February 1, 20241 yr 4 minutes ago, Hookem2147 said: From Bobby: I am told to expect to see some restructuring in the Texas personnel department as part of this move. Wonder if we might be adding a GM-type role too? Was just going to ask - I don't think we have that title, but Glasscock was essentially that, no? In the NFL you generally have a Director of Pro Personnel and a Director of College Scouting who roll up to the General Manager. Is the new way of college football to have a High School Recruiting and a College/Transfer Portal guy who roll up to a General Manager?
February 1, 20241 yr 9 minutes ago, JOSEYWALES66 said: Damn. This one hurts. I'm curious why we couldn't or wouldn't match their offer.   7 minutes ago, Tex-19 said: The glass dick? Sorry, couldn't help it. But yeah this sucks. Do we even have a GM? Seems odd that he'd leave I'm guessing that the GM role has more responsibilites and a pay raise, and it wasn't as simple as matching the offer. That's what my non-informed gut says here. And often you can't restructure until a change is made in an organization of size, so maybe Sark is using this blow to force a restructing in our favor. That's my pure sunshine take on this, which is probably nowhere near to reality.Â
February 1, 20241 yr 6 minutes ago, texifornia said: Damn, ok Lane. As said above, would be curious what went down there. Reeks of a cushy landing spot, though I know Glasscock has been pretty valuable. Bobby's notes give credence to that as well
February 1, 20241 yr 4 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said: That's what my non-informed gut says here. Non-informed gut off is a good description of....here.Â
February 1, 20241 yr Oh, hooray. Something dramatic to take all of my Thursday productivity away. Well done, everyone.Â
February 1, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, Ricky's one-hitter said: Oh, hooray. Something dramatic to take all of my Thursday productivity away. Well done, everyone. Time to make a wishlist of all the people we won't hire, so that when Sark does hire someone, Surly ends up like
February 1, 20241 yr I have a hard time seeing that guy move from Texas to Ole Miss without there being another reason behind it. Sucks because he was good in that role, but we’ll be fine.
February 1, 20241 yr Who was the guy at South Carolina (?) that Sark originally wanted for that spot? Â Maybe cycles back? Â Never a better time to ask than right after a playoff appearance and shit is rolling.Â
February 1, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, BurntOrangeBlooded15 said: Who was the guy at South Carolina (?) that Sark originally wanted for that spot?  Maybe cycles back?  Never a better time to ask than right after a playoff appearance and shit is rolling. Drew Hughes. He was named in all the stuff that went down at Tennessee under Pruitt and got a show-cause. That would likely never get through compliance.Â
February 1, 20241 yr 4 minutes ago, Hookem2147 said: Drew Hughes. He was named in all the stuff that went down at Tennessee under Pruitt and got a show-cause. That would likely never get through compliance. No, but do we even need a compliance department anymore?  It seems like nothing is enforceable.  Just threaten an anti-trust suit.  Eventually we will have unlimited eligibility, mid-season transfers, and guys who were cut from the NFL coming back to play college.
February 1, 20241 yr 4 minutes ago, ClubWhatever said: No, but do we even need a compliance department anymore? Â It seems like nothing is enforceable. Â Just threaten an anti-trust suit. Â Eventually we will have unlimited eligibility, mid-season transfers, and guys who were cut from the NFL coming back to play college. Yes, compliance is helpful. No, Hughes would never get through compliance. No, some things are enforceable.Â
February 1, 20241 yr I never heard of Glasscock until about a month ago, but I'm pretty sure we are now doomed.  j/k Sucks to lose someone in Belmont who was good at their job and added value (considering how much waste like Plonsky and most of her reports). Hope Sark hires the best replacement possible.
February 1, 20241 yr 54 minutes ago, HenryJames said: Are there pics of Glasscock's wife that we can make fun of? Glasscock's talent evaluation and recruiting skills confirmed. Wood.   Edited February 1, 20241 yr by DixonHur
February 1, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, texifornia said: Subtweeting the ex-Director of Player Personnel seems a little catty, but ok Sark needs Photoshop so he can put "My toxic trait is trusting the wrong people" over a picture of a chick doing yoga at sunset. FB divorcee vibes.
February 1, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, Ricky's one-hitter said: Oh, hooray. Something dramatic to take all of my Thursday productivity away. Well done, everyone.  Edited February 1, 20241 yr by Foosters
February 1, 20241 yr 14 hours ago, texifornia said: I went to a couple BC games and don't remember the stadium being awful. It was cold and I was drunk of course. It's not awful at all, it's not very large, but not awful.
February 1, 20241 yr Friendship ended with LaneMotherfuckin Freshwater not limiting his fishing to bars these days.Always thought Billy's parents should have named him "tempered", but maybe that's just me.
February 1, 20241 yr 3 hours ago, Hookem2147 said: From Bobby: I am told to expect to see some restructuring in the Texas personnel department as part of this move. Wonder if we might be adding a GM-type role too? Finley?Â
February 1, 20241 yr 2 hours ago, closetojumping said: Yes, compliance is helpful. No, Hughes would never get through compliance. No, some things are enforceable.Â
February 1, 20241 yr 5 minutes ago, South Austin said: I’m sorry. I was just trying to show Rimbo how to appropriately use this gif. 😉
February 1, 20241 yr Popular Post In case we want to put a little distance from whatever the fuck is happening here: The Deboer era is off to a rocky start
February 1, 20241 yr 4 hours ago, Js1 said: Time to make a wishlist of all the people we won't hire, so that when Sark does hire someone, Surly ends up like Ozzie Newsome, come on down.Â
February 1, 20241 yr On 1/30/2024 at 10:21 AM, Scholz said: And his nickname. What'd we settle on btw? KBak? Kenny B? Klam Bake? Nearly 2 days and 4 pages of shit posts (and a little solid info) and no one has come up with: Mastur Baker …dropping the ball.
February 1, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, VirginiaLonghorn said: Are those the new helmets designed to discourage targeting? It's the 43rd.. annual convention of the grand mystic royal order of the nobles of.. the Ali Baba temple of the shriiiiine.   Edited February 1, 20241 yr by Vertigo
February 1, 20241 yr 3 minutes ago, Leanderman said: There is no place on this board or in life general for this. Remember folks, recruits read this board as well. Not that I disagree with the sentiment, but the average age on this board is probably 50.  If a teenager is reading it’s purely out of old people mockery or out of curiosity to read what weird old people talk about.    You know who does think teenagers, particularly blue chip football players, hang on their every word?  TexAgs.Â
February 2, 20241 yr 5 hours ago, Herpa Derpa said: How do you take a Shriner in a fez seriously? As George Carlin said, "drink up Shriners".
February 2, 20241 yr On Baker  Not too concerned about the energetic and connecting with the yutes part, it's when Dad or an uncle (always an uncle) or even the recruit themselves compare Bakers resume against other D-line coaches that concerns me. We just lost the guy that already has a few DT's in the NFL and possibly two first rounders this upcoming draft...but he's using that to recruit to swamp tigah now.
February 2, 20241 yr 8 minutes ago, ousux said: 1 hour ago, BurntOrange&White said: On Baker  Not too concerned about the energetic and connecting with the yutes part, it's when Dad or an uncle (always an uncle) or even the recruit themselves compare Bakers resume against other D-line coaches that concerns me. We just lost the guy that already has a few DT's in the NFL and possibly two first rounders this upcoming draft...but he's using that to recruit to swamp tigah now. Should we just fold up shop and go home then? Losing Davis was always going to be an uphill battle for this next cycle. No shit Davis has skins on the wall that his replacement doesn’t.Â
February 2, 20241 yr Last few pages of this thread are fucking ridiculous. Shit is getting worse than the football board.
February 2, 20241 yr 9 minutes ago, ousux said: 1 hour ago, BurntOrange&White said: On Baker  Not too concerned about the energetic and connecting with the yutes part, it's when Dad or an uncle (always an uncle) or even the recruit themselves compare Bakers resume against other D-line coaches that concerns me. We just lost the guy that already has a few DT's in the NFL and possibly two first rounders this upcoming draft...but he's using that to recruit to swamp tigah now. If he's all that ("sources" giving him part credit for the dolphins dts) and alfred collins and co hold up to the run and get a bunch of sacks from the interior .... recruiting should get easier in the fall....
February 2, 20241 yr Should we just fold up shop and go home then? Losing Davis was always going to be an uphill battle for this next cycle. No shit Davis has skins on the wall that his replacement doesn’t. Just concerned is all. Maybe Baker becomes a D-line master and recruiting witch, but it's all pretty unknown at the moment.
February 2, 20241 yr 22 minutes ago, ousux said: 25 minutes ago, closetojumping said: Should we just fold up shop and go home then? Losing Davis was always going to be an uphill battle for this next cycle. No shit Davis has skins on the wall that his replacement doesn’t. Just concerned is all. Maybe Baker becomes a D-line master and recruiting witch, but it's all pretty unknown at the moment. No shit Dick Tracy. This has been covered extensively since his hiring.
February 2, 20241 yr No shit Dick Tracy. This has been covered extensively since his hiring.I was just responding to the Gerry Hamilton thing posted, sorry for absolutely ruining your surly experience.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.