August 12, 20187 yr 22 minutes ago, C-Man said: I will be shocked if he gets fired. I'd be inclined to agree if they didn't seem so dead set on keeping the story going.
August 12, 20187 yr I would expect a threatening phone call followed by a threatening letter from the ADs legal team on Monday to Snooks attorney in regards to a libel suit. I would then expect a retraction Monday afternoon.
August 12, 20187 yr 28 minutes ago, kopp0e said: Maybe it's getting really really real up in Columbus..? How about you post the whole article so we don't have to deal w/ paywall shit? Or at least the pertinent parts.
August 12, 20187 yr 21 minutes ago, Spur08 said: How about you post the whole article so we don't have to deal w/ paywall shit? Or at least the pertinent parts. I will keep that in mind, in future endeavours, if at all possible... Or you could post the link as well...
August 12, 20187 yr 17 minutes ago, kopp0e said: I will keep that in mind, in future endeavours, if at all possible... Or you could post the link as well... Did you even go to the website you posted? It shows a paragraph then you have to creating a paying account to read the rest? Quite useful
August 12, 20187 yr 21 minutes ago, Spur08 said: Did you even go to the website you posted? It shows a paragraph then you have to creating a paying account to read the rest? Quite useful Do you happen to know of an alternate sight..? Edited August 12, 20187 yr by kopp0e
August 12, 20187 yr 22 minutes ago, Spur08 said: Did you even go to the website you posted? It shows a paragraph then you have to creating a paying account to read the rest? Quite useful Keep in mind, I sent a tweet, not a direct link to said site...
August 12, 20187 yr 16 minutes ago, TXs said: Ladies! This type of shit is why guys like Zach pop a bitch.
August 12, 20187 yr 16 minutes ago, Bevo said: This type of shit is why guys like Zach pop a bitch. I’m headed to the shag to neg your ass for this comment.
August 12, 20187 yr 1 hour ago, Lhorn said: Oh, so she is defending Zach. What a POS. You'd think she'd have a problem with her daughter being abused. Guess not Well she is estranged.
August 12, 20187 yr Anyone else notice Courtney Smith & her new guy were in pics with her Mother in late May? If they are indeed estranged, hasn’t been more than a few months or so. Given the texts of Momma calling out Zach for dealing whippings & supporting s divorce, sounds like the Mom wanted the daughter to suck it up & keep the child support payments coming. Also confirmed is that Momma Carano was dealt a double gene pool of the white trash DNA. Water seeks its own level & they all deserved each other at one point short of abuse, but bottom line is Urbs and the tOSU AD decided to keep the trash around.
August 12, 20187 yr This is now the world in which we live. Obvious facts are now obscured by social media campaigns. Counter offensives are focused on clouding the truth. The populous buys in, wholeheartedly, to reconfirm their existing confirmation biases. It makes them feel good and secure. Facts no longer matter. Only grand perception matters.
August 12, 20187 yr This is really going to hurt our prospective bid to join the Big 10 conference in 2024.
August 12, 20187 yr 18 minutes ago, mdmost said: This is really going to hurt our prospective bid to join the Big 10 conference in 2024. Not if all the Surly poster moms keep up their behind the scenes work.
August 12, 20187 yr 19 minutes ago, mdmost said: This is really going to hurt our prospective bid to join the Big 10 conference in 2024. Meh, backup plan to the PAC 12 at best
August 12, 20187 yr 28 minutes ago, Dbeasy said: This is now the world in which we live. Obvious facts are now obscured by social media campaigns. Counter offensives are focused on clouding the truth. The populous buys in, wholeheartedly, to reconfirm their existing confirmation biases. It makes them feel good and secure. Facts no longer matter. Only grand perception matters. Lulz. I’m writing a book about cognitive dissonance, confirmation bias, double standards etc... and history. I will probably revise it 100 times and then have it published in about 30 years. I like to think I’ll change the world.
August 12, 20187 yr 27 minutes ago, Dbeasy said: This is now the world in which we live. Obvious facts are now obscured by social media campaigns. Counter offensives are focused on clouding the truth. The populous buys in, wholeheartedly, to reconfirm their existing confirmation biases. It makes them feel good and secure. Facts no longer matter. Only grand perception matters. Yeah, who was it that said social media would be the downfall of society? Someone called it fairly early on... I hired a twenty year old young lady recently...repeatedly had to ask her to turn her phone off as it constantly dinged, and she constantly snuck off to respond. She could get about an hours worth of work done in a day. Had to get rid of her. She’s already lost another job since. I miss football. Football season used to be my favorite time of year...but now there’s always some fucker that has to politicize something and it just fucking ruins it. I ain’t come here to play politics.
August 12, 20187 yr 23 minutes ago, GotThatFire said: Lulz. I’m writing a book about cognitive dissonance, confirmation bias, double standards etc... and history. I will probably revise it 100 times and then have it published in about 30 years. I like to think I’ll change the world. Buddy, I hope you do. I happen to think cognitive dissonance (largely associated with the other issues you mention) is a huge contributor to the modern mental health crisis. The surge in technology seems to have really mind-fucked the planet. I’ll buy that book.
August 12, 20187 yr CDC needs to get on top of this immediately and the best way to do that IMO is this sit Tom down and tell him that he needs to tell the entire story about what happened and if he leaked anything, his wife leaked anything or if they prompted anyone to leak anything then Tom needs to tell CDC that and tell Tom that he has 24 hours to go home, talk to his wife, make double sure she did not tell anyone anything or prompt anyone to do things then come back to CDC and tell him the full truth with knowledge that if he is found to be lying in the future it will be his job then Tom can come back and tell CDC 100% the truth and then CDC can craft a message to release to the public if Tom or his wife or someone they prompted did leak it then CDC can support him for looking out for abused women and say that Texas stands behind a coach that supports women getting out of abusive situations......if they did not leak or did not prompt anyone then CDC simply says he has been assured that Tom and his wife and associates did not leak anything and that GUARANTEE by Tom and his wife came with the assurance that if Tom was not telling the truth and it was proven then Tom would be let go with cause and not paid anything then CDC says that Texas does not support the abuse of women and the story on Toms involvement (or lack of hopefully) has been told and that CDC and Texas will no longer comment on it because the abuse and the cover up does not involve Texas and that if anyone has proof that Tom or his wife and associates were involved in leaking it then they need to come forward with concrete proof immediately because Texas will no longer address "unknown sources" and that if Tom and his wife or associates were involved in the leak then Texas will still not address it any further because spousal abuse is wrong and it was not happening at Texas and Texas is not the one investigating allegations of that and Texas has no further involvement and that Texas stands with those that help women get away from abusers Texas does not stand with those that try and cover it up or prolong it CDC needs to call out those that are trying to blame Tom if Tom assures CDC he was not involved and if on the off chance that Tom says he was involved Texas needs to call out those that are trying to vilify Tom for helping a woman get away from an abusive situation and Texas and CDC need to drop it all 100% back in the lap of osu to me that is the simplest way to handle it.....if involved in the leak at all say yes we helped someone get out from an abusive situation and we will never shy away from supporting that and we vilify those that would try and cover that up and if not involved say "proof" or stop asking Edited August 12, 20187 yr by ButtFumble
August 12, 20187 yr 24 minutes ago, ButtFumble said: CDC needs to get on top of this immediately and the best way to do that IMO is this sit Tom down and tell him that he needs to tell the entire story about what happened and if he leaked anything, his wife leaked anything or if they prompted anyone to leak anything then Tom needs to tell CDC that and tell Tom that he has 24 hours to go home, talk to his wife, make double sure she did not tell anyone anything or prompt anyone to do things then come back to CDC and tell him the full truth with knowledge that if he is found to be lying in the future it will be his job then Tom can come back and tell CDC 100% the truth and then CDC can craft a message to release to the public if Tom or his wife or someone they prompted did leak it then CDC can support him for looking out for abused women and say that Texas stands behind a coach that supports women getting out of abusive situations......if they did not leak or did not prompt anyone then CDC simply says he has been assured that Tom and his wife and associates did not leak anything and that GUARANTEE by Tom and his wife came with the assurance that if Tom was not telling the truth and it was proven then Tom would be let go with cause and not paid anything then CDC says that Texas does not support the abuse of women and the story on Toms involvement (or lack of hopefully) has been told and that CDC and Texas will no longer comment on it because the abuse and the cover up does not involve Texas and that if anyone has proof that Tom or his wife and associates were involved in leaking it then they need to come forward with concrete proof immediately because Texas will no longer address "unknown sources" and that if Tom and his wife or associates were involved in the leak then Texas will still not address it any further because spousal abuse is wrong and it was not happening at Texas and Texas is not the one investigating allegations of that and Texas has no further involvement and that Texas stands with those that help women get away from abusers Texas does not stand with those that try and cover it up or prolong it CDC needs to call out those that are trying to blame Tom if Tom assures CDC he was not involved and if on the off chance that Tom says he was involved Texas needs to call out those that are trying to vilify Tom for helping a woman get away from an abusive situation and Texas and CDC need to drop it all 100% back in the lap of osu to me that is the simplest way to handle it.....if involved in the leak at all say yes we helped someone get out from an abusive situation and we will never shy away from supporting that and we vilify those that would try and cover that up and if not involved say "proof" or stop asking Or not. oh & “Jesus wept”.
August 12, 20187 yr I'm curious as to what kind of distraction this will have on the team this season
August 12, 20187 yr 33 minutes ago, ButtFumble said: CDC needs to get on top of this immediately and the best way to do that IMO is this sit Tom down and tell him that he needs to tell the entire story about what happened and if he leaked anything, his wife leaked anything or if they prompted anyone to leak anything then Tom needs to tell CDC that and tell Tom that he has 24 hours to go home, talk to his wife, make double sure she did not tell anyone anything or prompt anyone to do things then come back to CDC and tell him the full truth with knowledge that if he is found to be lying in the future it will be his job then Tom can come back and tell CDC 100% the truth and then CDC can craft a message to release to the public if Tom or his wife or someone they prompted did leak it then CDC can support him for looking out for abused women and say that Texas stands behind a coach that supports women getting out of abusive situations......if they did not leak or did not prompt anyone then CDC simply says he has been assured that Tom and his wife and associates did not leak anything and that GUARANTEE by Tom and his wife came with the assurance that if Tom was not telling the truth and it was proven then Tom would be let go with cause and not paid anything then CDC says that Texas does not support the abuse of women and the story on Toms involvement (or lack of hopefully) has been told and that CDC and Texas will no longer comment on it because the abuse and the cover up does not involve Texas and that if anyone has proof that Tom or his wife and associates were involved in leaking it then they need to come forward with concrete proof immediately because Texas will no longer address "unknown sources" and that if Tom and his wife or associates were involved in the leak then Texas will still not address it any further because spousal abuse is wrong and it was not happening at Texas and Texas is not the one investigating allegations of that and Texas has no further involvement and that Texas stands with those that help women get away from abusers Texas does not stand with those that try and cover it up or prolong it CDC needs to call out those that are trying to blame Tom if Tom assures CDC he was not involved and if on the off chance that Tom says he was involved Texas needs to call out those that are trying to vilify Tom for helping a woman get away from an abusive situation and Texas and CDC need to drop it all 100% back in the lap of osu to me that is the simplest way to handle it.....if involved in the leak at all say yes we helped someone get out from an abusive situation and we will never shy away from supporting that and we vilify those that would try and cover that up and if not involved say "proof" or stop asking Unbelievable. How many more news cycles before Urban is reinstated and Herman is suspended and fighting for his job? All because God only knows how many waterheads out there are thinking along the same lines as this ^^. Edited August 12, 20187 yr by TriStone
August 12, 20187 yr 17 minutes ago, TriStone said: Unbelievable. How many more news cycles before Urban is reinstated and Herman is suspended and fighting for his job? All because God only knows how many waterheads out there are thinking along the same lines as this dipshit. why would herman be suspended if he simply tells CDC the truth
August 12, 20187 yr Because we'd need to have an investigation. Because we need to get to the bottom of Herman's involvement in all this. Because, by and large, America is populated by morons. Earlier today I wondered what possible reason the Urban Meyer camp could have for bringing Tom Herman into this, but a quick perusal of my Facebook feed and your manifesto have clarified things. Based on a sampling of my retarded FB friends you'd think Herman beat up this dude's wife himself. Edited August 12, 20187 yr by TriStone
August 12, 20187 yr 17 minutes ago, ButtFumble said: why would herman be suspended if he simply tells CDC the truth Why does he have to talk to CDC at all? If he did this then fine, he’s a big boy with his own PR rep and this has absolutely nothing do to with his job at UT. If he did it (even though it sounds like he didn’t) who the fuck cares? If he didn’t do it then he has his own lawyer and can sue for libel (assuming twitter falls under libel). Again this has nothing to do with UT so why the fuck would we want our University getting involved in this cluster fuck in any way shape or form. I like you as a poster but this is a stupid take.
August 12, 20187 yr I still don't understand how this means Herman did something wrong, but then I remember Ohio voted for Trump. Of course they will believe any batshit conspiracy theory to clear their beloved coach
August 12, 20187 yr I understand what people are saying, but when this broke everyone worried that Herman might be drug into it and then everyone seemed to say he was not there when it happened and it has nothing to do with him now IMO tosu talking heads have probably seen that concern and decided to try and drag Tom into it to deflect and as M. Knight is saying above Tom did nothing wrong if he did leak the story and he did nothing wrong if he did not break the story and IMO it is time to set that opinion out there once and for all set the narrative that Tom did nothing wrong if he did leak it and Tom did nothing wrong if he had nothing to do with leaking it and repeat that the issue is not taking place at Texas and does not involve abuse or a coverup by a coach or coaches at Texas
August 12, 20187 yr 45 minutes ago, ButtFumble said: CDC needs to get on top of this immediately and the best way to do that IMO is this sit Tom down and tell him that he needs to tell the entire story about what happened and if he leaked anything, his wife leaked anything or if they prompted anyone to leak anything then Tom needs to tell CDC that and tell Tom that he has 24 hours to go home, talk to his wife, make double sure she did not tell anyone anything or prompt anyone to do things then come back to CDC and tell him the full truth with knowledge that if he is found to be lying in the future it will be his job then Tom can come back and tell CDC 100% the truth and then CDC can craft a message to release to the public if Tom or his wife or someone they prompted did leak it then CDC can support him for looking out for abused women and say that Texas stands behind a coach that supports women getting out of abusive situations......if they did not leak or did not prompt anyone then CDC simply says he has been assured that Tom and his wife and associates did not leak anything and that GUARANTEE by Tom and his wife came with the assurance that if Tom was not telling the truth and it was proven then Tom would be let go with cause and not paid anything then CDC says that Texas does not support the abuse of women and the story on Toms involvement (or lack of hopefully) has been told and that CDC and Texas will no longer comment on it because the abuse and the cover up does not involve Texas and that if anyone has proof that Tom or his wife and associates were involved in leaking it then they need to come forward with concrete proof immediately because Texas will no longer address "unknown sources" and that if Tom and his wife or associates were involved in the leak then Texas will still not address it any further because spousal abuse is wrong and it was not happening at Texas and Texas is not the one investigating allegations of that and Texas has no further involvement and that Texas stands with those that help women get away from abusers Texas does not stand with those that try and cover it up or prolong it CDC needs to call out those that are trying to blame Tom if Tom assures CDC he was not involved and if on the off chance that Tom says he was involved Texas needs to call out those that are trying to vilify Tom for helping a woman get away from an abusive situation and Texas and CDC need to drop it all 100% back in the lap of osu to me that is the simplest way to handle it.....if involved in the leak at all say yes we helped someone get out from an abusive situation and we will never shy away from supporting that and we vilify those that would try and cover that up and if not involved say "proof" or stop asking CDC needs to do the exact opposite of this post and keep responding to dumbasses on twitter. That’s exactly what CDC needs to do in regards to this situation.
August 12, 20187 yr 24 minutes ago, Michael Knight said: I still don't understand how this means Herman did something wrong, but then I remember Ohio voted for Trump. Of course they will believe any batshit conspiracy theory to clear their beloved coach So did Texas, guy
August 12, 20187 yr So just so I am clear, all the waterhead jort wearing Buckeye's actually believe that all the text messages McMurphy provided were made up (requiring some form of digital design skills), and he was being paid (possibly by Herman, among others) to fabricate this story? Am I understanding this conspiracy correctly?
August 12, 20187 yr 20 minutes ago, Sejjr said: So just so I am clear, all the waterhead jort wearing Buckeye's actually believe that all the text messages McMurphy provided were made up (requiring some form of digital design skills), and he was being paid (possibly by Herman, among others) to fabricate this story? Am I understanding this conspiracy correctly? You've got it. Herman knew everything and helped cover it up, and then Mrs. Herman paid $10,000 in hush money to the victim to keep their names out of it. That is, no bullshit, the narrative that's worming it's way thru the intertrons. Edit: I forgot to add the best part. Herman "snitched" because tOSU was just destroying us in recruiting. Edited August 12, 20187 yr by TriStone
August 12, 20187 yr 22 minutes ago, GotThatFire said: So did Texas, guy Yeah but that's aggy's fault.
August 12, 20187 yr 56 minutes ago, ButtFumble said: CDC needs to get on top of this immediately and the best way to do that IMO is this sit Tom down and tell him that he needs to tell the entire story about what happened and if he leaked anything, his wife leaked anything or if they prompted anyone to leak anything then Tom needs to tell CDC that and tell Tom that he has 24 hours to go home, talk to his wife, make double sure she did not tell anyone anything or prompt anyone to do things then come back to CDC and tell him the full truth with knowledge that if he is found to be lying in the future it will be his job then Tom can come back and tell CDC 100% the truth and then CDC can craft a message to release to the public if Tom or his wife or someone they prompted did leak it then CDC can support him for looking out for abused women and say that Texas stands behind a coach that supports women getting out of abusive situations......if they did not leak or did not prompt anyone then CDC simply says he has been assured that Tom and his wife and associates did not leak anything and that GUARANTEE by Tom and his wife came with the assurance that if Tom was not telling the truth and it was proven then Tom would be let go with cause and not paid anything then CDC says that Texas does not support the abuse of women and the story on Toms involvement (or lack of hopefully) has been told and that CDC and Texas will no longer comment on it because the abuse and the cover up does not involve Texas and that if anyone has proof that Tom or his wife and associates were involved in leaking it then they need to come forward with concrete proof immediately because Texas will no longer address "unknown sources" and that if Tom and his wife or associates were involved in the leak then Texas will still not address it any further because spousal abuse is wrong and it was not happening at Texas and Texas is not the one investigating allegations of that and Texas has no further involvement and that Texas stands with those that help women get away from abusers Texas does not stand with those that try and cover it up or prolong it CDC needs to call out those that are trying to blame Tom if Tom assures CDC he was not involved and if on the off chance that Tom says he was involved Texas needs to call out those that are trying to vilify Tom for helping a woman get away from an abusive situation and Texas and CDC need to drop it all 100% back in the lap of osu to me that is the simplest way to handle it.....if involved in the leak at all say yes we helped someone get out from an abusive situation and we will never shy away from supporting that and we vilify those that would try and cover that up and if not involved say "proof" or stop asking Does your wife wash ur panties or u take care of that urself?
August 12, 20187 yr Author 32 minutes ago, Michael Knight said: I still don't understand how this means Herman did something wrong, but then I remember Ohio voted for Trump. Of course they will believe any batshit conspiracy theory to clear their beloved coach 17 minutes ago, TheFlyingBoat said: Yeah but that's aggy's fault. Can we not do this here? We have a whole forum for this.
August 12, 20187 yr 2 hours ago, Nivek said: I am beginning to think that some coaches are morons. Watch a few seasons of Hard Knocks, you start to realize it’s about 1 out of every 2. And that’s at the highest professional level.
August 12, 20187 yr Popular Post 34 minutes ago, Michael Knight said: I still don't understand how this means Herman did something wrong, but then I remember Ohio voted for Trump. Of course they will believe any batshit conspiracy theory to clear their beloved coach 26 minutes ago, GotThatFire said: So did Texas, guy 19 minutes ago, TheFlyingBoat said: Yeah but that's aggy's fault. We really need to re-caulk the seams of the cloak room. The slime is oozing out onto the football board.
August 12, 20187 yr Yeah, who was it that said social media would be the downfall of society? Someone called it fairly early on...Me. The day I heard about Facebook for the first time.Why in the ever loving fuck would anyone think it’s a good idea to give every moron on the planet a voice.
August 12, 20187 yr 30 minutes ago, TriStone said: You've got it. Herman knew everything and helped cover it up, and then Mrs. Herman paid $10,000 in hush money to the victim to keep their names out of it. That is, no bullshit, the narrative that's worming it's way thru the intertrons. Edit: I forgot to add the best part. Herman "snitched" because tOSU was just destroying us in recruiting. Hahaha...so he was complicit in the cover-up - so complicit that he, in fact, paid the victim hush money. But then he decided to make the story national - intentionally shining a light on a scandal in which he was intimately involved - because one 17 year-old kid in Texas has decided to play football at Ohio State? That...doesn't make sense. The conspiracy theorists need to huddle and come up with something a bit more plausible.
August 12, 20187 yr 47 minutes ago, TriStone said: We really need to re-caulk the seams of the cloak room. The slime is oozing out onto the football board. I'll sorry is this football we're discussing? Fuck your feelings snowflake and post in gamethreads only then
August 12, 20187 yr If he's they guy who's been droppin' dimes to McMurphy, it's a scumbag move, not befitting the HC of an elite university like Texas. But hardly illegal, or anything like that. Not sure why you guys are all wrapped up in it.
August 12, 20187 yr 1 hour ago, GotThatFire said: So did Texas, guy Well texags believes it too don't they
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.