Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Surly Horns

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Ghislaine "Sgt. Schultz" Maxwell: "I know NOTH-ING"

Featured Replies

16 minutes ago, Fondren & Main said:

You also seem to have a very rudimentary understanding of climate change.  The argument isn’t whether it exists or not.  The argument is whether it is anthropogenic or not.

lolololololololololololol

  • Replies 5.8k
  • Views 483k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

15 minutes ago, Fondren & Main said:

 

You also seem to have a very rudimentary understanding of climate change.  The argument isn’t whether it exists or not. 

 

Really?
 

 

On 7/15/2019 at 5:41 PM, Zavala said:

The investor list? Lulz.

His whole front is a pathetic lie. He only takes investments of $1B but the fund has $194M? 

That could be his annualized fees.  At 2/20, that'd be $9.7bn in AUM.  

 

50 minutes ago, Trey3216 said:

spacer.png

or

spacer.png

spacer.png

+

spacer.png

Edited by SmokeyTheBear
creepy twins

41 minutes ago, Fondren & Main said:

So, you are okay with open borders?  Say it.  Proclaim it from the rooftops.  You do know that it’s not only Mexicans that cross the border right?  Or, are you a racist?

You also seem to have a very rudimentary understanding of climate change.  The argument isn’t whether it exists or not.  The argument is whether it is anthropogenic or not.  If it is then how much of an effect does mankind have on the climate?  Seems to be quite a bit of debate on that front.

There is no question that it's anthropogenic.  The physical chemistry of CO2 radiative forcing has been well understood for over 100 years.  Anthropogenic emissions are the clear driver of rising GHG levels.   Most scientists agree on what the long term trends look like.  There are a few atmospheric scientists, like Judith Curry or John Christy, who disagree.  

Fondren is maybe not familiar with trump's views on climate change. A "hoax by the Chinese" is the exact wording, I believe. 

Climate change talk in the Epstein pedophile thread not going away.

2 minutes ago, DDD Dad said:

Climate change talk in the Epstein pedophile thread not going away.

That's because the distracting, deflecting trolls are out in force.  Here and on the AOC thread.

The trolls realize this is the most dangerous topic for trump out there. They will never even mention his name in this thread. It’s always gonna be something else. 

58 minutes ago, Fondren & Main said:

So, you are okay with open borders?  Say it.  Proclaim it from the rooftops.  You do know that it’s not only Mexicans that cross the border right?  Or, are you a racist?

You also seem to have a very rudimentary understanding of climate change.  The argument isn’t whether it exists or not.  The argument is whether it is anthropogenic or not.  If it is then how much of an effect does mankind have on the climate?  Seems to be quite a bit of debate on that front.

Yeah but do you think trump raped underage girls or not? 

59 minutes ago, Fondren & Main said:

So, you are okay with open borders?  Say it.  Proclaim it from the rooftops.  You do know that it’s not only Mexicans that cross the border right?  Or, are you a racist?

You also seem to have a very rudimentary understanding of climate change.  The argument isn’t whether it exists or not.  The argument is whether it is anthropogenic or not.  If it is then how much of an effect does mankind have on the climate?  Seems to be quite a bit of debate on that front.

There really isn't. I mean maybe politically there is, but not academically.

That's what I love about these Epstein Funds, man.

I get older...they stay the same age.  

Who doesn’t want open borders?  Imagine how much money we’d save on border security that obviously doesn’t work and cruel detention facilities.  Imagine how much cheaper our food would be.  Imagine all the tax revenue we could generate by instantly incorporating a few million more productive workers into the economy.  Shit, we might be able to knock out the national debt in a decade off the backs of some Mexicans.  

Seems like a no brainer.  

Macron sure seems to be a big fan of the policy.  Or not, irony is hard to gauge.  

Well the theory is his clients/blackmail targets invest in his hedge fund, which he probably just sticks in an SP500 fund, he reaps the 2/20 (probably with a low hurdle rate), and it all looks kosher to FBI/IRS.  He refuses business from anybody he doesn't know/have tape on.
Yep. At 4 "massages" a day he wouldn't have the time/energy/fluids for anything more than directing funds into an index fund.

His pref/hurdle looks like 8-12-15, I'm sure the waterfall includes live nude girls.  I have to admit, a Ponzi scheme shadowing an Index fund would make it much easier to pull off than it was even just back in the Madoff period and certainly much easier than before him.  

 

1 hour ago, Fondren & Main said:

So, you are okay with open borders?  Say it.  Proclaim it from the rooftops.  You do know that it’s not only Mexicans that cross the border right?  Or, are you a racist?

You also seem to have a very rudimentary understanding of climate change.  The argument isn’t whether it exists or not.  The argument is whether it is anthropogenic or not.  If it is then how much of an effect does mankind have on the climate?  Seems to be quite a bit of debate on that front.

Admit you believe what Rush and Mitch and Hannity and Trump tell me you believe! Can you at least be that honest for once in your life?

 

(Whether or not climate change is anthropogenic is kind of moot if the dire predictions are correct. Saying "it's not my fault" won't have much impact. If it takes humans changing their habits to prevent a wholesale disaster, maybe we shouldn't quibble about the details.)

Edited by RomaVicta
morphic? genic? What's the diff?

 

1 hour ago, seven said:

Fondren is maybe not familiar with trump's views on climate change. A "hoax by the Chinese" is the exact wording, I believe. 

Epstein thread?

Ahh the old, “I didn’t rape them- I SOLD them to rapists” defense.

 

bold move cotton, indeed.

39 minutes ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

Isn't that tomorrow?

Dunno, part of why I was asking. That and trying to steer the thread away from the ditch. 

2 hours ago, Doc Reeves said:

Ahh the old, “I didn’t rape them- I SOLD them to rapists” defense.

 

bold move cotton, indeed.

Hey man,  this was a capitalist society....

3 hours ago, cactusflinthead said:

Dunno, part of why I was asking. That and trying to steer the thread away from the ditch. 

I’m pretty sure the decision is to be made tomorrow.

22 hours ago, JimmyJames said:

I pledge allegience to Isreal. And to the republic for which it stands. Mumble mumble, one nation, under God, mumble mumble. 

Congratulations! You may now do business with the State of Texas. 

Not a good look for the judge deciding tomorrow if you should be released on bail:

“ Jeffrey Epstein used a foreign passport with a fake name to enter several countries in the 1980s including the United Kingdom, Spain and Saudi Arabia, federal prosecutors said Wednesday.

The questionable travel document was found inside a safe — along with $70,000 in cash and 48 loose diamonds — in the New York City home of the wealthy financier and accused sex trafficker. It contained a photo of Epstein with a different name and listed his place of residence as Saudi Arabia, according to prosecutors.

Epstein's lawyers filed court papers Tuesday claiming he obtained the Austrian passport in 1982 for "personal protection" to be presented to "potential kidnappers, hijackers, or terrorists." The lawyers said Epstein's Jewish faith and substantial wealth made him a target while traveling in the Middle East.

Epstein's attorneys also said that the government provided no evidence that he ever used the passport.

But Wednesday, prosecutors did just that.

"In fact, the passport contains numerous ingress and egress stamps, including stamps that reflect use of the passport to enter France, Spain, the United Kingdom, and Saudi Arabia in the 1980s," the court papers say.”

cont.

NBC:  Jeffrey Epstein used foreign passport with fake name to enter Saudi Arabia: prosecutors

hahaha, needs an Austrian passport cuz terrorists, but he can go to Saudi Arabia, but he is jewish? 

Fuck it, castrate that fuck either way. 

 

3 hours ago, SuingToGetAMessageBoard? said:

yeah, you don't have a fake passport and $59MM in cash and get bail.

This is going to be an interesting case, if he's working for or with Intelligence agencies, are things still illegal? They don't operate with any laws or oversight. I think the rule is "don't get caught" and he's not going to be able to give up his handlers. I'm just curious if they will protect him in any way.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/07/jeffrey-epstein-case-grows-more-grotesque

I hope all his handlers and clients get rekt.

Courtney Wild’s lawyer Brad Edwards said that after interviewing dozens of Epstein’s accusers, it appeared Epstein spent almost all of his time abusing underage girls. “It was his full-time job,” Edwards said. “We have not found anyone who has provided information about a legitimate business he was engaged [in].”

Edited by Zavala

If he has one fake passport, you can bet he's got another stashed in a vault or a strong box somehwere.

“Perfect perfect sex life”.

Excuse me while I vomit.



Also these arrogant invitations to dig deep into someone’s sex life (Gary Hart comes to mind) always seem to backfire.
32 minutes ago, Bama Chick said:

“Perfect perfect sex life”.

Excuse me while I vomit.
 

 


Also these arrogant invitations to dig deep into someone’s sex life (Gary Hart comes to mind) always seem to backfire.

 

One woman, but how many girls? 

7 minutes ago, Mojo Hand said:

One woman, but how many girls? 

Exactly. 

Also maybe he fucked the 14 year old before he met the host of the party? 

Dershowitz is feeling the heat. Here is an op-ed he wrote trying to discredit The New Yorker which is about to publish an article on him and underage girls. Dershowitz claims that the upcoming hit-piece is a leftist attempt to silence him because of his defense of Trump, Netanyahu and the state of Israel. 

https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/924825

 

Can we  assume from his challenge that Dershowitz is also willing to go under oath to discuss his "perfect" sex life??

Getting kind of tired of this Israel bullshit. Trump and his psycho evangelical supporters want their Armageddon damnit! 

It is not un-American to not support Zionism. Frankly it’s none of our damn business and should elicit a rocko type yawn whenever the subject comes up. 

As for the Dershowitz, he’s just playing the only card he’s got since he’s a pedo. 

1 hour ago, Mojo Hand said:

One woman, but how many girls? 

Or boys

1 minute ago, Trey3216 said:

Or boys

Avatar checks out.

2 hours ago, Foggy Notion said:

Dershowitz is feeling the heat. Here is an op-ed he wrote trying to discredit The New Yorker which is about to publish an article on him and underage girls. Dershowitz claims that the upcoming hit-piece is a leftist attempt to silence him because of his defense of Trump, Netanyahu and the state of Israel. 

https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/924825

 

Lol so in other words he definitely diddled little girls. 

The first time I ever saw Dershowitz I thought that the three words I never wanted to hear him say are underwear, massage and sex and now look what happened. 

So... no bail decision? 

That's fine with me. It means that sleaze is still in the gray bar hotel. I wonder if he's in segregation. 

1 minute ago, cactusflinthead said:

So... no bail decision? 

That's fine with me. It means that sleaze is still in the gray bar hotel. I wonder if he's in segregation. 

Yes decision.   Bail was denied yesterday.  He may never be free again. 

Just now, Mojo Hand said:

Yes decision.   Bail was denied yesterday.  He may never be free again. 

This kicks much ass. 

Did the judge say anything particularly salty?

 

Not that I heard.  From what I saw, the judge found he was a danger to the public and a flight risk, given all the things that have come out in the last few days, and that no conditions of release could protect the public or assure his appearance. 

Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.