October 26, 20241 yr Popular Post 13 hours ago, Mitch Cumsteen said: Update: I just drove by the house and there were about 6 pickup trucks outside, the front door was wide open, all the lights were on and there were law enforcement officers in the driveway. I’m no Barnaby Jones, but I’m assuming they were scouring the place for more evidence. Did you walk in that door, say you were from the internet, and demand some answers?
October 26, 20241 yr "In his original arrest warrant, it states that the Simpson’s youngest child told a school official, “that her mom and dad were "fighting." ...she told staff that her dad had hit her mom in the face and possibly pushed her into a wall. ...she told staff that her mom had a bruise on her elbow and that her dad had taken her mom's cell phone away."" no need to read the rest of this or any other results from yesterday - journalism is dead https://www.news4sanantonio.com/news/local/veteran-criminal-attorney-weighs-in-on-brad-simpson-as-prime-suspect
October 26, 20241 yr 14 hours ago, Hate said: It's been too long since you've listened to Check Your Head.
October 26, 20241 yr Author 17 minutes ago, Hagbard Celine said: journalism Go away, I'm (click-) baitin'
October 26, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, Prepuce of Doom said: It's been too long since you've listened to Check Your Head. So what'cha want?
October 28, 20241 yr This could be in the "Great Enshittening" thread but there is a fake Gofund me page being circulated using photos from friends of Suzanne. If you see a GF page purporting to be in support of Suzanne's kids etc it is a fake. Do not donate.
October 28, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, BrazilHorn said: This could be in the "Great Enshittening" thread but there is a fake Gofund me page being circulated using photos from friends of Suzanne. If you see a GF page purporting to be in support of Suzanne's kids etc it is a fake. Do not donate. Ketch?
October 28, 20241 yr On 10/24/2024 at 2:33 PM, Murfdogg21 said: Trey probably got the best handy of his life when he showed up at the apartment, but she still made him sleep on the couch.
October 28, 20241 yr On 10/24/2024 at 10:07 PM, Hagbard Celine said: Bexar County District Attorney Joe Gonzales plans to challenge a motion to change Brad Simpson’s bond conditions. Simpson, who is facing a family violence charge, among others, is asking a Bexar County court to amend bond conditions so he can have contact with his children, his attorney said. https://www.ksat.com/news/local/2024/10/24/bexar-county-district-attorney-plans-to-challenge-brad-simpsons-motion-to-change-bond-conditions/ Thats some pretty ballsy shit. "Just because I beat and murdered their mother, doesn't mean I dont deserve to spend time with them."
October 29, 20241 yr On 10/24/2024 at 4:12 PM, Surly Bevo said: Did you see the monuments on The Mall at night? That's the best time to go. No, he never actually left Austin, so the only monuments he visited were these. Spoiler
October 29, 20241 yr 2 hours ago, Cousin Strawberry said: Thats some pretty ballsy shit. "Just because I beat and murdered their mother, doesn't mean I dont deserve to spend time with them." Yeah. They’re probably not gonna let you talk to material witnesses you have parental control over, Sherlock.
October 29, 20241 yr Who do you want telling the kids their mom was murdered by their dad? The government? This election is about parents rights/sorry if cr
October 29, 20241 yr Author 19 hours ago, Updawg said: Who do you want telling the kids their mom was murdered by their dad?
October 29, 20241 yr 20 hours ago, Updawg said: Who do you want telling the kids their mom was murdered by their dad? The government? This election is about parents rights /sorry if cr I will require more time to think about the sock puppets involved.
October 31, 20241 yr On 10/26/2024 at 4:02 AM, AnTiM said: Jed Clampett would have solved this case weeks ago. Reckon.
November 1, 20241 yr I saw a bunch of buzzards circling near the SA zoo today, but that's actually pretty normal. It's probably nothing.
November 1, 20241 yr 4 hours ago, Steel Shank said: What's the latest, dammit?! he's gettnig away with it
November 1, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, Hagbard Celine said: he's gettnig away with it nah. There’s enough circumstantial evidence to convict the guy.
November 5, 20241 yr Popular Post I'm not putting it here, but her (I believe oldest) daughter just posted on Instagram that her mother was a victim of abuse and that her dad killed her in a state of rage. And that she intends to be a voice for domestic violence so that her mother's name is remembered. Fucked up situation and I feel terrible for those kids.
November 7, 20241 yr Author 7 minutes ago, Mitch Cumsteen said: Is it common to charge somebody for murder without a body? I don't think it's common but it's not unheard of
November 7, 20241 yr 8 minutes ago, chainsaw said: I don't think it's common but it's not unheard of Yeah, if there is enough evidence against someone, they can still go forward without a body.
November 7, 20241 yr 39 minutes ago, Sbbruin said: The dude's brother's name is Barton Simpson? Even crazier is he claims to have seen the whole thing
November 8, 20241 yr So if they try him without a body and don't get a conviction, they can't try him again if they find the body, like that Ashley Judd movie. Is that right?
November 8, 20241 yr 6 hours ago, chainsaw said: I don't think it's common but it's not unheard of 6 hours ago, kevwun said: Yeah, if there is enough evidence against someone, they can still go forward without a body. 15 minutes ago, SameSame said: So if they try him without a body and don't get a conviction, they can't try him again if they find the body, like that Ashley Judd movie. Is that right?
November 8, 20241 yr 13 hours ago, kevwun said: Yeah, if there is enough evidence against someone, they can still go forward without a body. Yeah, it's kind of like "motive, means, and opportunity." It's not something that's an element of the crime, precisely (you do have to prove that the defendant caused death), but it's something you may need to convince a jury that the murder actually happened. What lawdogs call the burden of persuasion more than the burden of proof.
November 8, 20241 yr Oh, wow. I dated a Suzanne Clark back in the day. Not that one. The one I dated got put in the federal pokey for embezzling money from Perot Systems a couple of years after we broke up.
November 8, 20241 yr 8 minutes ago, Scary Stranger said: Oh, wow. I dated a Suzanne Clark back in the day. Not that one. The one I dated got put in the federal pokey for embezzling money from Perot Systems a couple of years after we broke up. Hopefully, you were able to help her spend some of that sweet Perot money before y'all broke up.
November 8, 20241 yr 2 hours ago, Scary Stranger said: Oh, wow. I dated a Suzanne Clark back in the day. Not that one. The one I dated got put in the federal pokey for embezzling money from Perot Systems a couple of years after we broke up. Uh-huh. Sounds like something a jilted rat would say....
November 8, 20241 yr 5 hours ago, TwiceHorn said: Yeah, it's kind of like "motive, means, and opportunity." It's not something that's an element of the crime, precisely (you do have to prove that the defendant caused death), but it's something you may need to convince a jury that the murder actually happened. What lawdogs call the burden of persuasion more than the burden of proof. If I'm on a murder trial jury, there's got to be a body to get a conviction. Or at least a pool of the victim's blood that's large enough to determine that they couldn't live after losing that much blood.
November 8, 20241 yr 8 minutes ago, Sandman said: If I'm on a murder trial jury, there's got to be a body to get a conviction. Or at least a pool of the victim's blood that's large enough to determine that they couldn't live after losing that much blood. Which means you would never make it onto a murder trial jury where a body had not been found.
November 8, 20241 yr Just now, royiv said: Which means you would never make it onto a murder trial jury where a body had not been found. If they're smart enough to ask about that during jury selection, you're right.
November 8, 20241 yr Something like 80%+ conviction rate for no body cases nationwide fwiw https://apbweb.com/2024/07/no-body-homicide-cases/
November 8, 20241 yr 6 hours ago, Bookman said: Ashley Judd was in a movie? Not sure. She was in a jersey, though.
November 8, 20241 yr 2 hours ago, Dennis Taylor said: Uh-huh. Sounds like something a jilted rat would say.... He pulls back on to Main Street in his new Mercedes-Benz…
November 8, 20241 yr Just now, Pato del Muerto said: He pulls back on to Main Street in his new Mercedes-Benz… the road goes on forever...
November 8, 20241 yr 22 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said: Not sure. She was in a jersey, though. She wasn't in them for long....so the rumors go
November 8, 20241 yr Author 1 hour ago, Sandman said: If they're smart enough to ask about that during jury selection, you're right. In a bunch of cases the victim is presumed dead. Like imagine two people go into the woods or out to sea, but only one returns. I don't know the number off the top of my head but after a certain number of days, you can know with mathematical certainty that they are no longer alive. I'm guessing the judge would basically force the jury to assume the victim is dead. Still hard, I guess, to say that the defendant was the cause of death and did it on purpose, but it gets easier when there's all this other stuff about how he was fighting with her and previously abusive. I don't think they would have brought murder charges unless they had some Kaitlin Armstrong-like evidence showing where he was at all times on the evening in question. Tracking his cars, trucks, phones, accounts, and reviewing surveillance from everywhere they know he had been on that evening and the other days before and after. By the time they charged Armstrong they'd gotten audio of the gunshots from a neighbor's Ring camera, video of the Jeep she was using, and the Jeep had some kind of GPS on it she forgot to disable. Of course, the ballistics matched up with her gun too and she had a track record of being controlling, envious, and specifically envious of the victim. I hope the detectives have similar evidence on Brad. If they've got all that, I'm not that worried about a lack of a body. Edited November 8, 20241 yr by chainsaw
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.