Again, I haven't been following this story so I don't know the details. To which member of Parliament are you referring? What is the underlying story? I was under the impression from your comment that this accusation was being made by the Israelis based on presumably Israeli intelligence.
My question was more about how you phrased yours. You asked, "What makes you think the parliamentary information didn't come from British intelligence"? My question back to you was essentially, "what makes you think the parliamentary information came from British intelligence?"
Well there appear to be signs printed by a number of different organizations in many of your pictures (such as ANSWER Coalition ("Act Now to Stop War and End Racism"), etc.). So yeah, I guess there are lots of people with diverse agendas who all are protesting what by all accounts is an unlawful and unconstitutional use of military force domestically.
Not sure what the point of your initial post was anymore.
Well yeah, he's not personally firing nonlethal projectiles at innocents (reporters, etc.) but I don't think you can correctly state that he's not a bad actor in the protests themselves.
It's not hiding any facts. It's highlighting the fact that the vast majority of protesters are in fact nonviolent.
Does that make it propaganda? I guess to a slight extent as it presumably is being published to send a message, but it isn't misrepresenting what is happening.