we discussing it? Passing was the right call. We just needed to not commit penalties, not turn it over, and to catch the ball. We didn't do that. Arch in the redzone would also have been a good idea as I do think that would have opened up more opportunities in a compact field. 

#18778
6 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

Do you think coming out running to start the game would have worked any differently? If not, why are we discussing it? Passing was the right call. We just needed to not commit penalties, not turn it over, and to catch the ball. We didn't do that. Arch in the redzone would also have been a good idea as I do think that would have opened up more opportunities in a compact field. 

Redzone is where this game was lost.  Texas was great between the 20s, but equally as bad in the Redzone. That meant Texas had a lot of empty yards.  This is year 2 of passing issues in the red zone. This is where Arch could been the difference in the game, but we will never know 

Edited by Codaxx

#18779
4 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

Do you think coming out running to start the game would have worked any differently? If not, why are we discussing it? Passing was the right call. We just needed to not commit penalties, not turn it over, and to catch the ball. We didn't do that. Arch in the redzone would also have been a good idea as I do think that would have opened up more opportunities in a compact field. 

We're just talking in circles, man. 

If the goal was to establish a running game from the start, who knows what would have happened. Maybe we go 3 and out. Maybe Wisner fumbles. Maybe he breaks one and gives the o-line some early confidence. In the end, it doesn't matter now. 

We decided to put the game in Quinn's hands. I think he flashed enough to give us a chance to win in the end. Didn't happen. We move on. 

 

#18780
1 minute ago, Codaxx said:

Redzone is where this game was lost.  Texas was great between the 20s, but equally as bad in the Redzone. That meant Texas had a lot of empty yards.  This is year 2 of passing issues ain’t he red zone. This is where Arch could been the difference in the game, but we will never know 

It'll be interesting to find out if the redzone issues are Quinn, Sark, or (as I suspect) a bit of both. I still think this team with just j whitt from last year would actually kill it in the redzone. 

#18781

It’s funny.  If Quinn makes the throw to Wingo when he has 2 steps on the DB instead of underthrowing and getting the PI, it’s a whole different conversation today.  That one throw would have changed the entire narrative and we’d be champs.  He has to make those throws in the playoffs for us to make a run.  

#18782
6 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

It'll be interesting to find out if the redzone issues are Quinn, Sark, or (as I suspect) a bit of both. I still think this team with just j whitt from last year would actually kill it in the redzone. 

Not sure why. They had Mitchell, Worthy, and J Whitt last year and were bad. Golden maybe the best of the bunch in the Redzone 

#18785
1 minute ago, Codaxx said:

Not sure why. They had Mitchell, Worthy, and J Whitt last year and were bad. Golden maybe the best of the bunch in the Redzone 

We were missing different pieces each year. Last year we didn't have a TE that could block. This year we don't have a ton of chemistry between our receivers and QB. Adding a J whitt safety blanket with sure hands would be really nice for those tight throws in the redzone. Just a theory. 

#18786
1 minute ago, Dahobbs said:

We were missing different pieces each year. Last year we didn't have a TE that could block. This year we don't have a ton of chemistry between our receivers and QB. Adding a J whitt safety blanket with sure hands would be really nice for those tight throws in the redzone. Just a theory. 

I just think Golden is that same guy. All good 

#18788

It seems to me that there's a very good argument to be made that there's no way Texas, with Arch taking half of the snaps against Georgia (with an "Arch Gameplan", of course), would have done any worse than the meager 16 fucking points that Ewers put on the board in Regulation. We probably would have fared a little better with him getting just half the snaps, maybe a lot better.

Therefore, there's an even stronger argument to be made that Arch should get half the snaps against Clemson, so that he can be ready to take on whatever comes after Clemson, because there is zero chance that Ewers can win the big one - zero - and that we absolutely have to get Manning into the game ASAP and not just for a couple of plays (for Christ Sakes). Only Manning can take us to the promised land. He needs to play at least half of the Clemson game, goddammit.

Edited by Irish Wrist Watch

#18789
20 minutes ago, BarthHollamew said:

It’s funny.  If Quinn makes the throw to Wingo when he has 2 steps on the DB instead of underthrowing and getting the PI, it’s a whole different conversation today.  That one throw would have changed the entire narrative and we’d be champs.  He has to make those throws in the playoffs for us to make a run.  

Correction: Arch has to make those throws for us to make a run. (It's a new mindset)

#18790
It seems to me that there's a very good argument to be made that there's no way Texas, with Arch taking half of the snaps against Georgia (with an "Arch Gameplan", of course), would have done any worse than the meager 16 fucking points that Ewers put on the board in Regulation. We probably would have fared a little better with him getting just half the snaps, maybe a lot better.
Therefore, there's an even stronger argument to be made that Arch should get half the snaps against Clemson, so that he can be ready to take on whatever comes after Clemson, because there is zero chance that Ewers can win the big one - zero - and that we absolutely have to get Manning into the game ASAP and not just for a couple of plays (for Christ Sakes). Only Manning can take us to the promised land. He needs to play at least half of the Clemson game, goddammit.

Asking for Arch is simply wish-casting at this point. Sark has shown that he will not make a change until Ewers simply can’t go any longer.

That said, just use him a little — like Urban did with Tebow when the Gators won his national title. Let him make a throw or two. Clearly the running game struggled against Georgia. What do you have to lose?
#18791
6 minutes ago, C-Man said:


Asking for Arch is simply wish-casting at this point. Sark has shown that he will not make a change until Ewers simply can’t go any longer.

That said, just use him a little — like Urban did with Tebow when the Gators won his national title. Let him make a throw or two. Clearly the running game struggled against Georgia. What do you have to lose?

After the stats have come out about Quinn's 8-game second half production? Mostly against mediocre teams? I just don't think Sark will continue to fuck this team for Quinn's sake. He absolutely must realize the guy has a problem in the red zone and that means giving Arch a lot more than just a couple of snaps. 

#18792

Watching NFL games today and I'm thinking Quinn doesn't look like a single one of these guys. Guys with legitimate strong arms like Darnold, Stafford, Josh Allen rip balls into tight windows with velocity is such a beautiful thing. His ceiling in the NFL is backup as far as I am concerned at this point. Likely a late 3rd(absolute best case scenario) to 7th round pick.

Edited by BurntOrange&White

#18793
Watching NFL games today and I'm thinking Quinn doesn't look like a single one of these guys. Guys with legitimate strong arms like Darnold, Stafford, Josh Allen rip balls into tight windows with velocity is such a beautiful thing. His ceiling in the NFL is backup as far as I am concerned at this point. Likely a late 3rd(absolute best case scenario) to 7th round pick.
I'm not sure which team takes a flyer on Quinn at all. He has zero zip on his passes. You float every pass in the pros, you will be destroyed with the speed they have. He also has terrible RedZone accuracy, and that's against college defenses.

I'd take Cooper Rush any day of the week over Quinn
#18794

Both Texas and Georgia had budding superstars standing on the sideline. Only one of those got a chance to make a meaningful contribution - which he did. He fucking decided to run the ball right up our gut - and he won the fucking game for Georgia. Yeah, he got his bell rung, but he'll be back after a big rest (that we won't get). 

Had both budding superstars had a shot in this game, it's almost a lock ours woulda come out on top. Because Arch would have had a better Defense playing behind him.

#18795

I’m concerned that we’re boxing Manning into a running qb. He is a qb that can run. He’s much more advanced as a passer than Tebow. He should not be in on running plays only.

#18796
2 minutes ago, Navin R. Johnson said:

I’m concerned that we’re boxing Manning into a running qb. He is a qb that can run. He’s much more advanced as a passer than Tebow. He should not be in on running plays only.

Compared to Quinn he's a running QB. We all know he can do much more with his arm.

#18797
1 minute ago, BurntOrange&White said:

Compared to Quinn he's a running QB. We all know he can do much more with his arm.

Arch should be given the same playbook as Quinn. It’s detrimental to treat him differently just because Quinn is is a frail statue. I’m not sure if sark is treating him differently, I think it’s possible, but it should not happen.

#18798
35 minutes ago, Irish Wrist Watch said:

It seems to me that there's a very good argument to be made that there's no way Texas, with Arch taking half of the snaps against Georgia (with an "Arch Gameplan", of course), would have done any worse than the meager 16 fucking points that Ewers put on the board in Regulation. We probably would have fared a little better with him getting just half the snaps, maybe a lot better.

Therefore, there's an even stronger argument to be made that Arch should get half the snaps against Clemson, so that he can be ready to take on whatever comes after Clemson, because there is zero chance that Ewers can win the big one - zero - and that we absolutely have to get Manning into the game ASAP and not just for a couple of plays (for Christ Sakes). Only Manning can take us to the promised land. He needs to play at least half of the Clemson game, goddammit.

But what if Arch throws a pick 6?
No one knows how he would have fared in the game.

Not being able to run the ball consistently is our biggest problem on offense.

#18799
45 minutes ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

Quinn's biggest problem is our overrated oline. 

Shadeur and Cam Ward would eat behind that line. Quinn's biggest problems are his mechanics, slow processing, angled release that gets batted down, the butterfly balls that float in the air forever (allowing the DB to catch up or worse, pick it) and his inability to scramble for the easy yards until he self sacks. Every once in a while Quinn will make a throw where you stop and say "well damn...that was nice" but if everything has to go 100 percent smoothly in all facets of a play for a 3rd year QB to have a modicum of success then that's a problem with the QB, the really good ones can do stuff off script.  

#18800
15 minutes ago, Navin R. Johnson said:

I’m concerned that we’re boxing Manning into a running qb. He is a qb that can run. He’s much more advanced as a passer than Tebow. He should not be in on running plays only.

I think you are reading too much into the last 2 appearances for Arch. Sark didn’t use him as a running QB in his 2 starts. He has used him as a change a pace the last 2 games. Bringing in a QB that can run the ball in the red zone. I suspect that package might get a bit deeper based on Sark’s comments about the Georgia game, but only time will tell 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.