Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Surly Horns

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty

Featured Replies

5 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

315F2F5E-E559-4071-A4C9-2D7E509CC27A.jpeg.c5deebaf06240fa7830a63f9ceedb268.jpeg

“ I can post an unlimited amount of posts on a thread on the same site, and on the same subject for free. This aggression shall not stand!!!”

 

"And tits!"

  • Replies 28.5k
  • Views 3m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • HillCountryBevo
    HillCountryBevo

    Imagine your basis of hating Trump is because of mean tweets, January 6 and “hush money” trial all because liberal media is crooked. Fuck right off. This is my last post in this forum  dumb fucki

  • Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand
    Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand

    When you're a court, you just grab their asset, and they let you do it!

  • HillCountryBevo
    HillCountryBevo

    Bye bitch. Enjoy living in literal hell if your man Biden is re elected

Posted Images

OK... So... We'll thinks he gets convicted? 

Indicted to me means, "He'll be exonerated because he's rich and whatnot." 

Whatnot isn't the W word I would normally use. 

Without strong evidence, doesn't this backfire? 

2 hours ago, TheStoicPaisano said:

Hair guy makes noise.

Is Blagojevich hiding a third eye?

The Simulation is entertaining. 

165B0A2C-823E-4B8F-B37E-C8DA50B64983.thumb.jpeg.e2b1ceb450994f8b24cba2c2392c9793.jpeg

John Dean and Carl Bernstein talking about a President’s criminality. 

5 minutes ago, Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand said:

*Raises hand and has still seen the inside of a jail cell and still pissed this law and order POS hasn't*

Everybody should go to jail once as a young person.  Just for a night.  It will convince you to generally be a law abiding citizen for the rest of your life.

13 minutes ago, Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand said:

*Raises hand and has still seen the inside of a jail cell and still pissed this law and order POS hasn't*

4 minutes ago, conVINCEd said:

Everybody should go to jail once as a young person.  Just for a night.  It will convince you to generally be a law abiding citizen for the rest of your life.

Considering Season 3 GIF by Portlandia

I dunno, I was convinced without having to go to jail. 
 

3 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:


delish 

70796111077__CC91A1C5-8B50-4F1A-8A6B-0382ABDAB3D7.jpeg

70796255037__E5D85821-81B9-4A15-A1C4-E0417C4E2F03.jpeg

where’s the jank ass carrot?

Edited by NameAlreadyInUse

3 minutes ago, NameAlreadyInUse said:

I dunno, I was convinced without having to go to jail. 
 

where’s the jank ass carrot?

A Vanilla Ice concert got out of hand.  Shit happens.  Lessons were learned.

35 minutes ago, conVINCEd said:

Everybody should go to jail once as a young person.  Just for a night.  It will convince you to generally be a law abiding citizen for the rest of your life.

The wealthy should go to jail at least once, not because they're inherently bad, but because if they remain wealthy they will almost inevitably become bad.

 

4 minutes ago, conVINCEd said:

A Vanilla Ice concert got out of hand.  Shit happens.  Lessons were learned.

High Five Friends GIF by Amazon Freevee

3 hours ago, Cairn Horn88 said:

Hung.

We could sell this to him... "This is a good idea, after all that bad Stormy PR. The whole country will be talking about how you were well hung."

1 hour ago, conVINCEd said:

A Vanilla Ice concert got out of hand.  Shit happens.  Lessons were learned.

Well you should’ve gone to jail for going to a vanilla ice concert. Fucking poser from Dallas pretending to be from Miami. 

19 minutes ago, NameAlreadyInUse said:

Well you should’ve gone to jail for going to a vanilla ice concert. Fucking poser from Dallas pretending to be from Miami. 

It was kind of a unique situation.  It was a Vanilla Ice concert,  but Vanilla Ice took a personal day because he wasn’t feeling well, and I was one of many trapped in the basement of Bob Popular when they announced he wasn’t performing after a 4 hour delay.  People were angry,  the bouncers got violent, and APD threw anybody they got their hands on into the paddy wagon.  I was released with no charges early in the morning.  No fights, nobody got raped in the holding tank, it was just a shitty place.  Good life lesson.  Jail is bad, avoid going there.

46 minutes ago, NameAlreadyInUse said:

Well you should’ve gone to jail for going to a vanilla ice concert. Fucking poser from Dallas pretending to be from Miami. 

spacer.png

so what's going to happen tuesday ? 

he shows up, they read the charges and he goes home to begin his endless delay tactics ?

Well you should’ve gone to jail for going to a vanilla ice concert. Fucking poser from Dallas pretending to be from Miami. 

* Carrollton
4 hours ago, Slacks said:

OK... So... We'll thinks he gets convicted? 

Indicted to me means, "He'll be exonerated because he's rich and whatnot." 

Whatnot isn't the W word I would normally use. 

Without strong evidence, doesn't this backfire? 

I don't think it matters.  Either way, he's "elected" president in 2024.  And I mean the quotes around "elected," because he's already done the dry run for stealing the presidency.  The sitting president isn't sitting in prison.  Or even being criminally tried.

6 hours ago, Gatorubet said:

While true, I think the very best we could expect before some CR themed post hit is about - three posts?

The downside is, we will never know what Mulletfree thinks about this. 

Not even funny as a joke, sir. 

Everybody should go to jail once as a young person.  Just for a night.  It will convince you to generally be a law abiding citizen for the rest of your life.

Hello Dad…

I have no doubt whatsoever that he intentionally kept national security secrets and sold them, or at least negotiated to sell them, to some bad people, probably Saudi. If it was just documents even his dumb ass would have given them back, he could still cry witchhunt to his merry band of morons and they’d eat it up just the same. There’s a reason he didn’t and why this is being prosecuted, he’s fucked, hope he dies is a pool of his own shit soon.

Edited by 'stache

7 hours ago, BamaATL said:

So Federal Prosecutors have a conviction rate of 95%, in part because most cases don't ever make it to trial.  That having been said, the odds of him beating one of the charges would be small, but possible.  The odds of beating 2 getting real small, but 7?  I'm tired, and I haven't calculated odds on this, but let's just say that would be extraordinary.  

With that all in mind, getting procedure correct makes a ton of sense, because a overturn on a venue technicality would seem to be the best odds for the defendant, not on the case itself.  

The federal conviction rate drops to about 83% at trial.  Still pretty salty.

This is not a very complicated case, as they go.  No novel legal theories (honest services fraud, obstruction of official proceeding).  To the extent there is specific intent, it sounds like Smith beat the bushes until he got evidence of it, from Trump's own mouth and his lawyers' notes.

I don't think there's much a jury can get confused on, or anything that's going to resemble a failure of proof of the elements of the crimes.  I don't believe there will be any "unique" POTUS defenses available.

It's going to take a real obstinate dickhead juror to hang this jury.  Maga world can supply those in spades of course and is well-represented in South Florida.  But, this case apparently is venued within Miami-Dade county, which is Biden country, and I believe jurors will be pulled mostly from that county, and not some of the more rural counties in the district.

I think it may be likely that the presiding judge extends the usual federal voir dire, ostensibly for the benefit of Trump.

But if you think about it, from an obvious bias standpoint, it will be much, much easier for the government to seat "fair" jurors than it will be for Trump to seat Magat jurors.  People that would be willing to say out loud to a federal judge that they will set aside their biases and judge the case on the evidence presented.  They're just not smart enough to do that convincingly.

18 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

They're just not smart enough to do that convincingly.

Half of them will show up in red hats

5 minutes ago, WBT said:

Half of them will show up in red hats

And the other half in blue hats that say not maga. 

8 hours ago, conVINCEd said:

Everybody should go to jail once as a young person.  Just for a night.  It will convince you to generally be a law abiding citizen for the rest of your life.

South Padre police feed you Whataburger in the drunk tank.

9 hours ago, Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand said:

Love how in the minds of aggy, law enforcement, that announced 11 days before the election it was re-opening the investigation into Hillary (based on copies of e-mails they had possession of for a month) while keeping the public in the dark that they were investigating Trump, was in the bag for the libs, law enforcement's longtime traditional ally.

Obvious, yes, but bears repeating-

Goddamn insane.

Read five posts all stunning examples of projection, and I could read no more. The ones on that thread are the best articulation, including inability to conjugate verbs or choose the correct homonym, of that large plurality that is argument-proof. 

It takes a cult to know a cult. 

7 hours ago, conVINCEd said:

A Vanilla Ice concert got out of hand.  Shit happens.  Lessons were learned.

Sounds like a helluva movie pitch. Greenlighted.

9 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

One thing, though, we're not going to hear shit from the government about the progress of the case or the evidence until the trial.  The only things we're going to hear about are Trump's pretrial motions,

[As always, I appreciate @TwiceHorn taking the time and clarity of speech to help guide my own opinions.]

Regarding the quote above:

We'll also hear months of lying propaganda spewing from Trump and even his opponents in the GOP race. We will be flooded with catch phrases, slander, and appeals to rage. This will be Trump's constant predictions about rigged elections run through a thousand megaphones except now it's the trial that's rigged.

Is jury nullification the term? To me it's jury tampering on a massive scale as intimidation will be on the table. I'd love to be on the jury and think I could be fair weighing evidence. I'd be absolutely terrified of having my name go public.

It's not important that the prosecutors leak to or protect evidence from the public. Enough is out there already. It may not be enough to convict, but what we know is fucking suspicious and calls out for criminal investigation and prosecution. The large plurality is absolutely blind to it. And will remain so.

I can't believe I'm going to write this without even a gram of humor: present the evidence to the public and perform summary executions. Remove the cancer root and branch.

But Roma, you're setting a precedent that the other side can turn against those who are pro-republic. 

They set the precedent of being willing to use mob violence to literally break into Congress, threaten violence to leaders of Congress, and stop the rightful processes of democratic transition to a new administration. 

I know I can't make a conclusive argument about the merits of summary execution.

I feel like I've tried to be reasonable with a mad woman who I used to know. She's slashing at me with a knife and has managed a few cuts to my arms and come close to my face. I'm backing up trying to calm her. I trip and fall backward. She rushes towards my exposed abdomen. Reasoning is over.

My only move is to kick that face with all of my force. Regain my footing intent on disabling her to disarm her. I'd rather not kill her, but I will destroy her ability to harm me or anyone else. I start by destroying a knee with a kick or taking a shoulder or/and elbow forcing the knife to be released.

I don't want to slaughter the plurality. I do want to disarm and destroy the leadership that makes them dangerous to me. From there, we'd see how it goes.

That's where I think we are. I just wish we could rapidly excise Trump and the scum in Congress devoted to him. So I return to the dark contemplation of the merits of summary execution.

Deep end. I'm right on the edge of sliding into it.

  • Popular Post

 

4 minutes ago, cactusflinthead said:

 

This is why he pivoted from “i declassified them” to “Biden has documents all over the place, can’t charge me if you don’t charge him” in his rants. 

Just now, RomaVicta said:

[As always, I appreciate @TwiceHorn taking the time and clarity of speech to help guide my own opinions.]

Regarding the quote above:

We'll also hear months of lying propaganda spewing from Trump and even his opponents in the GOP race. We will be flooded with catch phrases, slander, and appeals to rage. This will be Trump's constant predictions about rigged elections run through a thousand megaphones except now it's the trial that's rigged.

Is jury nullification the term? To me it's jury tampering on a massive scale as intimidation will be on the table. I'd love to be on the jury and think I could be fair weighing evidence. I'd be absolutely terrified of having my name go public.

It's not important that the prosecutors leak to or protect evidence from the public. Enough is out there already. It may not be enough to convict, but what we know is fucking suspicious and calls out for criminal investigation and prosecution. The large plurality is absolutely blind to it. And will remain so.

I can't believe I'm going to write this without even a gram of humor: present the evidence to the public and perform summary executions. Remove the cancer root and branch.

But Roma, you're setting a precedent that the other side can turn against those who are pro-republic. 

They set the precedent of being willing to use mob violence to literally break into Congress, threaten violence to leaders of Congress, and stop the rightful processes of democratic transition to a new administration. 

I know I can't make a conclusive argument about the merits of summary execution.

I feel like I've tried to be reasonable with a mad woman who I used to know. She's slashing at me with a knife and has managed a few cuts to my arms and come close to my face. I'm backing up trying to calm her. I trip and fall backward. She rushes towards my exposed abdomen. Reasoning is over.

My only move is to kick that face with all of my force. Regain my footing intent on disabling her to disarm her. I'd rather not kill her, but I will destroy her ability to harm me or anyone else. I start by destroying a knee with a kick or taking a shoulder or/and elbow forcing the knife to be released.

I don't want to slaughter the plurality. I do want to disarm and destroy the leadership that makes them dangerous to me. From there, we'd see how it goes.

That's where I think we are. I just wish we could rapidly excise Trump and the scum in Congress devoted to him. So I return to the dark contemplation of the merits of summary execution.

Deep end. I'm right on the edge of sliding into it.

Oh yeah, no doubt.

I am going to assume that the judge enters some kind of gag order on Trump similar to that in the Bragg case, maybe harsher.

And, similar to the Carroll case, I think the judge is going to insure that the jurors remain anonymous to the Trump side, at least.

1 hour ago, RomaVicta said:

[As always, I appreciate @TwiceHorn taking the time and clarity of speech to help guide my own opinions.]

Regarding the quote above:

We'll also hear months of lying propaganda spewing from Trump and even his opponents in the GOP race. We will be flooded with catch phrases, slander, and appeals to rage. This will be Trump's constant predictions about rigged elections run through a thousand megaphones except now it's the trial that's rigged.

Is jury nullification the term? To me it's jury tampering on a massive scale as intimidation will be on the table. I'd love to be on the jury and think I could be fair weighing evidence. I'd be absolutely terrified of having my name go public.

It's not important that the prosecutors leak to or protect evidence from the public. Enough is out there already. It may not be enough to convict, but what we know is fucking suspicious and calls out for criminal investigation and prosecution. The large plurality is absolutely blind to it. And will remain so.

I can't believe I'm going to write this without even a gram of humor: present the evidence to the public and perform summary executions. Remove the cancer root and branch.

But Roma, you're setting a precedent that the other side can turn against those who are pro-republic. 

They set the precedent of being willing to use mob violence to literally break into Congress, threaten violence to leaders of Congress, and stop the rightful processes of democratic transition to a new administration. 

I know I can't make a conclusive argument about the merits of summary execution.

I feel like I've tried to be reasonable with a mad woman who I used to know. She's slashing at me with a knife and has managed a few cuts to my arms and come close to my face. I'm backing up trying to calm her. I trip and fall backward. She rushes towards my exposed abdomen. Reasoning is over.

My only move is to kick that face with all of my force. Regain my footing intent on disabling her to disarm her. I'd rather not kill her, but I will destroy her ability to harm me or anyone else. I start by destroying a knee with a kick or taking a shoulder or/and elbow forcing the knife to be released.

I don't want to slaughter the plurality. I do want to disarm and destroy the leadership that makes them dangerous to me. From there, we'd see how it goes.

That's where I think we are. I just wish we could rapidly excise Trump and the scum in Congress devoted to him. So I return to the dark contemplation of the merits of summary execution.

Deep end. I'm right on the edge of sliding into it.

Ok, how did Brisket get a hold of Roma's account?

2 minutes ago, Chuckie Finster said:

Welp, at least we will always have the last 12 hours of fun.
 

oof-old-man.gif

Wait what? Wasn't she the special master in this same case? How could she serve as the judge?

3 minutes ago, Chuckie Finster said:

Welp, at least we will always have the last 12 hours of fun.
 

Fail Charlie Brown GIF by Peanuts

Lmao. What another weird and lucky break for trumpco again!

Fuck me running and dip me in shit.

Cannon!? Aileen Fucking Cannon!?

Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.