Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Surly Horns

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

3 hours ago, Jiggy-Z said:

Yes but....

OJ is brown and what is he wearing in this picture?... I thought so.

spacer.png

You couldn't find a pic that included Alan Dershowitz?

  • Replies 10.5k
  • Views 675.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • I voted for Trump/Against Hilary Clinton.   He should be impeached for: Extortion of a foreign government by withholding military assistance to an ally (and benefitting Russia) in exchange

  • Paul Wesley
    Paul Wesley

    I'm a couple pages back in this fast-moving thread, but I wanted to respond to this.   I'm pretty close to you in demographics, and I was also a child who echoed his parents' pro-Reagan stance, a

  • Unreal. Biden’s son can take home $1m a year from a Ukrainian company he knows nothing about...but our president acts like the CEO of a company with leverage in cutting deals and this shit happens?

Posted Images

2 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

He ran in 2018 against Trumpublican douchebag (Clay Higgins) that won without a runoff in a jungle primary. 

If he could take Higgins to a runoff in 2020 he might have a shot but that seat has been GOP since 2011. 

He needs fewer democrats to run in the primary because they split the vote. 

Just to show you how bad Higgins is:

In early July 2017, Higgins posted a five-minute video on YouTube from Auschwitz concentration camp, including a section from within one of the gas chambers. He said, "This is why homeland security must be squared away, why our military must be invincible".[44] This video was widely condemned as inappropriate, including by the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial and Museum, whose spokesman wrote in a Twitter post that "the building should not be used as a stage".[45][46] Higgins later removed his video from YouTube and issued an apology.[47][44]

2 hours ago, hayden_horn said:

7-things-trump-henchman-stephen-miller-h

seriously though. just look at this cretin.

Is that George on the new TV show EVIL? 

6 minutes ago, HenryJames said:

 

tenor.gif

 

24 minutes ago, Ted Lange said:

 

He can be disqualified from office with a simple majority. So If Cruz, Rubio and a couple others vote to disqualify they can run.

But I can't imagine what Trump might do as a lame duck for a year.

  • Author
17 minutes ago, RayDog said:

But I can't imagine what Trump might do as a lame duck for a year.

daffy duck GIF

3 hours ago, hayden_horn said:

180813stephenmillermaggettyimages-633576

someone (i really wish i could remember who) captioned this one with "that spider over there is almost big enough to eat."

makes me lol to this day, every time i see this picture

He always reminded me of the funeral director from Moonstruck (won’t embed)   The ‘artistic genius’ guy

https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/7ce403a8-52db-43d1-b93f-2c23470e3d62#HyrVXBM2DS.sms

7 minutes ago, Bama Chick said:

lol Not so fast!
 

Wasn't his first quote that he supported an impeachment inquiry, and this quote was that he has not said he supported actually voting for impeachment at the end of that inquiry? 

29 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

They might not break but I can see some cracks.

Trump has caused a helluva lot of grief for a lot of them.  He’s got the media shining flashlights in places they wanted to keep dark.  

9 hours ago, henrygandorf said:

my gif was in response to "she fears the senate may choose to force him to resign."

1. he's not going to resign.

2. she's not afraid of him resigning.  she would laugh her ass off.  she knows it's unrealistic, but she would welcome it.  it would leave the gop in complete disarray.

3. there was a time that an impeachment that was hard to explain to the people might turn the independents.  that time has long passed.

4. he's not going to resign.  never ever ever ever.

5. remaining president is all he has.  it's what's keeping him from a bunch of other investigations and prosecutions.  he's breaking laws left and right to win in 2020. 

6. never ever ever ever.

7. ever.

He's said repeatedly he hates losers, even in regards to POWs.  After all that, he can't resign. Plus, he's got his crusade to purge the non-believers or Liberals from America and he sure isn't resigning to do time in Rikers.

8 hours ago, Aqua Buddha said:

You guys are completely overrating the autonomy of the GOP base.  Especially with the evangelicals, they're the most pliable and morally flexible voting block in all of American politics.  

They have video and audio this day and age of all these jackasses giving fealty to Trump like he was a king.  Also, I'd play the pieces where all these holy shit bags get busted with homosexuality, prostitutes and whatever else they railed against.  This can be overcome by those that actually want to spend some time and effort to do so.  But they'll have to commit, unlike Biden who wanted to know that he'd be a lock to be the Democrat nominee before he'd run.    

3 hours ago, Mojo Hand said:

Wasn't his first quote that he supported an impeachment inquiry, and this quote was that he has not said he supported actually voting for impeachment at the end of that inquiry? 

He got the call. He's going to cover his ass and back up like a crawdad.

1 hour ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

 

Wasn't it already determined that quote was from months ago?

1 hour ago, troph said:

It’s not trump favorable it’s not being able to distinguish between trump lies about crowd size and trump lies about Russian ties and conversations about foreign leaders doing his dirty work.

What is hard about this?

2 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

Wasn't it already determined that quote was from months ago?

NPR amended their story earlier tonight.  If this is the same source, then yeah.  This is bogus.

Even if McConnell says it, the Dems shouldn't trust him.   Do public hearings in the House and get it all out there before sending it to the Senate. 

Okay lawyer people and constitutional scholars-

We all know it takes a 2/3 vote in the senate to remove but does the below red circled portion mean a simple majority vote can be used to block Trump from running for re-election?

cfaac0179d4c991abb4987d3f146a7e7.jpg

17 minutes ago, Bama Chick said:

Okay lawyer people and constitutional scholars-

We all know it takes a 2/3 vote in the senate to remove but does the below red circled portion mean a simple majority vote can be used to block Trump from running for re-election?

cfaac0179d4c991abb4987d3f146a7e7.jpg

Yes

I am not an expert but after reading a Dailykos story I verified it at several sources.

Edited by RayDog

22 minutes ago, Bama Chick said:

Okay lawyer people and constitutional scholars-

We all know it takes a 2/3 vote in the senate to remove but does the below red circled portion mean a simple majority vote can be used to block Trump from running for re-election?

cfaac0179d4c991abb4987d3f146a7e7.jpg

Now that would be interesting. 

 

Though probably much more of a shitshow than actual removal.

On 9/27/2019 at 1:31 PM, SubliminalHorn said:

Gen Z has no idea what’s going on right now 

Yeah first thing that jumped out to me is what dumb cunts they are

26 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Just got my first ever text from the DNC:

DB2491B7-ED9A-4635-B61E-F2667E99B98B_zps

That is such a bad look.

 

On 9/27/2019 at 5:09 PM, Ted Lange said:

 

Yeah that's such bullshit. Those bitches vote with him every time and confirmed Kav with no pushback at all. 

5 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

That is such a bad look.

 

No money to DNC, sent more money to Elizabeth Warren 

Is it true Pelosi changed the rules on the impeachment process in late 2018?  I wasn't aware of it then.  Is that a big deal to all y'all, out on the ledge, purists?

Definitely don’t give us any links explaining what you’re talking about.

11 minutes ago, zork said:

Is it true Pelosi changed the rules on the impeachment process in late 2018?  I wasn't aware of it then.  Is that a big deal to all y'all, out on the ledge, purists?

The impeachment process isn’t really set in stone beyond what is outlined in the constitution.  The process is very flexible on the House side. 

I heard that a lot of people are sayin that Nancy Pelosi has changed the impeachment rules. What’s yall’s opinion on what a,lot of those people are sayin?

19 minutes ago, zork said:

Is it true Pelosi changed the rules on the impeachment process in late 2018?  I wasn't aware of it then.  Is that a big deal to all y'all, out on the ledge, purists?

I think I’m in favor of it but I might be against it. 

I'm no expert, but I don't think the Speaker of the House can just change the rules.

I'm not really an out on the ledge purist.  Kind of a "scoot out on the ledge on all fours" kind of purist.

dad-crawls-to-edge.gif?w=640

 

That being said, this isn't 'Nam.

44 minutes ago, zork said:

Is it true Pelosi changed the rules on the impeachment process in late 2018?  I wasn't aware of it then.  Is that a big deal to all y'all, out on the ledge, purists?

Got a link yet? 

1 hour ago, zork said:

Is it true Pelosi changed the rules on the impeachment process in late 2018?  I wasn't aware of it then.  Is that a big deal to all y'all, out on the ledge, purists?

What a vague worthless question to ask.

Quote

Section 103. Separate Orders. Deposition Authority. Subsection (a) provides the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and each standing committee of the 116th Congress (except for the Committee on Rules) the authority to order the taking of a deposition by a member or counsel of such committee. Members, Delegates, and the Resident Commissioner may participate in all such depositions, but their presence is not required. Depositions taken under this authority are subject to regulations issued by the chair of the Committee on Rules and printed in the Congressional Record.

On page 7 of this from:

Quote

H. RES. 6

ADOPTING THE RULES FOR THE 116th CONGRESS

SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS

https://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20181231/116-HRes6-SxS.pdf

The big change is being able to depose without notifying anyone from the minority party.

That sounds like they are trying to prevent a committee from not being able to take a deposition because they won't get a quorum. If the minority member doesn't want to be there and is actively avoiding being notified then they can move forward. 

You were just skimming the house rules?

Just give us the infowars link already.

The number of Democrats on  this site with the means to travel to austin this weekend.  And absolutely radio silence.  Didn’t realize getting involved was so goddamn hard.  

Edited by Lobo

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.