Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Surly Horns

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty

Featured Replies

  • Replies 28.5k
  • Views 3m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • HillCountryBevo
    HillCountryBevo

    Imagine your basis of hating Trump is because of mean tweets, January 6 and “hush money” trial all because liberal media is crooked. Fuck right off. This is my last post in this forum  dumb fucki

  • Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand
    Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand

    When you're a court, you just grab their asset, and they let you do it!

  • HillCountryBevo
    HillCountryBevo

    Bye bitch. Enjoy living in literal hell if your man Biden is re elected

Posted Images

#1052
1 minute ago, TwiceHorn said:

Reporting 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree, all felonies.

I'm reading at least one of the charges is conspiracy, which seems to ramp things up even further - again, from what I am reading

  • Author
#1054
2 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Reporting 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree, all felonies.

image.gif.9c820b5fb83536e53d9869fe2143a5d4.gif

#1055

I'm not sure how important a conspiracy really is.

People always think it's worse than the underlying crime and it never is.  It's the same as the underlying crime and can be harder to prove.  It does allow for conviction of an offense that didn't actually occur, and that's about it.

Edited by TwiceHorn

#1056
Just now, TwiceHorn said:

I'm not sure how important a conspiracy really is.

People always think it's worse than the underlying crime and it never is.  It's the same as the underlying crime and can be harder to prove.


everything will be hard to charge on the case 

#1058

A talking head points out:

11 reimbursement checks to Cohen

1 invoice per check

1 ledger entry per check.

That's 33 falsified business records.

Then a final count of consipracy to falsify business records.  So, maybe Trump didn't falsify any records, but he conspired with Cohen and others to falsify the above records.

#1059

took this pic at the CO state capitol yesterday...we giggled bc the look on Obama's face is perfect...

we know, Barack, we know. 😒

 

20230403_144800.jpg

#1060

I’m busier then a one legged woman in an ass kicking contest today, but I want a record of my presence here today.

giphy.gif
giphy.gif
giphy.gif

#1063
3 minutes ago, The Royal We said:

image.png.2776eedf568ea17c0a6e45178a835387.png

GIF by Giffffr

(starring in this gif is yellow rose alum camille chen)

Edited by speed817

#1067
3 minutes ago, Captainant said:

Boris Epstein being in court with trump today is pretty notable. No idea why he's here

He doesn't know any better.

 

 

#1068
2 minutes ago, Captainant said:

Boris Epstein being in court with trump today is pretty notable. No idea why he's here

Hopefully, it means he has a say in his defense, because he's a fucking assclown.

#1070
Just now, Beau Vine said:

 

If true (and that's a big IF coming from brietbart via Donnie Cokehead), then the judge should recuse himself and hand this off to another judge.  Is it a legal ground for recusal?  Not sure.  But why give Team MAGA something to bitch about beyond the general bullshit far left lib label?

#1073
Just now, South Austin said:

If true (and that's a big IF coming from brietbart via Donnie Cokehead), then the judge should recuse himself and hand this off to another judge.  Is it a legal ground for recusal?  Not sure.  But why give Team MAGA something to bitch about beyond the general bullshit far left lib label?

Well, Merchan is a Democrat, ran as one, presumably is a party member, etc.  I don't think that's grounds for recusal.

Certainly isn't for Clarence.

There is some thought that the Chief Judge should reassign.

#1074
1 minute ago, TwiceHorn said:

Hopefully, it means he has a say in his defense, because he's a fucking assclown.

He also had some of his shit seized by Jan6 investigator warrants. Just really fucking weird to see the streams crossing already. 

Gonna be interesting once they adjourn for today, seems like they've been in court for nearly 75 minutes now

#1076
Just now, TwiceHorn said:

Well, Merchan is a Democrat, ran as one, presumably is a party member, etc.  I don't think that's grounds for recusal.

Certainly isn't for Clarence.

There is some thought that the Chief Judge should reassign.

Sure, I don't think sharing party affiliation with the defendant's political opponent in 2020 should be grounds for refusal.  But if his daughter worked for the campaign of that opponent and that campaign is sort of the subject of the offenses in the indictment, then the optics are worse.  Again, legal grounds for recusal under New York law?  I don't know.  But I think it would be a good idea to avoid any low-hanging fruit for the defendant and his legions of mouth breathers.

#1077
5 minutes ago, South Austin said:

Sure, I don't think sharing party affiliation with the defendant's political opponent in 2020 should be grounds for refusal.  But if his daughter worked for the campaign of that opponent and that campaign is sort of the subject of the offenses in the indictment, then the optics are worse.  Again, legal grounds for recusal under New York law?  I don't know.  But I think it would be a good idea to avoid any low-hanging fruit for the defendant and his legions of mouth breathers.

I don't think it would be, and I get your point.  But the Legion of Dumb is going to bitch no matter what.  Now if the judge were related to Stormy (like say her "step-brother"), had produced one of her fine films, or had left a review of one of said films on Rotten Tomatoes or the like, it might be a little closer of a question. 

Edited by dcbc

#1079
1 minute ago, dcbc said:

Now if the judge were related to Stormy, had produced one of her fine films, or had left a review of one of said films on Rotten Tomatoes or the like, it might be a little closer of a question. 

I don't think being a critic of fine film is grounds for refusal.

#1080
1 minute ago, South Austin said:

Sure, I don't think sharing party affiliation with the defendant's political opponent in 2020 should be grounds for refusal.  But if his daughter worked for the campaign of that opponent and that campaign is sort of the subject of the offenses in the indictment, then the optics are worse.  Again, legal grounds for recusal under New York law?  I don't know.  But I think it would be a good idea to avoid any low-hanging fruit for the defendant and his legions of mouth breathers.

isn't the indictment re: paying off Stormy? that was 2016 when he ran against Clinton, not Biden.

#1081
40 minutes ago, GhostOfTomJoad said:

There's a closeup shot of Trump with an eye zit growing out of his right eyelid. Reminded me Chris Elliott in There's Something About Mary.

Too much makeup 

#1082
4 minutes ago, South Austin said:

I don't think being a critic of fine film is grounds for refusal.

She doesn't know what "refusal" means.

#1083
14 minutes ago, bluto said:

Can’t wait for magaFox to talk about how important it is to protect the judge in this case 

Tucker is going to be outside this guys house in a hood 

#1084

Apparently a great deal of discussion about a protective order pertaining at least to discovery/evidence and social media.

They may wait until he spews some shit before going for an outright gag order.

#1088
3 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Apparently a great deal of discussion about a protective order pertaining at least to discovery/evidence and social media.

They may wait until he spews some shit before going for an outright gag order.

My innuendo meter just red lined.

#1092
5 minutes ago, PenelopeWitherspoon said:

This attorney is an idiot.

Are you really questioning the bona fides of Joey Tacos?

 

#1093
Just now, Beau Vine said:

Are you really questioning the bona fides of Joey Tacos?

 

On Tuesday of all days too!

#1097
1 hour ago, tx 3 putt said:

He’s not happy 😂😂😂

He really thought America would be up in flames right now.  I’m serious.  The gravy seals have failed him.  Truly shocking. 

#1098
3 minutes ago, Beau Vine said:

Are you really questioning the bona fides of Joey Tacos?

 

He's no Freddy Riedenschneider

#1099
1 minute ago, jimmyjazz said:

So the talking heads saying it was 11 x 3 falsifying business records + 1 conspiracy were . . . wrong.

The press release apparently characterizes the scheme as a conspiracy to influence the election, but no actual criminal charge.

Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.