Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Surly Horns

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Featured Replies

A great summary of where we are on this whole Clarence Thomas / Harlan Crowe situation by Jonathan Last:

Quote

MOAR GIFTS!

This morning we awake to news that conservative billionaire Harlan Crowe also paid for a couple years of tuition at a private school for a kid Clarence Thomas and his wife were raising.

Let me give you the most charitable reading of the story:

In 1997 the Thomas’s brought their great nephew to live with them, presumably because his home life was not optimal. They took legal custody of him and raised him. Justice Thomas’s good friend Harlan Crowe suggested that the young man might thrive at Crowe’s alma mater, Randolph Macon Academy. Crowe then paid for the kid’s first year of tuition.

After the first year, the child was sent to a different boarding school, in Georgia. Crowe paid for this year of tuition, too.

This is the official story from journalist lawyer special-friend of the justice Mark Paoletta, who seems to have taken on the job of crisis coms for Thomas.¹

How much did Crowe spend on tuitions for this kid? That’s unclear. More than $6,000. Maybe as much as $70,000. Fancy Southern boarding schools aren’t cheap.

Was Thomas required by the letter of the law to disclose any of this?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

But that’s not really the point.


Even if Thomas was in some violation by not disclosing this . . . what do we call it? A gift? Help from a friend? Even then, it wouldn’t be the biggest deal in the world.

Look: The Thomases did something extraordinary in taking this child in and raising him. God bless them for that. It sounds like they made a difference in his life. And when people take on extraordinary duties, sometimes they need help. That’s why friends and even strangers organize meal trains and start GoFundMe’s. When I was a kid and Hillary Clinton wrote It Takes a Village I laughed and called her a commie. Now that I’ve been around the block and seen the elephant, I realize she’s exactly right. Raising kids is hard. We all need help.

But the ick-factor on this new Thomas story is that it’s part of a pattern.

First we got the stories about Crowe donating money in order to pay the salary of Thomas’s activist/dilettante wife.

Then we found out that Crowe provided many lavish vacations for Thomas and his wife.

Then we learned about Crowe letting Thomas use his private jet for personal travel.

Then we found out that Crowe paid for a gigantic monument to Thomas’s 8th grade teacher.

Then it was discovered that Crowe bought property from Thomas and now allows Thomas’s mom to live rent-free in a house that he (Crowe) owns.

Any one of these things and you might say, “Hmmm. That’s a little strange. But whatever. Rich people are weird and if you have a rich friend maybe they do weird friend stuff.”

But take all of them together? Now we go from “a little weird” to “this is what cam girls hope for in a sugar daddy.”

And call me crazy, but while it’s fine for Supreme Court justices to have good friends, I think it’s not healthy for the Court for them to have sugar daddies.

The recap is perfect and restated for emphasis:

"Any one of these things and you might say, “Hmmm. That’s a little strange. But whatever. Rich people are weird and if you have a rich friend maybe they do weird friend stuff.”

But take all of them together? Now we go from “a little weird” to “this is what cam girls hope for in a sugar daddy.”

And call me crazy, but while it’s fine for Supreme Court justices to have good friends, I think it’s not healthy for the Court for them to have sugar daddies."

  • Replies 12.9k
  • Views 815.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Brisketexan
    Brisketexan

    Some people and posts above see this for the incredibly dangerous thing it is.  See the whole forest, not just the tree.  Roe is built on the bedrock of the 14th amendment and the inherent right to pr

  • Ghost of LL
    Ghost of LL

    The whole episode is pretty bad for the Court.  The leak is embarrassing.  But the decision is catastrophic. You've got a 5-4 decision to get rid of a something that has been settled as a constit

  • in one of the many instances in which i debunked your oversimplified, unsupported bullshit and you simply never responded, i addressed your absolutist contention that religious are more charitable tha

Posted Images



 
But the Supreme Court.
 
Look, I get it---but honestly, at this point, there is only one group that can hold the Supremes accountable for anything---themselves.  Because the GOP sure as hell doesn't want to (unless, of course, we magically had a 6-3 Democratic appointed Supreme Court, but that probably won't happen in the rest of my life).
 
 
 
 


"Personal Responsibility" means only I, personally, can hold me responsible.
  • Popular Post

Fuck George W. Bush for appointing both Roberts and Alito.

Oops! Almost forgot. Fuck George H.W. Bush for appointing Clarence Thomas.

Edited by WhatTheBuck

14 minutes ago, ChuckNorrisActionJeans said:

What a joke that Roberts gives a single, solitary fuck about the Court's "legacy."

Legacy, like history, is written by the winners.

Roberts gave up on actual legitimacy and legacy, but he's still angling to be a hero in the history books. 

The only way that happens is if he makes sure the GQP writes both history and his legacy. 

22 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

Fuck George W. Bush for appointing both Roberts and Alito.

Oops! Almost forgot. Fuck George H.W. Bush for appointing Clarence Thomas.

so basically fuck bush? mmm, bush

I thought I had a good run of never spending my own money while on an expat assignment with full and virtually unquestioned expense report. But this mother fucker takes it to another level. 

I wonder if Ruckus thinks he would still be the beneficiary of Harlan’s largess if he left the Court? Crow would drop him like a bad habit.

6 hours ago, HenryJames said:

 

Congress indisputably has the power to legislate ethical standards that bind the supreme court?  But who gets to ultimately decide that again?? And how would you enforce even the most blatant violations?  Strongly worded letters followed by even stronger worded letters?

Edited by Horn Dog

5 minutes ago, Satchel said:

I wonder if Ruckus thinks he would still be the beneficiary of Harlan’s largess if he left the Court? Crow would drop him like a bad habit.

That thought has never entered his mind because he will die on the bench.

The pressure on the Court in general and Ruckus in particular must be withering and sustained. That’s the only chance we have to make them responsive.

17 minutes ago, Fudge Nuggets said:

I thought I had a good run of never spending my own money while on an expat assignment with full and virtually unquestioned expense report. But this mother fucker takes it to another level. 

Shit, I was happy to just pocket most of my per diem on random and rare business trips.  What a piker.

41 minutes ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

so basically fuck bush? mmm, bush

The whole family. 

Every week brings a new story about how Thomas used his position to enrich himself and his only argument has been some vague memory that someone told him that he didn't have to disclose it. 

What we're finding out is what ProPublica has discovered, and they may have more to come. But it doesn't mean that Thomas' corruption only involves Harlan Crow.

The most shameless defense of unethical behavior I think I've ever seen:

“Harlan Crow has long been passionate about the importance of quality education and giving back to those less fortunate, especially at-risk youth,” the statement said. “It’s disappointing that those with partisan political interests would try to turn helping at-risk youth with tuition assistance into something nefarious or political.” The statement added that Crow and his wife have “supported many young Americans” at a “variety of schools, including his alma mater.” Crow went to Randolph-Macon Academy.

So tell me how Clarence Thomas is the legal guardian of a child (from 6 years old) who is both less fortunate and at risk.  Make that make sense to me.

Just now, NameAlreadyInUse said:

The most shameless defense of unethical behavior I think I've ever seen:

 

 

So tell me how Clarence Thomas is the legal guardian of a child (from 6 years old) who is both less fortunate and at risk.  Make that make sense to me.

To be fair, his mom's house was apparently a total shithole before Crow fixed it up, even though by that time Clarence had long been rich by nearly anyone's standards. I could see him making the kid live in a doghouse in the yard or something.

The kid didn't need to go to expensive private schools.  Even if Thomas couldn't really swing that monthly payment, it's not as if there were no other schooling options.  Total bullshit.

  • Popular Post

https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/04/politics/senate-ethics-rules-push-supreme-court/index.html

Quote

Sen. Thom Tillis, a member of Senate Judiciary, told CNN that he would oppose legislation imposing a new code of ethics – and he also argued Thomas’ controversy is not different from other issues involving other justices. But he said that the court has got “work to do” to fix the public’s perception.

“I’m not going to speak to that specific instance because I could sit here and talk about other instances from other justices that the fact patterns are similar, which goes back to the point of the Supreme Court should address this and they should address it on a consensus basis,” Tillis said when asked about concerns of Thomas’ receipt of gifts from a donor.

Tillis added: “You can’t make this issue about Justice Thomas unless you’re willing to make it about any number of other justices who had very similar situations that they’re dealing with, some who are sitting on the court and some who are icons of the court who are now off of it.”

I say bring it the fuck on, Thom. If other justices are compromised, conservative or progressive, they need to be fucking gone or at least held to more stringent ethics rules!

I wonder if ProPublica has checked the ownership history of Thomas' fancy RV that he claims to tour the country with Ginni. At this point, I'm assuming that Crow bought it but decided the next day that he didn't immediately need an RV and leased it to his good friend Clarence for $1/yr. 

Instead of implementing some sort of ethics guidelines for the SC justices, we might as well just make bribery of any public official legal.  We ain't gone do shit about anyway, might as well save money on potential investigations.

I’m strongly leaning toward “Fire them all so we’re sure we got all the guilty ones.”

Holy fuck. Drip ... drip ... drip .... This just dropped. 

"Conservative judicial activist Leonard Leo arranged for the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to be paid tens of thousands of dollars for consulting work just over a decade ago, specifying that her name be left off billing paperwork, according to documents reviewed by The Washington Post.

In January 2012, Leo instructed the GOP pollster Kellyanne Conway to bill a nonprofit group he advises and use that money to pay Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, the documents show. The same year, the nonprofit, the Judicial Education Project, filed a brief to the Supreme Court in a landmark voting rights case.

Leo, a key figure in a network of nonprofits that has worked to support the nominations of conservative judges, told Conway that he wanted her to “give” Ginni Thomas “another $25K,” the documents show. He emphasized that the paperwork should have “No mention of Ginni, of course.”


https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2023/05/04/leonard-leo-clarence-ginni-thomas-conway/

 

Edited by Horn Under a Bad Sign

2 hours ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:
He emphasized that the paperwork should have “No mention of Ginni, of course.”

 

image.png.7f96a543c66a6c459d727468a161fb39.png

guilty, every fucking one of them

This country needs an enema 

2 hours ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

Holy fuck. Drip ... drip ... drip .... This just dropped. 

"Conservative judicial activist Leonard Leo arranged for the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to be paid tens of thousands of dollars for consulting work just over a decade ago, specifying that her name be left off billing paperwork, according to documents reviewed by The Washington Post.

In January 2012, Leo instructed the GOP pollster Kellyanne Conway to bill a nonprofit group he advises and use that money to pay Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, the documents show. The same year, the nonprofit, the Judicial Education Project, filed a brief to the Supreme Court in a landmark voting rights case.

Leo, a key figure in a network of nonprofits that has worked to support the nominations of conservative judges, told Conway that he wanted her to “give” Ginni Thomas “another $25K,” the documents show. He emphasized that the paperwork should have “No mention of Ginni, of course.”


https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2023/05/04/leonard-leo-clarence-ginni-thomas-conway/

 

 

image.gif

  • Popular Post

The more I read about all of this the more convinced I become that the Federalist society is a domestic terrorist organization.

11 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

 

 

“Look, I may have funneled hidden payments of thousands of dollars to a SCOTUS justice through sham nonprofit expenses to his wife, but can’t we think of the real victims? It has to be hard on the Thomases to have everyone find out about all this corruption. Also me. I’m a victim of the evil press. Thanks for having me on Squak Box”

Flash forward a few weeks. "Ok, just so the Thomas' deposited 10 checks of a million dollars each, with notes on all saying "for repealing Roe".... I mean just leave him alone ok??".

39 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

The more I read about all of this the more convinced I become that the Federalist society is a domestic terrorist organization.

Canadian Yes GIF by CBC

I have a feeling that the Thomas' are so greedy that stories like this will be coming out for months.  It looks ike he didn't vote on a case without someone paying him for it.

Today's republican party has no shame. 

It’s actually the insane extreme of that: they are PROUD of this. They run society’s nose in it as a show of how above the law and untouchable they are. It’s a warning to the rest of us: we can do whatever we fucking want, and there’s not a damn thing you can do about it.

This is how fascism works. It always is.
  • Popular Post

It's really too bad nobody stepped up and testified about Clarence Thomas' low character during his confirmation hearings.

  • Author
1 hour ago, kevwun said:

I have a feeling that the Thomas' are so greedy that stories like this will be coming out for months.  It looks ike he didn't vote on a case without someone paying him for it.


It’s only just begun, they’re going to dig up everything. He’s not only greedy, but want too smart about even trying to hide any of this. 

12 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

He’s not only greedy, but want too smart about even trying to hide any of this. 

Why should he bother trying to hide it?  It's not like anyone with real stroke is clamoring to do a fucking thing about it.

2 hours ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

The more I read about all of this the more convinced I become that the Federalist society is a domestic terrorist organization.

And to think I was the founding member and president of my law school chapter.  (Don't tell fattie, he'd never believe it).

Yeesh GIFs - Find & Share on GIPHY

From May 2001:

 

https://nypost.com/2001/05/13/thomas-cries-heart-out-in-speech/

 

Quote

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas broke down in tears of joy as he spoke publicly for the first time about the legal battle to gain custody of his beloved 10-year-old grandnephew.

During a speech to the Bar Association in his native Savannah, Ga., Thomas paused, lowered his head, then wept uncontrollably and visibly shook for 25 seconds as he thanked lawyer Joseph Bergen for successfully handling the 1997 custody case of his sister’s grandson.

As tears streamed down the face of the normally reserved Thomas, the crowd of about 100, which included the justice’s mother and several cousins, broke the awkward silence with a round of heartfelt applause.

 

Quote

“That was embarrassing,” an emotional Thomas said during the Friday speech, before pausing again for a few more seconds.

“I apologize for the interruption. Suffice it to say, it had to be done very quickly, very quietly, very sensitively, very thoroughly,” said Thomas, his voice choked with a wave of emotion.

“Thank God for Joe Bergen. He has been a friend when my family needed friends. He has never asked for a single thing.”

Thomas then dabbed his watery eyes and resumed his speech.

The boy lives with Thomas and his wife in Fairfax, Va. Thomas has one adult son, Jamal, from a previous marriage.

 

 

Quote

Thomas added that he loves his job – but the salary doesn’t tip the scales of justice.

“The job is not worth doing for what they pay,” said Thomas, who was appointed in 1991 after fighting off sexual-harassment allegations by Anita Hill, his former subordinate.

“The job is not worth doing for the grief. But it is worth doing for the principle.”

Like the eight other members of the Supreme Court, Thomas does not grant interviews.

 

Being on the Supreme Court is not worth the grief or the pay. But being the selfless, humble public servant he is, he's gonna keep sacrificing for the rest of our sakes. And now we're crucifying him just like Jesus. We should all be ashamed.

25 minutes ago, ChuckNorrisActionJeans said:

Being on the Supreme Court is not worth the grief or the pay. But being the selfless, humble public servant he is, he's gonna keep sacrificing for the rest of our sakes. And now we're crucifying him just like Jesus. We should all be ashamed.

Just like Jesus’ crucifixion, it’s part of God’s plan. 

On 5/4/2023 at 3:10 PM, jimmyjazz said:

The kid didn't need to go to expensive private schools.  Even if Thomas couldn't really swing that monthly payment, it's not as if there were no other schooling options.  Total bullshit.

Exactly.  How many kids could go to public school on what he spent on tuition to that exclusive school?  

Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.