Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Surly Horns

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

They don’t believe science. So it’s fake 

  • Replies 6k
  • Views 387.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Someday I'll forgive the ignorant mofos who voted for anyone other than her during the primaries.  But that day is not gonna be anytime soon. 

  • LowPressure
    LowPressure

  • The Most Pampered Generation was gifted a cheap education.  Then they voted to dismantle the system that made their own success possible and compiled wealth from lower taxes due in part to reduced gov

Posted Images

  • Author
7 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

The problem is that the Republicans aren't concerned with facts and evidence. They create their own reality. Karl Rove said as much and Trump is the poster child for the practice. They're the party of "alternative facts." They will simply dismiss the results of the test as false and their base will fall in line. 

 

2 minutes ago, Js1 said:

They don’t believe science. So it’s fake 

They are incapable of admitting fault because...

284FF564-D2A9-496D-8ABE-F751C26EA561_zps

 

So the whole "Pocahontas" thing was just because "she can't be part Native American - look at her"?

I think y’all are missing the point here  

So my DNA test showed I’m 0.3% Sub Saharan African. 1/300. Do I get to claim any minority privilege now? 

Obama is still a native Kenyan even though he produced a birth certificate.

Beto O'Rourke is still pandering for Latino votes even though there is proof he's had that nickname since he was a small child.

There is a zero percent chance Trump or Republicans drop the Pocahontas shtick.  There's no interest in truth there.

1 minute ago, GRHorn said:

I think y’all are missing the point here  

So my DNA test showed I’m 0.3% Sub Saharan African. 1/300. Do I get to claim any minority privilege now? 

Did your grandmother tell you you were 1/300 Sub Saharan?

I have exciting news. If you count me we now have one more African American conservative.  I can be the counter balance to Pancho. Y’all are ok with that right?

2 minutes ago, GRHorn said:

I think y’all are missing the point here  

So my DNA test showed I’m 0.3% Sub Saharan African. 1/300. Do I get to claim any minority privilege now? 

 

You're missing the point that she's never received any privilege from claiming she has some Native American heritage.  And you also seem to have glossed over the part where her Native lineage lines up exactly where she thought it was.

1 minute ago, GRHorn said:

If you count me we now have one more African American conservative.

b75585442b998e32ef54db7e6adb1a84.jpg

Show me the DNA test.

I hope they keep up with the Pocahontas thing.  Anyone that thinks that's a real issue for her isn't going to vote for her anyway, and it also means they have nothing of substance to attack her on.

1 minute ago, Tom said:

 

You're missing the point that she's never received any privilege from claiming she has some Native American heritage.  And you also seem to have glossed over the part where her Native lineage lines up exactly where she thought it was.

IIRC it was listed by Harvard as a feather in their cap to have that listed. It lines up?  It said somewhere between 6-10 generations ago.  Wide range. 

 

5 minutes ago, RPM said:

Did your grandmother tell you you were 1/300 Sub Saharan?

No, but I’m gonna do some digging, thanks. 

2 minutes ago, Tom said:

You're missing the point that she's never received any privilege from claiming she has some Native American heritage. 

In other words, she's a lousy liar.

I can't vote for any politician who isn't a good liar.  They're all one or the other.

Anyway, if all the Dems can muster up in 2020 is this old lying, shrill-voiced hen, they deserved to get buried - again.  For the love of god, get someone who actually is a good candidate.

2 minutes ago, Tom said:

I hope they keep up with the Pocahontas thing.  Anyone that thinks that's a real issue for her isn't going to vote for her anyway, and it also means they have nothing of substance to attack her on.

I agree with Ian Bremmer, the globalist establishment liberal. 

Just now, Celery Man said:

were you an Obama birther too?

Me?  No, that was stupid. 

7 minutes ago, phdhorn said:

In other words, she's a lousy liar.

I can't vote for any politician who isn't a good liar.  They're all one or the other.

Anyway, if all the Dems can muster up in 2020 is this old lying, shrill-voiced hen, they deserved to get buried - again.  For the love of god, get someone who actually is a good candidate.

 

Impossible since there is no Democratic candidate that you would consider "good."

How is she a liar?

Edited by Tom

17 minutes ago, RPM said:

b75585442b998e32ef54db7e6adb1a84.jpg

Show me the DNA test.

79-C3-E448-5-AB0-4350-8049-D3-EDA361-ED5

 

 

 

I thought Obama was an Islamist Marxist hell bent on destroying the United States and enslaving the white race...until he released his birth certificate.  Then I became a supporter.  

14 minutes ago, Tom said:

 

Impossible since there is no Democratic candidate that you would consider "good."

How is she a liar?

"shrill voiced"

Might as well just admit he will never vote for a woman.  Can't stand being "lectured" by a "shrill-voiced" bitch

4 minutes ago, GRHorn said:

79-C3-E448-5-AB0-4350-8049-D3-EDA361-ED5

 

 

 

almost 10% socialist, can't be trusted

African-American-Example1.jpg

FWIW, that isn't my DNA results. But you wouldn't know that because internet.

2 minutes ago, RPM said:

African-American-Example1.jpg

you dirty non-specific.

22 minutes ago, phdhorn said:

In other words, she's a lousy liar.

I can't vote for any politician who isn't a good liar.  They're all one or the other.

Anyway, if all the Dems can muster up in 2020 is this old lying, shrill-voiced hen, they deserved to get buried - again.  For the love of god, get someone who actually is a good candidate.

Republicans: "We found one little thing about Elizabeth Warren we'll run into the ground, and claim the high road. Yeah, you might think a small issue like this deserves a free pass, but we have standards when it comes to Democratic candidates."

Also Republicans: "Yes, I will vote for the Arby's cup of diarrhea again in 2020. MAGA."

 

1 minute ago, 52-80 said:

you dirty non-specific.

2%er

42 minutes ago, Tom said:

I hope they keep up with the Pocahontas thing.  Anyone that thinks that's a real issue for her isn't going to vote for her anyway, and it also means they have nothing of substance to attack her on.

They will keep it up.  They are tone-deaf when it comes to women and minorities, and they reinforce it on a daily basis. 

moving the racial purity goal posts is very on brand

  • Author

Elizabeth Warren wants them to keep calling her Pocahontas.  

This is the fight she wants because it makes them look stupid 

51 minutes ago, phdhorn said:

In other words, she's a lousy liar.

I can't vote for any politician who isn't a good liar.  They're all one or the other.

Anyway, if all the Dems can muster up in 2020 is this old lying, shrill-voiced hen, they deserved to get buried - again.  For the love of god, get someone who actually is a good candidate.

God, inject this "both sides equally bad" right into my veins.

Like how much of a choad do you have to be in order to believe knuckle-dragger right wing talking points that claim she's a liar and therefore you wouldn't vote for her? Oh wait, you're just being disingenuous because you would never vote for a Democrat, much less a female Democrat candidate who doesn't listen to being told to shut up.

Edited by GSU&UT

11 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

This is the fight she wants because it makes them look stupid 

Narrator: They are.

12 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

This is the fight she wants because it makes them look stupid 

Well, to be completely fair, she's right.

Warren is everything the "conservatives" hate. She's in favor of consumer protections and prosecuting Wall Street bankers.

2 minutes ago, RPM said:

Warren is everything the "conservatives" hate. She's in favor of consumer protections and prosecuting Wall Street bankers.

Warren has no shot, imo. She comes across as too shrill and whiny. Moreso than HRC. 

Maybe VP material. 

What you see as "whiny and shrill" I see as smart and defiant.

Trump had no problem winning while being shrill and whiny

3 minutes ago, RPM said:

What you see as "whiny and shrill" I see as smart and defiant.

He just doesn't want to vote for a woman who doesn't put up with bullshit.

9 minutes ago, Asithappens said:

Warren has no shot, imo. She comes across as too shrill and whiny. Moreso than HRC. 

Maybe VP material. 

Weird how women are always the ones described as "shrill and whiny". 

Trump has the vocabulary and temperament of a 8 year old but according to Rs "he talks like me.".  

Just fucking burn it all down. 

 

 

Just now, Hank Kingsley said:

Weird how women are always the ones described as "shrill and whiny". 

Not weird at all.

Especially when she is shrill and whiny. 

 

 

 

8 minutes ago, seven said:

Trump had no problem winning while being shrill and whiny

This is true, but look who he was going against.

1 minute ago, Asithappens said:

Not weird at all.

Especially when she is shrill and whiny. 

You're right, it's not weird. It's dumb and sexist. 

 

Nice headline.  

BREAKING:  GRHorn releases his DNA test:  Yes, he is African American. 

3 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

You're right, it's not weird. It's dumb and sexist. 

 

Maybe sexist. But not necessarily dumb. It's a social/gender-based convention. If you want to tilt at that windmill, then go ahead. I won't say that you're wrong, other than saying it's not weird that women are primarily the gender that gets called "shrill and whiny". It's fairly commonplace. 

Edited by Asithappens

15 minutes ago, Turkleton said:

This is true, but look who he was going against.

He's much more shrill and whiny than Hillary.

Just sayin'.

1 hour ago, GRHorn said:

79-C3-E448-5-AB0-4350-8049-D3-EDA361-ED5

 

 

 

So your Great, Great, Great Grandmother...

SlowComposedGiraffe-size_restricted.gif

  • Author

Talk about Warren not having a shot to beat Trump is really silly when you consider all the voices saying Trump had no chance to beat Hillary in 2016. 

Warren is everything Hillary should have been without the baggage.

1 minute ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Talk about Warren not having a shot to beat Trump is really silly when you consider all the voices saying Trump had no chance to beat Hillary in 2016. 

Warren is everything Hillary should have been without the baggage.

She has a ton of baggage. Maybe not to you or others on this board, I agree. But I think she wouldn’t play well in real life when it was nut cutting time. 

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.