Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Surly Horns

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Featured Replies

do you mean against the judge or the president

  • Replies 17.6k
  • Views 1.1m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • No, you guys went Republican to ethnonationalist.

  • Bozo_Casanova
    Bozo_Casanova

    When Georgetown Prep sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're

  • In 2016 I was a moderate.  Socially liberal, fiscally conservative, but not quite a libertarian.  I would have considered voting for Kasich had he won the nomination. Now?  I will probably never

3 minutes ago, horncyclist said:

Here's a WaPo story on Swetnick. Seems fair


https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/who-is-julie-swetnick-the-third-kavanaugh-accuser/2018/09/26/91e16ed8-c1bc-11e8-97a5-ab1e46bb3bc7_story.html

This stood out to me:

At least one of Kavanaugh’s classmates scoffed at the notion that Swetnick would have been a regular at parties with Georgetown Prep students.

“Never heard of her,” said the person, who declined to be named because members of the class have agreed not to speak on the record to reporters. “I don’t remember anyone from Prep hanging out with public school girls, especially from Gaithersburg.”
 

steff.jpg

There is no statute of limitations for these acts in Maryland. These ladies should file criminal complaints. 

Edited by Johnny Sack

1 minute ago, dOUblewide said:

Why are they not in jail then? 

Im guesing not 1 criminal complaint has ever been filed. 

Because they are wealthy and white. And scumbags like you always have their back anyway, hoping for a few crumbs thrown your way. 

Just now, JimmyJames said:

Because they are wealthy and white. And scumbags like you always have their back anyway, hoping for a few crumbs thrown your way. 

You think he’s guilty of these offenses?

Just now, Johnny Sack said:

You think he’s guilty of these offenses?

Probably. Do you? 

Here's the thing about "innocent until proven guilty."

If there's one accusation, I'll give the guy the benefit of the doubt.  I have no idea what happened between Kobe Bryant and the girl in that hotel.  Women do sometimes make false accusations.  Fair enough.

But when 15 women accuse the president of rape, or 3 women (and counting) accuse Kavanaugh of rape, it has a lot more weight.

Here's the other thing about "innocent until proven guilty":

All of you who are discounting the victims' stories are assuming that they're guilty of falsely accusing someone of a felony.  Why aren't they innocent until proven guilty?

1 minute ago, JimmyJames said:

Because they are wealthy and white. And scumbags like you always have their back anyway, hoping for a few crumbs thrown your way. 

That's a pretty shitty excuse. Hope you don't lead or mentor young people. 

 

1 minute ago, TexArcher said:

Here's the thing about "innocent until proven guilty."

If there's one accusation, I'll give the guy the benefit of the doubt.  I have no idea what happened between Kobe Bryant and the girl in that hotel.  Women do sometimes make false accusations.  Fair enough.

But when 15 women accuse the president of rape, or 3 women (and counting) accuse Kavanaugh of rape, it has a lot more weight.

Here's the other thing about "innocent until proven guilty":

All of you who are discounting the victims' stories are assuming that they're guilty of falsely accusing someone of a felony.  Why aren't they innocent until proven guilty?

It’s your understanding that three women have accused him of rape?

4 minutes ago, JimmyJames said:

Probably. Do you? 

Probably not.  But I want to hear testimony. 

If I was on a jury deciding whether or not to send him to jail, maybe I’d vote not to.

if I was sitting on a committee deciding whether or not to put this guy on the Supreme Court, I’d vote no. 

Just now, Johnny Sack said:

It’s your understanding that three women have accused him of rape?

Oh, I'm sorry.  I should have said "sexual assault or sexual misconduct."

Go and latch onto that instead of the point that he's been accused three times and counting.

You're like Kellyanne Conway with a smaller dick.

1 minute ago, Johnny Sack said:

Probably not.  But I want to hear testimony. 

Nothing wrong with that. I’d also like to hear testimony from that other dude she says was there.

Just now, TexArcher said:

Oh, I'm sorry.  I should have said "sexual assault or sexual misconduct."

Go and latch onto that instead of the point that he's been accused three times and counting.

You're like Kellyanne Conway with a smaller dick.

You accused him of being a serial fucking rapist.  That’s some serious shit.  

attempted rape, sexual assault, and Avenatti's client's claim is salacious and puts him waiting in line to run train on a drugged woman in a bedroom but does not actually say that he took part in her rape.  it also claims there are some people out there who can corroborate the stories.  some anonymous complaints that i haven't read into much

Ford's prepared opening statement is pretty powerful.  Tomorrow will be interesting. 

Given the available evidence, ignoring political alignment...

- I would vote not guilty in a jury trial.

- I would vote against him as an SC nominee.

It's not complicated.

Just now, Johnny Sack said:

You accused him of being a serial fucking rapist.  That’s some serious shit.  

LOVE the selective decorum and moral outrage from the "FUCK YOU LIBS DRUNKS WHORES DESERVE RAPE!" crowd.

26 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

Present?  In the house?  At the party?   In the bedroom?  Come the fuck on.  

All very good questions that someone should ask.

1 minute ago, David Dennison said:

All very good questions that someone should ask.

If only someone in some sort of leadership capacity could authorize an FBI investigation...

3 minutes ago, bad_teammate said:

LOVE the selective decorum and moral outrage from the "FUCK YOU LIBS DRUNKS WHORES DESERVE RAPE!" crowd.

I’ve never come close to saying that. Cut this dishonesty shit out.  

4 minutes ago, bad_teammate said:

Given the available evidence, ignoring political alignment...

- I would vote not guilty in a jury trial.

- I would vote against him as an SC nominee.

It's not complicated.

It really is that simple.

1 minute ago, Johnny Sack said:

I’ve never come close to saying that. Cut this dishonesty shit out.  

giphy.gif

11 hours ago, Johnny Sack said:

“I know that these parties included rape and drugged drinks”

“I continued going though”

“I eventually got raped”

A little help for those that may have missed this earlier.

Just now, Lurch said:

A little help for those that may have missed this earlier.

Again.  Not saying she brought it on herself.  Saying it makes no sense for a adult aged college women to go to a Gang rape party once and then go back 9 more times.  It’s a credibility issue because that’s unbelievable to me.  

9 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

You accused him of being a serial fucking rapist.  That’s some serious shit.  

He’s a serial fucking sexual assaulter. Is this really the best argument you can make? Guys it wasn’t rape it was attempted rape and sexual assault.

So what time do the fireworks start in the hearing room tomorrow?

I doubt they were billed as gang rape parties.

2 minutes ago, hobbes2702 said:

He’s a serial fucking sexual assaulter. Is this really the best argument you can make? Guys it wasn’t rape it was attempted rape and sexual assault.

He is?  He’s guilty huh?

Just now, Johnny Sack said:

He is?  He’s guilty huh?

Asked and answered by multiple posters. The fact that you’re concerned with parsing between rape and sexual assault is the ridiculous part.

3 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

Again.  Not saying she brought it on herself.  Saying it makes no sense for a adult aged college women to go to a Gang rape party once and then go back 9 more times.  It’s a credibility issue because that’s unbelievable to me.  

When stupid people think they're clever.

Just now, retread said:

I doubt they were billed as gang rape parties.

The college aged woman swore under oath that she knew gang rapes were happening at these high school parties.  Yet she went back 9 times.  Again, bizarre.  

Just now, bad_teammate said:

When stupid people think they're clever.

When stupid people think they’re clever.  

Just now, Johnny Sack said:

The college aged woman swore under oath that she knew gang rapes were happening at these high school parties.  Yet she went back 9 times.  Again, bizarre.  

In what sense were they "high school parties"? Was there signage?

Just now, bad_teammate said:

When stupid people think they're clever.

Especially since he’s clearly saying she brought it on herself. He’s a piece of shit. I dunno why we continue to entertain him. He’s a real person who posts like a troll because he’s unable to use critical thinking.

1 minute ago, hobbes2702 said:

Especially since he’s clearly saying she brought it on herself. He’s a piece of shit. I dunno why we continue to entertain him. He’s a real person who posts like a troll because he’s unable to use critical thinking.

No dumbass.  I’m not saying she brought it on herself.  I’m saying “it”likely didn’t happen given how bizarre her allegations are.  

Edited by Johnny Sack

I think they’d be better off pulling his nomination now before she testifies.  Rs can say those dastardly Ds ruined a man over unproved rumors with their tricky tricks and fuel the ongoing war.  Waiting too long and it’ll be a loss on the merits and the blue wave gets even bigger.  

1 minute ago, Johnny Sack said:

No dumbass.  I’m not saying she brought it on herself.  I’m saying “it”likely didn’t happen given how bizarre her allegations are.  

Right that’s exactly what your post implies.

Stay the course. Supporting rape suits you.

Just now, hobbes2702 said:

Right that’s exactly what your post implies.

Stay the course. Supporting rape suits you.

So you do agree that I’m not saying she was raped and deserved it, true?

Just now, Kdub said:

apparently there is a 4th accuser...happened in 1998.

She's full of shit, too, though.  Kavanaugh is innocent until proven guilty.  This woman, however, is obviously guilty of being a liar and a drunken whore who shouldn't have put herself near a rape boner.

Just now, Johnny Sack said:

So you do agree that I’m not saying she was raped and deserved it, true?

Jesus Christ what kind of sentence structure is this?

3 hours ago, David Dennison said:

Four separate cases all pointing in the same direction.

The common denominator denies it all.

Hmmmm.

you meet an asshole one day, you met an asshole.

you meet an asshole every day...

Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.