October 15Oct 15 Saw a headline today that OpenAI plans to spend $1T over the next five years. Their most recent revenue is estimate is $12.7B for 2025. Everyone knows this is a bubble but no one knows for sure when it will pop. I can bet on one thing, it's not going to pop until all these scams go public. The oligarchs have to cash out before the rug gets pulled. Edited October 15Oct 15 by Fudge Nuggets
October 15Oct 15 12 minutes ago, Fudge Nuggets said: Saw a headline today that OpenAI plans to spend $1T over the next five years. Their most recent revenue is estimate is $12.7B for 2025. Everyone knows this is a bubble but no one knows for sure when it will pop. I can bet on one thing, it's not going to pop until all these scams go public. The oligarchs have to cash out before the rug gets pulled. I don't know exactly what is going to happen. Or when it will happen. But I know with 100% certainty that the bolded WILL happen. Because the laws of this "capitalist, freedom!" economy are (1) rules for thee, not for me, and (2) privatize gains, socialize losses. And we have half the country defending that approach to the death, and calling anything that dares question it "EBIL COMMUNISM!"
October 15Oct 15 5 hours ago, Brisketexan said: I don't know exactly what is going to happen. Or when it will happen. But I know with 100% certainty that the bolded WILL happen. Because the laws of this "capitalist, freedom!" economy are (1) rules for thee, not for me, and (2) privatize gains, socialize losses. And we have half the country defending that approach to the death, and calling anything that dares question it "EBIL COMMUNISM!" From what I've been reading and can gather, I think most people are comfortable with the ebil communism in terms of national security like rare earth minerals and Intel, as they should be. That said, of course a bubble is going to burst and of course the sharps and the monied are going to more or less be fine, but not because of some evil nefarious backroom abilities, but because they are the market makers and their cashing out is going to be the timing and cause of the collapse IMO. Beyond AI, the market is in need of a correction and that's the scary part for us Jimmy and Joe's with one or two million in net worth and not 100 or 200 who can stomach the crash and take advantage of it by buying cheap.
October 15Oct 15 There are some cool things video-wise, like this - I’ve used a similar tool from a genealogy service on some old photos and they match what relatives remember (or what I saw as a kid). In the below video, you can compare a few of the figures like Ingrid Bergman in Casablanca to real life film footage. They did a fine job with Cléo de Mérode
October 15Oct 15 9 hours ago, atomheartbevo said: Soon, you will be able to make the porn of your dreams. We made ChatGPT pretty restrictive to make sure we were being careful with mental health issues. We realize this made it less useful/enjoyable to many users who had no mental health problems, but given the seriousness of the issue we wanted to get this right. Now that we have been able to mitigate the serious mental health issues and have new tools, we are going to be able to safely relax the restrictions in most cases. In a few weeks, we plan to put out a new version of ChatGPT that allows people to have a personality that behaves more like what people liked about 4o (we hope it will be better!). If you want your ChatGPT to respond in a very human-like way, or use a ton of emoji, or act like a friend, ChatGPT should do it (but only if you want it, not because we are usage-maxxing). In December, as we roll out age-gating more fully and as part of our “treat adult users like adults” principle, we will allow even more, like erotica for verified adults. That's going to go over well with CTOs and CISOs who will soon realize their very same APIs used to assemble boardroom presentations can be intermixed with hentai pr0n and age-verification PII collection.
October 15Oct 15 Customizable porn is the best business case yet from these people but I still don't think it justifies the trillions in capital investment
October 15Oct 15 Sam Altman is doing a delightful job of diluting the legitimacy of his product, where over the last quarter, he's attempting to be everything to everyone, guaranteeing his platform will be trusted to nobody. He's recently placed or proposed the following: Walmart's mass-market retail and e-commerce partnership AI compute infrastructure and energy Custom chip manufacturing, which I'm not sure is even tangible LinkedIn-replacement employment and jobs search Robotics and consumer embedded AI AI-driven digital identity systems Sora's social media AI slop And now... adult content and generative media experimentation.
October 16Oct 16 1 hour ago, WBT said: Customizable porn is the best business case yet from these people but I still don't think it justifies the trillions in capital investment
October 16Oct 16 The rise of AI NSFW Companions is going to break so many brains. This will be a billion times worse than that time Screech got hooked on the attention of the waitresses at Skeeters in Saved by the Bell.
October 16Oct 16 7 hours ago, F250 said: The rise of AI NSFW Companions is going to break so many brains. This will be a billion times worse than that time Screech got hooked on the attention of the waitresses at Skeeters in Saved by the Bell. But honey, my AI companion really enjoys ass-to-mouth.
October 16Oct 16 One of my favorite YouTube channels - deep dives on classic sci-fi and literature/films/TV. He uses the point of people claiming to have remembered seeing some scenes in the original Star Wars movie that would have basically been impossible to be there. The missing scene was in fact filmed, and most Star Wars fans have now seen parts of it or at least heard about it - stills from the scene made it into 1970s picture books, novels, comic books, etc. From the perspective of a historian, there are paper trails, contemporary interviews, etc. that cast doubt on those claims of people having seen it in the 1970s, and that all goes out the window with AI in the future. Only 10 minutes, but sobering to think that future historians trying to track down what is or is not true, and prove or disprove collective memories, is going to be near impossible because of AI. edit: he makes a point that people could be convicted or even killed because of bogus video in the future, Edited October 16Oct 16 by atomheartbevo
October 16Oct 16 11 minutes ago, YChang said: https://theoatmeal.com/comics/ai_art I may need a Butt Rat t-shirt.
October 16Oct 16 Author 18 hours ago, Gravy Train said: Sam Altman is doing a delightful job of diluting the legitimacy of his product, where over the last quarter, he's attempting to be everything to everyone, guaranteeing his platform will be trusted to nobody. He's recently placed or proposed the following: Walmart's mass-market retail and e-commerce partnership AI compute infrastructure and energy Custom chip manufacturing, which I'm not sure is even tangible LinkedIn-replacement employment and jobs search Robotics and consumer embedded AI AI-driven digital identity systems Sora's social media AI slop And now... adult content and generative media experimentation. Yes, this is the lifecycle of enshitiffication on all online platforms. 1. Create something useful or enjoyable for a targeted set of people. 2. Continually cast a bigger and bigger net so that corporate customers see the value— to do this you have to get the 80 iq set on the same platform as the geniuses and the working stiffs. 3. Shift the utility to respond to business customer desires rather than users. Platform is overwhelmed with corporate, paid content and activities. 4. Stop providing services to the businesses now that they are captured. Platform reaches end-stage shit: slop, optimized ads for shit, thirst traps, scams. The Oatmeal cartoon above really spoke to me. The old weird internet was great because even if something was shit or crazy, it was all there intentionally; someone made the choice to create the page or write the article or even make the ad. Those old weird “one trick” banner adds and pop ups were the first creeping inkling of non-humans controlling what we see. Generative AI is where this all ends: robots continually reheating stuff that has already been created in worse and worse ways in the service of idiots who cannot fully finish and express an idea. It’s really a nightmare, and it’s empowering the worst type of people who imagine themselves creative. “I have a great idea for a movie, but I just don’t have the time to write a script.”
October 16Oct 16 1 hour ago, YChang said: https://theoatmeal.com/comics/ai_art Quote ten-trilion teraclops per floppyshart that got me
October 16Oct 16 31 minutes ago, Chopper said: ai not only wants to fuck, it wants you to take heroin. Or perhaps kratom. That AI should completely intersect with RFK Jr. is perhaps the perfect encapsulation of this craptastic timeline.
October 16Oct 16 1 hour ago, Chopper said: ai not only wants to fuck, it wants you to take heroin. Or perhaps kratom. Reddit Answers grounds it's responses from Reddit posts. lol This would be like if Surly had a Generative AI service and somebody asked for anniversary gift ideas for their wife. The response would likely be "Many Surly posters expect you to share pictures of your wife, preferably nude as this is not only a custom but a rule. Also you might consider PM'ing Derka. Mule Dick!"
October 16Oct 16 1 minute ago, F250 said: This would be like if Surly had a Generative AI service Immamac right now:
October 16Oct 16 5 minutes ago, F250 said: Reddit Answers grounds it's responses from Reddit posts. lol This would be like if Surly had a Generative AI service and somebody asked for anniversary gift ideas for their wife. The response would likely be "Many Surly posters expect you to share pictures of your wife, preferably nude as this is not only a custom but a rule. Also you might consider PM'ing Derka. Mule Dick!" 1 minute ago, Brisketexan said: Immamac right now: @immamac
October 16Oct 16 21 hours ago, Gravy Train said: Sam Altman is doing a delightful job of diluting the legitimacy of his product, where over the last quarter, he's attempting to be everything to everyone, guaranteeing his platform will be trusted to nobody. He's recently placed or proposed the following: Walmart's mass-market retail and e-commerce partnership AI compute infrastructure and energy Custom chip manufacturing, which I'm not sure is even tangible LinkedIn-replacement employment and jobs search Robotics and consumer embedded AI AI-driven digital identity systems Sora's social media AI slop And now... adult content and generative media experimentation. Quibble: The Wal Mart in-app purchase thing is brilliant.
October 16Oct 16 3 hours ago, 956 Worldwide said: Yes, this is the lifecycle of enshitiffication on all online platforms. 1. Create something useful or enjoyable for a targeted set of people. 2. Continually cast a bigger and bigger net so that corporate customers see the value— to do this you have to get the 80 iq set on the same platform as the geniuses and the working stiffs. 3. Shift the utility to respond to business customer desires rather than users. Platform is overwhelmed with corporate, paid content and activities. 4. Stop providing services to the businesses now that they are captured. Platform reaches end-stage shit: slop, optimized ads for shit, thirst traps, scams. I've read your posts a lot so I know you are a smart guy. Surely you understand that "enshittification" in almost every case, is trying to go from adoption and growing a market/user base, to monetization so you can have a profitable (or at least a sustainabile) business. Your first bullet point is almost always the loss leader and unsustainabile by design and business (math). I read somehwere that right now, as of today, OpenAI (even with all their funding, valuation, cash infusions, partnerships, and paying customers) with thier couple billions in ARR while operating at triple the billions in burn rate is today spending $3 to earn $1. That's not going to last forever, just like every other "free" or "cheap" software/service that began as a market grab fueled by VC.
October 16Oct 16 38 minutes ago, Vegas64 said: I read somehwere that right now, as of today, OpenAI (even with all their funding, valuation, cash infusions, partnerships, and paying customers) with thier couple billions in ARR while operating at triple the billions in burn rate is today spending $3 to earn $1. That's not going to last forever, just like every other "free" or "cheap" software/service that began as a market grab fueled by VC. I don't think you're really wrong here. But here's the problem. When you have (1) a product that just can't be attractive and draw in and please consumers without spending $3 to make $1, then (2).....maybe it's a fucking shit product. And if what you have is a shit product, then the only way you can finally monetize it is by fucking people over. That's it. That's the whole thought, thanks for coming to my TED talk.
October 16Oct 16 Author 53 minutes ago, Vegas64 said: I've read your posts a lot so I know you are a smart guy. Surely you understand that "enshittification" in almost every case, is trying to go from adoption and growing a market/user base, to monetization so you can have a profitable (or at least a sustainabile) business. Your first bullet point is almost always the loss leader and unsustainabile by design and business (math). I read somehwere that right now, as of today, OpenAI (even with all their funding, valuation, cash infusions, partnerships, and paying customers) with thier couple billions in ARR while operating at triple the billions in burn rate is today spending $3 to earn $1. That's not going to last forever, just like every other "free" or "cheap" software/service that began as a market grab fueled by VC. I’ll come back to this. You’re not wrong, you’ve identified accurately that nearly all start-ups (especially tech) come to play with a built in enshitification model. The issues is that this is a fundamentally predatory business model that suffocates innovation and uses rent-seeking strategies to preserve monopolies and cartels. The model is: make something good for cheap, burn through VC cash till alternatives/competitors are broke, impose artificial costs to prevent customers from leaving, then make money by making the thing worse for everyone. And it’s allowed to happen because of policy and regulatory choices.
October 16Oct 16 On 10/13/2025 at 11:58 AM, Captainant said: The railroad "boom" and "bubble" from building in the late 1800's absolutely left useful infrastructre over. Can you enumerate some of the use cases for these leftover AI chips? Please, enlighten me. Because they are specifically NOT general compute, and are only fit for this extremely specialized usecase. Further, the hardware purchases are decaying silicon assets, not steel fucking rails. You don't have to replace rails every few years just to keep burning $500,000,000,000 a year Bitchin framerates on muh gamez, man.
October 16Oct 16 42 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said: Bitchin framerates on muh gamez, man. Driver support is doodoo with enterprise cards for gaming, you're always better off with a 5090 for gaems
October 16Oct 16 2 minutes ago, Captainant said: Driver support is doodoo with enterprise cards for gaming, you're always better off with a 5090 for gaems Yeah I assumed something like that was true. Just talking shit.
October 17Oct 17 2 hours ago, 956 Worldwide said: I’ll come back to this. You’re not wrong, you’ve identified accurately that nearly all start-ups (especially tech) come to play with a built in enshitification model. The issues is that this is a fundamentally predatory business model that suffocates innovation and uses rent-seeking strategies to preserve monopolies and cartels. The model is: make something good for cheap, burn through VC cash till alternatives/competitors are broke, impose artificial costs to prevent customers from leaving, then make money by making the thing worse for everyone. And it’s allowed to happen because of policy and regulatory choices. To the bolded, but I don't think that's exactly how it plays out. In fact, two economists I think won a Nobel Peace Prize this week arguing the opposite Quote Aghion and Howitt explained the role of “creative destruction,” an endless process in which new products displace older products. Aghion and Howitt, who split the second half of the award, argue that “competition for profit is what causes you to put in the effort to make a better product,” Brian Albrecht, the chief economist for the International Center for Law & Economics. “That in turn drives economic growth,” he added. For example, the release of the iPhone decimated BlackBerry’s market share. The laureates warned that growth is not inevitable. Immigration and openness to trade are key components for growth, the winners told The Times. Aghion expressed optimism that A.I. could be a large growth driver, but favored policies that promoted competition and did not consolidate power to just a few winners.
October 17Oct 17 3 hours ago, Vegas64 said: I've read your posts a lot so I know you are a smart guy. Surely you understand that "enshittification" in almost every case, is trying to go from adoption and growing a market/user base, to monetization so you can have a profitable (or at least a sustainabile) business. Your first bullet point is almost always the loss leader and unsustainabile by design and business (math). I read somehwere that right now, as of today, OpenAI (even with all their funding, valuation, cash infusions, partnerships, and paying customers) with thier couple billions in ARR while operating at triple the billions in burn rate is today spending $3 to earn $1. That's not going to last forever, just like every other "free" or "cheap" software/service that began as a market grab fueled by VC. The huge part of what you're missing is they (the type of start-ups you're talking about) were shooting to take market share -- legit market and actual profits -- away from other companies. For gai there is no existing market share or profit that they're targeting. Google ai, for example, is taking money away from their own ads and their own ad customers. Maybe these consumer-facing companies find a load of profits in making porn and taking away profits from onlyfans, but I doubt it. No survey has ever shown any more than a small fraction of people are willing to pay actual money to subscribe to ai. In most instances even the businesses that use it have to force it on their employees, and the employees will try it but then use quickly subsides. Because it's crap. It doesn't save most people time. You can't trust it. Quote The Nobel committee said Mokyr “demonstrated that if innovations are to succeed one another in a self-generating process, we not only need to know that something works, but we also need to have scientific explanations for why.” I mean...lol...gai is a black box. There is no explanation for why it works. It just doesn't. Edited October 17Oct 17 by Chopper
October 17Oct 17 So….the last paragraph…literally the 180 degree opposite of our current system and approach.That’s 956’s point. Combine our VC culture with our economic system of complete oligarchical regulatory capture and government-enforced consolidation of economic power in those oligarchs (and strident anti-immigration, anti-trade, and such), and you get fuckery all the way down. “Growth” is an illusion created by a society that is consuming its consumers. It’s perfectly apt that AI outfits boost sales by buying their own products, really - fits perfectly with the zeitgeist.
October 17Oct 17 They're destroying the internet. The bubble and the unsustainable levels of investment can't stop soon enough.
October 17Oct 17 Author Popular Post 47 minutes ago, Vegas64 said: To the bolded, but I don't think that's exactly how it plays out. In fact, two economists I think won a Nobel Peace Prize this week arguing the opposite Dude, Apple is the enshitifier par excellence (I type on an iPhone). Here’s a vignette: I’m being issued a new credit card, and it’s going to be a pain in the ass for me if I decide to renew my Spotify subscription. Why? Because I can’t renew it via the app. Why can’t I renew it via the app? Because the App Store takes a 30 percent (30 percent!) vig from anything sold via an app in its App Store. So Spotify can either lose the massive global iPhone market, or it can pay the 30, or it can make the user experience shitty and I will have to go via the browser to renew (I’ve forgotten my password) and honestly I may just say fuck it at this point. And here’s the thing— Apple doesn’t charge all apps the same. Apple wants me to use Apple Music and there I can subscribe via the app. And sometimes Apple picks winners— Uber does not pay a 30 percent, but smaller ride shares do. Competition! And of course I’m totally locked into Apple. Two factor authentication. Photos. Shit in the cloud. When I need a new phone I for sure want to just image my iPhone to the new one; trying to move to Android makes me shudder. And— key point— my choices are Apple and Android, basically, for a functioning OS. And also it’s a felony to jailbreak my iPhone to move shit. Remember, iPhone is supposed to be easier. User friendly. Seamless. Unless I want to use a streaming service I like more than Apple Music. Then it’s not, and that’s enshitification. Pure rent-seeking; and we could regulate this shit and say “Apple, you basically have a monopoly on apps. You have to extend them all the same terms of use and fees.” We could say “we aren’t going to make it a felony for people to move their own data from one phone to another.” And this is everywhere. Getting commercials on Amazon Prime streaming— after you cut the cord and bought a sub— is enshitification. The entire Amazon search is a grift scheme designed to have sellers compete for how much they will pay for product placement and you the buyer have to work harder to find what you want in a sea of drop-shop slop. That’s enshitification. I am sure it’s creating shareholder value but it’s not creating value. And back to AI— what OpenAI is doing is getting OpenAI in EVERYTHING. Walmart, your bank, whatever. And then once it’s there and you can’t get a toilet plunger at the Wal-Mart without it Altman will jack up the price and reduce support and add on features to make it even more impossible to dislodge. And that’s where the shareholder value comes in. This is not “creative destruction.”
October 17Oct 17 Yeah, Apple doesn't sell your shit to the extent Google does, but they lock you in and make it difficult to leave. Google does the same shit, to a slightly lesser extent, and sells your shit. All of that is rent-seeking, not innovation. And what of it is innovation gets corrupted into rent-seeking.
October 17Oct 17 Author 39 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said: Yeah, Apple doesn't sell your shit to the extent Google does, but they lock you in and make it difficult to leave. Google does the same shit, to a slightly lesser extent, and sells your shit. All of that is rent-seeking, not innovation. And what of it is innovation gets corrupted into rent-seeking. Yeah, and the earlier “good” version is not a loss leader as Vegas describes. Costco’s hot dogs are a loss leader. They get you in the door and build good will and then you buy other stuff that you need that is profitable. Enshitiffication would be if Costco sold hot dogs for a dime while overpaying for wieners at every producer so long as they only sold to Costco. Then, when the only place you can get a hot dog is Costco, they add a small dollop of shit to the “basic dog” but left it off if you upgraded to the 20 dollar dog— and at the same time reduce what they pay to the weiner producers. This is basically how big tech operates.
October 17Oct 17 14 hours ago, Chopper said: They're destroying the internet. The bubble and the unsustainable levels of investment can't stop soon enough. I have both an offline wikipedia of of the top 50k articles and a 3B parameter Edge AI Studio (Google) model on an older Android tablet. Both are ~3-5 GB. While it is very cool to see an offline LLM model work with no internet connection, the output is laughably vague or wrong. It's no contest what I would rather have. I don't need the internet fed back to me in a predictive way at extreme computational cost when it is already available easily. Edited October 17Oct 17 by Nightfly
October 17Oct 17 14 hours ago, 956 Worldwide said: Yeah, and the earlier “good” version is not a loss leader as Vegas describes. Costco’s hot dogs are a loss leader. They get you in the door and build good will and then you buy other stuff that you need that is profitable. Enshitiffication would be if Costco sold hot dogs for a dime while overpaying for wieners at every producer so long as they only sold to Costco. Then, when the only place you can get a hot dog is Costco, they add a small dollop of shit to the “basic dog” but left it off if you upgraded to the 20 dollar dog— and at the same time reduce what they pay to the weiner producers. This is basically how big tech operates. It sounds like the fundamental beef is with money, specifically Venture Capital. And, it makes sense that OpenAI would know how to run this playbook perfectly given Sam Altman's VC / YC pedigree. Thanks for your post, the costco hot dog analogy really helped me visualize and unlocked your point for me. ETA because I'm just now catching up and seeing it, but I do have a larger problem with your apple gripe and disagree there. Edited October 17Oct 17 by Vegas64
October 17Oct 17 2 minutes ago, Vegas64 said: It sounds like the fundamental beef is with money, specifically Venture Capital. No, the problem is with predatory, monopolistic practices, which achieve their greatest success when backed with stacks of money. The money is just an enabler/accelerator.
October 20Oct 20 This is the kind of shit that will take off with AI/is taking off. NSFW Spoiler They are fucking with photos of Mariska Hargitay's mom and Sasha Alexander's mother-in-law.
October 20Oct 20 So, what is the phrase for AI that feeds on itself? Yeah, I know its cannibalism and whatnot, but I recall a perfect phrase/name for the phenomenon, but can't remember it now.
October 20Oct 20 1 hour ago, Brisketexan said: So, what is the phrase for AI that feeds on itself? Yeah, I know its cannibalism and whatnot, but I recall a perfect phrase/name for the phenomenon, but can't remember it now. Asswater?
October 20Oct 20 1 hour ago, Brisketexan said: So, what is the phrase for AI that feeds on itself? Yeah, I know its cannibalism and whatnot, but I recall a perfect phrase/name for the phenomenon, but can't remember it now. Hapsburg AI
October 20Oct 20 Author 2 hours ago, Brisketexan said: So, what is the phrase for AI that feeds on itself? Yeah, I know its cannibalism and whatnot, but I recall a perfect phrase/name for the phenomenon, but can't remember it now. Self-licking ice cream cone?
October 20Oct 20 21 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said: Self-licking ice cream cone? no, that's the commercial real estate market and RTO mandates
October 21Oct 21 Amazon Plans to Replace More Than Half a Million Jobs With Robots Internal documents show the company that changed how people shop has a far-reaching plan to automate 75 percent of its operations. Over the past two decades, no company has done more to shape the American workplace than Amazon. In its ascent to become the nation’s second-largest employer, it has hired hundreds of thousands of warehouse workers, built an army of contract drivers and pioneered using technology to hire, monitor and manage employees. Now, interviews and a cache of internal strategy documents viewed by The New York Times reveal that Amazon executives believe the company is on the cusp of its next big workplace shift: replacing more than half a million jobs with robots. Amazon’s U.S. work force has more than tripled since 2018 to almost 1.2 million. But Amazon’s automation team expects the company can avoid hiring more than 160,000 people in the United States it would otherwise need by 2027. That would save about 30 cents on each item that Amazon picks, packs and delivers to customers. Executives told Amazon’s board last year that they hoped robotic automation would allow the company to continue to avoid adding to its U.S. work force in the coming years, even though they expect to sell twice as many products by 2033. That would translate to more than 600,000 people whom Amazon didn’t need to hire. At facilities designed for superfast deliveries, Amazon is trying to create warehouses that employ few humans at all. And documents show that Amazon’s robotics team has an ultimate goal to automate 75 percent of its operations. Amazon is so convinced this automated future is around the corner that it has started developing plans to mitigate the fallout in communities that may lose jobs. Documents show the company has considered building an image as a “good corporate citizen” through greater participation in community events such as parades and Toys for Tots. The documents contemplate avoiding using terms like “automation” and “A.I.” when discussing robotics, and instead use terms like “advanced technology” or replace the word “robot” with “cobot,” which implies collaboration with humans. Amazon said in a statement that the documents viewed by The Times were incomplete and did not represent the company’s overall hiring strategy. Kelly Nantel, a spokeswoman for Amazon, said the documents reflected the viewpoint of one group inside the company and noted that Amazon planned to hire 250,000 people for the coming holiday season, though the company declined to say how many of those roles would be permanent. Amazon also said that it’s not insisting executives avoid certain terms, and that community involvement is unrelated to automation. Amazon’s plans could have profound impact on blue-collar jobs throughout the country and serve as a model for other companies like Walmart, the nation’s largest private employer, and UPS. The company transformed the U.S. work force as it created a booming demand for warehousing and delivery jobs. But now, as it leads the way for automation, those roles could become more technical, higher paid and more scarce. Gift link: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/21/technology/inside-amazons-plans-to-replace-workers-with-robots.html?unlocked_article_code=1.vE8.UxIh.b0QqhmR8pUfz&smid=url-share
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.