Yes. I don't know the mechanics or if it's possible but something like a 2 year renewable lease for $1 would at least start to make sense but just giving would be dumb.
@immamac - what do you think about a sticky for posters who live outside of Texas and are willing / able to host anybody who needs reproductive care? @PenelopeWitherspoon (NY obviously) and @mchookem (Soon-to-be CO) have mentioned this. I'm in CA and when the news hit Friday one of the first things my wife said was trying to figure out how to help others who don't live in places were abortion or other care is possible. I image we are not the only ones.
Again you are being obtuse (I suspect intentionally so). If a legislator voted for a specific bill or if someone supported a specific piece of legislation then there is a critical difference about using that legislation against them vs a non-supporter.
And @Brisketexan @Dahobbs (and potentially @TwiceHorn) - do you know if there is anybody that actually has been sued this way? Can non-Texans actually sue under this bill, and if so, how judgement proof would "nuisance suits" be? I am 100% serious about filing against literally every daughter / wife of any Texas Republican senator who voted for this bill if I can and am actually free from penalty. I know you can't give binding legal advice over the board so hell, PM me and am willing to actually have a call to discuss.
Gee, it's almost like there's a distinction between targeting those who, you know, actually supported and voted for this legislation vs poors who didn't. I just quite can't put my finger on why there might be a difference there.
A) Some women are you, you just don't see them. B) It is very common for some members of an oppressed group to look for ways to further oppress members of that same group.
Indeed. @slorch - you are essentially @NowThis or the Scot that fucked a sheep. Yeah you may have built some great bridges and walls but people aren't going to be walking around saying "Slorch the builder".
I am confused what you mean here. Are you suggesting that this indicates that Denver and Minneapolis are more corrupt that Philadelphia, Denver, and Los Angeles? That this indicates something about police forces? I don't know that you're wrong, I don't have data to suggest otherwise, but that seems questionable to me.
You are describing your behavior which I certainly don't have any problem with, it's your money. But you keep saying this is based on historical principles which is bullshit - there is no history of bitcoin in a bear market / end of a debt cycle. It may perform awesomely - I suspect not but definitely not going to claim I know. So I'm not saying you or others should or shouldn't buy more. Just be honest about what is speculation vs what is grounded in history.
I agree but of course the argument against is that he was so dominant that he kept that majority of those clutch situations from occurring. Similar to Shaq (who of course is more extreme) - yeah he may not be your 1st/2nd/3rd choice for clutch situations but if he reduces the games that even have those clutch situations by 50% (just making up a number) it still nets out as pretty awesome.
So historically, how has cryptocurrency performed in a time of high inflation and/or recession that gives you such confidence. I mean, given that this has actually never happened, how can you possibly cite history?
Cue the punchline about how you must be a consultant, because you just said something that was true but without adding any value. No shit it has historically performed very well, bitcoin's history coincides with great market growth. Now that doesn't mean it will or won't crash, but I won't give BTC a ton of credit for it's growth in this Dow Jones market: