September 29, 20196 yr 6 hours ago, Judge Roybeanbag said: Then 12 Angry Men in the Boat 5th album--Banging the gavel.
September 29, 20196 yr 8 minutes ago, Fuck Tim Beck said: 5th album--Banging the gavel. Live album - The Chair
September 29, 20196 yr 14 hours ago, Judge Roybeanbag said: Hot Sequestration Banging is a decent band name. First album could be Hung Jury. Well Hung Jury is so much better
September 29, 20196 yr And the comeback reunion album Innocent on Appeal Then the album where they’ve taken it too far, the lead singer has left and they’ve replaced him with a sound alike they found in Bangalore and lead guitarists reborn cocaine addiction is really interfering with his diabetes. Miscarriage of Justice.
September 29, 20196 yr 14 hours ago, RPM said: If she wasn't a cop she'd be toast. I'd say it's 50/50 right now. Inaccurate. She's a white woman. That in itself carries protection.
September 29, 20196 yr 3 hours ago, Surly Bevo said: And the comeback reunion album Innocent on Appeal Then the album where they’ve taken it too far, the lead singer has left and they’ve replaced him with a sound alike they found in Bangalore and lead guitarists reborn cocaine addiction is really interfering with his diabetes. Miscarriage of Justice. Lulz. This is extremely specific.
September 30, 20196 yr They’re getting deep on the jury charges, this is the shit that actually determines the outcome. And defense just got what seemed like a big win. Deciding on what the actual mistake of fact was along with what qualifies as self defense regarding immediate danger
September 30, 20196 yr Having a hard time understanding everything they're saying due to excessive weekend boozing. But the inclusion of the Castle Doctrine surprised me. That seems like a problematic precedent.
September 30, 20196 yr When you're a cop, the world is your castle! Shoot whoever the fuck you want wherever! Who cares!?
September 30, 20196 yr 17 minutes ago, thestud said: Huh? That doesn’t make any sense seeing as it’s not her castle. Wtf Mistake of fact
September 30, 20196 yr Mistake of fact is about to become to murdering police what the Interstate Commerce Clause was to federal judicial overreach.
September 30, 20196 yr Hey I know I shot that guy who was just sleeping, but I thought he was raping my wife! Justified! Mistake of fact!
September 30, 20196 yr I've moved over to the WFAA feed. The analysis during the breaks from the lawyer is pretty good. https://www.wfaa.com/article/news/special-reports/botham-jean/amber-guyger-murder-trial-daily-breakdown-livestream/287-7c0187eb-efc0-4170-a847-3d69aff27eb4
September 30, 20196 yr I've moved over to the WFAA feed. The analysis during the breaks from the lawyer is pretty good. https://www.wfaa.com/article/news/special-reports/botham-jean/amber-guyger-murder-trial-daily-breakdown-livestream/287-7c0187eb-efc0-4170-a847-3d69aff27eb4Wfaa has been great all trial long
September 30, 20196 yr I was in court and missed the charge conference....I guess I'm fixing to find out what defensive charges she got
September 30, 20196 yr I don't see how they come back with a not guilty based on these directions. Does the jury decide the sentence in Texas?
September 30, 20196 yr 1 minute ago, 4th and 5 said: wow, manslaughter included.... Goddamn, I was told the stupid Sooner couldn't understand the law.... 😁
September 30, 20196 yr A guilty verdict on manslaughter would keep her from ever being a law enforcement officer again, right?
September 30, 20196 yr 15 minutes ago, TXSooner518 said: Goddamn, I was told the stupid Sooner couldn't understand the law.... 😁 I think the issue is that if there is any evidence, no matter how small, incredible, inconsistent and unbelievable, it is reversible error not to give the charge. The judge doesn't want to try it twice and neither does the state Also the lawyer on WFAA said the same thing. She admitted causing his death intentionally. The jury probably won't pick up on the fine details of the law and convict her of manslaughter Edited September 30, 20196 yr by 4th and 5
September 30, 20196 yr 7 minutes ago, Huckleberry said: A guilty verdict on manslaughter would keep her from ever being a law enforcement officer again, right? Let us hope
September 30, 20196 yr Something odd to me about including the Castle Doctrine instruction (on top of her, you know, not being in her Castle)...It only applies if the person enters your OCCUPIED habitation, which Botham didn't do, even allowing Guyger's mistake of fact. She knew she wasn't home when the "intruder" entered. So it can only apply if she was trying to stop the imminent commission of aggravated kidnapping, murder, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, robbery, or aggravated robbery. What evidence was entered that the person, even if an intruder, was imminently committing any of these offenses?
September 30, 20196 yr Not much. I went over this way back when. Plus if she entered the habitation she was committing a criminal trespass and can't use the castle doctrine
September 30, 20196 yr 4 minutes ago, TXSooner518 said: Something odd to me about including the Castle Doctrine instruction (on top of her, you know, not being in her Castle)...It only applies if the person enters your OCCUPIED habitation, which Botham didn't do, even allowing Guyger's mistake of fact. She knew she wasn't home when the "intruder" entered. So it can only apply if she was trying to stop the imminent commission of aggravated kidnapping, murder, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, robbery, or aggravated robbery. What evidence was entered that the person, even if an intruder, was imminently committing any of these offenses? None. The Castle Doctrine instruction is REALLY troubling.
September 30, 20196 yr So over/under amount of time Jury is deliberating? I've got 4 hours.Wfaa analyst estimates day and a half
September 30, 20196 yr Can one of y'all lawdogs lay out what's going on with the charges/directions/castle doctrine stuff? I'm not watching any livestream and can't read between the lines of what y'all are saying.
September 30, 20196 yr Are we looking at riots in Dallas in she isn't convicted? Let's just say that I wouldn't want to be at the SFOT.
September 30, 20196 yr Yeah, as someone that doesn't watch these on the reg, he seems like he's doing a pretty good job.
September 30, 20196 yr 6 minutes ago, 4th and 5 said: a scintilla of evidence, you got that okie? I was there from jump, you were the one saying manslaughter was a DV of NG, because intentional. 2 minutes ago, CHEF DIESEL said: This prosecutor with the beard is hungry. Like him. I actually am finding him pretty annoying and grating, and I'm much more inclined to the state's side of this case.
September 30, 20196 yr 1 minute ago, TXSooner518 said: I was there from jump, you were the one saying manslaughter was a DV of NG, because intentional. I actually am finding him pretty annoying and grating, and I'm much more inclined to the state's side of this case. WTF I did not say a directed verdict of not guilty, I said she shouldn't even get the charge, because there was no evidence to support it.
September 30, 20196 yr 1 minute ago, TXSooner518 said: I actually am finding him pretty annoying and grating, and I'm much more inclined to the state's side of this case. Everything has been civilized thus far. Glad to see some serious sarcastic darkness mixed into all this.
September 30, 20196 yr Just now, 4th and 5 said: WTF I did not say a directed verdict of not guilty, I said she shouldn't even get the charge, because there was no evidence to support it. Sorry if I misstated, it's been a lot of pages, but I recalled that you said it would be overturned on appeal, because no evidence (not even a scintilla).
September 30, 20196 yr His faux exasperation is pretty tiring. Some of the jury is going to be leaning to her side, can’t be too flippant and offend their intelligence.
September 30, 20196 yr Hammering "reasonable" over and over which is what he clearly has to do considering the narrative the defense is about to spin.
September 30, 20196 yr Whiny, indignant, and sarcastic. He's cut from the same cloth as the rest of them.
September 30, 20196 yr Defense guy reading legalese in a closing? Is that normal? zzzzzzzz if I'm a juror
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.