July 26Jul 26 58 minutes ago, Gatorubet said: He does have that perfect combination of extreme gullibility, unquestioned certainty and self-induced factual ignorance from his limited sources that can be entertaining. Admiring one of the worst human beings on earth - and maybe the worst Texas politician (until the newest ones arrived) is certainly some kind of statement about something. As a long dead friend of mine often said "Shit on that bullshit!"
July 26Jul 26 1 hour ago, Gatorubet said: He does have that perfect combination of extreme gullibility, unquestioned certainty and self-induced factual ignorance from his limited sources that can be entertaining. Admiring one of the worst human beings on earth - and maybe the worst Texas politician (until the newest ones arrived) is certainly some kind of statement about something. He's not gullible. He's a fat fucking moron. Last week he was posting Megyn Kelly. He likes being lied to when it makes him feel good, so he actively seeks it out.
July 26Jul 26 On 7/23/2025 at 9:46 PM, F250 said: He is a junkyard dog, he doesn't growl or bark, he bites. This is awesome. I need two of these hammer holdsters, with two mini sledge hammers in them. Any Surly member I see, is getting a Thor hammer throw to the dome.
July 26Jul 26 8 hours ago, atomheartbevo said: Her brother died in Vietnam? Damn, Kids in the Hall actor married well. Defected across the DMZ in Korea. One of the reasons Howard stopped mentioning him.
July 26Jul 26 On 7/24/2025 at 7:49 AM, TwiceHorn said: This really may be the solution. I detest video news online (on TV too for the most part). Exactly. Take out the pretty faces, the practiced oratory skills, and most of the emotions and dig into to the meat of the news from multiple sources more quickly and efficiently than any video. I also like to dig into forum comments. Here, Reddit, discord, Bluesky (not txags). I focus on the counter arguments to see if they hold merit.
July 26Jul 26 8 hours ago, Rigid said: Exactly. Take out the pretty faces, the practiced oratory skills, and most of the emotions and dig into to the meat of the news from multiple sources more quickly and efficiently than any video. I also like to dig into forum comments. Here, Reddit, discord, Bluesky (not txags). I focus on the counter arguments to see if they hold merit. Narrator: They did not hold merit.
July 26Jul 26 On 7/24/2025 at 7:50 PM, Gil Bang said: how many times have you been arrested for rape? I'm 60 fucking years old, and I've never done either of those things. He does raise kind of an interesting point. In this particular case, it would seem that there is pretty conclusive evidence that would put the lie to the rumors almost immediately in the form of genetic testing. But then, how and where do you "raise" that so it reaches the Owens of the world and their audience? And then, of course, like the birth certificates, the crazies would continue to crazy about the authenticity of the test and its results. Also a funny thing about the misinformation system of today: a defamation suit cannot enjoin a party from continuing to defame the plaintiff, the First Amendment won't allow it (prior restraint, dude). But most rational actors, once they've lost a defamation suit (hell usually once they've been sued), shut the fuck up. Notable exceptions include Trump, Rudy, Cuntface, and others. Just no respect for the truth or anything else.
July 26Jul 26 49 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said: But then, how and where do you "raise" that so it reaches the Owens of the world and their audience? And then, of course, like the birth certificates, the crazies would continue to crazy about the authenticity of the test and its results. This. Ms. Macron could pee in a cup in front of Candace in a lab while being recorded on a PPV feed. The urine gets tested right there and results displayed (I'm assuming this is a quasi-instant test) and the crazies would still deny it was accurate/real/legitimate.
July 26Jul 26 On 7/24/2025 at 11:33 AM, Js1 said: Yeah imma say it, this dude is retarded. im so glad it's 2025 and it's okay to use this word again as it's truly intended!
July 26Jul 26 Well, to be fair, using regarded instead doesn't really make those of us with intellectually impaired children feel any better. I would rather people just come right out and be the bigots that they are.
July 27Jul 27 On 7/24/2025 at 3:34 PM, Thetexashammer said: There will be a lawsuit and the facts will be determined. The reason I posted her video would be obvious if you watched it. The intensity of the whole thing is remarkable. It’s fifty fucking minutes long and you posted it with essentially no context. Only her subscribers would watch it when presented like that
August 26Aug 26 I just can't fathom how someone would think running with something so clearly defamatory is a good strategy. She is a hateful, grifting cunt but I never thought she was stupid.
August 26Aug 26 1 hour ago, Brian Fantana said: I just can't fathom how someone would think running with something so clearly defamatory is a good strategy. She is a hateful, grifting cunt but I never thought she was stupid. She’s all of that wrapped up in a piping hot butter biscuit.
August 26Aug 26 On 7/24/2025 at 1:16 PM, Blotto said: well which is it you pudding-brained fuckstick? Did you get your email fwd:fwd:fwd's mixed up? Man, lost it a second time on this one
August 26Aug 26 And miss me with that she’s good looking stuff. She’s not: https://www.facebook.com/DemiTv.OnDemand/posts/-conservative-commentator-candace-owens-exposed-after-image-of-her-working-with-/1187400992944319/
August 26Aug 26 Author 2 hours ago, Brian Fantana said: I just can't fathom how someone would think running with something so clearly defamatory is a good strategy. She is a hateful, grifting cunt but I never thought she was stupid. I agree. That's actually why I started the thread. Edited August 26Aug 26 by Thetexashammer
August 26Aug 26 3 hours ago, HenryJames said: Quote “The job of the federal government is to defend us from foreign invaders,” Owens said. “And I would pretty much say Emmanuel Macron right now is being a foreign invader. But no, they are silent.” Owens’s hopes for a presidential intervention have grown increasingly desperate. Last week, she claimed on her podcast that the U.S. military had pressured Trump to encourage her to drop the Macron story, implying that Trump is merely a puppet for a military junta. The dumbest people getting high on their own supply.
August 26Aug 26 3 hours ago, Brian Fantana said: I just can't fathom how someone would think running with something so clearly defamatory is a good strategy. She is a hateful, grifting cunt but I never thought she was stupid. What possible reason could you have for NOT thinking she was stupid as fuck? What signs of intelligence has she shown?
August 26Aug 26 On 7/24/2025 at 10:45 AM, Hitch said: All jokes aside, that is one fugly ass woman. Ew. *alleged woman.
August 26Aug 26 So she’s married to the son of a British lord, whatever the fuck that is, making this more like classic French-British rivalry than a French invasion of the US. Also, she knew this guy for 2 weeks and spent like 4 days total with him before they got engaged — further proof that she’s crazy. Wonder if he has any ragrets
August 26Aug 26 8 hours ago, Blotto said: What possible reason could you have for NOT thinking she was stupid as fuck? What signs of intelligence has she shown? Idk, I just never automatically assume a hateful person is stupid. It seems like letting them off the hook in a way
November 22Nov 22 So, on the lawsuit. Candy-baby has filed a motion to dismiss, but not on the public figure/actual malice standard that is typical in a defamation lawsuit. The first ground is procedural in that the lawsuit is in Delaware and is against her, her LLC and her husbands (or their) LLC. Both the LLCs are Delaware, so that's proper, but she's in Nashville. So it seems the court may lack personal jurisdiction over her. Worst case, the Macrons have to maintain one suit in Delaware and one in Nashville. But the potentially dispositive aspect of the motion is much more troubling. France has a three-month statute of limitations on defamation cases. That's three months from publication of the defamatory statement. A period long past. This is a US lawsuit against a US defendant, but by French plaintiffs. Pretty arguably, French law applies, including limitations, so this whole suit is probably going bye-bye. God dammit.
November 22Nov 22 us lawsuit, in the us, accusations made in the us by a us citizen, all under us laws bleed her out ($$$) for every cent they can
November 22Nov 22 3 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said: us lawsuit, in the us, accusations made in the us by a us citizen, all under us laws bleed her out ($$$) for every cent they can They're going to appeal and string this out. It's gonna cost Candy baby a shitload.
November 22Nov 22 39 minutes ago, aggie08 said: I'm going to need you to stop saying "Candy baby" I can't let it go oh oh.
November 22Nov 22 Admittedly, one of the few bright spots over the past year has been watching these podcast parasites flounder and lash out for attention and relevancy. It sure is a whole lot easier to scam the morons when you're in the opposition party. Much harder to create content when you can't rant about Hunter Biden's laptop and the price of eggs for an hour a day. Edited November 22Nov 22 by aggie08
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.