Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Surly Horns

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty

Featured Replies

29 minutes ago, HenryJames said:

IMG_5452.png

Perchance?

 

 

  • Replies 28.5k
  • Views 3m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • HillCountryBevo
    HillCountryBevo

    Imagine your basis of hating Trump is because of mean tweets, January 6 and “hush money” trial all because liberal media is crooked. Fuck right off. This is my last post in this forum  dumb fucki

  • Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand
    Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand

    When you're a court, you just grab their asset, and they let you do it!

  • HillCountryBevo
    HillCountryBevo

    Bye bitch. Enjoy living in literal hell if your man Biden is re elected

Posted Images

1 minute ago, Bullneck said:

Perchance?

 

 

Bad idea.  Someone could PPV the broadcast and I guarantee it would cover the bill.

  • Popular Post

The hits keep coming …

 

1 hour ago, Brisketexan said:

I mean.....there's also this.

Seriously, I don't even know how the law handles serial, continuing defamation once there's already been a trial and verdict.

If you call me a pedophile who rapes my own kids, and I sue and get punitives of $10 million....and the minute after the verdict, you go outside and say Brisket is still a pedophile who rapes his own kids.....then that's a new tort.  The falsity of which has already been established in the first case.  So....I file suit again, and get a whole new bite at the punitive damages apple.  All.  Day.  Long.

See, for instance, the Georgia election workers.

image.thumb.png.0430e8f67ba46a574a13920789dd39f2.png

10 hours ago, DDD Dad said:

I guess I don’t see it as close a question as you’ve suggested. This reminds me of when the 11th circuit judge I clerked for swore me in to the bar (twice), he read me the oath, he repeated the part about candor two or three times. 
 

(He was a hell of a guy)

Sorry to derail, but why did you get sworn in twice? 

Jury should have made it exactly $91 million, for reasons.

21 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

The hits keep coming …

 

Hugh Jackman Reaction GIF

31 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:


 

 

Yes and no.  As Twice noted, this case depends on the underlying case that found that defamation occurred, which IS on appeal and has actual appellate grounds.  If that case is reversed, then this one is toast too.  But on its own....yeah, not much chance for reversible error in this specific case.

48 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:


 

 

oh that's beautiful:

"For example, she kept saying 'no objection' as exhibits were entered into evidence.

"It appeared to me that she was saying that because she that's something she had heard real lawyers say before."

4 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

oh that's beautiful:

"For example, she kept saying 'no objection' as exhibits were entered into evidence.

"It appeared to me that she was saying that because she that's something she had heard real lawyers say before."

Season 5 Episode 20 GIF by The Simpsons

2 hours ago, yoladu said:

image.thumb.png.de3e9f3f2b96a18d48a87c14cd39f888.png

Habba Dabb Notgonnaworkherenomore

.......

Edited by dcbc
Question answered in another post.

2 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

As mentioned above, there is an appeal of the first verdict ongoing.  From what I read it is not the usual borderline frivolous Trump bullshit that is easily dismissed.  Someone that is a more seasoned/sophisticated appellate practitioner will have to opine on that.  Maybe Carroll's brief will make me feel better about it.

But if that appeal works, the first verdict will be undone and this one will go right along with it as it is premised on the first one being "law of the case" that decided many of the issues.  The whole shootin match will have to be retried, if Carroll chooses to do that and the witness list for her may be quite different.

This was an amendment to add more allegations to up the damages, which is why law-of-the-case would apply, correct?  But law of the case wouldn't apply to a subsequent suit, if I'm remembering it correctly.  But I suppose you could admit the prior judgment as evidence in support of the truth of the statement that she'd been raped so as to prove the falsity of the ongoing denials.  It seems like an awkward process going forward.

Edited by dcbc

39 minutes ago, dcbc said:

She already had a trial, verdict, and damages.  This was a second damages hearing based on statements he made after the first one, right?

Curiously, both before and after. 

This case started as pure defamation because the sexual assault claims were barred by limitations.  The defamation alleged occurred when he was president and got bogged down in Westfall Act/immunity litigation and appeals. 

She filed a second suit alleging sexual assault and out of office defamation and that is the one that went to trial. New York revived barred sexual assault claims for one year, allowing them to be brought. 

The appeal mandate in favor of Carroll on the Westfall Act issues came down during or after the verdict in the first trial,which could not consider the 2019 defamatory statements. 

I suppose to some extent because the very first defamatory statements were excluded from Carroll I, and they usually inflict the most damage, that may explain the moderate award in the first trial and the fairly jumbo one here.  

Edited by TwiceHorn

36 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

 As Twice noted, this case depends on the underlying case that found that defamation occurred, which IS on appeal and has actual appellate grounds.  If that case is reversed, then this one is toast too.  

2bc.jpg.3bd79589ad37b069b3f05d01d9b97f65.jpg

1 hour ago, Gil Bang said:

Sorry to derail, but why did you get sworn in twice? 

Because he was inverted 

9 minutes ago, Judge Roybeanbag said:

He definitely has a plan C.  

I thought that was Hep C

9 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

Because he was inverted 

coughBullshitcough

2 hours ago, 4th&Five said:

 He hates more than anything to look like a loser and today he’s all over TV looking like a loser. 

Oh? You should tune in to FoxNews. They were talking about the border when I flipped over. 
 

I wonder if the average maga cultist is even aware of today’s events. 

49 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

oh that's beautiful:

"For example, she kept saying 'no objection' as exhibits were entered into evidence.

"It appeared to me that she was saying that because she that's something she had heard real lawyers say before."

I've never had to wonder this before, but is there any form of "structural error" based on an argument of denial of procedural due process in a civil case that would not have to be preserved.  I've never seen an argument of structural error in civil cases.  Those lawyers tend to appeal trials where trial counsel was competent enough to make specific objections and get rulings.  If Habba dabba didn't preserve anything, I could see an appellate lawyer trying that if it even works in a civil case, if only to try to run out the clock on November on the off chance he wins, declares defamation the preferred form of speech, and turns the West Wing into one of those automated McDonalds.

Chickens coming home to roost on the mfers who use social media and TV to defame and damage other people. Alex Jones, Rudy Guiliani and now Donald Trump.  Wheels of justice often run slow but people need to realize that their words can have consequences.
The milstone does turn slow, but it grinds exceedingly fine.
image.thumb.jpeg.7a11d98252ca4109ec0d21bcc41184c9.jpeg
Counter point; big hands, ample vag depth, and I can go to town without fear of her discomfort.

In my experience.
10 minutes ago, cactusflinthead said:

 

 

In addition to the judgment, Trump should have to build her a ramp, like Richie had to do for Beanzie.

Edited by dcbc

7 minutes ago, Born to Run said:
3 hours ago, Bullneck said:
 
 

He is not paying you, dear.

He's likely paying her at least $5M.  Under the strange procedural circumstances, I wonder if they could move to increase the supercedeas bond?  Or are they stuck with the one they have.

2 minutes ago, dcbc said:

He's likely paying her at least $5M.  Under the strange procedural circumstances, I wonder if they could move to increase the supercedeas bond?  Or are they stuck with the one they have.

Well, I think this would be a separate appeal of a separate judgment and require a separate bond in the amount of judgment.

Going to be a bit tougher to post this one.  Does Carroll dare attempt to collect pending appeal?

28 minutes ago, yoladu said:

Oh? You should tune in to FoxNews. They were talking about the border when I flipped over. 
 

I wonder if the average maga cultist is even aware of today’s events. 

I stand corrected. Jesse Watters is interviewing throuples now. 

Edited by yoladu

2 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Well, I think this would be a separate appeal of a separate judgment and require a separate bond in the amount of judgment.

Going to be a bit tougher to post this one.  Does Carroll dare attempt to collect pending appeal?

I think that was already covered somewhere above, but yeah, I think it's a separate bond for each appeal. that's why everyone is chuckling over the fact that if he keeps yapping he'll get dragged right back to court. and she'll collect the money. 

what does she have to lose at this point? she's already a target of the maga hoard. if she's the one to actually bring him down, she'll be a heroine. funny thing is, if it's not her it's likely another woman along the way that will.

4 hours ago, yoladu said:

image.thumb.png.de3e9f3f2b96a18d48a87c14cd39f888.png

Alina's hand bigger than Trump's.

I'll say it twice.

Edited by RDCanecutter
Damn they big. The hands.

25 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Well, I think this would be a separate appeal of a separate judgment and require a separate bond in the amount of judgment.

Going to be a bit tougher to post this one.  Does Carroll dare attempt to collect pending appeal?

That's what I figured.  So does the $5M bond posted to appeal the judgment on liability and initial damages apply to her ability to recover the "amended" amount?  Probably?

  • Author
  • Popular Post
13 minutes ago, RDCanecutter said:

Alina's hand bigger than Trump's.

E. Jean Carroll has more balls than 80% of the Republican Congress……fact!

3 hours ago, Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand said:

I don't give a fuck. I spent a day and a half inside a 2 man cell (part time) with 5 other guys 

Damn, Old-Timer. Respeck.

3 hours ago, Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand said:

I don't give a fuck. I spent a day and a half inside a 2 man cell (part time) with 5 other guys for an unpaid no liability insurance traffic ticket in The Land Of The Free apologizing to the guy sleeping on floor whose face was closest to the toilet while I was peeing when I was poor as fuck and it's nauseating seeing this fuckstick know he's only subject to his VIP Civil code of goddamn law and quite confident he'll never experience the same even though he should be rotting in Guantanamo. 

High Five Friends GIF by Amazon Freevee

22 minutes ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

I think that was already covered somewhere above, but yeah, I think it's a separate bond for each appeal. that's why everyone is chuckling over the fact that if he keeps yapping he'll get dragged right back to court. and she'll collect the money. 

what does she have to lose at this point? she's already a target of the maga hoard. if she's the one to actually bring him down, she'll be a heroine. funny thing is, if it's not her it's likely another woman along the way that will.

I haven't paid close enough attention to this from a procedural standpoint.  And the idea of two separate damages trials stemming from one liability finding already is making my head hurt.  Or that might be the shingles vaccine I got earlier.

15 minutes ago, dcbc said:

I haven't paid close enough attention to this from a procedural standpoint.  And the idea of two separate damages trials stemming from one liability finding already is making my head hurt.  Or that might be the shingles vaccine I got earlier.

You slept with South Austin‘s mom, too?

  • Author

Trump can pay his judgment from that $250 million he collected after he lost…..to battle election fraud, or he could reopen Trump University.

Edited by Cairn Horn88

4 hours ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

It will not.  You could have video evidence of the most despicable sex crimes and it would be minimized as his “locker room phase” by the MAGA faithful.  

 

That's mighty Baptist of them.

She won’t see a dime. These people don’t see consequences 

  • Popular Post

Whew.  Glad Rudy was able to clear it up for everyone.

 

 

 

 

Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.