Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Surly Horns

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Featured Replies

  • Replies 2.4k
  • Views 192.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Update 1 p.m.:

1) Front mostly benign coming through ATX, good soaking showers, maybe up to 1.5"-2" in some spots, but little wind/other severe.  Yay!

2) Worst of it is SW of us around Uvalde across to San Antonio and south, mostly tons and tons of rain, flooding locally, and a few severe cells.  We seem to be escaping that.  

3) ACL/Rapelor game:  Models now trending up, as expected, on rain chances thanks to Pacific Hurricane Sergio, remnants gonna filter NE up to us.  Friday looks ok, Saturday could get rapey (at the game) and rainy, peak Sat. evening into Sun. morning.  Again though this is not a given, but 2X as likely as it was yesterday.  I'll update you on Sergio tomorrow or whatever.

4) Cool weather coming in with this front, but wait until Sunday afternoon - that's the cold shot e'rrybody talkin' bout.  Daytime highs mid 70's maybe, nightime in down to mid-40's west of town, about 50° in town.  That's the first true cold front of the season.  Money on Oct. 14?  You win the Internetz.

Signing off until later this week with forecasts unless conditions warrant...

All this talk about river flows has me hankering for some chicken fried steak.

Am I imagining things, or has this been an unusual late summer into early fall?  We haven't really been hit with any crazy rain bombs, but a whole bunch of my kids' soccer practice and various weekend matches in the San Antonio to Temple corridor have been rained out.  (This is my best way to keep track of weather.) 

Seems pretty consistently wet.  Like your Mom.  (Was.)

The band this morning/afternoon looks like it moved too fast and it went slightly too far north to get LT up to 670.

A lot of the higher rainfall amounts from this morning actually fell in the Buchanan basin, which I am sure they will be glad to keep right there.

The stream flow in Junction is at 34k cfs right now, but yesterday it peaked at 110k.

IF, and that is a big IF, LCRA doesn't send any of this downstream, I think we'll be lucky to get Travis up to about 666-667 after all of this slowly filters in over the next 3 days. And that is only a few feet below the 671 that they consider "normal" for this time of year.

I'll take it.

1 hour ago, jimmyjazz said:

Am I imagining things, or has this been an unusual late summer into early fall?  We haven't really been hit with any crazy rain bombs, but a whole bunch of my kids' soccer practice and various weekend matches in the San Antonio to Temple corridor have been rained out.  (This is my best way to keep track of weather.) 

Seems pretty consistently wet.  Like your Mom.  (Was.)

September was much cooler, and much wetter, than normal.  October is slightly cooler, and slightly rainier, than normal.

Average high for October 9:  77°.  Today's high so far:  71°.  Will probably get to about 74°.

Edited by phdhorn

Won't this be 7 straight weekends coming up that we've had rain to one extent or the other?  Want to say it started late August. 

Needs to stop raining just long enough for my dog to take a shit. Walked her in the rain for nearly an hour last night, and this morning and she just wouldn't drop that deuce. 

1 hour ago, Wally Pryor said:

Won't this be 7 straight weekends coming up that we've had rain to one extent or the other?  Want to say it started late August. 

i got curious... Since September 3rd (37 days) , we have had 24 days where it rained; 13 where it did not.

wunderground is your friend.

What's the record number of days with rain in a single month? I feel like we had rain two thirds of the month in Sept.

Life feels right outside just this moment. 
Yeah felt great walking the dog. And then I HEARD mosquitoes chasing me. Big as houseflies.
12 minutes ago, troph said:

LT at 665.14 at 10:23pm.

 

That’s nuts. 12 or so feet higher than the last time we went out and the llano river is still reading full up river. LBJ will keep pouring into LT for a few more days. We could be above 681 to start the late spring/early summer.

Thats fucking crazy. 

LT at 665.14 at 10:23pm.
 
That’s nuts. 12 or so feet higher than the last time we went out and the llano river is still reading full up river. LBJ will keep pouring into LT for a few more days. We could be above 681 to start the late spring/early summer.
 
 


The LCRA laughs in your general direction.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't know if y'all have paid attention to the last few years, but LCRA has completely revamped their system to determine how much water is sent to farmers (based on Lake level at predetermined dates throughout the year) and have also added a 90k acre foot storage reservoir downstream to collect runoff from rains below LT and from hydro electric generation flow and save it for farmers and environmental water needs downstream at a later time.

Because of those two things and the fact that the lake has remained pretty full since the drought broke will pretty much ensure that their sunset review will garner them glowing reviews.

Just an FYI, YES, LCRA's moneymaker is selling power.  But hydro is such a tiny part of their portfolio as to be a non-motivator in any of their business decisions.  Seriously, it's something like 2% of their power sales.  Almost all of their power is generated by coal and gas-fired plants.

The reason that folks lose cool Lake Travis water isn't because of demands for hydro.  It's because of demands for downstream water, which were adjudicated via water rights claims DECADES ago, and Texas has a tested scheme as to priorities for water rights.  We may not like it, but the farmers had their claims first, and adjudicated those rights fair and square.  Which is why creating the off-channel reservoir in Wharton was an important move.  There have been some modifications to the system of water rights claims based on modern needs, but it's damned tricky, and it's not done lightly.

1 hour ago, Brisketexan said:

Just an FYI, YES, LCRA's moneymaker is selling power.  But hydro is such a tiny part of their portfolio as to be a non-motivator in any of their business decisions.  Seriously, it's something like 2% of their power sales.  Almost all of their power is generated by coal and gas-fired plants.

The reason that folks lose cool Lake Travis water isn't because of demands for hydro.  It's because of demands for downstream water, which were adjudicated via water rights claims DECADES ago, and Texas has a tested scheme as to priorities for water rights.  We may not like it, but the farmers had their claims first, and adjudicated those rights fair and square.  Which is why creating the off-channel reservoir in Wharton was an important move.  There have been some modifications to the system of water rights claims based on modern needs, but it's damned tricky, and it's not done lightly.

Wow! This is the most accurate and impartial post on this topic that I have ever seen across HornFans>Shaggy>Surly history.

8 minutes ago, South Austin said:

LCRA realignment talk not going away.

My realignment inside your mom not gong away either.

I understand why we have to release water to rice farmers. I question why the fuck we're growing rice in Texas. Are we low on rice? Is there not a better use of our water resources? Like keeping golf courses green, for instance. 

 

 

 

and have also added a 90k acre foot storage reservoir

 

Just a quick clarification, the reservoir volume is only about 45,000 acre feet; they intend to cycle the reservoir twice a year, yielding 90,000 acre feet.

 

19 hours ago, irishtexan said:

I understand why we have to release water to rice farmers. I question why the fuck we're growing rice in Texas. Are we low on rice? Is there not a better use of our water resources? Like keeping golf courses green, for instance. 

 

Rice is grown in Texas because well over 100 years ago, 1) farmers figured out that they could do it, 2) that there was demand for it, and 3) no one gave a shit about how much water they were using. Once that happened, families spent hundred of thousands of dollars on land and equipment to create their family farms that continue to operate to today and that have been handed down through generations.

The other thing to note is that the vast majority of Texas rice farmers get their water from a source other than the Colorado River.

I get that water is more scarce in Texas now than it was when those farmer started their farms, but that is still not an excuse to take away their family livelihood so some folks can take their jetskis on Lake Travis easier. The farming community never asked for the Highland Lakes to be created. As a matter of fact, most of them opposed it, but worked within in the process to negotiate a legal arrangement that suited the LCRA and their own rights.

The LCRA is not lacking for money. They do just fine. If there is a true lack of water, and the amount used by rice farmers is detrimental to the region, the LCRA always has the legal right to buy out their farms at a price that compensates them fairly.

What I have never understood is the notion that any lack of water is ALWAYS the fault of Rice farmers and never the fault of the thousands of people a month that move to the region and use more water. Why does every solution to solving the issue start with fucking over farmers who negotiated their rights 100 years ago and never involves higher cost to developers who continue to build homes and businesses that use more water?

 

 

Edited by Orange&White

8 minutes ago, South Austin said:

So is it going to fucking rain tomorrow or what?

Why you no like rice?

4 hours ago, LonghornJones said:

I like rain.

Well then, here you go.

file.php?id=14614&t=1

Well then, here you go.
file.php?id=14614&t=1
When are we supposed to get the bulk of that?

Oh geez NVM I just looked it up.

8 hours ago, Orange&White said:

 

Rice is grown in Texas because well over 100 years ago, 1) farmers figured out that they could do it, 2) that there was demand for it, and 3) no one gave a shit about how much water they were using. Once that happened, families spent hundred of thousands of dollars on land and equipment to create their family farms that continue to operate to today and that have been handed down through generations.

The other thing to note is that the vast majority of Texas rice farmers get their water from a source other than the Colorado River.

I get that water is more scarce in Texas now than it was when those farmer started their farms, but that is still not an excuse to take away their family livelihood so some folks can take their jetskis on Lake Travis easier. The farming community never asked for the Highland Lakes to be created. As a matter of fact, most of them opposed it, but worked within in the process to negotiate a legal arrangement that suited the LCRA and their own rights.

The LCRA is not lacking for money. They do just fine. If there is a true lack of water, and the amount used by rice farmers is detrimental to the region, the LCRA always has the legal right to buy out their farms at a price that compensates them fairly.

What I have never understood is the notion that any lack of water is ALWAYS the fault of Rice farmers and never the fault of the thousands of people a month that move to the region and use more water. Why does every solution to solving the issue start with fucking over farmers who negotiated their rights 100 years ago and never involves higher cost to developers who continue to build homes and businesses that use more water?

 

 

The same type of argument could be said about coal. Just because it's been done for a 100 year doesn't mean that it still should. Shit changes. Policies and actions should change with it.

8 minutes ago, crash_davis said:

The same type of argument could be said about coal. Just because it's been done for a 100 year doesn't mean that it still should. Shit changes. Policies and actions should change with it.

In simplified terms...they have an adjudicated water right, which is a property interest.

If it is in the public interest to take away that property right, then the public can and should obtain it, as that would be good public policy.  And pay for it.  It happens all the time. 

On 10/11/2018 at 7:57 AM, troph said:


Yeah they are up for limited sunset review I think. Time to redo their charter and grant of authority - hydro-electric power - sending water down stream to make money - needs to be stripped from them.

Fuckers bent their rules to let someone with ties to a higher up at the LCRA get approval to build an RV park below Buchanan Dam on Inks, in an area FEMA has designated as a floodway. Not a floodzone, but an actual floodway. Good luck the next time they have to open more than three floodgates on Buchanan. Corrupt bastards. 

Edited by Deej

10 minutes ago, troph said:

I have no issue with ensuring rice farmers have water. I also think more capacity is needed for increased demands. No one should waste water and that includes LCRA.

That’s an important point.  Austin area utilities lose 7 billion gallons a year in leaks.  To compare the total release per year for farmers is around 30 billion.  

1 hour ago, Deej said:

Fuckers bent their rules to let someone with ties to a higher up at the LCRA get approval to build an RV park below Buchanan Dam on Inks, in an area FEMA has designated as a floodway. Not a floodzone, but an actual floodway. Good luck the next time they have to open more than three floodgates on Buchanan. Corrupt bastards. 

Yea, there is no FEMA floodway there.

You haven't seen seven gates opened, then.

I have. There is no fema floodway there though. There is not a single floodway in the highland lakes if I recall.

 

This is what three looks like where they want to put an RV park.

 

There is already an RV park there. I think I could make an argument that since you have the LCRA warning system to let you know when the gates will be opened, and there is no debris coming down, you are much safer there than multitudes of places along the highland lakes and Blanco, Llano and Pedernales Rivers that are subject to flash floods...Like the one just this last week on the Llano.

LCRA notifies you they will be opening gates in a few hours, you pack up and are long gone...I would much rather have that situation than a flash flood that you don’t know is coming.

No, they want a new RV park higher up, above the 29 bridge, right below where that water comes down. 

Well I guess it could just as easily be a bunch of houses, not sure why RVs that are easily movable is a big issue.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.