June 5Jun 5 Just now, cabowabo said: These umps are retarded. they are trying to make it so confusing so that tech can win or at least tie the game
June 5Jun 5 Softball's wonky rules are getting exposure on the biggest stage. Not the best showcase of the sport
June 5Jun 5 I assume we are challenging no batter interference in case they reverse the umpire interference
June 5Jun 5 So batter interference would make the runner out to end the game, right? Otherwise what is there to review? You would think the announcers would know the rules but I guess that's too much to ask.
June 5Jun 5 Author Just now, WBT said: So batter interference would make the runner out to end the game, right? Otherwise what is there to review? You would think the announcers would know the rules but I guess that's too much to ask. That’s what they said. It would be a double play
June 5Jun 5 Just now, WBT said: So batter interference would make the runner out to end the game, right? Otherwise what is there to review? You would think the announcers would know the rules but I guess that's too much to ask. Yes
June 5Jun 5 Just now, The_Great_Hornsby said: Lmao, this would be a hell of a way for the game to end As crazy as that one game where our runner got hit by the 1st base throw to home.
June 5Jun 5 Apparently runner would be out if batter interfered on the throw (regardless of the umpire interference)
June 5Jun 5 1 minute ago, cabowabo said: These umps are retarded. I take offense to that. I have a late uncle that was mentally retarded and he would have ran less of a clown show tonight.
June 5Jun 5 1 minute ago, Js1 said: That’s what they said. It would be a double play Yeah, finally they figured it out Edited June 5Jun 5 by WBT
June 5Jun 5 It took the announcers 7 minutes to figure out they were challenging her crossing the plate and interfering.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.