August 28, 20241 yr Here's a picture of the real life war photog that the character is loosely based on. Stone cold fox.Name/history?
August 28, 20241 yr On 8/11/2024 at 6:44 AM, Snake Diggity said: 42 year old war photographers can be hot as fuck. Especially if they are Kirsten Dunst. They had her out there like Charlize in Monster. I think your mind has been warped by internet porn.
August 28, 20241 yr 38 minutes ago, aggie08 said: 4 hours ago, futureman said: I think your mind has been warped by internet porn. Yeah, but whose hasn't? And not just our minds ...
August 28, 20241 yr On 6/11/2024 at 3:08 PM, MissingInAction said: Dunst has some fat milkers. She bared them to glorious effect in 2011's Melancholia. NSFW Spoiler
August 28, 20241 yr On 8/11/2024 at 11:53 AM, MissingInAction said: Dunst is an all time fap dish. Before the Internet Id watch Bring it On with my available hand on the pause button. She's fit as fuck in the movie Wimbledon too
September 14, 20241 yr Watched it last night. Visuals and sound were fantastic. Story was meh. Overall kinda disappointing. Towards the end was checking to see how much time was left in the movie. The Plemons scene was the best in the movie.
September 14, 20241 yr Watched it last night. Visuals and sound were fantastic. Story was meh. Overall kinda disappointing. Towards the end was checking to see how much time was left in the movie. The Plemons scene was the best in the movie. Apparently the actor who was supposed to play that part had to cancel and JP was around so he just subbed in. Dunno if that’s true but it’s a good story.
September 14, 20241 yr Apparently the actor who was supposed to play that part had to cancel and JP was around so he just subbed in. Dunno if that’s true but it’s a good story. Yes, around because he’s married to Dunst, who asked him to take it.
September 14, 20241 yr On 8/28/2024 at 8:04 AM, futureman said: I think your mind has been warped by internet porn. Does Dunst get stuck in a dryer during the movie? Or accidently walk in on her stepson masturbating? If not, I'm out.
September 14, 20241 yr On 8/27/2024 at 8:31 PM, Party_Taco said: Name/history? Lee Miller https://www.leemiller.co.uk/
September 14, 20241 yr Lee Miller https://www.leemiller.co.uk/A biopic is coming out this fall with Kate Winslet getting naked for the role.
September 15, 20241 yr 2 hours ago, CooterBrown said: A biopic is coming out this fall with Kate Winslet getting naked for the role.
September 15, 20241 yr 11 hours ago, tx 3 putt said: extremely dumb movie lol the storyline was solid but it taking place in an abandoned US was the dumb part
September 16, 20241 yr 18 hours ago, tx 3 putt said: what happened to the entire population of the US in this movie ? They all dog paddled to New Zealand
September 16, 20241 yr Saw it on Max last night. Other than the joy of seeing the Devs team together again, I wasn’t impressed. Must have been better in theatre. Edited September 16, 20241 yr by Dr. Teeth
September 16, 20241 yr 8 hours ago, freyguy said: They started fucking couches... like you never have…
September 16, 20241 yr 15 hours ago, mdleast said: Perhaps abandoned due to the titular war? It's like some of you don't know what happens in a war.
September 16, 20241 yr 18 hours ago, Dr. Teeth said: Must have been better in theatre. It was, especially the closing battle. If nothing else it’s a great war movie.
September 16, 20241 yr 28 minutes ago, Parliament said: It was, especially the closing battle. If nothing else it’s a great war movie.
September 16, 20241 yr 17 hours ago, tx 3 putt said: You set that movie in Ukraine, it wins awards Why does that matter? It wasn’t making any political points or anything. It was a pretty straightforward “this is what civil wars look like” movie.
September 26, 20241 yr Jessie did have a fat ass in old women jeans. dunst killed it. It seemed at times she was always one step ahead of what was going down. the flag bearing bomb runner chick. the president not in the car. save the girl etc.
October 6, 20241 yr There’s some bad opinions on this page.So much this. Also, soundtrack was on point. So pissed I didn’t see this in the theater.
October 17, 20241 yr On 5/1/2024 at 1:28 PM, BurdineBandit said: This is my beef with it. Although, I'll say that I actually enjoyed the movie, I just wasn't satisfied with the story/writing/lukewarm message. I think it was really well made and the sounds/shots (visuals)/acting were all great. Kirsten Dunst was great, Wagner Moura is a G. I just don't like that they teased "Civil War" in the leadup, to deliver a movie that had a lot to say about "war" as a concept, and nothing about the "Civil" part that was the teaser to get people into the seats. War takes a toll on the humanity of everyone around? Yes, I think we've been shown that in much better ways with more deeper and thorough storytelling. I've seen many of the greats, and there have been more than a handful over the decades. Did we just need a reminder that in-fighting will also lead to a lack of humanity? I can just log on to twitter to see that. Perhaps the title civil war, given that it is an oxymoron, is a clue. War is decidedly uncivil, even when it comes to journos who are just trying to document and report it.
October 17, 20241 yr Elaborating on the above, I think people expected something political and some aspects of it dovetail with the current environment, but I don't think that was particularly intentional. Yes, it is about a civil war in some respects, but more about observers of it than participants/combatants, or the war itself. Therefore, I think the title is a double-entendre. If there's a big criticism, it might be on character development on those observers. I suppose the development of the Spaeny character was supposed to reflect the development of the Dunst and Moura characters, as well as perhaps the Henderson character (in sort of an opposite way).
October 17, 20241 yr Shit movie, cobbled together like a high school video project. Could not give a fuck about any character because they were all hollow.
October 17, 20241 yr Elaborating on the above, I think people expected something political and some aspects of it dovetail with the current environment, but I don't think that was particularly intentional. Yes, it is about a civil war in some respects, but more about observers of it than participants/combatants, or the war itself. Therefore, I think the title is a double-entendre. If there's a big criticism, it might be on character development on those observers. I suppose the development of the Spaeny character was supposed to reflect the development of the Dunst and Moura characters, as well as perhaps the Henderson character (in sort of an opposite way).This is how I took a lot of the initial criticism I saw - “How dare Hollywood make a movie about Civil War in the US and not make a statement that aligns with my political ideology.”
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.