Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Surly Horns

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

2 minutes ago, Sbbruin said:

That cunt Biondi is arguing that “times have changed” and that the framers didn’t intend for birthright citizenship to apply in the way it is being “abused” today.  OK, then let’s apply the same argument to the 2nd amendment.  

I'm honestly waiting for them to tell us the constitution isn't real and everything is made up and the points don't matter

  • Replies 12.9k
  • Views 815.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Brisketexan
    Brisketexan

    Some people and posts above see this for the incredibly dangerous thing it is.  See the whole forest, not just the tree.  Roe is built on the bedrock of the 14th amendment and the inherent right to pr

  • Ghost of LL
    Ghost of LL

    The whole episode is pretty bad for the Court.  The leak is embarrassing.  But the decision is catastrophic. You've got a 5-4 decision to get rid of a something that has been settled as a constit

  • in one of the many instances in which i debunked your oversimplified, unsupported bullshit and you simply never responded, i addressed your absolutist contention that religious are more charitable tha

Posted Images

2 minutes ago, Sbbruin said:

That cunt Biondi is arguing that “times have changed” and that the framers didn’t intend for birthright citizenship to apply in the way it is being “abused” today.  OK, then let’s apply the same argument to the 2nd amendment.  

Point of order, birthright citizenship arose under the 14th Amendment in about 1870, not the 1789 timeframe of the original Constitution and Bill of Rights.

 

Listening to Trump pretend to care about the rights of “little black babies” was cringeworthy.

1 hour ago, SimonBolivar said:

Nobody is set up to win National Titles in the Stephen Miller Era like BYU. They're going to feast.

Without Samoan converts BYU is gonna drop down to 6-Man

4 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Point of order, birthright citizenship arose under the 14th Amendment in about 1870, not the 1789 timeframe of the original Constitution and Bill of Rights.

 

More specifically there was debate in the senate about it including immigrants and yes they clearly said as it was being written that it did include immigrants like point blank.

If SCOTUS modifies it in any way it is quite literally a coup.

9 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Point of order, birthright citizenship arose under the 14th Amendment in about 1870, not the 1789 timeframe of the original Constitution and Bill of Rights.

 

Do you think she knows that? 

1 hour ago, tokamak said:

So we're definitely heading toward stripping US citizens of their citizenship, right?

yes

  • Popular Post

So the President gets to move with speed and throw all kinds of shit at everybody but the slow as fuck wheels of justice are tapping their brakes?  Do I have this right?  

Edited by Mdhorn

  • Popular Post
6 minutes ago, Mdhorn said:

So the President gets to move with speed and throw all kinds of shit at everybody but the slow as fuck wheels of justice are tapping their brakes?  Do I have this right?  

We had four years, and couldn't even get to a trial in all the 1/6, election fraud stuff. Four years. 

1 hour ago, TwiceHorn said:

Point of order, birthright citizenship arose under the 14th Amendment in about 1870, not the 1789 timeframe of the original Constitution and Bill of Rights.

 

Was that before or after the Declaration of Independence?  You know, that beautiful document that ended the Civil War?

35 minutes ago, Sbbruin said:

Was that before or after the Declaration of Independence?  You know, that beautiful document that ended the Civil War?

As funny and evident as this should be, it's a joke that only plays to woke libtards.  Facts, science, history and knowledge are libtard ideals.  Sanity doesn't matter either if the goal is to empower crazy people with personal vendettas to powerful positions.  

The goal isn't maintenance or better performance, and the Fox propaganda machine only serves to dehumanize and authorize crimes against humanity.  The wheels are cranking.  When people start fighting back is when the boot comes down and the last lever is pulled for an authoritarian.  

Think about how the law is enabling a lunatic that doesn't understand America's basic founding and freedom documents, for which blood and lives were shed.  And people voted for this.  

The final stage of freedom appears to be the ability to not give a shit and willfully turn the reigns over to an oppressor, that forefathers fought to escape and conquer.  When people refuse to care or can't be bothered, then ignorance becomes untenable and much more expensive.  And this makes me laugh--we're relying on the 2nd amendment to be wielded by apathetic dipshits that allowed it, voted for it, to happen.  Suddenly, we're going to go from Applebees to troops for freedom as long as there's air-conditioning and a nearby pharmacy for our prescription diabetes meds.  We're fucked proper.  

Edited by Mdhorn

4 hours ago, chainsaw said:

Do you think we'll at least get to see Arch lead the Horns to back to back undefeated seasons and national titles from the concentration camps?

Not if you're in the Bandera camp.

3 hours ago, SimonBolivar said:

Nobody is set up to win National Titles in the Stephen Miller Era like BYU. They're going to feast.

The SEC will thrive under Stephen Miller. 

tumblr_ml2vo0hG7S1r4gei2o8_400.gif

4 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Point of order, birthright citizenship arose under the 14th Amendment in about 1870, not the 1789 timeframe of the original Constitution and Bill of Rights.

 

Point of order, Bondi and SCOTUS can go fuck themselves.

  • Popular Post

"This Supreme Court is an existential threat to the rule of law."

– Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson

  • Author
58 minutes ago, Willfully Horn said:

"This Supreme Court is an existential threat to the rule of law."

– Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson

Season 5 Nbc GIF by The Office

19 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Point of order, birthright citizenship arose under the 14th Amendment in about 1870, not the 1789 timeframe of the original Constitution and Bill of Rights.

You don't get to make that argument and lump the Bill of Rights in with the original Constitution.  It's either the original document with no amendments or it's everything.  The year an amendment is enacted should not matter --it's an amendment.

Not that the MAGAts get the subtlety, but for fuck's sake let's at least TRY to be intellectually consistent.

20 hours ago, tokamak said:

So we're definitely heading toward stripping US citizens of their citizenship, right?

No. If what we decide is the actual definition of a citizen and everyone else was wrong then they never actually were to begin with and you can’t strip something from someone if they never actually had it

Think About It GIF by Identity
/6-3 Majority opinion.

Loving the implication of the CASA ruling.  Trump can demand that every first-born be sacrificed to appease Stephen Miller’s wrath and unless you live in a lib state it’s happening for at least as long as it takes to certify a class. 
 

America is broken. And the hell of it is that I fundamentally agree that it’s a stretch of judicial power to issue nation-wide injunctions and we are beyond the norm. But there’s also a norm against just issuing facially unconstitutional executive orders. And at this point it’s just 6 people cherry-picking the norms that should continue to apply (and it’s the ones that appease Stephen Miller).

On 6/27/2025 at 6:28 PM, austingirl said:

Meanwhile, on Fox News:

image.thumb.png.6000a7c41266937a420ae01290b6fb8a.png

Is KJ allowed to respond to ACB's untethered and completely unhinged reply response to her dissent?    I mean how  exactly is allowing a district judge to issue a TEMPORARY injunction, subject to appeal, in certain circumstances, make a district judge "above the law"? Their decision can, and often is overruled so they obviously not "imperial" or "above the law" just cause they may pause the situation to the status quo.  Does ACB realise that the some branch of government has to get final say about the constitutionality of  laws/orders and,  as per our constitution, that is the judiciary branch??

22 hours ago, 956 Worldwide said:

Loving the implication of the CASA ruling.  Trump can demand that every first-born be sacrificed to appease Stephen Miller’s wrath and unless you live in a lib state it’s happening for at least as long as it takes to certify a class
 

Don't worry, they'll make that impossible too.

Quote

America is broken. And the hell of it is that I fundamentally agree that it’s a stretch of judicial power to issue nation-wide injunctions and we are beyond the norm. But there’s also a norm against just issuing facially unconstitutional executive orders. And at this point it’s just 6 people cherry-picking the norms that should continue to apply (and it’s the ones that appease Stephen Miller).

The dead giveaway was the express exception from their ruling for challenges to agency action. They might as well have simply written "notwithstanding anything to the contrary, Republican district judges may grant nationwide injunctions if a Democrat ever manages to retake the White House and Republican groups challenge anything they try to do." 

1 hour ago, wildcat09 said:

Don't worry, they'll make that impossible too.

The dead giveaway was the express exception from their ruling for challenges to agency action. They might as well have simply written "notwithstanding anything to the contrary, Republican district judges may grant nationwide injunctions if a Democrat ever manages to retake the White House and Republican groups challenge anything they try to do." 

Such BS.  How is an order issued by an Executive branch agency (which they have ruled is directly in the President's control and not subject to congressional oversight) any different than an order issued directly by the President??  Such a stupid nonsensical distinction.  I wish just once in my lifetime we could get a progressive leader that would play hardball and shove this shit right up these justices disingenuous asses. 

On 6/28/2025 at 11:24 AM, jimmyjazz said:

You don't get to make that argument and lump the Bill of Rights in with the original Constitution.  It's either the original document with no amendments or it's everything.  The year an amendment is enacted should not matter --it's an amendment.

Not that the MAGAts get the subtlety, but for fuck's sake let's at least TRY to be intellectually consistent.

I mean, I don't disagree with the sentiment, but maybe you should go back and read the comment he was responding to a little more closely. 

  • Popular Post
10 hours ago, HenryJames said:

 

IMG_9280.jpeg

It really is crazy how much of conservative policy is just policing their own demons and forcing the rest of society to live their self-hatred sickness

Edited by Captainant

6 hours ago, Captainant said:

It really is crazy how much of conservative policy is just policing their own demons and forcing the rest of society to live their self-hatred sickness

image.gif.4d48b05ca7906b3cd9b5d397ae97129f.gif

I didn't realize it was this bad, but the Trump administration is using the Emergency Docket more than any administration in history, and coincidentally finding that the court agrees with them much more often via this shadow docket than in fully heard cases.   

 

image.png.d7dd47f21154fd45f92b2f42cabab149.png

Order list just dropped. Transgender athletics is officially on the docket for next term. 

Thank fuck the Supreme Court is going to save us from the scourge of team with a trans player coming in third in the Big West Conference

The absolute minimum we must do if we manage to retake power and want to fix anything is arrest and send Roberts, Kavanaugh, Barrett, Scalia, Gorsuch, and Thomas to fucking CECOT or South Sudan while they await trial. 

1 hour ago, wildcat09 said:

The absolute minimum we must do if we manage to retake power and want to fix anything is arrest and send Roberts, Kavanaugh, Barrett, Scalia, Gorsuch, and Thomas to fucking CECOT or South Sudan while they await trial. 

The Simpsons GIF

I have my doubts about their decision when dotard inevitably runs for a third term. 

25 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

I have my doubts about their decision when dotard inevitably runs for a third term. 

I don't - political question doctrine. They'll demur to the states to say who is eligible to be on their ballots. In Red states, Trump will remain. If, for some reason Obama did try to run, those same states would remove him from the ballot, leaving no drama for election day.

5 hours ago, wildcat09 said:

The absolute minimum we must do if we manage to retake power and want to fix anything is arrest and send Roberts, Kavanaugh, Barrett, Scalia, Gorsuch, and Thomas to fucking CECOT or South Sudan while they await trial. 

Probably worth pointing out that this is just more DVD.  The district court tried an end run around the stay of injunction and this cuts it off.

Kagan concurred with this despite dissenting from the stay.

3 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Probably worth pointing out that this is just more DVD.  The district court tried an end run around the stay of injunction and this cuts it off.

Kagan concurred with this despite dissenting from the stay.

image.gif.a2c1279088ad080bd3e285a99bd723f8.gif

Just now, Biff Tannen said:

image.gif.a2c1279088ad080bd3e285a99bd723f8.gif

Meaning it's not a new traveshamockery, it's the same one from a couple of weeks ago.

6 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Probably worth pointing out that this is just more DVD.  The district court tried an end run around the stay of injunction and this cuts it off.

Kagan concurred with this despite dissenting from the stay.

Serious. When habeas corpus isn’t a thing, why do you think there is anything? 

On 7/3/2025 at 4:05 PM, wildcat09 said:

The absolute minimum we must do if we manage to retake power and want to fix anything is arrest and send Roberts, Kavanaugh, Barrett, Scalia, Gorsuch, and Thomas to fucking CECOT or South Sudan while they await trial. 

Pretty sure Scalia can't be arrested. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(He dead)

Just now, SKJ said:

Pretty sure Scalia can't be arrested. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(He dead)

We're gonna arrest and render his corpse. 

7 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

We're gonna arrest and render his corpse. 

Oh, well, then by all means,  carry on

countdown to the surly lawdogs coming in here and telling us this is a nothingberder and everything is fine and justice still prevails. lol. goddamn

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.