Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Surly Horns

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

  • Author
2 minutes ago, kingkoopa6 said:

That run was sexy 

7-0 to end the set is def sexy

2-1 Texas now 

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Views 129k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Machinator
    Machinator

    https://newsroom.heb.com/h-e-b-partners-with-ut-austins-three-time-ncaa-champion-madi-skinner-for-first-nil-deal/ H-E-B Partners With UT Austin’s Three-time NCAA Champion, Madi Skinner, for First

  • She's staying!   

  • Gardner Barnes
    Gardner Barnes

    I'd like to jump in here and state for the record that my daughter started in the D2 final 4. We lost. Kinda sucked but man what an incredible experince for her. Thier win the Elite 8 game was one

Posted Images

Carlson served it out from either 19-20 or 20-20

I like being on this side of a late run. Much better.

From 20-18 Georgia to a 25-20 set win. I'll take it.

Emma does things out there ive never seen anyone do. 
 

she really be making legendary plays 

25-18.  Texas wims

  • Author

I didn’t have Georgia as our most competitive SEC opponent so far but we likely needed that 

aggy in town Wednesday night 

  • Author

Also Texas was 8th in the committee rankings today, 1 spot behind SMU. @perfectchaos007, we won’t see them in Austin

1. Nebraska
2. Pittsburgh
3. Louisville
4. Penn State
5. Stanford
6. Creighton
7. SMU
8. Texas
9. Purdue
10. Oregon
11. Wisconsin
12. Kansas
13. Minnesota
14. TCU
15. Utah
16. Arizona State

Lincoln Regional
1. Nebraska, 8. Texas, 9. Purdue, 16. Arizona State

Pittsburgh Regional
2. Pittsburgh, 7. SMU, 10. Oregon, 15. Utah

Louisville Regional
1. Louisville, 6. Creighton, 11. Wisconsin, 14. TCU

University Park Regional
1. Penn State, 5. Stanford, 12. Kansas, 13. Minnesota

I really wanted a dominant sweep. But after that first set got sideways, I just wanted a win. Salvaging what we could of the weekend. 

Texas has to win out and hope other teams lose some they shouldn't.

The Big 12 might be a better conference in the top half than the SEC this year. Not a lot of tests in the rest of the schedule. Kentucky and Florida are both a little down. I like the potential of this conference long term. Last year it was really good, but there was a lot of drop off.

I'm trying to compare how I feel about this team versus last year's squad at this time. I guess I'm just going to have to hope for the best and they turn on the jets in the post season after the sweet 16. The personnel is there. Backcourt passing and defense is a little suspect compared to the last year. Barnes really helped solidify things in the latter half of the season after she got her sea legs as a DS as opposed to the career libero she was coming in.

My expectations for Skinner and Rutherford were too high entering the season. But Skinner in particular can turn it on at any point. I love Kahahawai's emergence. Singletary looks like another plug and play spectacular middle for MBU. The serving overall looks really good. 

l don't know. Lots of good teams out there. Texas just doesn't seem to be playing as well as some of the top teams, but again, I feel like I would have said that last year, and those last 3 postseason matches ended up being dominant victories.

27 minutes ago, Js1 said:

Also Texas was 8th in the committee rankings today, 1 spot behind SMU. @perfectchaos007, we won’t see them in Austin

1. Nebraska
2. Pittsburgh
3. Louisville
4. Penn State
5. Stanford
6. Creighton
7. SMU
8. Texas
9. Purdue
10. Oregon
11. Wisconsin
12. Kansas
13. Minnesota
14. TCU
15. Utah
16. Arizona State

Lincoln Regional
1. Nebraska, 8. Texas, 9. Purdue, 16. Arizona State

Pittsburgh Regional
2. Pittsburgh, 7. SMU, 10. Oregon, 15. Utah

Louisville Regional
1. Louisville, 6. Creighton, 11. Wisconsin, 14. TCU

University Park Regional
1. Penn State, 5. Stanford, 12. Kansas, 13. Minnesota

Shocked I am that they’d want us in Lincoln. I think the best way for us to move up is to have Nebraska lose and drop a couple spots so they will move us up accordingly. 

  • Author
25 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Shocked I am that they’d want us in Lincoln. I think the best way for us to move up is to have Nebraska lose and drop a couple spots so they will move us up accordingly. 

I really don’t want to go to any of those top 4 seeds but I REALLY don’t want to go to Lincoln or Pittsburgh 

  • Author
2 hours ago, SL Xpress said:

I feel like the solution is to play Carlson all the way around and use Kahahawai over Rutherford.

But I have an inordinate affection towards Swindle after last year. I don't want that to be the solution.

And I've watched Rutherford her whole career. I feel like we've marginalized her somehow. 

But right now I just want to beat Georgia. And I certainly don't want to lose another commanding lead. 

Good. Second set goes to the good guys. 

I really hate the 6-2 in general, as an aside. I understand why we're using it, but I'm just not a fan in general.

Avery is a huge liability in the front row.

Maybe it’s just me, because I like the 6-2 and I think our blocking numbers are much better in the 6-2 without Carlson in the front row, but I do think what hitters the setter typically gets matters a lot.

Rutherford has been kind of meh lately and that is the RS hitter that Swindle is paired with. Devin has been really good lately and she’s paired with Carlson.  Is it a better setter = better attacker in this case or is Swindle suffering from her RS hitter being in a funk? Or is her funk caused by Swindle?

Def for the coaching staff to figure out 

  • Author

Singletary goes back...to back....to back

3x SEC Defensive Player of the Week for the third week in a row

6 hours ago, Js1 said:

Singletary goes back...to back....to back

3x SEC Defensive Player of the Week for the third week in a row

image.gif.47f3d3261af2884b1039dbd1ab850467.gif

  • Author

I don't mind the 6-2 vs 5-1 discourse, but it's hard to beat the results.  9-0 and have only lost 3 sets (and should have been 2 if we don't blow that first set against Georgia) 

2.55 blocks per set (42nd nationally)
.272 hitting % (24th nationally)
12.57 assists per set (39th nationally)

I know we all miss the gaudy .300+ hitting % for the season, but it's been great since we switched to the 6-2.

Before the 6-2, we had 3 matches where we hit under .200 (Minnesota, Miami, Stanford) and just 2 matches above .300 (Houston and Indiana)
Since we switched, 1 match under .200 (aggy, who has a serious good block) and 5 matches above .300 (and  close to 6 or 7, we hit .296 versus Baylor and .281 versus Kentucky)

Before the switch, 3 matches with 10+ blocks (Wisconsin, Minnesota, Houston).  Since the switch, 5 matches with 10+ blocks

Before the switch, 4 matches with 5+ aces.  Since the switch, 6 matches with 5+ aces 

The 6-2 is better for our blocking (no Averi in the front row) and utilizing our best setters.  If we can get Rutherford out of this funk and Madi a little more efficient, the numbers will look better (for both the team and Ella's assists)

6 hours ago, Js1 said:

I don't mind the 6-2 vs 5-1 discourse, but it's hard to beat the results.  9-0 and have only lost 3 sets (and should have been 2 if we don't blow that first set against Georgia) 

2.55 blocks per set (42nd nationally)
.272 hitting % (24th nationally)
12.57 assists per set (39th nationally)

I know we all miss the gaudy .300+ hitting % for the season, but it's been great since we switched to the 6-2.

Before the 6-2, we had 3 matches where we hit under .200 (Minnesota, Miami, Stanford) and just 2 matches above .300 (Houston and Indiana)
Since we switched, 1 match under .200 (aggy, who has a serious good block) and 5 matches above .300 (and  close to 6 or 7, we hit .296 versus Baylor and .281 versus Kentucky)

Before the switch, 3 matches with 10+ blocks (Wisconsin, Minnesota, Houston).  Since the switch, 5 matches with 10+ blocks

Before the switch, 4 matches with 5+ aces.  Since the switch, 6 matches with 5+ aces 

The 6-2 is better for our blocking (no Averi in the front row) and utilizing our best setters.  If we can get Rutherford out of this funk and Madi a little more efficient, the numbers will look better (for both the team and Ella's assists)

No volleyball expert but hitting % is also drastically overrated. We hit .260 and .270 in last year's national semis and finals. It didn't matter because of how we served and played defensively. 

I think the big turning point with Elliott was realizing that there's much more to winning titles than just prioritizing terminal players. Serving and defense is what got us over the hump. 

  • Author
27 minutes ago, Rickylovesweed said:

No volleyball expert but hitting % is also drastically overrated. We hit .260 and .270 in last year's national semis and finals. It didn't matter because of how we served and played defensively. 

I think the big turning point with Elliott was realizing that there's much more to winning titles than just prioritizing terminal players. Serving and defense is what got us over the hump. 

You're not wrong -

Texas hit .333 in the 2020 finals against Kentucky, which should be good enough to win, but then we watched UK hit over Gabriel her entire 3 front row rotations and hit .349 to beat us in 4. 

Wisky won the 2021 finals only hitting .183, but 7 aces and 24 blocks. 

You can suck at hitting if you have the defense (like Wisconsin) and you can be an excellent hitting team, but lose because you have a front row blocking liability.

The 6-2 helps with that - Carlson never goes into the front row to block, so they're constantly having to hit at our OHs and MBs, which in turn, has created a really strong block.  At any one time, opponents are hitting at 6'4 Ames, 6'4 Singletary, 6'4 Devin, 6'0 Rutherford, 6'2 Skinner and 6'1 Wenaas. And our pins are extremely good blockers on their own - 23 blocks for RR, 32 for Skinner, 43 for Devin. Jenna may be the weakest front row blocker (12), but she's been doing what she has to do in the backrow. 

And then 88 for Mari, including 10 of Texas' 18 solo blocks, and 40 for Ames.  

  • Author

RPI Futures has Texas finishing the regular season 6th, with 1 more loss.   Probably a road match at OU or Auburn, but it doesn't really specify who we lose to. 

Texas still has 3 more home matches in this homestand - tomorrow (aggy), Nov 1 (Mizzou), Nov 3 (OU).  Then we go 4 matches away from Gregory - MSST (Nov 6), Auburn (Nov 15), Bama (Nov 17), OU (Nov 22).  Then finish at home versus Tenn (Nov 27) and Ole Miss (Nov 30).  

Then it's Texas' favorite season - the postseason. 

We’ll have to be road warriors in the NCAAs once again thanks to our slow start. All part of Elliott’s plan?

Edited by perfectchaos007

  • Author
22 hours ago, perfectchaos007 said:

We’ll have to be road warriors in the NCAAs once again thanks to our slow start. All part of Elliott’s plan?

Well good thing we've played in front of record road crowds basically every road match in 2024

Texas/aggy part 2 at Gregory - 7pm, ESPNU

  • Author

Advanced stats still has 3 Horns servers in the top 12 - Halter #2, Carlson #3 and Wenaas #12

We did run into issues closing out UGA because of Muoneke, who is #8 in advanced stats

The only top 20 server we have on our upcoming schedule is Jordan Iliff (Mizzou) at #11. 

Texas has faced #8 (Muoeneke), #9 (Sarah Franklin), #13 (Erin Lamb) and #14 (Julia Orzol) so far.

I think playing on the road can be advantageous if you advance. 

There's a comfort in playing at home and it's a completely new environment playing on a neutral/road court. Those Tennessee and Stanford matches were good for us last year. 

  • Author

15-14 aggy. Media TO

Texas was up 14-10

  • Author

22-21 aggy. TO. texas

  • Author

27-25

1-0 Texas 

  • Author
Just now, Dahobbs said:

Texas takes set 1. 

3-0 run to win it 

  • Author
2 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

Ugly start to this set. 

2-0 Texas to 6-2 aggy. TO Texas 

  • Author

Playing out like the match at aggy so far 

Aggies going quick every time to the middles. You would think the block would figure out.

  • Author
1 minute ago, sunset87 said:

Aggies going quick every time to the middles. You would think the block would figure out.

Forcing our middles to make quick decisions is not a bad game plan bc they’re young

  • Author

Trash that set. Never look at it again - not even worth saying the score 

1-1

  • Author

4-0 Texas. TO aggy

  • Author

Nya Bunton getting some third set run

 

I think we've become a bit too worried about spreading it around. 

Skinner is hitting .529. Set her until they can stop her. 

  • Author

Another 10 block match. Aggy currently +7 in kills and +5 in aces. Yet this set is tied. Just back and forth, back and forth 

When have we played worse? At least Rutherford has showed up. Unfortunately, so has Lednicky. 

  • Author
Just now, Gut Wagon said:

When have we played worse?

Stanford?

21-19 Texas. TO aggy

Just now, Js1 said:

Stanford?

I didn't see that match. And I'm glad. 

We're making this too difficult. Skinner has 11 kills on 19 swings. 

Like last year, this is the time of the year when you just have to ride your best player. Set her until teams can stop her. 

  • Author
Just now, Gut Wagon said:

I didn't see that match. And I'm glad. 

Blessed, because that was hideous 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.