May 28May 28 Details of a sexual misconduct allegation lawsuit. What a piece of shit. "Stone is most known as the far-right lawyer who defended the Texas "bounty hunter" abortion law, which allowed Texas residents to sue individuals who aid or abet in performing or inducing an abortion. The suit alleges that anyone involved from an Uber driver to the doctor, could be targeted." https://www.rawstory.com/texas-judd-stone-lawsuit/ https://timesng.com/former-texas-solicitor-general/ Here is the Complaint. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txwd.1172845463/gov.uscourts.txwd.1172845463.1.0_1.pdf ...In summary, both women asked me how I would protect them from Judd and Chris and informed me of Judd having sexually harassed them. They were also afraid that Judd might continue his abuse and might physically and/or sexually assault or harass them at OAG. They both informed me that they came to fear him as a result of working in close quarters with him in a small house that he picked out for them all to do impeachment work in. They also expressed their disappointment with Chris Hilton who just sat there and watched Judd harass them over the summer without speaking up in their defense. The first female employee came to me on October 13, 2023. I asked Ralph Molina to join the conversation with me, so that I had a witness. Through many tears, she told me stories of Judd discussing sexual things with her, specifically regarding a disturbing sexual fantasy Judd had about me being violently anally raped by a cylindrical asteroid in front of my wife and children. According to this employee, Judd publicly described this in excruciating detail over a long period of time, to a Case 1:25-cv-00804 Document 1 Filed 05/27/25 Page 9 of 19 10 group of OAG employees, Office of the Governor employee(s), federal judges, and other non-government employees at a table. Chris Hilton was present for this conversation. The female employee conveyed that she was so disgusted by the violent sexual nature of the discussion that she left the table to get away from it. When she came back, people at the table harassed her, joking that she “couldn’t handle people talking about dicks.” Chris Hilton was clearly aware that this female employee was uncomfortable, shrugged at her, and did nothing. The female employee had other concerns about treatment of women and sexual harassment and exhibited emotional distress as she told me this story. She tearfully expressed to me that she could never work with Chris or Judd ever again. We finished the long conversation at the close of business. I was so disturbed by the violent sexual fantasies about me that I took the weekend to process the news. Immediately following this, on Monday, a second female employee messaged me asking to meet with me immediately about Judd and Chris. Ralph Molina was not available, so I asked my Executive Assistant, Gayla Schwab, to be my witness. This second female employee asked me what I would be doing to protect her from Judd and Chris now that they were returning to the office. This employee told a different story of sexual comments being made towards her, specifically one where Judd discussed people putting sexual organs in her mouth. Chris was present for these comments and this employee asked Chris for assistance and he apparently dismissed her comments and placed approval on Judd’s actions. Additionally, this second female employee told me stories of abuse, where she was cornered alone in offices with Judd and Chris and was screamed at and berated to “cry” for failing to get Judd and Chris their catered lunch on time. ... It was decided that the allegations were credible and of such nature that immediate action had to be taken. Eventually Judd was confronted with the allegations against them, and promptly admitted that all of the allegations were true and that the actions described by the two females did indeed happen. Since they were both back at the office, we had to move fast with the termination to protect both women and other female employees at OAG. No further investigation into the allegations was necessary given that Judd had admitted to the conduct at issue. State law requires that the OAG and managers immediately take action to stop sexual harassment, and failure to take immediate action could result in financial liability for managers and for the OAG. Additionally, Pursuant to legal advice from HR, it is customary to allow people to resign in lieu of termination. Judd and Chris would be notified that they would be terminated if they did not resign. Former Deputy First Assistant Grant Dorfman was assigned to carry out the termination process. Grant Dorfman now serves as a judge, appointed by Governor Abbott. As described above, during the termination process, Judd admitted to Judge Dorfman that the allegations were true, including the comments about his desires to watch me be anally raped in front of my kids, but that it was ok because it was during their time at a private law firm. Chris did not contest the allegations. Judd and Chris submitted their resignation at the end of their conversation with Judge Dorfman, on October 17, 2023.
May 28May 28 Popular Post Remember, the main point of all the anti-abortion stuff is really about controlling women. With that in mind, his being a fucking psycho toward them totally checks out. Edited May 28May 28 by bolverk
May 28May 28 Author Well, to my knowledge there are no documented cases of abortions from women being analy raped by asteroids so at least his fantasies are consistent with this bullshit. Edited May 28May 28 by crash_davis
May 28May 28 Let me get this straight... A lawyer who wants to prosecute people for helping women actually treats women like shit. Hmm, guess I've seen it all now.
May 28May 28 16 minutes ago, crash_davis said: Details of a sexual misconduct allegation lawsuit. What a piece of shit. "Stone is most known as the far-right lawyer who defended the Texas "bounty hunter" abortion law, which allowed Texas residents to sue individuals who aid or abet in performing or inducing an abortion. The suit alleges that anyone involved from an Uber driver to the doctor, could be targeted." https://www.rawstory.com/texas-judd-stone-lawsuit/ https://timesng.com/former-texas-solicitor-general/ Here is the Complaint. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txwd.1172845463/gov.uscourts.txwd.1172845463.1.0_1.pdf ...In summary, both women asked me how I would protect them from Judd and Chris and informed me of Judd having sexually harassed them. They were also afraid that Judd might continue his abuse and might physically and/or sexually assault or harass them at OAG. They both informed me that they came to fear him as a result of working in close quarters with him in a small house that he picked out for them all to do impeachment work in. They also expressed their disappointment with Chris Hilton who just sat there and watched Judd harass them over the summer without speaking up in their defense. The first female employee came to me on October 13, 2023. I asked Ralph Molina to join the conversation with me, so that I had a witness. Through many tears, she told me stories of Judd discussing sexual things with her, specifically regarding a disturbing sexual fantasy Judd had about me being violently anally raped by a cylindrical asteroid in front of my wife and children. According to this employee, Judd publicly described this in excruciating detail over a long period of time, to a Case 1:25-cv-00804 Document 1 Filed 05/27/25 Page 9 of 19 10 group of OAG employees, Office of the Governor employee(s), federal judges, and other non-government employees at a table. Chris Hilton was present for this conversation. The female employee conveyed that she was so disgusted by the violent sexual nature of the discussion that she left the table to get away from it. When she came back, people at the table harassed her, joking that she “couldn’t handle people talking about dicks.” Chris Hilton was clearly aware that this female employee was uncomfortable, shrugged at her, and did nothing. The female employee had other concerns about treatment of women and sexual harassment and exhibited emotional distress as she told me this story. She tearfully expressed to me that she could never work with Chris or Judd ever again. We finished the long conversation at the close of business. I was so disturbed by the violent sexual fantasies about me that I took the weekend to process the news. Immediately following this, on Monday, a second female employee messaged me asking to meet with me immediately about Judd and Chris. Ralph Molina was not available, so I asked my Executive Assistant, Gayla Schwab, to be my witness. This second female employee asked me what I would be doing to protect her from Judd and Chris now that they were returning to the office. This employee told a different story of sexual comments being made towards her, specifically one where Judd discussed people putting sexual organs in her mouth. Chris was present for these comments and this employee asked Chris for assistance and he apparently dismissed her comments and placed approval on Judd’s actions. Additionally, this second female employee told me stories of abuse, where she was cornered alone in offices with Judd and Chris and was screamed at and berated to “cry” for failing to get Judd and Chris their catered lunch on time. ... It was decided that the allegations were credible and of such nature that immediate action had to be taken. Eventually Judd was confronted with the allegations against them, and promptly admitted that all of the allegations were true and that the actions described by the two females did indeed happen. Since they were both back at the office, we had to move fast with the termination to protect both women and other female employees at OAG. No further investigation into the allegations was necessary given that Judd had admitted to the conduct at issue. State law requires that the OAG and managers immediately take action to stop sexual harassment, and failure to take immediate action could result in financial liability for managers and for the OAG. Additionally, Pursuant to legal advice from HR, it is customary to allow people to resign in lieu of termination. Judd and Chris would be notified that they would be terminated if they did not resign. Former Deputy First Assistant Grant Dorfman was assigned to carry out the termination process. Grant Dorfman now serves as a judge, appointed by Governor Abbott. As described above, during the termination process, Judd admitted to Judge Dorfman that the allegations were true, including the comments about his desires to watch me be anally raped in front of my kids, but that it was ok because it was during their time at a private law firm. Chris did not contest the allegations. Judd and Chris submitted their resignation at the end of their conversation with Judge Dorfman, on October 17, 2023. Don't know about the plaintiff's lawyer, Austin lawdogs would have to opine, but that complaint has the absolute ring of truth to it. Nothing speculative. A lot of he-said/she-said, but with witnesses and receipts. Also, these two clowns, Stone and Hilton, took a leave of absence from the AGs office to be second-tier defenders of Paxton in his impeachment (Buzbee and Cogdell being the first tier), and agreed to pay the plaintiff a salary of $180k as an executive assistant. They weren't being paid that kind of money by Ken fucking Paxton, even embezzling from campaign funds. I smell Tim Dunn.
May 28May 28 1 minute ago, TwiceHorn said: I smell Tim Dunn. The entire "groundswell" of pro-Paxton billboards and social media ads came from that asshole
May 28May 28 Author 3 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said: Don't know about the plaintiff's lawyer, Austin lawdogs would have to opine, but that complaint has the absolute ring of truth to it. Nothing speculative. A lot of he-said/she-said, but with witnesses and receipts. The piece of shit admitted to saying those things. Eventually Judd was confronted with the allegations against them, and promptly admitted that all of the allegations were true and that the actions described by the two females did indeed happen.
May 28May 28 29 minutes ago, crash_davis said: a disturbing sexual fantasy Judd had about me being violently anally raped by a cylindrical asteroid in front of my wife and children Oddly specific.
May 28May 28 3 minutes ago, crash_davis said: The piece of shit admitted to saying those things. Eventually Judd was confronted with the allegations against them, and promptly admitted that all of the allegations were true and that the actions described by the two females did indeed happen. In the end, that is just an allegation in a lawsuit, but I am sure it is well-documented and provable. That's what I mean by ring of truth everywhere. But it's ok because it was in a private law firm.
May 28May 28 1 hour ago, crash_davis said: a disturbing sexual fantasy Judd had about me being violently anally raped by a cylindrical asteroid
May 28May 28 1 hour ago, chainsaw said: So the redacted stuff, I'm guessing he has a medical condition? All these guys have broken dicks.
May 28May 28 2 hours ago, chainsaw said: He's dirty? NO FUCKING WAY! Clerked for Scalia, Chief Counsel for Ted Cruz, just shocking!
May 28May 28 According to a pro-forma, these clowns were paid 750k/month for Paxton's defense. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70382405/1/1/eskew-v-stone-hilton-pllc/ Of which "Judd and Chris" were paying themselves $100k/month. Next lawyer getting half that.
June 26Jun 26 Rumor on the street is that Stone and Hilton are suing Brent Webster over his asteroid in the anus comment.
June 26Jun 26 15 minutes ago, HRSchenker said: Rumor on the street is that Stone and Hilton are suing Brent Webster over his asteroid in the anus comment. Wait.....suing him for an allegation made in a pleading filed in court? That's, umm, not a thing.
June 26Jun 26 Author 5 minutes ago, Brisketexan said: Wait.....suing him for an allegation made in a pleading filed in court? That's, umm, not a thing. The state leaders accept your challenge.
June 26Jun 26 12 minutes ago, Brisketexan said: Wait.....suing him for an allegation made in a pleading filed in court? That's, umm, not a thing. You clearly haven't been following the Blake Lively thread
June 27Jun 27 5 hours ago, HRSchenker said: Found it! Here's the lawsuit CV125-cv-00983.pdf 3.1 MB · 16 downloads That's one of the most cockamamie lawsuits I have ever seen in my life. Makes some of Trump's efforts look sane and grounded. They're suing all defendants in their individual capacities, alone, for violating their civil rights under color of law in violation of 1983. Edited June 27Jun 27 by TwiceHorn
June 27Jun 27 On 5/28/2025 at 2:28 PM, bolverk said: Remember, the main point of all the anti-abortion stuff is really about controlling women. Many of us see it much different as it’s taking a human life. It’s weird how your mind even gets to controlling women.
June 27Jun 27 Popular Post 27 minutes ago, LW Goatman said: Many of us see it much different as it’s taking a human life. It’s weird how your mind even gets to controlling women. I don't think it's weird at all. The same loud voices that claimed that it was only ever about saving lives are the same ones who are now making pushes against contraception and maternity care. I don't have the energy to get into it with you right now, but you're more than welcome to peruse or join in on the abortion thread in the CR to read all the arguments. It's a really long thread, and I wish I could tell you where a good starting point might be. I dunno, sorry, maybe start 5-10 pages from the end. If you decide to chime in, I'll address you over there when I'm not so tired. I promise to be civil. https://www.surlyhorns.com/board/topic/1761-official-thread-for-abortion-demagoguery/
June 27Jun 27 5 minutes ago, royiv said: No, it’s not. You're never going to convince him of that. But, if you look at Project 2025 and what a lot of the serious scary religious government people have in mind it is clear that: the process of conception should not be interfered with, as God's plan; this will result in women staying barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen as It was for long periods of time; child care and even public education will become unnecessary; "family values" will flourish; and, best of all, women will be removed from the workforce (other than Triangle Shirtwaist Factory, of course) along with all the dirty coloreds (except for the menial jobs, of course). So, call it control of women or not, the above is their grail.
June 27Jun 27 Just now, TwiceHorn said: You're never going to convince him of that. Yeah, I know. I was kind of making a point that I can throw out the same statement in the opposite and it lacks any nuance to address a very complex issue.
June 27Jun 27 In good faith, you can make an ethical case against abortion or at least certain instances, but that good faith rings a little hollow when the most notable and hardline advocates are harassing women with anal asteroid rape spam. Its hard to coherently argue for the sanctity of life when your sticky fingered auto correct changes life begins at conception to: observe my C-type as I ram this Trojan asteroid up Uranus while you’re on your orbital period; you got me at Perihelion baby.
June 28Jun 28 On 6/26/2025 at 11:11 AM, Brisketexan said: Wait.....suing him for an allegation made in a pleading filed in court? That's, umm, not a thing. But it is https://www.texastribune.org/2025/06/26/ken-paxton-impeachment-witness-tampering-former-employees/
June 28Jun 28 On 5/28/2025 at 2:32 PM, Wiler77 said: Let me get this straight... A lawyer who wants to prosecute people for helping women actually treats women like shit. Hmm, guess I've seen it all now. Maybe he was confused about his job title. Them wimmens should submit to his commands when he solicited them?
June 28Jun 28 On 6/26/2025 at 8:05 PM, LW Goatman said: Many of us see it much different as it’s taking a human life. It’s weird how your mind even gets to controlling women. You might understand that point of view if you consider that a husband who uses abortion medication, on seven different occasions, to poison his wife, and in the process severely damages her fetus, is sentenced to 180 days in prison, compared to the life sentence a woman’s doctor faces if he aborts the fetus, as per her choice. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/texas-attorney-poisoned-pregnant-wife-abortion-medication-sentenced-18-rcna138065 Edited further to remind you that a woman’s corpse was kept on life support until her fetus could survive without her body. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/brain-dead-woman-must-carry-fetus-to-birth-because-of-georgias-abortion-ban-hospital-tells-family Edited June 28Jun 28 by Willfully Horn Link
July 4Jul 4 On 6/26/2025 at 9:19 PM, TwiceHorn said: You're never going to convince him of that. But, if you look at Project 2025 and what a lot of the serious scary religious government people have in mind it is clear that: the process of conception should not be interfered with, as God's plan; this will result in women staying barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen as It was for long periods of time; child care and even public education will become unnecessary; "family values" will flourish; and, best of all, women will be removed from the workforce (other than Triangle Shirtwaist Factory, of course) along with all the dirty coloreds (except for the menial jobs, of course). So, call it control of women or not, the above is their grail. I’m a girl dad, my daughter rocks. We encourage her to be involved in everything she can. I take her to see strong women colleagues in my field that are judges and other advocates. I nurture her artistic abilities. She is an accomplished archer. My wife is a small business owner and kicks ass. She is an incredibly strong woman. He’ll if a co piracy theory, but that is t reality.
July 5Jul 5 1 hour ago, LW Goatman said: I’m a girl dad, my daughter rocks. We encourage her to be involved in everything she can. I take her to see strong women colleagues in my field that are judges and other advocates. I nurture her artistic abilities. She is an accomplished archer. My wife is a small business owner and kicks ass. She is an incredibly strong woman. He’ll if a co piracy theory, but that is t reality. I am the father of two daughters. Our daughter’s rights vary from state to state. Ours don’t. If that doesn’t piss you off, well, I’m glad I don’t know you. Saves me the effort of making your life miserable until you hide.
July 5Jul 5 The rights of women vary state to state. The rights of men don’t. If that is fine with you, then you are both a shitty father and a shitty citizen.
July 5Jul 5 On 6/26/2025 at 10:19 PM, TwiceHorn said: You're never going to convince him of that. But, if you look at Project 2025 and what a lot of the serious scary religious government people have in mind it is clear that: the process of conception should not be interfered with, as God's plan; this will result in women staying barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen as It was for long periods of time; child care and even public education will become unnecessary; "family values" will flourish; and, best of all, women will be removed from the workforce (other than Triangle Shirtwaist Factory, of course) along with all the dirty coloreds (except for the menial jobs, of course). So, call it control of women or not, the above is their grail. 1 hour ago, LW Goatman said: I’m a girl dad, my daughter rocks. We encourage her to be involved in everything she can. I take her to see strong women colleagues in my field that are judges and other advocates. I nurture her artistic abilities. She is an accomplished archer. My wife is a small business owner and kicks ass. She is an incredibly strong woman. He’ll if a co piracy theory, but that is t reality. What the fuck does your reply have to do with the post you are replying to?
July 5Jul 5 22 minutes ago, Willfully Horn said: The rights of women vary state to state. The rights of men don’t. If that is fine with you, then you are both a shitty father and a shitty citizen. Sure they do, I won't get into it as we are talking about the lives of babies. But I'm sure deciding to suck a live baby out with a tube makes you the father of the year, asshole.
July 5Jul 5 2 hours ago, LW Goatman said: Sure they do, I won't get into it as we are talking about the lives of babies. But I'm sure deciding to suck a live baby out with a tube makes you the father of the year, asshole. Never made that decision. Assholes are those, yourself included, who feel entitled to force their religious beliefs on others.
July 18Jul 18 On 6/26/2025 at 12:29 PM, That Guy said: Just popping in to remind y'all that Brent is a bitch. This guy?
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.