Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Surly Horns

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Vice President tells NASA to get to the Moon in 5 years.

Featured Replies

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Views 89.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • More to come, I'm sure ... but sneak preview from one of my launch photography buddies.  

  • RamjetFDO
    RamjetFDO

    The ones that came on in the 60s/70s were mostly retiring out before the Shuttle Program (and our own ability to launch humans) was ended without a funded follow-on program.  It's the ones that came o

  • RamjetFDO
    RamjetFDO

    Yes, we can debate (valid points on both sides) of whether SLS is the right answer for lunar exploration vs private space companies ... but there is no doubt that seeing SLS roll out to LC39B is excit

Posted Images

On 8/14/2024 at 12:43 PM, Hagbard Celine said:

they can't ride home in a dragon in boeing suits

Help me out here. We have two government contractors and we didn't specify some basics regarding compatibility of the life support systems in the RFPs?

Someone catch me up. We’ve had the technology to go to mars and start crudely colonizing since what, the ‘80s? but instead, we’re fucking around and maybe going to land on the moon again (yay?) sometime in the next decade, where there are basically no useful resources, and the exercise in no way actually helps us get to further worlds? 

1 minute ago, B00M said:

Someone catch me up. We’ve had the technology to go to mars and start crudely colonizing since what, the ‘80s? but instead, we’re fucking around and maybe going to land on the moon again (yay?) sometime in the next decade, where there are basically no useful resources, and the exercise in no way actually helps us get to further worlds? 

In theory, we've had the tech to at least land people on Mars from the 70s (they'd have likely been dead bodies, but hey).  Going to the moon actually makes more sense than meets the eye, and it does have resources.  

1.  Water exists on the moon, it isn't plentiful, but it exists.  Where water exists, you can make rocket fuel.  For deep space manned exploration, barring improvements in propulsion, that will be important.

2.  It's beneficial to have a proving ground for new tech, like regolith 3D printing, or farming.  The moon being only a few days away makes it a realistic test bed for emergent tech.  In other words, you can afford to have something fail on the moon and get a replacement or a return to Earth in short order.  Something like that happens on Mars, everyone could die.  

3.  Helium 3 exists in abundance on the moon's surface, while it doesn't here on Earth.  This makes it potentially highly commercially profitable.  

There are lots of other reasons, but a big one to me is the fact that we aren't likely to send people without lots of fail-safes.  To me, that means we will realistically we will need essentially weigh stations in space in between here and Mars, all equipped with the ability for things like life support, supplies, and return options.  I think it's far more viable (mind you not economically) to build a series of O'Neill cylinders as both research stations and lifeboats.  

That isn't to say that leap in technology can't turn all this on it's head, after all, more or less we are using the same principles Robert Goddard and Werner Van Braun used.  The Starship could be a game changer for a lot of reasons beyond itself, for example, the ability to get new test beds into orbit on the cheap could (and likely will) lead to new breakthrus.  

  • Author
1 hour ago, Anastasis said:

Help me out here. We have two government contractors and we didn't specify some basics regarding compatibility of the life support systems in the RFPs?

SpaceX is sending people into the radiation belt next week, in brand-new suits.

Floating Music Video GIF by Epitaph Records

Rule 1: stop eating the freeze-dried asparagus.  It makes the water taste funny.

On 8/21/2024 at 7:32 PM, B00M said:

we’re fucking around and maybe going to land on the moon again

Again?

 

 

 

 

 

 

/I kid. I kid.

Polaris Dawn mission delayed for a second time, this time due to unfavorable weather conditions on projected splash down.  The mission itself seems more like a billionaire's thrill ride, but there is science being done, so cool. 

Part of the mission includes passing thru the Van Allen belts, which did get me thinking.  Invariably, be it to the Moon, Mars, or anywhere else into deep space, one the challenges we face is radiation.  We are shielded here, thanks to the Earth's magnetism and part of that is the Van Allen belt (at least as I understand it).  So I've read stuff that indicates that one potential barrier to radiation we could use is a wet suit (or poop shield) to combat the radiation.  That seems fine during transit, but what will we do when the time comes to attempt to colonize?  For example, I don't think you could poop shield an entire base on the moon.  I realize that you could initially go underground as a solve, but eventually you are going to do some level of surfacing terraforming.  I just wonder what sort of magnetic field we would need to generate to protect an area of that size, and if it is even within our technical grasp.  If anyone knows anything about this, I'd be interested in learning.  

I’d say we know how, but being able to do it is another matter entirely. Right now it would take a lot of power with our current “tech”, and obviously power is at a premium. So that part is just beyond our reach for now. Plus, we have to get everything there, and weight is a premium.

For us to get to a level of colonization where we needed something like that will be a long while. Not to mention, you’re not sending the kids outside to play.

So to get to a point we’d need a magnetic field, we’d need an atmosphere. Terraforming on that scale isn’t in our wheelhouse for now.

 

16 hours ago, Armybrat said:

IMG_3927.png

19544925_web1_copy_RAMclr-082924-starlin

Boeing's 1st crewed Starliner to return to Earth without astronauts on Sept. 6

 

Boeing's Starliner capsule now has a homecoming date.

NASA announced this evening (Aug. 29) that Starliner will depart the International Space Station (ISS) no earlier than next Friday (Sept. 6), provided the weather cooperates and no technical issues pop up.

If all goes according to plan, the capsule will undock at 6:04 p.m. EDT (2204 GMT) on Sept. 6 and land under parachutes six hours later in White Sands Space Harbor in New Mexico.

Dumb question alert. How much food and water is up there for the 2 astronauts stuck? It was an 8 day trip and now it’s going to be 5 months. 

  • Author
48 minutes ago, Clintonaldo said:

Dumb question alert. How much food and water is up there for the 2 astronauts stuck? It was an 8 day trip and now it’s going to be 5 months. 

comedy central GIF by Workaholics

1 hour ago, Clintonaldo said:

Dumb question alert. How much food and water is up there for the 2 astronauts stuck? It was an 8 day trip and now it’s going to be 5 months. 

Matt Damon Science The Shit GIF

On 8/27/2024 at 11:13 PM, BamaATL said:

For example, I don't think you could poop shield an entire base on the moon.

@Brisketexan "Hold my beer!"

2 hours ago, Clintonaldo said:

Dumb question alert. How much food and water is up there for the 2 astronauts stuck? It was an 8 day trip and now it’s going to be 5 months. 

Dragon automated resupplies are pretty common place (so much so they are rarely even mentioned), and generally have gone without a hitch.  That combined with the current cache of supplies up there, it shouldn't create any sort of problem.  If I remember correctly, the payloads of the dragons are generally a couple thousand pounds, and most of it is consumables like freeze dried food and water.  

Well this isn't great, Bob.

https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/09/starliners-speaker-began-emitting-strange-sonar-noises-on-saturday/

On Saturday NASA astronaut Butch Wilmore noticed some strange noises emanating from a speaker inside the Starliner spacecraft.

"I've got a question about Starliner," Wilmore radioed down to Mission Control, at Johnson Space Center in Houston. "There's a strange noise coming through the speaker ... I don't know what's making it."
  • Author

More from the transcript:

Butch: Hey a Houston, I gotta question about one of the other astronauts.

NASA: Houston here, go ahead Butch.

Butch: Yeah, uh one of the astronauts just told me that Boeing created the Starliner to reach the stars, that but she's gone much, much farther than that. She tore a hole in our universe, a gateway to another dimension. A dimension of pure chaos.

NASA: Sounds like somebody is playing a joke on you,

Butch: Yeah, but he gouged out his own eyes and said “Where we're going, we won't need eyes to see.” And that’s when that sound started coming from Starliner 

NASA: Houston here, Butch can you repeat that part about the gouging

Butch: He gouged out his own eyes, and shit is getting weird,

NASA: Can you hang tight for a moment, Butch?

NASA: Butch, can you hear us? Hello? Can anybody respond?

If they look through the hatch and this chick is in there looking back... Don't open the hatch, regardless of what she is or isn't wearing.

AbLxwKi3eBaC5HiK6cPZPL8ioKb-1024x576.jpg

On 8/30/2024 at 2:01 PM, Clintonaldo said:

Dumb question alert. How much food and water is up there for the 2 astronauts stuck? It was an 8 day trip and now it’s going to be 5 months. 

It's gon' be alright.

Gilligan and'nem made it, and they only had Snacks for a three hour tour.

Sounds like an extremely ominous countdown clock....

 

Too bad they can't just nope right out of there!

  • Author
2 hours ago, SurlyGator said:

Sounds like an extremely ominous countdown clock....

Too bad they can't just nope right out of there!

Or they left the turn signal on, or forgot to install new batteries in the smoke alarm. Or…

 

Beeping is claimed to be a misconfiguration in comms systems causing that rhythmic sound through the speaker, but yeah ... "okay".

Just watched the press conference, and my old co-worker tried to give a very politically-savvy and calm description of what must've been a dick-measuring contest between Boeing and NASA.  I don't envy him that job, as it looks like the last month or so has aged him a decade at least.  He looks really tired.

Everything's on schedule for an undocking on Friday, Sept 6, just after 5pm CDT.  They'll do a fairly conventional undock/separation profile that will allow Starliner to translate out in front of ISS quite a bit over the course of several orbits.  This is a very safe and predictable trajectory ... presuming the thrusters fire correctly (fingers crossed).  Even *if* the deorbit maneuver fails, Starliner will still continue to separate downrange from ISS, so from a trajectory standpoint, I'm good with this plan.

See you Friday.

The source of the strange sounds is obvious...

The One About the Whales | Star Trek

 

On 9/1/2024 at 7:06 PM, RamjetFDO said:

If they look through the hatch and this chick is in there looking back... Don't open the hatch, regardless of what she is or isn't wearing.

AbLxwKi3eBaC5HiK6cPZPL8ioKb-1024x576.jpg

Alien vampire or not....I'm checking it out.

Because I'm a dude.

31 minutes ago, BehoId, The Underminer! said:

"Right at two for me."

"Ha! Two and a quarter here!"

and then elmo comes in with spacex:

"Ha! Tree fiddy!"

On 9/1/2024 at 7:06 PM, RamjetFDO said:

If they look through the hatch and this chick is in there looking back... Don't open the hatch, regardless of what she is or isn't wearing.

AbLxwKi3eBaC5HiK6cPZPL8ioKb-1024x576.jpg

 

So, uh, for um, scientific research purposes, can somebody tell me what movie that's from?

 

 

43 minutes ago, High Plains Drifter said:

 

So, uh, for um, scientific research purposes, can somebody tell me what movie that's from?

 

 

Lifeforce: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089489/

Edited by RamjetFDO

14 minutes ago, Hagbard Celine said:

there's a 4k cleanup of those scenes....

445p this afternoon coverage of the undocking

also on nasa's stream:

https://plus.nasa.gov/scheduled-video/nasas-boeing-crew-flight-test-undocking/

landing scheduled for 11:05pm at the Northrup Strip which is now completely covered by the White Sands

the cherry on top for this boondoggle would be for it to lose attitude control and become ballistic due to the thruster failure. Here's hoping that boeing and aerojet rocketdyne haven't fallen THAT far

if there is even a 1% chance of that happening, Holloman was a questionable choice for the landing zone

australia is 95% empty space and although there would be lots of griping by their citizens (see: Skylab) it would be a safer option

@RamjetFDO do you have the parms for the de-orbit trajectory?  are any US or Mexican metros in the de-orbit flight path?

58 minutes ago, Hagbard Celine said:

if there is even a 1% chance of that happening, Holloman was a questionable choice for the landing zone

australia is 95% empty space and although there would be lots of griping by their citizens (see: Skylab) it would be a safer option

@RamjetFDO do you have the parms for the de-orbit trajectory?  are any US or Mexican metros in the de-orbit flight path?

A map depicting the southern United States and Central America, highlighting where the reentry of Boeing's Starliner spacecraft will be most visible. A blue and green trail extends over Baja California and northern Mexico before ending near central New Mexico. Times next to the trail indicate when Starliner will be visible at those locations. Credit: NASA

The worrying part of that trajectory (as if there's only one) is that any underburn (low performance, failed jet, etc.) on that deorbit burn would extend that trajectory right into CONUS heartland territory.

So - here's hoping they get a nominal burn delta-V from the thruster combos that are available.

5 minutes ago, RamjetFDO said:

The worrying part of that trajectory (as if there's only one) is that any underburn (low performance, failed jet, etc.) on that deorbit burn would extend that trajectory right into CONUS heartland territory.

So - here's hoping they get a nominal burn delta-V from the thruster combos that are available.

Took the words right out of my mouth.

I know the thing is built to land on land, but it has emergency water capabilities iiuc. Why not draw a circle in the ocean and land that pos there away from any potential population centers. 

  • Popular Post

Live TV shot right now:

Image

Is Boeing about to destroy the ISS? Let's find out

Reputation? Iss? Same same

Holy crap. Rob Navias on the PAO loop.

That's comforting to hear my old friend.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.