November 3Nov 3 3 hours ago, Jimbob said: Surly 8 tech guys 5 doctors 2 wimmenz 10 O&G guys 7 contractors 10 students 9 retired people 3 teachers 24,348 attorneys what the fuck 1 minute ago, dcar00 said: ahem...you forgot 1 highly paid Nurse And risk manager. I mean Insurance.
November 3Nov 3 12 minutes ago, Drew said: And risk manager. I mean Insurance. Is that @aggie08 or @bizzle
November 3Nov 3 13 hours ago, TwiceHorn said: I suppose the end-zone DPI wasn't called because the official whose first-line call it was called it a TD. But others should have tossed the flag. He must’ve him numerous times down the field. Refs should’ve been clued in by that time. Just egregious non-call. Incompetence or intentional. Both are reasons not to let the refs off the hook. Bad reffing need to be consequential
November 3Nov 3 12 hours ago, The Original CaliHorn said: This hits close to home while I was in Southern California. Was hitting a hot older woman that was 8 years my age from Highland, CA. Meh casino in my opinion This was my dad's (RIP pops) go to in retirement. I went with him a couple of times. While it had great memories for me, I can't see myself going back.
November 3Nov 3 9 hours ago, dcar00 said: ahem...you forgot 1 highly paid Nurse And a serial killer, but not sure that should be included in a list of occupations for this place. Rock throwers and emergency reef fund managers aside.
November 3Nov 3 39 minutes ago, BurntEyes said: And a serial killer, but not sure that should be included in a list of occupations for this place. Rock throwers and emergency reef fund managers aside. I don’t know, they say if you enjoy your work, you’ll never work a day in your life. Those dudes seemed to enjoy their work. That tow truck driver enjoyed fucking unsuspecting young men and throwing rocks into windshields and killing people.
November 3Nov 3 13 hours ago, honolulu horn said: Well, that squares. You're about as insufferable and miserable to be around as anyone I can remember. You'll be a great lawyer. Sounds like she took you to the cleaners.
November 4Nov 4 12 hours ago, BurntEyes said: And a serial killer, but not sure that should be included in a list of occupations for this place. That's really more of a side hustle.
November 4Nov 4 10 hours ago, mwaadeeb said: Sounds like she took you to the cleaners. Don't worry, I'm not a lawyer but I'm much smarter and more effective than 9/10 of them.
November 4Nov 4 13 hours ago, BurntEyes said: This was my dad's (RIP pops) go to in retirement. At first, I honestly thought you meant "hitting a hot older woman" was your dad's go to.
November 4Nov 4 Just now, Born Burnt said: At first, I honestly thought you meant "hitting a hot older woman" was your dad's go to. Hah! If he hadn't been married, his dago, once a player self would have been all over it. So... yeah it sure would have been.
November 4Nov 4 9 hours ago, Born Burnt said: At first, I honestly thought you meant "hitting a hot older woman" was your dad's go to. I had to read it about 3. And since I'm contemplating retirement in the next 5 to 7 years, I'm going with it as I read it the first two times, because hitting hot older women at a casino sounds like a better version of hitting the slot machines, if you know what I mean.
November 4Nov 4 11 hours ago, Leanderman said: I'm actually not that worried about the officiating in the Georgia game, at least from the standpoint that I don't think Georgia is going to get some inherent favoritism from SEC officials. I say that for two reaons: 1) The SEC doesn't have an interest in Georgia beating Texas. The SEC wants more teams in the CFP, full stop. If Georgia wins, they're probably still in the CFP with only two losses. Texas, on the other hand, is probably out (not definitely, but probably). So if anything, the Conference should favor Texas winning that game. 2) I'm very skeptical of the conspiracy theories about conferences wanting certain teams to win. It would be just too big a conspiracy to keep a lid on. It's one thing for two or three referees on a crew to agree to something among themselves; it's quite another to have a crew agree with the league office about something. I just don't think it's realistic scenario. What is a realistic scenario--and one that could affect any game--is gambling. It's just really hard to watch the fourth quarter of that Vanderbilt game and conclude that one or more of that crew didn't have an interest in Vanderbilt +3.5. I think that's exceedingly rare. But as we saw--it does happen. But next time, it could just as easily happen in favor of Texas. It's completely unpredictable.
November 4Nov 4 18 minutes ago, Ghost of LL said: I'm very skeptical of the conspiracy theories about conferences wanting certain teams to win. What is a realistic scenario--and one that could affect any game--is gambling. I think both can be true. The Vanderbilt finish was 100% gambling related. But then again, look at all the BS the fat chode Kirby is allowed to get away with: being on the field in the literal ref's huddle on every damn play, spitting in the refs' ears all game long, the entire Auburn game including the timeout/clap, on and on...
November 4Nov 4 1 minute ago, Scholz said: I think both can be true. The Vanderbilt finish was 100% gambling related. But then again, look at all the BS the fat chode Kirby is allowed to get away with: being on the field in the literal ref's huddle on every damn play, spitting in the refs' ears all game long, the entire Auburn game including the timeout/clap, on and on... The officiating in the Vanderbilt game felt like gambling The officiating in the Auburn and Florida games felt like protecting a CFP team
November 4Nov 4 22 minutes ago, Ghost of LL said: I'm actually not that worried about the officiating in the Georgia game, at least from the standpoint that I don't think Georgia is going to get some inherent favoritism from SEC officials. I say that for two reaons: 1) The SEC doesn't have an interest in Georgia beating Texas. The SEC wants more teams in the CFP, full stop. If Georgia wins, they're probably still in the CFP with only two losses. Texas, on the other hand, is probably out (not definitely, but probably). So if anything, the Conference should favor Texas winning that game. 2) I'm very skeptical of the conspiracy theories about conferences wanting certain teams to win. It would be just too big a conspiracy to keep a lid on. It's one thing for two or three referees on a crew to agree to something among themselves; it's quite another to have a crew agree with the league office about something. I just don't think it's realistic scenario. What is a realistic scenario--and one that could affect any game--is gambling. It's just really hard to watch the fourth quarter of that Vanderbilt game and conclude that one or more of that crew didn't have an interest in Vanderbilt +3.5. I think that's exceedingly rare. But as we saw--it does happen. But next time, it could just as easily happen in favor of Texas. It's completely unpredictable. Fuck that, Kirby Smart is the most insufferable bullshit artist douchebag of a coach.
November 4Nov 4 2 hours ago, Ghost of LL said: I'm actually not that worried about the officiating in the Georgia game, at least from the standpoint that I don't think Georgia is going to get some inherent favoritism from SEC officials. I say that for two reaons: 1) The SEC doesn't have an interest in Georgia beating Texas. The SEC wants more teams in the CFP, full stop. If Georgia wins, they're probably still in the CFP with only two losses. Texas, on the other hand, is probably out (not definitely, but probably). So if anything, the Conference should favor Texas winning that game. 2) I'm very skeptical of the conspiracy theories about conferences wanting certain teams to win. It would be just too big a conspiracy to keep a lid on. It's one thing for two or three referees on a crew to agree to something among themselves; it's quite another to have a crew agree with the league office about something. I just don't think it's realistic scenario. What is a realistic scenario--and one that could affect any game--is gambling. It's just really hard to watch the fourth quarter of that Vanderbilt game and conclude that one or more of that crew didn't have an interest in Vanderbilt +3.5. I think that's exceedingly rare. But as we saw--it does happen. But next time, it could just as easily happen in favor of Texas. It's completely unpredictable. You should be worried, but it's not about the SEC mandating that certain teams get protection or Vegas sticking its dick in the mash potatoes. I'm sure some of that is happening (especially Vegas and the Vandy game), but you are right that those shouldn't really be factors against UGA. The reason you should be worried is because the refs love Kirby. It's because he worked the refs every chance he got. He's chummy with them before and after games, but he's also in their ear the entire time the game is happening. They know if he doesn't like a call that they're never going to hear the end of it. And they allow him to get up their ass because he's so friendly to them outside the games. It's not some big conspiracy or anything, just personal preferences working their way into calls. Throw that on top of the fact that most of the refs don't have any love for Texas and you've got some meaningful bias to overcome. You remember how much favorable treatment Gundy got? Kirby is the SEC's version of Gundy. That's what should be concerning.
November 4Nov 4 2 hours ago, TexasEd said: Fuck that, Kirby Smart is the most insufferable bullshit artist douchebag of a coach. Holy fucking shit, that thumbnail looks like Kirby is doing the Tango with the official a la Arnold and Jamie Lee in True Lies!
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.