Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Surly Horns

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread

Featured Replies

  • Replies 13.9k
  • Views 1.1m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • @troph’s wife here. Time for my inaugural post. 

  • Let’s start this week with a feel good story! How it started     How it’s going   Not going to offer prayers but here’s a thought, Rodney. Eat s

  • The Dog
    The Dog

Posted Images

I assume a lot of these posts are Russian Twitter bots. The question I have is why is Russia turning on him now? Just to sow chaos basically? Not getting what they want as fast as they want in Ukraine?

25 minutes ago, tokamak said:

I assume a lot of these posts are Russian Twitter bots. The question I have is why is Russia turning on him now? Just to sow chaos basically? Not getting what they want as fast as they want in Ukraine?

Division and chaos have always been their overarching goal with these ops.

dumb question...CA, CO, etc. have weed even though it's illegal at the fed level, why couldn't states like TX and WI do the same with the hemp products? like... just keep making/selling, dare the feds to 'come and take it' like the full legal weed states do?

Edited by mchookem

dumb question...CA, CO, etc. have weed even though it's illegal at the fed level, why couldn't states like TX and WI do the same with the hemp products? like... just keep making/selling, dare the feds to 'come and take it' like the full legal weed states do?

This was the same question I had.
  • Popular Post
6 hours ago, mchookem said:

dumb question...CA, CO, etc. have weed even though it's illegal at the fed level, why couldn't states like TX and WI do the same with the hemp products? like... just keep making/selling, dare the feds to 'come and take it' like the full legal weed states do?

Because our Lt. Governor is a boot licking sycophantic MAGtard.

1 minute ago, Macanudo said:

Because our Lt. Governor is a boot licking sycophantic MAGtard.

Stop, you're making him blush.

i mean yeah, TX is fucked bc puritans are in charge...but it's still a question for many other states. what makes whatever this says different from the CSA? 

This is probably on her thread but it belongs here too:

image.thumb.png.1d20948d25f7a02e1d410ccef5a1515f.png

that is really something

Edited by mchookem

If Biden did that?  
If Obama did that?

If Crazy Earl of Crazy Earl’s Used Car Mart did that, there would be commentary, consequences, feedback.  
 

But the President of the United States of America did that.  Today.   Ho hum.  In the new times (dibs on the phrase, I’m working in the details), US “journalism” will be punished or demoted for such laziness.  That is the election pitch I want to hear.  

On 9/10/2025 at 7:28 AM, Bozo_Casanova said:

Reagan didn’t act like that, but Trump is very continuous with Reagan. 
Im not sure if you were one of the Reagan Republicans who believed in all that nonsense and are still trying to rationalize your support, but there’s a straight line between the two.
Reagan was just far more palatable and his administration was held much more in check by congress, which in those days was elected in mostly competitive districts by communities of interest.*
 

 

 

or “communities of interest,” as @Ag with kids likes to call real places and people with things in common, as opposed to preordained partisan outcomes. 

Sigh...You keep on bringing this up...

 

But, how are you going to define your "community of interest"?

Your household?

Your street?

Your neighborhood?

Your suburb area?

Your town/city?

Your metro area?

Your county?

Your regional area in the state?

Your state?

Your regional area in the country?

Your country?

Your continent?

 

ALL of those could be "communities of interest"

If you want to define it at one of the the lowest levels (which is what it appears you want to do), then we can't do that with 435 US Representatives (or for TX, 150 Reps and 31 Senators).  Because there are just too many "communities of interest" at those levels.

 

BTW, people don't cooperate politically with "communities of interest".  Most areas have people who care closely about lots of local issues, but disagree massively about wider issues.  How do you propose reconciling those differences?  BTW, by "most areas", I meant you could attach that definition to any one of those areas I listed above...even including the household...

1 hour ago, Ag with kids said:

Sigh...You keep on bringing this up...

 

But, how are you going to define your "community of interest"?

Your household?

Your street?

Your neighborhood?

Your suburb area?

Your town/city?

Your metro area?

Your county?

Your regional area in the state?

Your state?

Your regional area in the country?

Your country?

Your continent?

 

ALL of those could be "communities of interest"

If you want to define it at one of the the lowest levels (which is what it appears you want to do), then we can't do that with 435 US Representatives (or for TX, 150 Reps and 31 Senators).  Because there are just too many "communities of interest" at those levels.

 

BTW, people don't cooperate politically with "communities of interest".  Most areas have people who care closely about lots of local issues, but disagree massively about wider issues.  How do you propose reconciling those differences?  BTW, by "most areas", I meant you could attach that definition to any one of those areas I listed above...even including the household...

Denying that urban dwellers have more in common with urban dwellers than they do with rural dwellers is the sort of willful obtuseness that can also present n casting a vote for a serial liar, child sexual predator, criminal. 

7 hours ago, The Dog said:

This is probably on her thread but it belongs here too:

image.thumb.png.1d20948d25f7a02e1d410ccef5a1515f.png

POTUS has a very small dick.

 

  • Popular Post
6 hours ago, Ag with kids said:

Sigh...You keep on bringing this up...

 

But, how are you going to define your "community of interest"?

Your household?

Your street?

Your neighborhood?

Your suburb area?

Your town/city?

Your metro area?

Your county?

Your regional area in the state?

Your state?

Your regional area in the country?

Your country?

Your continent?

 

ALL of those could be "communities of interest"

If you want to define it at one of the the lowest levels (which is what it appears you want to do), then we can't do that with 435 US Representatives (or for TX, 150 Reps and 31 Senators).  Because there are just too many "communities of interest" at those levels.

 

BTW, people don't cooperate politically with "communities of interest".  Most areas have people who care closely about lots of local issues, but disagree massively about wider issues.  How do you propose reconciling those differences?  BTW, by "most areas", I meant you could attach that definition to any one of those areas I listed above...even including the household...

Oh Jesus this is like the least slippery slope of all time.

No, I won’t define a well understood, widely used concept. Google is your friend. Here’s how this goes: I think representative democracy should involve competition to represent the real interests of actual people. You have indicated that parties represent “schools of thought” (or “wider interests”) and therefore people should be structured into prepackaged tranches to produce a partisan result that conforms to their party preferences as expressed across the widest political subdivision available, ie, the state. My view is that “wider issues” will remain in play but compact districts composed of actual places where people have things in common will also weigh those issues against local ones and produce a more nuanced and fulsome consideration of candidates, and that candidates will therefore represent their constituents. You contend those local considerations don’t matter or at best should be distinctly secondary. The parties agree, which is why we have nationalized basically all federal races. 
In other words want shitty government that disrespects your intelligence and robs you blind while offering you no choices that matter. I don’t.
 

That’s where we disagree. 

Edited by Bozo_Casanova

2 hours ago, TexArcher said:

POTUS has a very small dick.

 

Newsom should start saying this on social media. I don’t care if it’s juvenile. This is where we are and it will work. Hitler dick. 

20 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

Newsom should start saying this on social media. I don’t care if it’s juvenile. This is where we are and it will work. Hitler dick. 

the-office-pam-beesly.gif

 

On 11/13/2025 at 6:30 PM, mchookem said:

i mean yeah, TX is fucked bc puritans are in charge...but it's still a question for many other states. what makes whatever this says different from the CSA? 

Pharma lobbyists?

9 hours ago, Ag with kids said:

If you want to define it at one of the the lowest levels (which is what it appears you want to do), then we can't do that with 435 US Representatives (or for TX, 150 Reps and 31 Senators).  Because there are just too many "communities of interest" at those levels.

 

You are so close to getting it

  • Popular Post
On 11/8/2025 at 1:06 PM, jimmyjazz said:

Well, first of all the idea of helping one's fellow man is not even remotely some sort of exclusively "Christian" value.  Beyond that, the American evangelical movement has perverted Christian values beyond recognition, so no I don't give a flying fuck how bad they are.  I do give a flying fuck about people starving.  Call me a libtard.

The problem with your line of thinking is that it is emotional.  You want to help because you have not walled off your humanity and empathy.  We all want to be like that.  Heck that is who we were to various degrees.  But I am edumacated enough to know that people's dissonance ends when their world around them devolves.  Their hungry bellies will make them long for the days of Bidenomics and Commiela Harris.   You already noticed the pattern in most of these Leopards posts. 

The only strategy that we (I am projecting here) see is for people to suffer until they can no longer deny it.  That the poor and middle class who have been exploited by the super wealthy and politically connected must unite to demand change.  

We are currently in a cold revolution.  Our way of life and government has been hijacked by fascist elements from our society.  We can comfortable go along with it, or we can act.  

 

59 minutes ago, Nivek said:

The problem with your line of thinking is that it is emotional.  You want to help because you have not walled off your humanity and empathy.  We all want to be like that.  Heck that is who we were to various degrees.  But I am edumacated enough to know that people's dissonance ends when their world around them devolves.  Their hungry bellies will make them long for the days of Bidenomics and Commiela Harris.   You already noticed the pattern in most of these Leopards posts. 

The only strategy that we (I am projecting here) see is for people to suffer until they can no longer deny it.  That the poor and middle class who have been exploited by the super wealthy and politically connected must unite to demand change.  

We are currently in a cold revolution.  Our way of life and government has been hijacked by fascist elements from our society.  We can comfortable go along with it, or we can act.  

 

I respectfully disagree.  Doing nothing ensures a good number of "innocent" people suffer, and it fails to clearly demonstrate the true differences between the left and the right.  If I feed a few people, regardless of political stripe, there is a chance some who supported Trump and believed his false characterizations of me & mine will learn the truth.  Some.  Not all.

And please, let's leave the hypercynical "sweet summer child" and "bless your heart" responses out of this.  I get it.

8 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

I respectfully disagree.  Doing nothing ensures a good number of "innocent" people suffer, and it fails to clearly demonstrate the true differences between the left and the right.  If I feed a few people, regardless of political stripe, there is a chance some who supported Trump and believed his false characterizations of me & mine will learn the truth.  Some.  Not all.

And please, let's leave the hypercynical "sweet summer child" and "bless your heart" responses out of this.  I get it.

Innocent people already suffer and were made to suffer.  Were told they were going to suffer.  And some people willingly went along with it.  Special education was going to get harmed, and that harm was going to be passed onto the children.  And people gleefully went along with it.  My own family knew it would harm me and they did anyway. 

If anything, I profoundly respect you for holding on to your humanity.   I just don't think it is a strategy to move forward.  But we will need you in the future when this is all over.  Hopefully you won't get corrupted by our cynicism in the meantime.  

6 hours ago, Biff Tannen said:

Newsom should start saying this on social media. I don’t care if it’s juvenile. This is where we are and it will work. Hitler dick. 

Hitler dick is the name of my next band. 

6 hours ago, Biff Tannen said:

Newsom should start saying this on social media. I don’t care if it’s juvenile. This is where we are and it will work. Hitler dick. 

Should tweet out  "Science says that fascists overcompensate because they have small genitalia."  

  • Popular Post

2g8krm.gif

Soooo, when are we getting just the right post from MTG all up in here?

1 hour ago, The Dog said:

image.thumb.png.e60f8dd75ad8666ad745ca81986b83e8.png

In 2026 and definitely in 2028, they will ALL go back to their orange master. 

This Lollapalooza's concert starting with - I am Team Jimmy, followed by Hitler Dick, and the main event, Revolting Cocks.

39 minutes ago, Nivek said:

This Lollapalooza's concert starting with - I am Team Jimmy, followed by Hitler Dick, and the main event, Revolting Cocks.

No Buzzcocks?

Blowing Bubba should be a band name as well. 

51 minutes ago, The Dog said:

image.thumb.png.bb45b8d6f343198aadd98a38f0a7c124.png

When the former convicts turn on you…

4 hours ago, The Dog said:

image.thumb.png.bb45b8d6f343198aadd98a38f0a7c124.png

Message to this guy: You’re a fucking mark and too stupid to understand it. 

These have to be the same people who are huge pro wrestling fans, right? Not the fans who find it mildly entertaining, but the ones who go all in paying thousands of dollars on merch and meet and greets with female wrestlers thinking they have a shot to score if they can just tell her how they feel. 

3 hours ago, Hermanator said:

These have to be the same people who are huge pro wrestling fans, right? Not the fans who find it mildly entertaining, but the ones who go all in paying thousands of dollars on merch and meet and greets with female wrestlers thinking they have a shot to score if they can just tell her how they feel. 

Yes

4 hours ago, Hermanator said:

These have to be the same people who are huge pro wrestling fans, right?

I think of it more as the cohort who know it’s not real but find it emotionally indistinguishable from reality (I.e., maybe they even prefer the fiction).  
 

I think that’s one reason why the alt-right has settled on “red pill” as a rhetorical device, because this concept of a reality known only to an “in-group” is shared between wrestling fans and the conspiracy laden Infowars type and the manosphere.  

  • Popular Post

r/LeopardsAteMyFace - Trump voter cheered federal workers getting canned. Months later, guess who’s unemployed? Karma speedrun.

Noticeable uptick in spam commercials during football last weekend. Hormel not wasting an opportunity. 

On 11/13/2025 at 11:48 AM, mchookem said:

dumb question...CA, CO, etc. have weed even though it's illegal at the fed level, why couldn't states like TX and WI do the same with the hemp products? like... just keep making/selling, dare the feds to 'come and take it' like the full legal weed states do?

200.gif

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.