Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Surly Horns

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

1 minute ago, Hiphopopotamos said:

Vindman is gaining confidence - and I don't know what the hell Castor is doing.

Neither does he. 

  • Replies 10.5k
  • Views 675.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • I voted for Trump/Against Hilary Clinton.   He should be impeached for: Extortion of a foreign government by withholding military assistance to an ally (and benefitting Russia) in exchange

  • Paul Wesley
    Paul Wesley

    I'm a couple pages back in this fast-moving thread, but I wanted to respond to this.   I'm pretty close to you in demographics, and I was also a child who echoed his parents' pro-Reagan stance, a

  • Unreal. Biden’s son can take home $1m a year from a Ukrainian company he knows nothing about...but our president acts like the CEO of a company with leverage in cutting deals and this shit happens?

Posted Images

Castor now going through the R's talking points about 'concerns' that WH staff had with Vindmann's competence. 

3 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

Vindman is much more comfortable now.

 

5 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

If Hunter or Joe did something illegal, it would seem likely that the DOJ would actually decide to investigate them. You know the dept that Trump has some ability to control. Of course, I imagine that even Barr has turned down this request from Trump. "We can't just investigate your opponents because you want them to be investigated. Gotta give me something.  Something that isn't sourced from Alex Jones or Rudy."

 

Again, this needs to become a bigger talking point:

 

20 hours ago, RomaVicta said:

 

We won't do that because the ruling class will think they are joined by the other 98% in the belief that men like these, men of such background (and color) aren't really, really criminals like the faceless people we throw in the slammer everyday to be raped and forced into committing prison crimes.

 

This punchable-faced Frenchman and his friends once thought the same thing. Shit can go real south, real fast. 

louis-xvi-470.jpg

Lmao Vindman telling castor to his face that it's laughable that he would leave US service. He even chuckled as he said it. Get fucked, you fucking shit heel republicans for trying to tarnish an honorable man

Just now, Hiphopopotamos said:

Castor now going through the R's talking points about 'concerns' that WH staff had with Vindmann's competence. 

That seems risky to do. The truth is something Vindman has on his side. 

How is it an indictment of Vindman that the Ukrainians like him?

No, Castor, he didn't agree to your "not too outlandish" characterization. You're dissembling. 

Republicans have the Van Drew statement on their posters today. They better be thankful that the Democrats haven’t returned the favor but then the Democrats are taking this inquiry seriously.

If Hunter or Joe did something illegal, it would seem likely that the DOJ would actually decide to investigate them. You know the dept that Trump has some ability to control. Of course, I imagine that even Barr has turned down this request from Trump. "We can't just investigate your opponents because you want them to be investigated. Gotta give me something.  Something that isn't sourced from Alex Jones or Rudy."

Wasn’t The House a Republican majority the last 5 or 6 years? Why didn’t the investigate the Bidens?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Hey CBS News -- replace the toner cartridge in your copy machine. 


Wasn’t The House a Republican majority the last 5 or 6 years? Why didn’t the investigate the Bidens?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
They were to busy approving and passing funding for the President's border wall.
7 minutes ago, Ths71 said:


Wasn’t The House a Republican majority the last 5 or 6 years? Why didn’t the investigate the Bidens?

Because it was Infrastructure Week.

2 hours ago, 4th&Five said:

Why is Ethan Supplee behind Nunes?

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRgMOUt3AjMcXmyr9QndkQ

Because they think he's really a white nationalist.

americanHistoryX_018b.jpg

27 minutes ago, Doc Sam Beckett said:

 

Again, this needs to become a bigger talking point:

 

Yep, and actually it should be noted that the US policy isn't about announcing investigations on CNN, it's about actually wanting an investigation to occur. By the way, if Joe Biden did something wrong, I'm 100% behind going after him. However it's not a crime if his adult son took a job in Ukraine, even if the optics are horrible. By the way if Don Jr. took a job with a foreign company, I would say the same.

Haha.  Fuck you Gym Jordan.  Go get a gottdam jacket before you talk to Vindman. 

Lulz Vindman dunking on Gym. I have to hand it to Jordan, he gets posterized over and over again and keeps coming back for more... 

At least on NPR I get the see the blondie behind Jordan while his insipid questioning is occurring.

How can you be worried about a perfect call being leaked?

Holy shit that was great. “Well let me just read my most recent evaluation...”. 

I keep on seeing posts about this hot blonde, but have yet to see any pics.  The fuck is wrong with you, surl?

Gym was injured in duty as well, twisting his ankle as he ran from accusations he knew about kid diddling

4 minutes ago, Longhornfan1024 said:

I keep on seeing posts about this hot blonde, but have yet to see any pics.  The fuck is wrong with you, surl?

Gotta watch NPR while Gym Jordan is on.

It's a great sacrifice, but I made it.

 

RATcliffe from Texas going with the media angle.

And the explicit ‘bribery,’ angle. Coaching by the mob is effective...

Ratcliffe responding to Pelosi's branding of Trump's corruption as bribery by getting witnesses to admit the word "bribery" was never used. 

If Ratcliffe does a good job, he may get a cabinet appointment. Wait, what’s that?

Apparently we should have been asking for legal conclusions from fact witnesses. Weird.  Also, quid pro quo is different from bribery or extortion for some reason that I don't really understand. Quid pro quo is generally an element of both bribery and extortion..

Edited by Dahobbs

This argument is a joke. "No one said the word bribery, so there is no case!"

The last time a Republican member of an impeachment inquiry swam in transcripts, it only served to prove the point that the evidence against the President was overwhelming.

Witnesses are all, “If you’re just gonna make a speech, do we need to be here?”

Ratcliffe-  Sure there was an offer of exchange of something of value in exchange for something else, but bribery?  Come on!

According to Republican logic, you can kill someone as long as you don't refer to it as murder.

1 minute ago, kevwun said:

According to Republican logic, you can kill someone as long as you don't refer to it as murder.

That’s de-lifeing....totally different,  and also not illegal since the term “de-lifeing” is not in the constitution.

So they’re pro-delife?

 

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.