Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Surly Horns

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

Back when Academy was an actual army super surplus store, my scout master used to go get old MRI's for camping trips.  They were nasty.

Damn. Your scout master must of been one rich vato.
  • Replies 985
  • Views 115.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

2 hours ago, Nueces River Rat said:
5 hours ago, ClubWhatever said:
Back when Academy was an actual army super surplus store, my scout master used to go get old MRI's for camping trips.  They were nasty.

Used to hit up the one on the east side of I35, there across from Hancock Shopping center.  Loved that store as a kid!

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
5 hours ago, Machinator said:

 

 

Belichick-like coach-speak on their injury status....

Still doubts on Caden's condition recently mentioned by IT.... "One thing to monitor will be the health of Caden Sterns. Herman said he should be good to go but I'm not so sure. He certainly isn't 100%. Pretty much every safety has taken reps at field safety this week, including Overshown."

Edited by LTtxfan

I’d be getting everyone ready too. It’s gonna be a physical game and Sterns has been dinged up a couple of times this year.

So when we're up 40 in the fourth, and we clear the benches, Ojomo can get some playing time. Excellent.

I think we will see a good amount of subs. UGA doesn’t run crazy tempo like we see in the big 12

Really hope Brandon Jones stays. It'll make it much easier for our freshmen corners with Sterns and Jones playing over the top next year.

https://247sports.com/college/texas/Article/Caden-Sterns-Sugar-Bowl-knee-injury--127586739/

Quote

A knee injury suffered in the Big 12 championship kept star Texas safety Caden Sterns out of the Sugar Bowl against Georgia, a 28-21 Longhorns win, but fans did notice from the telecast that Sterns was dressed out and involved on the sidelines.

Sterns practiced in full leading up to the game but the Texas staff made a game-time decision to hold him out. Rehab from the injury is going as planned and Sterns will be ready for spring football.  

"I'm great," Sterns told 247Sports during a Jan. 4 interview in San Antonio, where he presented an award during the All-American Bowl banquet. "Making sure I'm getting right ... I did try [to play in the Sugar Bowl] but wasn't able to go full-go (in warmups). ... They made sure they took care of me. Rehab is going well."

 

  • 1 month later...

Is a "forced incompletion" similar to a "pass broken up" at all?

2 minutes ago, Tex Long said:

Is a "forced incompletion" similar to a "pass broken up" at all?

forced incompletion percentage = (pass breakups +  interceptions + tight coverage) / total targets

wtf is tight coverage?

 

Indulge me, Red Raider fans ain't familiar with the fancy shmancy defensive stats...

Edited by slorch

6 minutes ago, Machinator said:

forced incompletion percentage = (pass breakups +  interceptions + tight coverage) / total targets

Yeah, okay for interceptions. How tight is "tight coverage"? 

Sounds like something your mom might be involved in.

4 minutes ago, Tex Long said:

Yeah, okay for interceptions. How tight is "tight coverage"? 

Sounds like something your mom might be involved in.

Trust me, she has nothing to do with the word tight. 

13 minutes ago, slorch said:

wtf is tight coverage?

You know it when you see it....

giphy.gif

1 minute ago, LTtxfan said:

You know it when you see it....

giphy.gif

Okay, I'd stand in line for a chance to go deep on that. 

2 hours ago, South Austin said:

Eckrich sausages are dogshit.

 But it’s “crowd pleasing” dogshit. Like if the Westminster champion topped the award ceremony off with a good healthy dump

22 minutes ago, tbone_ said:

Hail dents on that hamstring

 

Yeeaaaahhhh... gtfo the line, then.

55 minutes ago, Born Burnt said:

Yep, which makes their spokesperson perfect...

melanie-trombley-producer-chicago-locati

Kirk

Herbstreit

Burned

5

Hotdogs?

  • Author

lowell just sucks in general and is an embarrassment to the LHN.

love caden's attitude and mindset though.  really excited about watching him the next couple of years.

On 2/28/2019 at 6:16 PM, Tex Long said:

Yeah, okay for interceptions. How tight is "tight coverage"? 

I would think anything that leads to nearly instant contact after the receiver touches the ball...so not necessarily a break-up, but hitting the receiver, forcing him out of bounds or into the ground causing a loss of control. Also keeping the receiver from getting to where he’s supposed to be in his route

3 hours ago, SquishMitten said:

I would think anything that leads to nearly instant contact after the receiver touches the ball...so not necessarily a break-up, but hitting the receiver, forcing him out of bounds or into the ground causing a loss of control. Also keeping the receiver from getting to where he’s supposed to be in his route

Ummm... "so not necessarily a break-up, but... causing a loss of control" - that is specifically a PBU, not merely "tight coverage".  

That is not really the point, though. I've never seen a stat line in print or on a screen with a category styled as "tight coverage". 

Interceptions, yep. PBU, yep. But "tight coverage" (as something in addition to or other than the first two)? All I can think of is something along the lines of having guys you're covering being rarely or not at all targeted. 

50 minutes ago, Tex Long said:

Ummm... "so not necessarily a break-up, but... causing a loss of control" - that is specifically a PBU, not merely "tight coverage".  

That is not really the point, though. I've never seen a stat line in print or on a screen with a category styled as "tight coverage". 

Interceptions, yep. PBU, yep. But "tight coverage" (as something in addition to or other than the first two)? All I can think of is something along the lines of having guys you're covering being rarely or not at all targeted. 

I can see cases where the DB rips through the hands but the WR still hangs on being considered tight coverage.  Similarly where he rattles the WR's teeth with a hit but the guys still hangs on, like that sideline shot in the Rose Bowl NC game where I wondered if the Trojan receiver was going to even get up but he completed the catch.

Edited by sushihorn

8 hours ago, sushihorn said:

I can see cases where the DB rips through the hands but the WR still hangs on being considered tight coverage.  Similarly where he rattles the WR's teeth with a hit but the guys still hangs on, like that sideline shot in the Rose Bowl NC game where I wondered if the Trojan receiver was going to even get up but he completed the catch.

Yeah, nah. "Almost didn't not prevent catch" fits that better than "tight coverage". Not sure I give a fuck whether  the receivers he was covering were wide open or made a miracle catch. Too many completions given up is too many, no matter if coverage was tight or no.

26 minutes ago, Tex Long said:

Yeah, nah. "Almost didn't not prevent catch" fits that better than "tight coverage". Not sure I give a fuck whether  the receivers he was covering were wide open or made a miracle catch. Too many completions given up is too many, no matter if coverage was tight or no.

Then you just don't care about playing defense.  Sometimes the defender makes the play and the the receiver just makes a better one.

On 3/5/2019 at 5:08 PM, Machinator said:

 

These are the kind of guys you can build a program around.  I feel very good that the safety room will have no drop off when Brandon Jones leaves. 

10 hours ago, sushihorn said:

Then you just don't care about playing defense.  Sometimes the defender makes the play and the the receiver just makes a better one.

Oh, yeah... right, I forgot it's the Shag Surl. Not giving a fuck about a made-up and essentially pointless stat is clearly an indication of disdain for that side of the team.

 

 

 

1 hour ago, Tex Long said:

Oh, yeah... right, I forgot it's the Shag Surl. Not giving a fuck about a made-up and essentially pointless stat is clearly an indication of disdain for that side of the team.

I was reacting specifically to what you said, not your imaginary conversation.

Quote

Not sure I give a fuck whether  the receivers he was covering were wide open or made a miracle catch.

It actually makes a huge difference.

21 hours ago, sushihorn said:

I can see cases where the DB rips through the hands but the WR still hangs on being considered tight coverage.  Similarly where he rattles the WR's teeth with a hit but the guys still hangs on, like that sideline shot in the Rose Bowl NC game where I wondered if the Trojan receiver was going to even get up but he completed the catch.

The term is being used in a stat for incompletions. If the receiver makes the catch, it would not be in the calculation.

1 hour ago, SquishMitten said:

The term is being used in a stat for incompletions. If the receiver makes the catch, it would not be in the calculation.

Ed Zachry

  • 3 weeks later...

Here's your chance DeMarvion.

Hope Caden recovers well

2 hours ago, Machinator said:

 

If it had to happen, better now than during the season.  Get well soon.

2 hours ago, Machinator said:

 

Is this same injury that kept him out of the Sugar Bowl??

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Everybody forgot about O'Nesl so he had to do something stupid gor attention 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.