No bias whatsoever here.
So there is member of the media saying they are going to war against the president and notice how he doesn't say I, he says we, as in MSNBC.
Hey, dumbshit if no one has indicted you you are not a criminal(and technically even if they have you are still not a criminal until you have been convicted of something.) By this logic Donnie Douche is an unindicted criminal, I am an unindicted criminal, and everyone else here without criminal records are unindicted criminals.
Hmm, I thought fairness and objectivity were supposed to be cornerstones of professional journalism?
Headline-Reuters photo captures Guatemalan mother begging soldier to let her enter U.S.
First sentence of story--Ledy Perez fell to her haunches, a clenched hand covering her face as she wept, an arm clutching her small 6-year-old son, who glared defiantly at the Mexican National Guard soldier blocking them from crossing into the United States.
Because we all know that anyone just skimming the headlines is automatically going to assume the soldier is part of the Mexican National Guard.
I would be willing to bet there are currently more mixed marriages and children from those marriages in the United States than at any other time in the country's history. How are things working out? (Actually pretty damn good, but one political party can't sell their message to anyone if they admit that.) If you wanted to make it even better a good place to start would be nuking social media outlets back to the stone age. (or even the face to face conversations and land line telephone communications age.)
Maybe not the best thread to post this but I can't find any better ones either. Bold type are my highlights of this piece.
https://www.economist.com/open-future/2018/08/17/the-dangers-of-illiberal-liberalism?fsrc=scn/fb/te/bl/ed/thedangersofilliberalliberalismopenfuture
This is Twitter, not Facebook, but the level of dumbass is high enough I figure everyone will let it slide.
https://twitter.com/RightWingLawMan/status/1153825861830754308
https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/23/politics/house-anti-bds-resolution/index.html?utm_term=image&utm_content=2019-07-23T23%3A11%3A06&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twCNNp
CNN headline--House approves resolution opposing Israel boycott movement in divisive vote.
Actual vote-398 to 17.
Right now if you think every proposal that comes out of a Democrat's mouth is complete insanity what other choice do you have? I get called a Trumpkin, Trumpalo, or some other insult every fucking day in this forum simply because in my opinion the entire Democrat Party has gone batshit insane and any alternative to them is a better alternative. I'm not voting for Republicans because they are Republicans. I'm voting for them because they are not batshit insane. I'm not following Trump blindly. I'm following Trump because he is not batshit insane. I would love for a legitimate third party to have enough pull to be a legitimate option in elections. I have been waiting for this to happen for over 30 years. I'm expecting I will have to wait at least another 130 years though before it ever happens.
LOL, a member of parliament's head of communications announced his resignation by hijacking the parliament member's Twitter account and changed the password so the tweets can't be deleted. He then proceeded to basically tell the parliament member to fuck off.
https://mobile.twitter.com/jaredomaramp/status/1153742493034438656
If Trump was such a racist then why did he not include Elijah Cummings, Sheila Jackson Lee, Maxine Waters, Al Greene, Hank Johnson, Frederica Wilson, or any of the other remaining 112 minority members of the House (I subtracted the four idiots he did single out.) while he was ranting? Maybe because it's not the color of their skin that has made him form his opinion of them but instead the shit they spew out of their mouths? Also your last sentence makes you much more of a bigot than a Trump supporter is.