my last hundred bucks says the rooskies let kasich know they know about some stuff he did.
that's what's so awful about all this sir valence crap. you can't fart in a tin cup anymore that somebody doesn't hold up a number card, and as soon as anybody knows something, everybody who has the connections and the bucks knows it, too.
i don't see why it shouldn't be ok to shoot at them. shoot them is a little severe, but shoot at them should be ok. and if you wing one now and then, heyyyyy.
good thing he did if he did because, in this context, everything is russia. every now and then we learn a little more the depth of it and then realize there's a long, long way to go.
this is crap.
i wanted to watch that segment and went to youtube where i searched for nick akerman. that segment doesn't show up (might be reasonable) but what does show up for nick akerman:
1) a nick ackerman who runs some sort of blog regarding technical stuff
2) 2 month old appearance of nick akerman on msnbc
3) 1 year old
4) 1 year old
5) 5 month old
6) 23 hours old with akerman and talking about yesterday's indictments - no mention of no way, as i said above
7) kid doing bicycle stunts
8). 22 hours old - same interview as 6) above
i have no idea how the algorithms might be set up by google, but they sure aren't helping. the two tubes that even deal with yesterday are clear off the screen of results if you search for nick akerman.
dayam.
i hadn't been on the lookout for a pretty teen daughter wearing nothing below the waist. one who looks like she's been corkscrewed a few too many times and both her sets of cheeks are facing the same way, that is, unless her head is twisted around and her hands are tied behind her back.
me kinky? no, not at all. i'm telling you what i didn't notice.
totally agree. also if it were as much as a dollar, he'd have an erection. . . . oh. stormy says he does have an erection here. that and chest hair between his girly nipples.