May 13May 13 Author And by the way, the definition of what they consider to be obscene covers a shitload of your typical R-rated movies and TV shows.
May 13May 13 Popular Post 32 minutes ago, drt said: I knew there was a reason I never threw away those hard drives from college!
May 13May 13 This will just create another prohibition era during which we buy all our porn from the mafia.
May 13May 13 Not me! I’m going to start making bootleg porn in my dirty bathtub in the basement. As you know, it might make you go blind, but the “juice” will most probably be worth the squeeze.
May 13May 13 Just now, tbone_ said: So what vpns do ya’ll like in Texas? Why would you get a VPN based in Texas?
May 13May 13 My hope is that the test case challenge to this proposed legislation is a satire porn in which the actors depict Donald Trump fucking all of his children, a throwback to the Hustler ad with a satiric interview of Jerry Falwell talking about losing his virginity to his mother in an outhouse.
May 13May 13 I like how apparently they think pornhub is the only site out there. This will not stop anyone from accessing anything.
May 13May 13 I can't define porn, but I know it when I see it. A kid's stepmom getting stuck in the dryer ain't it.
May 13May 13 Author 3 minutes ago, DaysOff said: I can't define porn, but I know it when I see it. A kid's stepmom getting stuck in the dryer ain't it. Nope, apparently, it's a pretty common thing to happen, according to the internet.
May 13May 13 Author 50 minutes ago, Js1 said: The slow march towards There's nothing slow about it, and this legislation will pass. 4 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said: I like how apparently they think pornhub is the only site out there. This will not stop anyone from accessing anything. It'll stop plenty of tech-ignorant people, but I'm assuming the VPNs will be blasting ads all over the place (more than they do now). Right now the legislation is just aimed at producers of porn, and their hosting companies.
May 13May 13 Author 23 minutes ago, South Austin said: My hope is that the test case challenge to this proposed legislation is a satire porn in which the actors depict Donald Trump fucking all of his children, a throwback to the Hustler ad with a satiric interview of Jerry Falwell talking about losing his virginity to his mother in an outhouse. How about just printing out large posters of Melania Trump posing nude with that other woman and displaying them in court? It's pretty wild that they are going to try and criminalize all porn and adult content in one go, (down to things like Game of Thrones) - I figured we would have gotten a nation-wide version of the Texas age ID bill where people had to present their IDs in some form to view porn/get put on a government list first. But nope, going right for the sources.
May 13May 13 I'm convinced most of these guys are so anti-porn because they've been burned by being poor lays and/or they are terrified of how they compare to guys who know how to fuck and girls who know how get off, and what it feels like to get off. ChangeMyMind.gif.
May 13May 13 SEC! SEC! SEC! A dipshit from Oklahoma is the genius behind this performative bullshit. Oklahoma, Texas, Alabama, there's not much difference. maga dudes are going to be hella conflicted.
May 13May 13 Popular Post 2 minutes ago, crash_davis said: maga dudes are going to be hella conflicted. Good news guys, if this image offends you, high likelihood the government will ban it too.
May 13May 13 59 minutes ago, tbone_ said: You know what I meant Treefiddy comes with a VPN if you ask for one.
May 13May 13 27 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said: I'm convinced most of these guys are so anti-porn because they've been burned by being poor lays and/or they are terrified of how they compare to guys who know how to fuck and girls who know how get off, and what it feels like to get off. ChangeMyMind.gif. A deeply rooted self-loathing is pretty core to the GOP platform.
May 13May 13 6 hours ago, atomheartbevo said: Congressional Republicans will introduce legislation Thursday that would severely crack down on internet pornography and potentially deal a major blow to the online porn industry. Republican Utah Sen. Mike Lee and Republican Illinois Rep. Mary Miller’s Interstate Obscenity Definition Act would create a national definition of obscenity under the Communications Act of 1934 and amend the Supreme Court’s 1973 “Miller Test” for determining what qualifies as obscene, according to background on the bill exclusively obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation. The bill would pave the way for the prosecution of obscene content disseminated across state lines or from foreign countries and open the door to federal restrictions or bans regarding online porn Maybe I wasn't paying close enough attention in civics class but isn't the First Amendment a check on the power of Congress? It says "Congress shall make no law" so why does "Based Mike Lee" think he can make a law that tells the Supreme Court how to define obscenity? How would it be any different from a gun-grabbing blue state senator (let's say Kirsten Gillibrand of NY) pushing a law that says the meaning of "arms" in Second Amendment is limited to muskets? I'll hang up and listen.
May 13May 13 6 minutes ago, chainsaw said: Maybe I wasn't paying close enough attention in civics class but isn't the First Amendment a check on the power of Congress? It says "Congress shall make no law" so why does "Based Mike Lee" think he can make a law that tells the Supreme Court how to define obscenity? How would it be any different from a gun-grabbing blue state senator (let's say Kirsten Gillibrand of NY) pushing a law that says the meaning of "arms" in Second Amendment is limited to muskets? I'll hang up and listen. Good point.
May 13May 13 1 hour ago, chainsaw said: Maybe I wasn't paying close enough attention in civics class but isn't the First Amendment a check on the power of Congress? It says "Congress shall make no law" so why does "Based Mike Lee" think he can make a law that tells the Supreme Court how to define obscenity? How would it be any different from a gun-grabbing blue state senator (let's say Kirsten Gillibrand of NY) pushing a law that says the meaning of "arms" in Second Amendment is limited to muskets? I'll hang up and listen. Idiots: Porn bad, guns gud. What's The Constitution?
May 13May 13 1 hour ago, High Plains Drifter said: proton Dumb question amnesty requested: proton free- Proton plus- Nominal amount per month Is the free worth a shit if I am basically streaming baseball( fuck MLB!!!) and occasional pegging videos? Before someone lights me up on the question about free, I have used a free ad blocker for years and it works like a charm. Is it reckless to even consider the free one for VPN? I would actually subscribe to MLB.com if the VPN works. Edited May 13May 13 by Iceman
May 13May 13 My VPN works fine for the porno, but MLB.com can identify most if not all the very popular VPNs. If you use one of those, you will still be blocked.
May 13May 13 Popular Post 36 minutes ago, Fudge Nuggets said: My VPN works fine for the porno, but MLB.com can identify most if not all the very popular VPNs. If you use one of those, you will still be blocked. MLB is quite determined to deprive themselves of my money.
May 13May 13 37 minutes ago, Fudge Nuggets said: My VPN works fine for the porno, but MLB.com can identify most if not all the very popular VPNs. If you use one of those, you will still be blocked. Thats why I use Honest Vaclav VPN Is safe! Not for crimes or to steal identities! Edited May 13May 13 by Bozo_Casanova
May 13May 13 As far as the gubment knows, I'm logging in from Astana, Kazakhstan. Edited May 13May 13 by MissingInAction
May 13May 13 1 hour ago, Iceman said: Dumb question amnesty requested: proton free- Proton plus- Nominal amount per month Is the free worth a shit if I am basically streaming baseball( fuck MLB!!!) and occasional pegging videos? Before someone lights me up on the question about free, I have used a free ad blocker for years and it works like a charm. Is it reckless to even consider the free one for VPN? I would actually subscribe to MLB.com if the VPN works. I got the proton plus because: 1) cheap 2) includes something like 10 different emails with more storage than I'll ever use. Also fuck google mail. With proton, some version of your actual name is probably still available as an email address. You don't have to have an email like "Iceemano1972xyz@proton.me" as your email. You can probably just be IcemanSmith@proton.me. For example, I use my actual first name, middle initial, last name as one of mine. I also have firstnamespam@proton.me for ordering crap online and they want an email. 3) the country/location that the server is located in is randomly chosen. It does every now and then pick a server in Texas, but you can just tell it to pick another. With the free version, you are limited on how often you can do this. 4) Backed up by Swiss privacy laws. (Full disclosure, I have no idea what this means). Not sure about MLB.com. Try the free one. If it doesn't work for MLB, then the paid one probably won't work either. Works fine for pron. Edited May 13May 13 by High Plains Drifter
May 13May 13 10 minutes ago, MissingInAction said: As far as the gubment knows, I'm logging in from Astana, Kazakhstan. With proton, sometimes its Poland, Japan, Netherlands, some eastern european country(ies) I don't remember, and sometimes, yes, Texas (which I just change). Man, those Japs have some weird taste in pron.
May 13May 13 I have multiple friends who use VPNs to get "in-market" MLB games and they don't get blocked. They are still subscribing to MLB.com, it's just using the VPN to gain access to teams they want to watch.
May 13May 13 Apropos VPNs https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/05/vpn-firm-says-it-didnt-know-customers-had-lifetime-subscriptions-cancels-them/ The new owners of VPN provider VPNSecure have drawn ire after canceling lifetime subscriptions. The owners told customers that they didn’t know about the lifetime subscriptions when they bought VPNSecure, and they cannot honor the purchases. In March, complaints started appearing online about lifetime subscriptions to VPNSecure no longer working. The first public response Ars Technica found came on April 28, when lifetime subscription holders reported receiving an email from the VPN provider saying: To continue providing a secure and high-quality experience for all users, Lifetime Deal accounts have now been deactivated as of April 28th, 2025. A copy of the email from “The VPN Secure Team” and posted on Reddit notes that VPNSecure had previously deactivated accounts with lifetime subscriptions that it said hadn’t been used in “over 6 months.” The message noted that VPNSecure was acquired in 2023, “including the technology, domain, and customer database—but not the liabilities.” The email continues: Unfortunately, the previous owner did not disclose that thousands of Lifetime Deals (LTDs) had been sold through platforms like StackSocial. We discovered this only months later—when a large portion of our resources were strained by these LTD accounts and high support volume from users, who through part of the database, provided no sustaining income to help us improve and maintain the service.
May 13May 13 Does Elon know about this new legislation? I gotta figure he's not too happy about it since most of Twitter these days is porn links.
May 13May 13 1 minute ago, HornOnTheBayou said: Does Elon know about this new legislation? I gotta figure he's not too happy about it since most of Twitter these days is porn links. Russia: How much more monies you need?
May 13May 13 15 minutes ago, HornOnTheBayou said: Does Elon know about this new legislation? I gotta figure he's not too happy about it since most of Twitter these days is porn links. I'm sure there will be a super special carve-out for "social media" where x% of your content is non-pornography. And that X will be whatever BS percentage Elon fakes and tells Mike Lee.
May 13May 13 1 hour ago, crash_davis said: Apropos VPNs https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/05/vpn-firm-says-it-didnt-know-customers-had-lifetime-subscriptions-cancels-them/ The new owners of VPN provider VPNSecure have drawn ire after canceling lifetime subscriptions. The owners told customers that they didn’t know about the lifetime subscriptions when they bought VPNSecure, and they cannot honor the purchases. In March, complaints started appearing online about lifetime subscriptions to VPNSecure no longer working. The first public response Ars Technica found came on April 28, when lifetime subscription holders reported receiving an email from the VPN provider saying: To continue providing a secure and high-quality experience for all users, Lifetime Deal accounts have now been deactivated as of April 28th, 2025. A copy of the email from “The VPN Secure Team” and posted on Reddit notes that VPNSecure had previously deactivated accounts with lifetime subscriptions that it said hadn’t been used in “over 6 months.” The message noted that VPNSecure was acquired in 2023, “including the technology, domain, and customer database—but not the liabilities.” The email continues: Unfortunately, the previous owner did not disclose that thousands of Lifetime Deals (LTDs) had been sold through platforms like StackSocial. We discovered this only months later—when a large portion of our resources were strained by these LTD accounts and high support volume from users, who through part of the database, provided no sustaining income to help us improve and maintain the service. I’m not sure how a lack of due diligence in the acquiring company’s behalf means they can shut off your shit without some sort of compensation.
May 13May 13 America, 2025.... Not obscene, and must be permitted and protected at all costs: characterizing brown people as vermin, claiming they are "poisoning the blood of our country," saying they should be exterminated, etc. Arresting and imprisoning someone for writing an op-ed. Shit like that. Obscene, and must be banned: pictures of tits. Yeah....we're a shithole country.
May 13May 13 Author 5 hours ago, crash_davis said: Idiots: Porn bad, guns gud. What's The Constitution? What if we started a porn company where every photo and every video showed guns. Everything from a little .38 up to .50. All of our videos take place in and around gun stores, hunting stands, firing ranges, etc. And then when they try to block us or shut us down, we go out there and say Mike Lee doesn't like guns.
May 13May 13 Author 7 hours ago, SydneyCarton said: I'm convinced most of these guys are so anti-porn because they've been burned by being poor lays and/or they are terrified of how they compare to guys who know how to fuck and girls who know how get off, and what it feels like to get off. ChangeMyMind.gif. All of that and it's an attack on the LBGTQ crowd, and it's another step towards an attempt at regulating the internet. Remember, the Speaker of the House and his 17-year-old son are each other's porn accountability buddies. These people are weird as fuck.
May 13May 13 27 minutes ago, Fudge Nuggets said: I’m not sure how a lack of due diligence in the acquiring company’s behalf means they can shut off your shit without some sort of compensation. Bro don't you want their shareholders to get the GAINZZZZZ they have an absolute right to?? Are you some kind of pinko?
May 13May 13 50 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said: What if we started a porn company where every photo and every video showed guns. Everything from a little .38 up to .50. All of our videos take place in and around gun stores, hunting stands, firing ranges, etc. And then when they try to block us or shut us down, we go out there and say Mike Lee doesn't like guns.
May 13May 13 1 hour ago, Brisketexan said: Obscene, and must be banned: pictures of tits. but only if they arouse, titillate, or gratify the sexual desire
May 13May 13 8 hours ago, immamac said: Treefiddy comes with a VPN if you ask for one. Does it work on iphone? I only jerk off with my iphone. If so I'll take it!
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.