September 30, 20196 yr On 9/25/2019 at 11:30 AM, 4th and 5 said: If the firing of the pistol is an intentional or knowing act, and there is no evidence that she did not intend to fire the pistol, then there can be no charge for criminally negligent homicide or manslaughter. There has to be some evidence, even if weak,, contradicted, not credible, to support submitting the charge to the jury That the act was not intentional or knowing In this case she shot at him twice hitting him once in the chest, clearly an intentional act unless she’s going to testify that she just had her finger on the trigger and she did not intend to pull the trigger......TWICE On 9/25/2019 at 11:36 AM, TXSooner518 said: I guess I'm still missing it. You're saying the CCA is affirming murder convictions by saying no evidence that the shooting is unintentional. Sure! Any case law of CCA overruling a manslaughter conviction by saying "nope it was intentional, not reckless"? Under Texas law, proof of intent = proof of reckless. The elements of manslaughter are prima facie met under the Penal Code. So unless there is case law of a manslaughter or CNH conviction overturned because the act was intentional not reckless, I'm still missing it. EDIT: I'm not saying failing to give lesser included would invalidate a murder conviction, but I also don't see how a manslaughter conviction could be overturned as a matter of law. On 9/25/2019 at 12:37 PM, 4th and 5 said: Proof of the greater Culpable mental state is proof of the letter. But that doesn’t mean you get a jury charge when there is no evidence to support the chart. There has to be some evidence. Then in response to me asking about what would happen if she was only charged with manslaughter, and that surely it wouldn't be directed verdict of acquittal: On 9/25/2019 at 2:09 PM, 4th and 5 said: It would be a not guilty, because the specific reckless or negligent act need be ALLEGED in the indictment and PROVEN IN COURT, if not, not guilty. There is no negligent or reckless act in intentionally discharging a firearm. So I don't think I misrepresented your position, which was that there would be no lesser included charge and that she can't be convicted of manslaughter.
September 30, 20196 yr 1 minute ago, DaysOff said: Defense guy reading legalese in a closing? Is that normal? zzzzzzzz if I'm a juror My thoughts as well.
September 30, 20196 yr in closing arguments can you use props? for example can they have a posterboard highlighting the standards need to be met for reasonable doubt/not guilty/self defense? all these legal terms coming hot and heavy, it'd be handy for the jurors to have a cheat sheet to reference other than their own notes.
September 30, 20196 yr Kind of ironic that the defense is telling the jury to make a calm, patient decision without emotion. As I say, not as I do...
September 30, 20196 yr @TXSooner518You said I said a DV of NG, which I assume means directed verdict of not guilty. I did not say that. I said there is no evidence to get the lessers in this murder trial. I have also pointed out that if there is any evidence whatsover (a "scintilla"), the judge will put it in the charge because it is reversible error not to. I also said that if she were charged with manslaughter or CNH, a specific negligent or reckless act would have to be alleged in the indictment and proven in court. Without one, it is a NG Edited September 30, 20196 yr by 4th and 5
September 30, 20196 yr Fair enough, I misunderstood your response to my post asking about a DV of acquittal earlier, my mistake.
September 30, 20196 yr To get an idea why the Man charge is there, the law is such that it is reversible error, no harm analysis on appeal. In one case I tried and gotten SIX Ch. 8 and 9 defenses charged (over the state's objection, they're not very smart) in because the judge feared trying the case again. I was hoping the judge to deny one or two just so I had a point on appeal. No appeal needed.
September 30, 20196 yr BTW, the law on "mistake of fact" seems absolutely horrendous. How can you prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person didn't make a mistake of fact? Would seem to make more sense to have a sliding burden of proof, like on a Batson challenge. The defense establishes the mistake of fact, then the state can show it wasn't reasonable. And maybe in practice, that's how it really works. Edited September 30, 20196 yr by TXSooner518
September 30, 20196 yr Defense seems to be mis-stating the law here. They said if the state doesn't prove either that Amber's mistaken belief that she was in her apartment or that Botham was an intruder in her apartment were unreasonable beyond a reasonable doubt, she must be acquitted. That's not true. Even if she was in her apartment and Jean was an intruder, jury would ALSO have to find that she believed that he was imminently committing one of the above listed offenses. No evidence was entered on that part.
September 30, 20196 yr Rogers is awkwardly raising and lowering his voice, like Ferrell SNL character who CAN'T CONTROL their voice MODULATION.
September 30, 20196 yr So we don't know where he was sitting but we know exactly how this guy eats ice cream?
September 30, 20196 yr Just now, Continental Op said: So we don't know where he was sitting but we know exactly how this guy eats ice cream? Also, LOL at maybe the marijuana made it tough for Bo to figure out what was going on. Yep, if only he was clear-minded, this surely would have been avoided. Also, they specifically said she DIDN'T follow protocol because it wasn't a call, and now say she has done everything just as she was taught.
September 30, 20196 yr repetition of the closing argument is odd Edited September 30, 20196 yr by 4th and 5
September 30, 20196 yr 1 minute ago, hookem17 said: Why is Rogers repeating the same stuff as the other defense attorney? Just now, 4th and 5 said: my thought exactly my non-attorney wife just texted me asking the same thing, why are they having two people say the same things, so it isn't just lawdogs feeling that way either
September 30, 20196 yr 2 minutes ago, TXSooner518 said: Also, LOL at maybe the marijuana made it tough for Bo to figure out what was going on. Yep, if only he was clear-minded, this surely would have been avoided. Also, they specifically said she DIDN'T follow protocol because it wasn't a call, and now say she has done everything just as she was taught. If the filthy negro man had not been smoking the demon weed he would have been able to Matrix bullet time his way out of this situation and we wouldn't be sitting here trying this hero today!
September 30, 20196 yr It’s like they didn’t coordinate at all. Or they both have egos too big to not tell the story themselves.
September 30, 20196 yr 1 hour ago, woohorn said: 1 hour ago, housious said: Are we looking at riots in Dallas in she isn't convicted? Let's just say that I wouldn't want to be at the SFOT. ??? has something been stated would happen at six flags over texas???
September 30, 20196 yr 57 minutes ago, 4th and 5 said: Whiny, indignant, and sarcastic. He's cut from the same cloth as the rest of them. Goddammit.
September 30, 20196 yr ??? has something been stated would happen at six flags over texas???No, Arlington is safe. Why do you ask?
September 30, 20196 yr 3 minutes ago, woohorn said: 8 minutes ago, msudawg said: ??? has something been stated would happen at six flags over texas??? No, Arlington is safe. Why do you ask? Because of what I quoted unless SFOT means something else in this instance... Fright fest is going on and people are always looking for a reason to get stupid there... Edited September 30, 20196 yr by msudawg
September 30, 20196 yr 1 minute ago, TXSooner518 said: This guy's tone is more where I think is the most effective. Yea.. the 2nd defensive attorney was slightly stumbling.. and repeating the same things.. not a good look.
September 30, 20196 yr Just now, msudawg said: Yea.. the 2nd defensive attorney was slightly stumbling.. and repeating the same things.. not a good look. And I didn't like the 1st prosecutor really either.
September 30, 20196 yr Just now, TXSooner518 said: Thought you were kidding. State Fair of Texas. Ah.. duh. Nope. wife works at six flags so i think of that being that term instead.
September 30, 20196 yr Point was "Dallas" is pretty segregated. No "protests" gonna happen in Uptown, Lakewood, Bluffview, etc. All bets are off for Fair Park, tho.
September 30, 20196 yr Just now, TXSooner518 said: And I didn't like the 1st prosecutor really either. Missed him.. saw yall say something about the guy with the beard. will have to rewatch.
September 30, 20196 yr 1 minute ago, woohorn said: Point was "Dallas" is pretty segregated. No "protests" gonna happen in Uptown, Lakewood, Bluffview, etc. All bets are off for Fair Park, tho. I agree. But what is the level of punishment that sets off an uproar. Anything less than murder? or just if she get's off completely, which seems less likely now that manslaughter has been given as an option.
September 30, 20196 yr No point speculating, but this always seemed to me like a pretty horrible murder. Let's hope justice is served.
September 30, 20196 yr This guy is giving the strongest closing and hitting all the necessary notes for a finding of guilty.
September 30, 20196 yr 2 minutes ago, msudawg said: I agree. But what is the level of punishment that sets off an uproar. Anything less than murder? or just if she get's off completely, which seems less likely now that manslaughter has been given as an option. I don't think manslaughter conviction sets off uproar, only acquittal.
September 30, 20196 yr It was a horrible accident. How much more profile has it been though due to her being a cop. and then there's the other component...the major driving one.
September 30, 20196 yr 8 minutes ago, msudawg said: Ah.. duh. Nope. wife works at six flags so i think of that being that term instead. Not gonna lie... That was the direction my mind went in as well.
September 30, 20196 yr Don't like this phrasing of "I'm worried y'all might have sympathy for her." Frame it as "something tough y'all have to do.." instead IMO. Otherwise, think this close has been great.
September 30, 20196 yr 2 minutes ago, 4th and 5 said: Man is 2-20 but probation eligible Does a manslaughter verdict get tossed because it simply can't be manslaughter under the statute?
September 30, 20196 yr Guilty of murder and a sentence of 5 years = riots. I have no doubt about that.
September 30, 20196 yr 1 minute ago, HRSchenker said: Guilty of murder and a sentence of 5 years = riots. I have no doubt about that. What? Why? I would feel very strongly that would not be the case. Edited September 30, 20196 yr by TXSooner518
September 30, 20196 yr She testified "I thought he would come at me." Meaning: He was not coming at her. I rest my case.
September 30, 20196 yr Just now, Tailgate said: She testified "I thought he would come at me." Meaning: He was not coming at her. I rest my case. Maybe you were out of the room when they testified about the pot and the black though.
September 30, 20196 yr 9 minutes ago, HRSchenker said: Guilty of murder and a sentence of 5 years = riots. I have no doubt about that. That's almost best case scenario. I mean a 20 year stint with the evidence in play was never a realistic option.
September 30, 20196 yr Not to derail too much, but I figure Dallas is a little more sympathetic towards cops than some other cities. Bad shooting a while back, black CoP, understaffed, pension crisis, etc. I know that the DPS presence has hurt relations, but I don't see this case as all cops are bad as much as some other shootings.
September 30, 20196 yr Alright, it's a wrap, thoughts? OPENING LINES Convicted of murder +170 Convicted of manslaughter +120 Acquitted +200 Edited September 30, 20196 yr by TXSooner518
September 30, 20196 yr 13 minutes ago, msudawg said: It was a horrible accident. How much more profile has it been though due to her being a cop. and then there's the other component...the major driving one. Yes, she accidently decided to leave her training and police protocol at the door. She accidently pulled the trigger. Accidently forgot how to do cpr. Accidently texted her married love during 911 call. Accidently erased texts. The accidently part ended the moment she claimed to have heard Jean before deciding to go in.
September 30, 20196 yr 2 minutes ago, TXSooner518 said: Alright, it's a wrap, thoughts? OPENING LINES Convicted of murder +170 Convicted of manslaughter +120 Acquitted +200 I fully believe it's manslaughter now that was put back as an option. the public pressure caused the overcharge.
September 30, 20196 yr Just now, msudawg said: I fully believe it's manslaughter now that was put back as an option. the public pressure caused the overcharge. It wasn't an overcharge. I'd call it one if it was one, because it's the biggest problem in the CJ system today. Manslaughter, in this case, will be jury nullification. Not sure exactly of what, but it won't be strictly following the law.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.